Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2014

Open Access 01.12.2014 | Research article

Predictors of dizziness in older persons: a 10-year prospective cohort study in the community

verfasst von: Otto R Maarsingh, Hanneke Stam, Peter M van de Ven, Natasja M van Schoor, Matthew J Ridd, Johannes C van der Wouden

Erschienen in: BMC Geriatrics | Ausgabe 1/2014

Abstract

Background

The current diagnosis-oriented approach of dizziness does not suit older patients. Often, it is difficult to identify a single underlying cause, and when a diagnosis is made, therapeutic options may be limited. Identification of predictors of dizziness may provide new leads for the management of dizziness in older patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate long-term predictors of regular dizziness in older persons.

Methods

Population-based cohort study of 1,379 community-dwelling participants, aged ≥60 years, from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). Regular dizziness was ascertained during face-to-face medical interviews during 7- and 10-year follow-up. We investigated 26 predictors at baseline from six domains: socio-demographic, medical history, medication, psychological, sensory, and balance/gait. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses with presence of regular dizziness at 7- and 10-year follow-up as dependent variables. We assessed the performance of the models by calculating calibration and discrimination.

Results

Predictors of regular dizziness at 7-year follow-up were living alone, history of dizziness, history of osteo/rheumatoid arthritis, use of nitrates, presence of anxiety or depression, impaired vision, and impaired function of lower extremities. Predictors of regular dizziness at 10-year follow-up were history of dizziness and impaired function of lower extremities. Both models showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P value of 0.36 and 0.31, respectively) and acceptable discrimination (adjusted AUC after bootstrapping of 0.77 and 0.71).

Conclusions

Dizziness in older age was predicted by multiple factors. A multifactorial approach, targeting potentially modifiable predictors (e.g., physical exercise for impaired function of lower extremities), may add to the current diagnosis-oriented approach.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1471-2318-14-133) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

OM extracted the data and wrote the first draft. OM, MR, and JW were involved in the design of the study. OM and PV performed the statistical analyses. All authors revised the draft for intellectual content and approved the final version of the paper.
Abkürzungen
AUC
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
CES-D
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale
CI
Confidence interval
GP
General practitioner
HADS
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
LASA
The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam
MMSE
Mini-Mental State Examination
OR
Odds ratio
SE
Standard error.

Background

The symptom dizziness is common among older persons: 30% of people above 65 years of age experience some form of dizziness, increasing to more than 50% in persons of 90 years and older [1, 2]. Dizziness can lead to severe limitations in daily functioning and is associated with depressive symptoms [35], poor self-rated health [2, 6], and reduced quality of life [7]. More importantly, it is a major risk factor for falling [7, 8], leading to fatal and non-fatal injuries and high healthcare costs [9, 10]. With the ageing of the population, the burden of dizziness – on society, health care systems, and individuals – will increase significantly.
Despite the aetiological differences between younger and older dizzy patients, guidelines on dizziness advocate the same diagnosis-oriented approach for all patients regardless of their age (http://​cks.​nice.​org.​uk/​vertigo). However, this approach does not suit older patients presenting with dizziness. Often, it is difficult to identify an underlying cause in dizzy older patients. In 40% of dizzy older patients, general practitioners (GPs) record a symptom diagnosis as the final diagnosis (‘dizziness’ or ‘vertigo’) [11]. But even if an underlying disease is diagnosed, therapeutic options may be limited [5, 12]. Identification of long-term predictors of dizziness in older people may provide new leads for the management of dizziness in older patients.
The aim of the present study was to investigate long-term predictors of regular dizziness in persons above 60 years of age in a prospective cohort study with 7- and 10-year follow-up. We investigated predictors from six domains: socio-demographic, medical history, medication, psychological, sensory, and balance/gait, in a large nationally representative sample from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA).

