Sie können Operatoren mit Ihrer Suchanfrage kombinieren, um diese noch präziser einzugrenzen. Klicken Sie auf den Suchoperator, um eine Erklärung seiner Funktionsweise anzuzeigen.
Findet Dokumente, in denen beide Begriffe in beliebiger Reihenfolge innerhalb von maximal n Worten zueinander stehen. Empfehlung: Wählen Sie zwischen 15 und 30 als maximale Wortanzahl (z.B. NEAR(hybrid, antrieb, 20)).
Findet Dokumente, in denen der Begriff in Wortvarianten vorkommt, wobei diese VOR, HINTER oder VOR und HINTER dem Suchbegriff anschließen können (z.B., leichtbau*, *leichtbau, *leichtbau*).
Chronic migraine is a debilitating neurological condition that significantly impairs both individual and socioeconomic outcomes. The aim of the present study was to estimate the remission rates of chronic migraine to episodic migraine, and to identify potential predictors of chronic migraine remission. In addition, to assess impact of chronic migraine remission on headache related disability.
Results
Out of 300 individuals with chronic migraine (CM) who attended to our institution and continued for follow up in the period from the 1st of January 2021 up to the end of December 2022, approximately 82 cases (27.3%) had remitting CM, while 117 cases (39.0%) had persistent CM, and 101 cases (33.7%) had transitional CM. On multivariate model for detection of potential predictors of CM remission revealed that patients with lowest headache frequency (15–19 frequency/month) were much more likely to remit (OR = 577.826, 95% CI: 15.259 to 21,881.228, P = 0.001) than those with high-frequency CM (25–30 frequency/month), patients with non CM with allodynia (0–2) were more likely to remit (OR = 139.374, 95% CI: 4.634 to 419.879, P = 0.004) compared to those with moderate to severe CM with allodynia (≥ 6). Additionally, those using Topiramate or beta-blockers were more likely to achieve remission (OR = 23.325, 95% CI: 3.289 to 165.400, P = 0.002, and OR = 34.205, 95%CI: 3.591 to 325.842, P = 0.002, respectively), and also non-smokers were 11 times more likely to achieve remission compared to smokers (OR = 11.370, 95% CI: 1.702 to 75.934, P = 0.012).
Conclusion
These findings identified several potential predictors of remission among patients with chronic headache. However, the majority of these prognostic factors are modifiable.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ASC
Allodynia symptom checklist
BMI
Body mass index
CDH
Chronic daily headache
CI
Confidence interval
CM
Chronic migraine
CRP
C-reactive protein
CT
Computed tomography
EM
Episodic migraine
Ham-A
Hamelton anxiety rating scale
Ham-D
Hamelton depression rating scale
HFEM
High-frequency episodic migraine
HIT
Headache impact test
IBMS
International burden of migraine study
ICHD
International classification of headache disorders
IRB
Institutional review board
LFEM
Low-frequency episodic migraine
MIDAS
Migraine disability assessment test
MOH
Medication overuse headache
MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
MSQ
Migraine specific quality of life questionnaire
NSAIDs
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
OR
Odds ratio
OTC
Over the counter
QOL
Quality of life
Introduction
Headache is now ranked among the most common medical diseases worldwide that cause disability [1]. Migraine is common type of headache, and one of the complicated neuro-inflammatory illnesses. It is characterized by recurring, throbbing headache pain, usually on one side of the head. Nausea and blurred vision are also common side effects. 1.4% of all neurological and mental diseases are caused by migraine headache [2]. Migraine affects an estimated 12% of the population. Global estimates are higher. Chronic migraine (CM) affects 1–2% of the global population. Approximately 2.5% of persons with episodic migraine progress to CM [3].
The International Classification of Headache Disorders—ICHD-3 defines chronic migraine as having headaches for at least 15 days per month for at least 3 months, with at least 8 days per month associated with migraine, while Episodic migraine (EM) is characterized by having migraine from 0 to 14 headache days per month. Global estimates of CM prevalence generally range from 1.4 to 2.2% [3]. While estimated prevalence of medication overuse headache varies among studies, between 0·5% and 7·2%, with a median of 1–2%, depending on the country, the nature of the study sample [4]. Chronic migraine is associated with a substantially greater personal and societal burden, more frequent comorbidities, and possibly with persistent and progressive brain abnormalities [5].
