Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2018

29.11.2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Predictors of cerclage failure in patients with singleton pregnancy undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage

verfasst von: K. Taghavi, M. L. Gasparri, D. Bolla, D. Surbek

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The role of cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth (PTB) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for cerclage failure among singleton pregnant women following prophylactic cerclage (PC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of PC was performed in a single center. The main outcome measure was cerclage failure, defined by spontaneous early PTB prior to 32 weeks’ gestation. Age, BMI, history of instrumentation of the uterus, history of second trimester miscarriage, previous conization, positive vaginal swab prior cerclage, gestational age at time of cerclage, CRP 1 week after cerclage and post-cerclage US changes of cervical length were tested as predictive factors. Descriptive statistical and binary logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

141 women underwent cerclage procedures between 2007 and 2016. 39 patients had PC with McDonald suture, singleton pregnancy and complete clinical follow-up information, thus fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Multivariate analysis showed that history of instrumentation of the uterus was the only independent prognostic factor [OR = 0.14 (0.03, 0.72) p = 0.019] for cerclage failure.

Conclusion

This is the first study showing that a history of previous uterine instrumentation is an independent predictor of cerclage failure. This finding has significant clinical implications for women of childbearing age, particularly when management of miscarriage/abortion is being considered. Women should be informed about the potential risks when counseled prior to surgical evacuation and medical management or cervical ripening should be considered. These results are also helpful in counseling patients undergoing cerclage, when a prior uterine instrumentation has been performed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Noori M, Helmig RB, Hein M, Steer PJ (2007) Could a cervical occlusion suture be effective at improving perinatal outcome? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 114:532–536CrossRef Noori M, Helmig RB, Hein M, Steer PJ (2007) Could a cervical occlusion suture be effective at improving perinatal outcome? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 114:532–536CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbott D, To M, Shennan A (2012) Cervical cerclage: a review of current evidence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:220–223CrossRefPubMed Abbott D, To M, Shennan A (2012) Cervical cerclage: a review of current evidence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 52:220–223CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM (2005) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 106:181–189CrossRefPubMed Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM (2005) Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 106:181–189CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorgensen AL, Alfirevic Z, Tudur Smith C, Williamson PR, cerclage IPDM-aG (2007) Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss: individual patient data meta-analysis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 114:1460–1476CrossRef Jorgensen AL, Alfirevic Z, Tudur Smith C, Williamson PR, cerclage IPDM-aG (2007) Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss: individual patient data meta-analysis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 114:1460–1476CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sneider K, Christiansen OB, Sundtoft IB, Langhoff-Roos J (2017) Recurrence rates after abdominal and vaginal cerclages in women with cervical insufficiency: a validated cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:859–866CrossRefPubMed Sneider K, Christiansen OB, Sundtoft IB, Langhoff-Roos J (2017) Recurrence rates after abdominal and vaginal cerclages in women with cervical insufficiency: a validated cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:859–866CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragab A, Mesbah Y (2015) To do or not to do emergency cervical cerclage (a rescue stitch) at 24–28 weeks gestation in addition to progesterone for patients coming early in labor? A prospective randomized trial for efficacy and safety. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1255–1260CrossRefPubMed Ragab A, Mesbah Y (2015) To do or not to do emergency cervical cerclage (a rescue stitch) at 24–28 weeks gestation in addition to progesterone for patients coming early in labor? A prospective randomized trial for efficacy and safety. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1255–1260CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hui SY, Chor CM, Lau TK, Lao TT, Leung TY (2013) Cerclage pessary for preventing preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix at 20–24 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 30:283–288PubMed Hui SY, Chor CM, Lau TK, Lao TT, Leung TY (2013) Cerclage pessary for preventing preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix at 20–24 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 30:283–288PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolla D, Gasparri ML, Badir S, Bajka M, Mueller MD, Papadia A, Raio L (2017) Cervical length after cerclage: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:885–890CrossRefPubMed Bolla D, Gasparri ML, Badir S, Bajka M, Mueller MD, Papadia A, Raio L (2017) Cervical length after cerclage: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:885–890CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Haram K, Mortensen JHS, Wollen AL (2003) Preterm delivery: an overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:687–704CrossRefPubMed Haram K, Mortensen JHS, Wollen AL (2003) Preterm delivery: an overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:687–704CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Costeloe K, Group EPS (2006) EPICure: facts and figures: why preterm labour should be treated. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113(Suppl 3):10–12CrossRef Costeloe K, Group EPS (2006) EPICure: facts and figures: why preterm labour should be treated. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113(Suppl 3):10–12CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Goya M, Pratcorona L, Merced C, Rodo C, Valle L, Romero A, Juan M, Rodriguez A, Munoz B, Santacruz B, Bello-Munoz JC, Llurba E, Higueras T, Cabero L, Carreras E, Cervical Pesario, para Evitar Prematuridad Trial G (2012) Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1800–1806CrossRefPubMed Goya M, Pratcorona L, Merced C, Rodo C, Valle L, Romero A, Juan M, Rodriguez A, Munoz B, Santacruz B, Bello-Munoz JC, Llurba E, Higueras T, Cabero L, Carreras E, Cervical Pesario, para Evitar Prematuridad Trial G (2012) Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1800–1806CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yim HJ, Song JE, Kim JE, Son GH, Lee KY (2016) Preoperative and postoperative serum C-reactive protein levels to predict the outcome of ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Obstet Gynecol Sci 59:97–102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yim HJ, Song JE, Kim JE, Son GH, Lee KY (2016) Preoperative and postoperative serum C-reactive protein levels to predict the outcome of ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Obstet Gynecol Sci 59:97–102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Berghella V, Sheffield JS, Perez-Delboy A, Egerman RS, Wing DA, Tomlinson M, Silver R, Ramin SM, Guzman ER, Gordon M, How HY, Knudtson EJ, Szychowski JM, Cliver S, Hauth JC (2009) Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(375):e371–e378 Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Berghella V, Sheffield JS, Perez-Delboy A, Egerman RS, Wing DA, Tomlinson M, Silver R, Ramin SM, Guzman ER, Gordon M, How HY, Knudtson EJ, Szychowski JM, Cliver S, Hauth JC (2009) Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(375):e371–e378
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghella V, Odibo AO, Tolosa JE (2004) Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1311–1317CrossRefPubMed Berghella V, Odibo AO, Tolosa JE (2004) Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1311–1317CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Song RK, Cha HH, Shin MY, Choi SJ, Oh SY, Kim JH, Roh CR (2016) Post-cerclage ultrasonographic cervical length can predict preterm delivery in elective cervical cerclage patients. Obstet Gynecol Sci 59:17–23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Song RK, Cha HH, Shin MY, Choi SJ, Oh SY, Kim JH, Roh CR (2016) Post-cerclage ultrasonographic cervical length can predict preterm delivery in elective cervical cerclage patients. Obstet Gynecol Sci 59:17–23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzman ER, Houlihan C, Vintzileos A, Ivan J, Benito C, Kappy K (1996) The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:471–476CrossRefPubMed Guzman ER, Houlihan C, Vintzileos A, Ivan J, Benito C, Kappy K (1996) The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:471–476CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Drassinower D, Vink J, Zork N, Pessel C, Vani K, Brubaker SG, Ananth CV (2016) Does the rate of cervical shortening after cerclage predict preterm birth? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:2233–2239PubMed Drassinower D, Vink J, Zork N, Pessel C, Vani K, Brubaker SG, Ananth CV (2016) Does the rate of cervical shortening after cerclage predict preterm birth? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:2233–2239PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen J, Szychowski J (2009) Association between post-randomization sonographic cervical length and birth gestational age in a multicenter trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:S197CrossRef Owen J, Szychowski J (2009) Association between post-randomization sonographic cervical length and birth gestational age in a multicenter trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:S197CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dijkstra K, Funai EF, O’Neill L, Rebarber A, Paidas MJ, Young BK (2000) Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 96:346–350PubMed Dijkstra K, Funai EF, O’Neill L, Rebarber A, Paidas MJ, Young BK (2000) Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 96:346–350PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemmers M, Verschoor MA, Hooker AB, Opmeer BC, Limpens J, Huirne JA, Ankum WM, Mol BW (2016) Dilatation and curettage increases the risk of subsequent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 31:34–45CrossRefPubMed Lemmers M, Verschoor MA, Hooker AB, Opmeer BC, Limpens J, Huirne JA, Ankum WM, Mol BW (2016) Dilatation and curettage increases the risk of subsequent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 31:34–45CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger TM, Bernet V, El Alama S, Fauchere JC, Hosli I, Irion O, Kind C, Latal B, Nelle M, Pfister RE, Surbek D, Truttmann AC, Wisser J, Zimmermann R (2011) Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland 2011 Revision of the Swiss recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly 141:w13280PubMed Berger TM, Bernet V, El Alama S, Fauchere JC, Hosli I, Irion O, Kind C, Latal B, Nelle M, Pfister RE, Surbek D, Truttmann AC, Wisser J, Zimmermann R (2011) Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland 2011 Revision of the Swiss recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly 141:w13280PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ma’ani W, Solomayer E-F, Hammadeh M (2014) Expectant versus surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a randomised controlled study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1011–1015CrossRefPubMed Al-Ma’ani W, Solomayer E-F, Hammadeh M (2014) Expectant versus surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a randomised controlled study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1011–1015CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of cerclage failure in patients with singleton pregnancy undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage
verfasst von
K. Taghavi
M. L. Gasparri
D. Bolla
D. Surbek
Publikationsdatum
29.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4600-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.