Methods

Study sample

The study was conducted within LASA, an ongoing cohort study on physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning in older people in The Netherlands [13]. The LASA cohort was recruited in 1992 from a random sample of older men and women, aged 55–85, in the west, northeast, and south of The Netherlands. Since 1992, longitudinal data have been collected every three years. The sample was stratified by age, sex, degree of urbanization, and expected 5-year mortality. The sample is representative for the older Dutch population with respect to geographic region and degree of urbanization. Sampling, data collection, and nonresponse are described elsewhere [14, 15].The present study was performed among a subsample of the LASA cohort, consisting of 1,379 participants who were aged 60 years or older. This group of 1,379 participants answered a (face-to-face) question on dizziness during the third data collection cycle of LASA (1998/1999; Figure 1). We used the fifth and sixth data collection cycles of LASA (2005/2006 and 2008/2009) to conduct a 7-year and 10-year follow-up on dizziness. The 7-year follow-up sample included 681 participants with valid data at baseline on dizziness, the 10-year follow-up sample included 512 participants with valid data at baseline on dizziness (Figure 1).
Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the VU University Medical Center.

Ascertainment of dizziness

Dizziness was ascertained during face-to-face medical interviews in 1998/1999 (baseline measurement), 2005/2006 (7-year follow-up), and 2008/2009 (10-year follow-up). To assess dizziness, participants were asked if they were dizzy regularly (yes/no).

Potential predictors of regular dizziness

Based on previous research, we examined 26 potential predictors of regular dizziness [25, 11, 16, 17]. Potential predictors were measured at baseline (1998/1999) and covered six domains: socio-demographic, medical history, medication, psychological, sensory, and balance/gait. The socio-demographic domain included age, gender, education, and household composition. Education was assessed as the highest level of education completed, ranging from 5 years (primary education) to 18 years (university). The domain medical history included history of dizziness and the self-reported number of major chronic diseases (0–7), history of chronic pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer. These self-reported answers correspond well with information from general practitioners [18]. The domain medication included the number of drugs used and the use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antihypertensives, diuretics, or nitrates. Names of drugs were copied directly from the containers. The psychological domain included cognition, anxiety, and depression. Cognition was assessed by means of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; score of ≤24 as cutoff for cognitive impairment) [19]. Anxiety symptoms were measured using the general anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A; score 0–21) [20]. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D; score 0–60) [21]. To improve clinical relevance, we used the dichotomous variable ‘presence of anxiety or depression’ (yes/no) with pre-established cutoff points for anxiety and depression (HADS-A score ≥11 or CES-D score ≥16) for the final analysis [20, 22]. The sensory domain included vision and hearing status. Visual and hearing impairment was assessed using two questions from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development long-term disability indicator [23], asking ‘can you see well enough?’ and ‘can you hear well enough?’ (yes/no). The domain balance/gait included gait speed (time needed to walk 3 meters, turn 180° and walk back as quickly as possible; test for functioning of lower extremities), chair stands (time needed to stand up and sit down five times with arms folded; test for functioning of lower extremities), tandem stand (ability to stand with one foot placed behind the other in straight line for at least 10 seconds; test for standing balance) [24], and fall history. We used dichotomous outcomes for gait speed (‘unable, or ≥10 seconds’; yes/no), chair stands (‘unable, or ≥15 seconds’; yes/no), and tandem stand (‘unable, or <10 seconds’; yes/no), with cutoff values based on previously determined categories in LASA (http://​www.​lasa-vu.​nl/​themes/​physical/​physicalperforma​nce.​htm). Fall history was assessed by asking ‘did you fall past year?’ (yes/no).