Anzeige
There is complexity in the interaction between EM and CM. While most patients with episodic migraine remain that way, 2.5% of persons with episodic migraine per year develop chronic migraine [6], while CM frequently remits to EM (26% transition rate in 2 years) [7]. Age, sex, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, obesity, medication compliance, medication over usage, coffee, poor income, allodynia, and other pain disorders comorbidities are some of the characteristics that have been linked to migraine chronification (predictors) [8].
Finding potential determinants of chronic migraine remission and calculating the remission rates of CM to EM are the primary objectives of the current study. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of long-term migraine remission on headache-related disability.
The aim of the present study was to estimate the remission rates of chronic migraine to episodic migraine, to identify potential predictors of chronic migraine remission and to assess impact of chronic migraine remission on headache-related disability.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Outpatient Headache Clinic, Neuropsychiatric Department at Assiut University Hospital and continued for follow-up during the study period of two years, from January 2021 up to the end of December 2022. A total of 300 patients with chronic migraine who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with chronic migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria [9]. Chronic migraine was defined as headaches occurring on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months, with features of migraine headaches on at least 8 days per month, persistent CM was defined as headache meeting criteria of CM in 2 years of follow-up, remitting CM was defined as headache meeting criteria of episodic migraine in 2 years of follow-up, while transitional CM was defined as headache not meeting criteria of CM nor episodic migraine in 2 years of follow-up. Both male and female patients were included in the study. Patients with other neurological diseases, chronic medical conditions, or those who refused to participate or missed follow-up were excluded from the study. The study adhered to the guidelines of Assiut University’s Ethical Committee (IRB no. 17101400). Eligible patients who express their willingness to participate will be asked to provide written informed consent before enrollment in the study.
Anzeige
All patients who met the previously mentioned criteria underwent a complete assessment, which included a full history, a complete general examination, and a full neurological examination according to the prepared specialized sheet.
The predictor variables associated with chronic migraine remission were assessed at baseline. This may include age, sex, body mass index (BMI), age of onset, medication use, coffee consumption, smoking status, headache frequency, and use of preventive medication. These variables were analyzed to identify potential predictors of remission.
Participants underwent assessments of depression and anxiety using standardized scales. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) was used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The scale consists of several items that evaluate the presence and intensity of symptoms such as depressed mood, guilt feelings, sleep disturbances, and changes in appetite. The scores on the HAM-D range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms [10].
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) was employed to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms. The scale comprises various items that assess symptoms such as tension, nervousness, trembling, and worry. The HAM-A scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms [11].
The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) was utilized to evaluate the impact of chronic migraine on quality of life. This questionnaire consists of multiple domains that assess different aspects of quality of life, including the impact of migraines on daily activities, social functioning, and emotional well-being. The MSQ provides scores for each domain, with lower scores indicating a greater negative impact on quality of life [12].
Disability related to chronic migraine was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS). This scale measures the impact of migraine on daily functioning and productivity. It includes questions about the number of headache days, the impact of headaches on various activities, and the need for bed rest or missed work or school. The MIDAS score ranges from 0 to 270, with higher scores indicating greater disability [13].
Additionally, the 12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist was used to assess symptoms of allodynia, which is the experience of pain or discomfort in response to non-painful stimuli. The checklist includes items related to the presence and severity of allodynia symptoms. The scores on the checklist range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating a higher presence and severity of allodynia symptoms [14].
These assessments were conducted both at baseline and after a 2-year follow-up period to evaluate changes in depression, anxiety, disability, quality of life, and allodynia symptoms over time.
Anzeige
Data were gathered, edited, coded, and entered into the IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science, version 20). The qualitative data were presented as number (percentage) while quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (range). The comparison between categorical data was done by using Chi-square test or Fisher exact test when the expected frequency in any cell was less than 5. Comparison of quantitative variables was done Mann–Whitney U. Correlation between various variables was done using Pearson correlation test. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and Logistic Regression was calculated for prediction of CM remission. P-value set significant at 0.05 level.