Statistical analysis

The data were analysed in SPSS for Windows, version 20.0.0. In order to develop prediction models for regular dizziness at respectively 7- and 10-year follow-up, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis with presence of regular dizziness at 7-year follow-up and 10-year follow-up as dependent variables. Prior to multivariate logistic regression analysis, we performed univariate logistic regression analysis to investigate associations between separate potential predictors at baseline and regular dizziness at 7- and 10-year follow-up. Variables were only entered in the multivariable regression model if the univariate P value was <0.1. In a backward elimination process (Wald test) we deleted variables from the initial model until only variables with a P value of less than 0.157 (Akaike Information Criterion) were retained in the final model [25]. We tested continuous variables for linear association with the outcome, which revealed no non-linear associations. We used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the variance inflation factor to investigate multicollinearity. The number of major chronic diseases showed correlations of ρ > 0.5 with cardiac disease and osteo/rheumatoid arthritis, and was therefore not used in the final model. The number of used drugs showed a correlation of ρ > 0.5 with use of antihypertensives and was also not used in the final model. The multicollinearity analysis revealed no other relevant correlations between variables.
Because of the long-term follow-up and the risk to drop out, we compared characteristics of dropouts with non-dropouts at 7- and 10-year follow-up. Because some variables (n = 7) had missing values, we performed a missing value analysis. Because history of dizziness may be a strong predictor that overrules other predictors of regular dizziness [26], we also performed a multivariate regression analysis without history of dizziness as potential predictor.

Performance of the models

To assess the reliability of the models we calculated the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic. Calibration plots were constructed by first grouping respondents into categories based on the model-based predicted probabilities of suffering from regular dizziness at the end of follow-up. Categories used were 0-10%, 10-20%, …, 90-100%. The observed proportion of patients in each category was plotted against the center of the range defining the category (5%, 15%, …, 95%).
To assess the discriminative ability of the models we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Because prediction models perform better at the development cohort than in other similar populations, we used bootstrapping to adjust for over-optimism in model performance [27]. Bootstrap samples were drawn with replacement (n = 1000) from the two data sets (N = 681 and N = 512, respectively) and were used to compute adjusted AUCs. The variability of the adjusted AUCs over the bootstrap samples was quantified by the 2.5th lower and 97.5th upper percentile of the bootstrap distribution.

Results

Prevalence of dizziness

At baseline 254 out of 1379 participants reported regular dizziness (18.4%; Figure 1), 10.6% in those aged 60–69, 16.3% in those aged 70–79, and 26.5% in those aged 80 years or older. At 7-year follow-up 129 out of 681 participants reported regular dizziness (18.9%) and at 10-year follow-up 73 out of 512 (14.3%; Figure 1).

Univariable associations with dizziness

Baseline characteristics significantly associated with regular dizziness at 7-year follow-up were gender, education, living alone, history of dizziness, history of peripheral arterial disease, number of drugs, use of anxiolytics, use of diuretics, use of nitrates, anxiety, depression, impaired vision, impaired functioning of lower extremities, and impaired standing balance (Table 1). Baseline characteristics significantly associated with regular dizziness at 10-year follow-up were living alone, history of dizziness, number of drugs, use of anxiolytics, anxiety, depression, impaired vision, impaired gait speed, and impaired chair stands (Table 1).
Table 1
Univariable associations of baseline characteristics (1998/99) with regular dizziness at 7- and 10-year follow-up (2005/06 and 2008/09)
 
7-year follow-up (N = 681)
10-year follow-up (N = 512)
Baseline characteristic
D+ (N = 129)
D- (N = 552)
OR
95% CI
Pvalue
D+ (N = 73)
D- (N = 439)
OR
95% CI
Pvalue
I. Sociodemographic
          
Age, mean (SD)
74.0 (6.2)
72.9 (6.2)
1.0
1.0-1.1
0.052
72.4 (6.0)
72.0 (5.9)
1.0
1.0-1.1
0.609
Gender, female, n (%)
99 (76.7)
304 (55.1)
2.7
1.7-4.2
<0.001
48 (65.8)
253 (57.6)
1.4
0.8-2.4
0.193
Years of education, mean (SD)
8.3 (2.8)
9.4 (3.3)
0.9
0.8-1.0
0.001
9.0 (3.1)
9.4 (3.3)
1.0
0.9-1.0
0.315
Living alone, n(%)
67 (51.9)
182 (33.0)
2.2
1.5-3.2
<0.001
36 (49.3)
144 (32.8)
2.0
1.2-3.3
0.007
II. Medical history
          