Results
Out of 300 individuals with chronic migraine (CM) who attended to our institution and continued for follow-up in the period from the 1st of January 2021 up to the end of December 2022, approximately 82 cases (27.3%) had remitting CM, while 117 cases (39.0%) had persistent CM, and 101 cases (33.7%) had transitional CM (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Two-year transition rates relative to chronic migraine status among the studied participants
More than half of the studied cases (52.2%) aged less than 40 years old, 18.1% aged 40–49 years, 11.6% aged 50–59 years, and 18.1% aged ≥ 60 years. Out of 199 studied participants, 33 cases (16.6%) were males, and 166 cases (83.4%) were females. About half of the studied cases (51.3%) have normal BMI, 71 cases (35.7%) had overweight, and 13.1% were obese. No significant difference was observed between patients with persistent and remitting CM regarding to their age, sex, BMI, and age of onset (P > 0.05, for all).
Meanwhile, a higher prevalence of persistent headaches was observed between patients receiving Acetaminophen, NSAIDs, Ergotamine, Triptans, combined OTC, or OTC overuse. Also, a higher prevalence of persistent headache was observed between patients drinking coffee, smokers, those with higher headache frequencies, and those with higher allodynia (P < 0.05 for all). In addition, patients receiving current preventive therapy, beta blockers, or topiramate have a lower prevalence of persistent headaches (P < 0.05 for all) (Table 1).
Table 1
Baseline demographic characteristics and susceptible risk factors for persistent CM
Demographic data
Total (n = 199)
Persistent CM (n = 117)
Remitting CM (n = 82)
P value
Age groups
18–29 years
52
(26.1)
31
(26.5)
21
(25.6)
0.386
30–39 years
52
(26.1)
32
(27.4)
20
(24.4)
40–49 years
36
(18.1)
25
(21.4)
11
(13.4)
50–59 years
23
(11.6)
11
(9.4)
12
(14.6)
≥ 60 years
36
(18.1)
18
(15.4)
18
(22.0)
Sex
Male
33
(16.6)
15
(12.8)
18
(22.0)
0.088
Female
166
(83.4)
102
(87.2)
64
(78.0)
BMI
Normal 18.5–24.9
102
(51.3)
59
(50.4)
43
(52.4)
0.765
Overweight 25–29.9
71
(35.7)
41
(35.0)
30
(36.6)
Obese ≥ 30
26
(13.1)
17
(14.5)
9
(11.0)
Risk factors
Age of onset groups
18–29 years
84
(42.2)
53
(45.3)
31
(37.8)
0.534
30–39 years
42
(21.1)
26
(22.2)
16
(19.5)
40–49 years
29
(14.6)
17
(14.5)
12
(14.6)
50–59 years
24
(12.1)
12
(10.3)
12
(14.6)
≥ 60 years
20
(10.1)
9
(7.7)
11
(13.4)
Medication
Acetaminophen use
142
(71.4)
101
(86.3)
41
(50.0)
< 0.001
NSAID use
134
(67.3)
99
(84.6)
35
(42.7)
< 0.001
Ergotamine use
90
(45.2)
69
(59.0)
21
(25.6)
< 0.001
Triptans use
136
(68.3)
92
(78.6)
44
(53.7)
< 0.001
Barbiturates use
35
(17.6)
24
(20.7)
11
(13.3)
0.174
Opiates use
26
(13.1)
18
(15.5)
8
(9.6)
0.255
Combined OTC use
157
(78.9)
110
(94.0)
47
(57.3)
< 0.001
OTC overuse
91
(45.7)
81
(69.2)
10
(12.2)
< 0.001
Prescription overuse
130
(65.3)
71
(60.7)
59
(72.0)
0.100
Drink coffee
No
79
(39.7)
35
(29.9)
44
(53.7)
0.001
Yes
120
(60.3)
82
(70.1)
38
(46.3)
Smoking
No
73
(36.7)
33
(28.2)
40
(48.8)
0.003
Yes
126
(63.3)
84
(71.8)
42
(51.2)
Headache frequency/month
15–19
51
(25.6)
1
(0.9)
50
(61.0)
< 0.001
20–24
52
(26.1)
22
(18.8)
30
(36.6)
25–30
96
(48.2)
94
(80.3)
2
(2.4)
Allodynia at baseline
None (0–2)
64
(32.2)
3
(2.6)
61
(74.4)
< 0.001
Mild (3–5)
60
(30.2)
40
(34.2)
20
(24.4)
Moderate (6–8)
61
(30.7)
60
(51.3)
1
(1.2)
Severe (≥ 9)
14
(7.0)
14
(12.0)
0
(0.0)
Allodynia after follow up
None (0–2)
72
(36.2)
4
(3.4)
68
(82.9)
< 0.001
Mild (3–5)
53
(26.6)
39
(33.3)
14
(17.1)
Moderate (6–8)
59
(29.6)
59
(50.4)
0
(0.0)
Severe (≥ 9)
15
(7.5)
15
(12.8)
0
(0.0)
Preventive medication
Current preventive use
125
(62.8)
64
(54.7)
61
(74.4)
0.005
Amitryptylline use
85
(42.7)
44
(37.6)
41
(50.0)
0.082
Valproic acid use
27
(13.6)
15
(12.8)
12
(14.6)
0.713
Beta blocker use
43
(36.1)
16
(13.8)
27
(32.5)
0.002
Topiramate use
70
(35.2)
22
(18.8)
48
(58.5)
< 0.001
Anti-depressants use
37
(18.6)