Regular dizziness, n (%)
47 (36.4)
50 (9.1)
5.8
3.6-9.1
<0.001
28 (38.4)
41 (9.3)
6.0
3.4-10.7
<0.001
No. major chronic diseases (0–7), mean (SD)
1.6 (1.1)
1.1 (1.0)
1.4
1.2-1.7
<0.001
1.4 (1.1)
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
1.0-1.5
0.015
Chronic pulmonary disease, n (%)
18 (14.0)
73 (13.2)
1.1
0.6-1.9
0.827
9 (12.3)
58 (13.2)
0.9
0.4-2.0
0.836
Cardiac disease, n (%)
38 (29.5)
134 (24.3)
1.3
0.9-2.0
0.223
19 (26.0)
103 (23.5)
1.1
0.7-2.0
0.634
Peripheral arterial disease, n (%)
14 (10.9)
33 (6.0)
1.9
1.0-3.7
0.053
4 (5.5)
27 (6.2)
0.9
0.3-2.6
0.824
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)
10 (7.8)
36 (6.5)
1.2
0.6-2.5
0.617
5 (6.8)
22 (5.0)
1.4
0.5-3.8
0.517
Stroke, n (%)
5 (3.9)
26 (4.7)
0.8
0.3-2.2
0.683
3 (4.1)
15 (3.4)
1.2
0.3-4.3
0.766
Osteo/rheumatoid arthritis, n (%)
93 (72.1)
248 (44.9)
3.2
2.1-4.8
<0.001
45 (61.6)
216 (49.2)
1.7
1.0-2.8
0.051
Cancer, n (%)
25 (19.4)
58 (10.5)
2.0
1.2-3.4
0.006
14 (19.2)
52 (11.8)
1.8
0.9-3.4
0.087
III. Medication
          
No. of drugs, mean (SD)
2.9 (2.1)
2.2 (2.0)
1.2
1.1-1.3
0.001
2.5 (2.0)
2.0 (1.9)
1.1
1.0-1.3
0.030
Psychopharmaceutical drugs
          
Antidepressants, n (%)
8 (6.2)
20 (3.6)
1.8
0.8-4.1
0.189
2 (2.7)
16 (3.6)
0.7
0.2-3.3
0.698
Anxiolytics, n (%)
13 (10.1)
28 (5.1)
2.1
1.1-4.2
0.035
9 (12.3)
20 (4.6)
2.9
1.3-6.8
0.011
Hypnotics, n (%)
19 (14.7)
51 (9.2)
1.7
1.0-3.0
0.067
8 (11.0)
37 (8.4)
1.3
0.6-3.0
0.481
Cardiovascular drugs
          
Antihypertensives, n (%)
53 (41.1)
191 (34.6)
1.3
0.9-2.0
0.168
32 (43.8)
147 (33.5)
1.6
0.9-2.6
0.086
Diuretics, n (%)
28 (21.7)
75 (13.6)
1.8
1.1-2.9
0.022
12 (16.4)
49 (11.2)
1.6
0.8-3.1
0.201
Nitrates, n (%)
19 (14.7)
32 (5.8)
2.8
1.5-5.1
0.001
9 (12.3)
27 (6.2)
2.1
1.0-4.8
0.061
IV. Psychological
          
Impaired cognition, MMSE ≤24, n (%)
9 (7.0)
25 (4.5)
1.6
0.7-3.5
0.254
4 (5.5)
15 (3.4)
1.6
0.5-5.1
0.392
Anxiety, HADS-A ≥11, n (%)a,f
17 (13.3)
17 (3.1)
4.8
2.4-9.7
<0.001
7 (9.6)
13 (3.0)
3.5
1.4-9.0
0.011
Depression, CES-D ≥16, n (%)a,f
40 (31.3)
78 (14.2)
2.8
1.8-4.3
<0.001
20 (27.4)
68 (15.5)
2.1
1.2-3.7
0.014
Anxiety or depression a,f
43 (33.6)
83 (15.1)
2.9
1.8-4.4
<0.001
21 (28.8)
72 (16.4)
2.1
1.2-3.6
0.013
V. Sensory
          