19
(16.2)
18
(22.0)
0.308
Data are presented as number (percentage). Significance defined by P < 0.05
BMI body mass index, CM chronic migraine
Anzeige
Regarding to depression (according to HAMD questionnaire); 39.2% suffered from depression (38.7% had mild depression, and only one case had moderate depression). After 2 years of follow-up, 37.2% still suffered from depression (36.7% had mild depression, and only one had moderate depression). Higher prevalence of depression was observed among patients with persistent headache at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up as compared to patients with remitting headache (P < 0.001).
Regarding to anxiety (according to HAMA questionnaire), only one case suffered from mild to moderate anxiety. After 2 years of follow-up, two cases were suffered from mild to moderate anxiety. Patients with persistent headache have higher mean HAMA score, at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up, as compared to patients with remitting headache (P < 0.001).
By assessing disabilities among the studied participants using MIDAS questionnaire, we observed that, 38 cases (19.1%) had no or little disability, 61 cases (30.7%) had mild disability, 75 cases (37.7%) had moderate disability, and 25 cases (12.6%) had severe disability. Higher severity of disabilities was observed among patients with persistent headache compared to patients with remitting headache both at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up, as (P < 0.001).
To assessing the quality of life (QOL) among migraine patients, we used MSQ questionnaire and we observed that patients with remitting headache have significantly higher mean MSQ score compared to patients with persistent headache (at baseline; median (range) was 44 (30–69) versus 60 (30–72), P < 0.001), and after 2 years of follow-up; median (range) was 39 (25–68) versus 70 (48–78), P < 0.001) in both studied groups, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2
Difference in the HAMD, HAMA, MIDAS, and MSQ questionnaires at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up among respondents with persistent CM versus those with remitting CM
Questionnaires
Total (n = 199)
Persistent CM (n = 117)
Remitting CM (n = 82)
P value
1. HAMD
At baseline
Absent (< 7)
121
(60.8)
49
(41.9)
72
(87.8)
Mild depression (7–17)
77
(38.7)
68
(58.1)
9
(11.0)
< 0.001
Moderate depression (18–24)
1
(0.5)
0
(0.0)
1
(1.2)
Severe depression (> 25)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
Median (range)
5 (2–20)
7 (3–17)
3.5 (2–20)
< 0.001
After 2 years of follow-up
Absent (< 7)
125
(62.8)
44
(37.6)
81
(98.8)
Mild depression (7–17)
73
(36.7)
72
(61.5)
1
(1.2)
< 0.001
Moderate depression (18–24)
1
(0.5)
1
(0.9)
0
(0.0)
Severe depression (> 25)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
Median (range)
5 (0–20)
7 (1–20)
2 (0–7)
< 0.001
2. HAMA
At baseline
Mild severity (< 17)
198
(99.5)
116
(99.1)
82
(100.0)
Mild to moderate severity (18–24)
1
(0.5)
1
(0.9)
0
(0.0)
1
Moderate to severe (25–30)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
Median (range)
5 (2–20)
5 (2–20)
4 (2–12)
< 0.001
After 2 years of follow-up
Mild severity (< 17)
197
(99.0)
115
(98.3)
82
(100.0)
Mild to moderate severity (18–24)
2
(1.0)
2
(1.7)
0
(0.0)
0.513
Moderate to severe (25–30)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
Median (range)
5 (0–19)
7 (2–19)
2 (0–6)
< 0.001
3. MIDAS
At baseline
Little or no disability (0–5)
38
(19.1)
1
(0.9)
37
(45.1)
Mild disability (6–10)
61
(30.7)
29
(24.8)
32
(39.0)
< 0.001
Moderate disability (11–20)
75
(37.7)
62
(53.0)
13
(15.9)
Severe disability (≥ 21)
25
(12.6)
25
(21.4)
0
(0.0)
Median (range)
11 (2–25)
15 (3–25)
6 (2–20)
< 0.001
After 2 years of follow-up
None (0–5)
78
(39.2)
3
(2.6)
75
(91.5)
Mild (6–10)
19
(9.5)
13
(11.1)
6
(7.3)
< 0.001
Moderate (11–20)
55
(27.6)
54
(46.2)
1
(1.2)
Severe (≥ 21)
47
(23.6)
47
(40.2)
0
(0.0)
Median (range)