Impaired vision, n (%)b
42 (32.6)
94 (17.1)
2.3
1.5-3.6
<0.001
20 (27.4)
71 (16.2)
2.0
1.1-3.5
0.022
Impaired hearing, n (%)
49 (38.0)
169 (30.6)
1.4
0.9-2.1
0.107
26 (35.6)
127 (28.9)
1.4
0.8-2.3
0.249
VI. Balance/gait
          
Impaired function of lower extremities (gait speed), n (%)c,g
52 (41.3)
130 (23.8)
2.3
1.5-3.4
<0.001
25 (34.2)
98 (22.6)
1.8
1.0-3.0
0.033
Impaired function of lower extremities (chair stands), n (%)d,h
65 (51.2)
146 (26.5)
2.9
2.0-4.3
<0.001
34 (47.2)
108 (24.7)
2.7
1.6-4.6
<0.001
Impaired standing balance (tandem stand), n (%)e,g
35 (27.8)
97 (17.8)
1.8
1.1-2.8
0.012
17 (23.3)
68 (15.7)
1.6
0.9-3.0
0.110
Falling past year, n (%)a,f
46 (35.7)
159 (28.9)
1.4
0.9-2.0
0.134
25 (34.2)
128 (29.2)
1.3
0.7-2.1
0.386
CI: Confidence Interval; D+: presence of dizziness; D-: absence of dizziness; OR: Odds Ratio.
Missing values at 7-year follow-up in a0.3%, b0.1%, c1.2%, d0.6%, and e1.6% of respondents.
Missing values at 10-year follow-up in f0.2%, g1.0%, and h0.4% of respondents.
Participants who dropped out at 7- and 10-year follow-up were significantly older (both P <0.001), more often male (P = 0.004 and 0.04), used more drugs at baseline (both P <0.001), and had more major chronic diseases at baseline (both P <0.001).
Seven variables (anxiety, depression, impaired vision, gait speed, chair stands, tandem stand, and fall history) had limited missing values (0.1% to 1.6%). When comparing missing values in dizzy and non-dizzy participants at 7- and 10-year follow-up, the number of missing values did not differ significantly.

Multivariable associations with dizziness

Predictors selected for the model predicting regular dizziness at 7-year follow-up were living alone, history of dizziness, history of osteo/rheumatoid arthritis, history of cancer, use of nitrates, presence of anxiety or depression, impaired vision, and impaired function of lower extremities as measured by chair stands (Table 2). Predictors selected for the model predicting regular dizziness at 10-year follow-up were living alone, history of dizziness, history of cancer, use of anxiolytics, and impaired function of lower extremities.
Table 2
Predictors of regular dizziness in an older community population at 7- and 10-year follow-up*
Characteristic
B
SE
Wald
OR
95% CI
Pvalue
7-year follow-up a
      
Living alone
0.450
0.229
3.8
1.6
1.0-2.5
0.050
History of dizziness
1.324
0.265
25.0
3.8
2.2-6.3
<0.001
History of osteo/rheumatoid arthritis
0.644
0.239
7.3
1.9
1.2-3.0
0.007
History of cancer
0.524
0.307
2.9
1.7
0.9-3.1
0.088
Use of nitrates
0.835
0.351
5.6
2.3
1.2-4.6
0.018
Presence of anxiety or depression
0.541
0.262
4.3
1.7
1.0-2.9
0.039
Impaired vision
0.611
0.254
5.8
1.8
1.1-3.0
0.016
Impaired function of lower extremities (chair stands)
0.670
0.229
8.6
2.0
1.2-3.1
0.003
10-year follow-up b
      