11 (0–30)
17 (2–30)
3 (0–11)
< 0.001
4. MSQ
At baseline
Median (range)
52 (30–72)
44 (30–69)
60 (30–72)
< 0.001
After 2 years of follow-up
Median (range)
50 (25–78)
39 (25–68)
70 (48–78)
< 0.001
HAMD Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAMA Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, MIDAS Migraine Disability Assessment Test, MSQ Migraine specific quality. Data are presented as median (range), or number (percentage). Significance defined by P < 0.05
Anzeige
Table 3 summarizes potential predictors of CM remission among the studied participants. Those with lowest headache frequency (15–19 frequency/month) were much more likely to remit (OR = 577.826, 95% CI: 15.259 to 21,881.228, P = 0.001) than those with high-frequency CM (25–30 frequency/month). Those with non CM with allodynia (0–2) were more likely to remit (OR = 139.374, 95% CI: 4.634 to 419.879, P = 0.004) compared to those with moderate to severe CM with allodynia (≥ 6).
Table 3
Multivariate model for potential predictors of CM remission
Variables
Multivariate analysis
OR
95% CI
P value
Headache frequency/month
15–19
577.826
15.259–21,881.228
0.001
20–24
35.726
2.471–516.597
0.009
25–30
1
Allodynia
Non (0–2)
139.374
4.634–419.879
0.004
Mild (3–5)
4.642
0.259–83.147
0.297
Moderate to severe (≥ 6)
1
Drink coffee
No
4.323
0.945–19.781
0.059
Yes
1
Topiramate use
No
1
Yes
23.325
3.289–165.400
0.002
Beta-blockers use
No
1
Yes
34.205
3.591–325.842
0.002
Smoking
No
11.370
1.702–75.934
0.012
Yes
1
CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio. P value is significant ≤ 0.05
Additionally, those using Topiramate or beta-blockers were more likely to achieve remission (OR = 23.325, 95% CI: 3.289 to 165.400, P = 0.002, and OR = 34.205, 95%CI: 3.591 to 325.842, P = 0.002, respectively).
Also non-smokers were 11 times more likely to achieve remission compared to smokers (OR = 11.370, 95% CI: 1.702–75.934, P = 0.012).
Discussion
In the general population, the prevalence of CM ranges from 1 to 4%; it affects women more frequently than males and peaks between the ages of 18 and 50. CM not only results in a lower QOL but also has a large socioeconomic cost due to lost productivity and working days [15]. Investigating the risk factors of headache frequency in CM is crucial for identifying associated factors and optimizing treatment paradigms. Only a small number of studies document CM remission [16].
Anzeige
Findings in the current study indicate that more than one-third (39.0%) of sufferers with CM in a baseline year continue persistent over the subsequent 2 years of follow-up. Conversely, true remission occurs in only 27.3% of those with CM, and 33.7% had transitional CM.
Transitioning CM is defined as migraine that met CM criteria at baseline and either CM, low-frequency EM (LFEM), high-frequency EM (HFEM), chronic or episodic tension-type headache, probable migraine, no headache, or other episodic headache in subsequent years and did not meet persistent or remitting CM criteria [17].
Given that CM sometimes persists and sometimes remits, factors predicting remission were evaluated. Headache frequency per month, CM associated with allodynia, using medications as Topiramate or Beta-blockers, and smoking status were significant predictors for persistence or achieving remission among sufferers with CM.
Headache frequency was a significant independent predictor of CM remission, with higher headache frequency associated with lower rates of remission. This finding could be attributed to the fact that more frequent headaches were linked to more days with moderate-to-severe headaches, more frequent use of acute headache medications, more headache-related disability, and ultimately a lower QOL [18]. In contrast, a reduction in headache frequency may also translate into improvements in health-related QOL [19]. Thus, patients with higher headache frequency have a poorer outcome.
Anzeige
However, evidence from previous studies was contradictory. Similar findings were reported by [7, 20, 21] who reported that lower baseline headache frequency was a significant predictive factor for the remission of chronic migraine. Moreover, it was found to be linked to a decrease in migraine days at follow-up but also to an increased risk of allodynia and more drug use days [22]. Also, recently Henning and colleagues reported that there was a lower chance of remission for participants whose baseline headache frequency was higher (0.90, 0.84–0.97) [16].
Conversely, research showed that there was no difference in the incidence of headaches between those who responded and those who did not to preventive treatment [23], and higher baseline headache frequency did not predict treatment-induced remission of chronic migraine [24].
Evidence has accumulated that migraine progression and disability are influenced also by cutaneous allodynia, the perception of non-noxious thermal or mechanical stimuli as painful [25]. It was reported that allodynia affected 63% of migraineurs in the population and was associated with female sex, frequency, severity, and most of the diagnostic symptoms of migraine [26]. In the current study, the prevalence estimates of allodynia among our studied cases were 67.9%. Also, we observed that allodynia is more common and more severe in individuals with persistent migraine compared with those with remitting migraine. This finding was confirmed in the logistic regression analysis as we observed that patients with non-CM with allodynia (0–2) were more likely to remit (OR = 69.557, 95% CI: 4.013–1205.592, P = 0.004) compared to those with moderate to severe CM with allodynia (≥ 6). In line with this finding, Manack and colleagues stated that the absence of allodynia has been shown to be associated with remission [7], and Louter and colleagues reported that allodynia is more common in those with chronic migraine than in people with episodic migraine and suggests a higher risk of migraine chronification [22].
Medication overuse (use of acute medications on more than 10 or 15 days per month, depending on the medication class) is common among people with CM. For some people with migraine, despite taking greater amounts of acute headache medication, they develop an increase in monthly headache days [27]. In the current study, we observed that regular intake of analgesics was associated with persistent migraine. However, regression analysis revealed that medication utilization by class, and OTC/prescription overuse did not significantly predict CM remission. Similar finding was reported by Manack and colleagues [7].
Evidence for the efficacy of oral agents in CM is generally extrapolated from studies in patients with high-frequency EM [28]. Thus, preventive treatment is intended to facilitate the transition from CM to EM, but the real-world benefits of this remission have yet to be quantified. In the present study, the current use of preventive medications facilitated the achievement of remission. In the regression analysis model, we observed that those using Topiramate were more likely to achieve remission (OR = 12.561, 95% CI: 2.736–57.672, P = 0.001). Thus, we suggested that preventive medications may also increase remission rates, but effects may be offset by other unmeasured or inadequately measured confounders.
In line with the current study, Manack and colleagues reported that the use of preventive medications was associated with a lower rate of remission [7]. The author explains this finding as follows: persons with CM who receive preventive medication may be more likely to have other factors, such as high attack frequency, associated with a reduced chance of remission [7].
The most popular class of medications for treating migraines in prevention are beta-blockers, which can reduce migraine frequency by more than 50% with an efficacy of roughly 50%. The effectiveness of metoprolol, a selective beta1-blocker, and propranolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, has been repeatedly shown by evidence. Atenolol, nadolol, timolol, and bisoprolol are also shown to be effective [29]. This comes in agreement with the current finding as we observed that receiving Beta-blockers was effective in achieving remission among the studied cases.
Caffeine can cause migraine headaches by increasing urinary magnesium loss, most likely by inhibiting magnesium reabsorption. Caffeine may cause headaches by reducing magnesium levels, which affects neuromuscular conduction and nerve transmission and is beneficial in chronic pain syndromes including migraines. One probable migraine trigger is dehydration. Caffeinated coffee, in higher dosages, has an acute diuretic effect, which can lead to dehydration [30]. This could explain the current finding that drinking coffee was more prevalent among patients with persistent headache, and patients not drinking coffee were four times more likely to achieve remission in regression analysis model, with borderline significance. Similar finding was reported by previous literature [8].
It was discovered that smoking and migraines were related. A retrospective examination of data from the annual health survey revealed a positive correlation between the prevalence of migraines and daily smoking [31]. There is debate over the pathophysiology of smoking and nicotine use in the beginning of migraines, as both substances directly affect the central nervous system [32]. In the present study, smoking was found to be associated with persisting headache. Participants who did not smoke were more likely to experience remission of migraine. Similar finding was reported by Gong Q and colleagues [33].
Disability, anxiety, and depression are common risk factors of chronic migraine [34]. In the current study, we observed that patients with persistent headache suffered from higher disabilities, lower quality of life (QOL), and associated with other psychiatric comorbidities as depression, anxiety. This finding was supported by previous studies [35].
Manack and colleagues showed that disability is significantly influenced by persistence and remission. Remitted CM patients showed reductions in headache-related disability, but those with persistent CM showed increases in headache-related disability [7].
Patients with CM showed more impairment, a lower quality of life, and higher levels of anxiety and depression than those with EM, according to data gathered by the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS) from multiple countries in Western Europe, North America, and the Asia/Pacific areas [36, 37]. Also in line with the current study, the recent meta-analysis of Xu and colleagues reported that depression, anxiety are among modifiable risk factors for the transformation of EM to CM [38].
In fact, CM and depression are recognized risk factors for suicidal thoughts or behaviors in those who suffer from migraine [39, 40]. This finding highlights the need for proper prevention and management to avoid these catastrophic outcomes.
Conclusion
The current study identified several potential predictors for persistence or remission among patients with CM. Headache frequency per month, CM associated with allodynia, using medications as Topiramate or beta-blockers, and smoking status were significant predictors for achieving remission among sufferers with CM. The majority of these prognostic factors are modifiable. The results further emphasize the necessity for conducting further long-term studies on the prognostic variables for chronic headaches.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to express my sincere thanks to the neurology department of Assiut University Hospital and all staff working there. Also, thanks for the patients and their families for accepting to share in this study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study adhered to the guidelines of Assiut University’s Ethical Committee (IRB no: 17101400). All enrolled cases were provided an informed written consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Noor T, Sajjad A, Asma A. Frequency, character and predisposing factor of headache among students of medical college of Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(2):159–64.PubMed
2.
van Hemert S, Breedveld AC, Rovers JM, Vermeiden JP, Witteman BJ, Smits MG, et al. Migraine associated with gastrointestinal disorders: review of the literature and clinical implications. Front Neurol. 2014;5:241.PubMedPubMedCentral
Manack A, Buse D, Serrano D, Turkel C, Lipton R. Rates, predictors, and consequences of remission from chronic migraine to episodic migraine. Neurology. 2011;76(8):711–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Buse DC, Greisman JD, Baigi K, Lipton RB. Migraine progression: a systematic review. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2019;59(3):306–38.CrossRef
9.
Chalmer MA, Hansen TF, Lebedeva ER, Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Olesen J. Proposed new diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(4):399–406.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23(1):56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959.
12.
McKenna SP, Doward LC, Davey KM. The development and psychometric properties of the MSQOL: a migraine-specific quality-of-life instrument. Clin Drug Investig. 1998;15:413–23.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(suppl 1):S20–8.PubMed
14.
Melhado EM, Thiers Rister HL, Galego DR, de Oliveira AB, Buttarello IA, Belucio IS, et al. Allodynia in menstrually related migraine: score assessment by Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12). Headache J Head Face Pain. 2020;60(1):162–70.CrossRef
15.
Gribbin CL, Dani KA, Tyagi A. Chronic migraine: an update on diagnosis and management. Neurol India. 2021;69:S67-s75.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Henning V, Katsarava Z, Obermann M, Moebus S, Schramm S. Remission of chronic headache: rates, potential predictors and the role of medication, follow-up results of the German Headache Consortium (GHC) Study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(3):551–60.CrossRefPubMed
Schwedt TJ, Hentz JG, Sahai-Srivastava S, Spare NM, Martin VT, Treppendahl C, et al. Headache characteristics and burden from chronic migraine with medication overuse headache: cross-sectional observations from the Medication Overuse Treatment Strategy trial. Headache. 2021;61(2):351–62.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lipton RB, Varon SF, Grosberg B, McAllister PJ, Freitag F, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine. Neurology. 2011;77(15):1465–72.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lu S, Fuh J, Chen W, Juang K, Wang S. Chronic daily headache in Taipei, Taiwan: prevalence, follow-up and outcome predictors. Cephalalgia. 2001;21(10):980–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Lyngberg AC, Rasmussen BK, Jørgensen T, Jensen R. Prognosis of migraine and tension-type headache: a population-based follow-up study. Neurology. 2005;65(4):580–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Louter MA, Bosker JE, van Oosterhout WP, van Zwet EW, Zitman FG, Ferrari MD, et al. Cutaneous allodynia as a predictor of migraine chronification. Brain. 2013;136(11):3489–96.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Katsarava Z, Muessig M, Dzagnidze A, Fritsche G, Diener H, Limmroth V. Medication overuse headache: rates and predictors for relapse in a 4-year prospective study. Cephalalgia. 2005;25(1):12–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Seok JI, Cho HI, Chung CS. From transformed migraine to episodic migraine: reversion factors. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2006;46(7):1186–90.CrossRef
Baykan B, Ekizoglu E, Karli N, Kocasoy-Orhan E, Zarifoglu M, Saip S, Siva A, Ertas M. Characterization of migraineurs having allodynia: results of a large population-based study. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(7):631–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000301.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Yu S, Zhou J, Luo G, Xiao Z, Ettrup A, Jansson G, Florea I, Ranc K, Pozo-Rosich P. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. BMC Neurol. 2023;23(1):441. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03477-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Agostoni EC, Barbanti P, Calabresi P, Colombo B, Cortelli P, Frediani F, et al. Current and emerging evidence-based treatment options in chronic migraine: a narrative review. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):1–9.CrossRef
Nowaczewska M, Wiciński M, Kaźmierczak W. The ambiguous role of caffeine in migraine headache: from trigger to treatment. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2259.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Matias-Guiu J, Fernandez C, Porta-Etessam J, Mateos V, Diaz-Insa S. Factors associated with the differences in migraine prevalence rates between Spanish regions. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1.CrossRef
32.
Taylor FR. Tobacco, nicotine, and headache. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2015;55(7):1028–44.CrossRef
33.
Gong Q, Liu S, Li R, Yao L, Xiao Z. Overall trend towards headache remission during the COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese patients with pre-existing headache highlights the role of family support. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine is associated with new-onset chronic migraine. Neurology. 2015;84(7):688–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Lipton RB, Sollars CM, Buse DC. Epidemiology, progression, prognosis, and comorbidity of migraine. Headache. 2013:64–87.
36.
Payne KA, Varon SF, Kawata AK, Yeomans K, Wilcox TK, Manack A, et al. The International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS): study design, methodology, and baseline cohort characteristics. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(10):1116–30.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Blumenfeld A, Varon S, Wilcox T, Buse D, Kawata A, Manack A, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia. 2011;31(3):301–15.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Xu J, Kong F, Buse DC. Predictors of episodic migraine transformation to chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(5):503–16.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Serafini G, Pompili M, Innamorati M, Gentile G, Borro M, Lamis DA, et al. Gene variants with suicidal risk in a sample of subjects with chronic migraine and affective temperamental dysregulation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(10):1389–98.PubMed
40.
Pompili M, Serafini G, Di Cosimo D, Dominici G, Innamorati M, Lester D, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity and suicide risk in patients with chronic migraine. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treatment. 2010:81–91.
Medizinischen Rat von Chatbots auf der Basis sogenannter künstlicher Intelligenz haben laut Umfragen bereits knapp die Hälfte aller Erwachsenen schon einmal eingeholt. Welche Chancen und Risiken birgt das?
Wer insgesamt zuversichtlicher aufs Leben blickt, trägt ein geringeres Risiko, später einmal an Demenz zu erkranken als pessimistischere Zeitgenossen. Dafür sprechen zumindest Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittdatenanalyse aus den USA. Ob mehr Optimismus allerdings tatsächlich einer Demenz vorbeugt, bleibt unklar.
Eine hochdosierte Influenza-Vakzine geht mit einer verzögerten Demenzdiagnose einher. Darauf deutet eine Auswertung von US-Gesundheitsdaten hin. Besonders auffällig sind die Effekte in den ersten Monaten nach der Impfung.
Intensive Senkung eines erhöhten Blutdrucks kann nach einer intrazerebralen Blutung die funktionelle Erholung verbessern – mutmaßlich über eine Reduktion der Hämatomausdehnung. Offenbar hängt das aber vom Ausgangsvolumen ab, wie eine Analyse ergeben hat.