Living alone
0.460
0.278
2.7
1.6
0.9-2.7
0.098
History of dizziness
1.555
0.306
25.9
4.7
2.6-8.6
<0.001
History of cancer
0.552
0.357
2.4
1.7
0.9-3.5
0.122
Use of anxiolytics
0.861
0.475
3.3
2.4
0.9-6.0
0.070
Impaired function of lower extremities (chair stands)
0.744
0.281
7.0
2.1
1.2-3.7
0.008
CI: Confidence Interval; OR: Odds Ratio; SE: Standard Error.
*Multivariable logistic regression analysis, using backward elimination (Wald test) with a P value of 0.157 used for removal.
aAUC 0.78 [0.73-0.82], adjusted AUC 0.77 [0.75-0.78], Hosmer-Lemeshow 0.36.
bAUC 0.72 [0.65-0.78], adjusted AUC 0.71 [0.68-0.72], Hosmer-Lemeshow 0.31.
When excluding history of dizziness as potential predictor, the odds ratios (OR) of all identified predictors slightly increased (see Additional file 1).

Performance of the models

According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, the reliability of the models was adequate (P value of 0.36 for 7-year follow-up and 0.31 for 10-year follow-up). Calibration of the 7-year follow-up model was good, with the slope of the calibration plot approaching the diagonal (see Additional file 2). The slope of the 10-year follow-up calibration plot was below 1, indicating optimism of the model. The discriminative ability of the 7-year and 10-year model was acceptable (AUC 0.78 [0.73-0.82] and 0.72 [0.65-0.78], also after adjustment for over-optimism (adjusted AUC 0.77 [0.75-0.78] and 0.71 [0.68-0.72]).
When excluding history of dizziness as potential predictor, the discriminative ability of the 7-year and 10-year model decreased (from 0.78 to 0.75 and from 0.72 to 0.68, respectively; see Additional file 1).

Discussion

In this study we investigated long-term predictors of dizziness in a prospective cohort study among community-dwelling older persons. We found multiple factors to predict regular dizziness. Living alone, history of dizziness, history of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, use of nitrates, presence of anxiety or depression, impaired vision, and impaired function of lower extremities independently predicted regular dizziness at 7-year follow-up. Furthermore, history of dizziness and impaired function of lower extremities predicted regular dizziness at 10-year follow-up.
Until now, most studies investigating characteristics of dizziness in community-dwelling older adults used a cross-sectional study design [1, 35, 16, 17]. Only two studies performed a prospective cohort study to investigate predictors of dizziness. Gassmann et al. studied a sample of 620 persons aged 65+ years in a 2-year follow-up study [2] and Olsson Möller et al. studied 1,273 persons aged 60+ years during 3- and 6-year follow-up [26]. Although both studies provide essential data on dizziness in older adults, these studies were limited by respectively lack of adjustment for gender and age [2], and high percentages of missing values [26].
With the present study we confirm three previously identified predictors of dizziness, i.e. living alone [2], history of dizziness [26], and depression [2]. We also demonstrate previously described associations (with dizziness) to be long-term predictors of dizziness, namely arthritis [17], anxiety [5], depression [36, 16], and visual impairment [3, 17]. Contrary to Gassmann et al. [2] we did not identify a long-term relationship between cardiovascular disease and dizziness: history of cardiac disease, peripheral arterial disease, or stroke did not predict dizziness at 7- or 10-year follow-up. This may be due to our much longer follow-up (7 and 10 years versus 2 years) in which more persons dropped out because of severe cardiovascular illness or death (survivor effect). Apart from that, the identified relationship between cardiovascular disease and dizziness by Gassmann et al. was only modest (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.98-2.09).
Our study is the first to identify impaired function of the lower extremities as an important predictor of regular dizziness in older adults, at 7- as well as at 10-year follow-up. Until now, only one study included physical functioning tests to predict dizziness in older adults [26]. In that study, Ollson Möller et al. investigated the Romberg test and grip strength and found reduced grip strength to predict dizziness in subjects below 80 years of age.
Strengths of our study are the long-term follow-up period, the large representative sample, and the low percentage of missing values. A limitation of our study may be the choice of one prediction model for all age groups. However, a differentiation of age groups (e.g., 60–70, 70–80, 80+) would reduce the number of cases per group, subsequently decreasing the maximum permitted number of candidate predictors and leaving no space for all relevant predictors [28]. Another limitation may be the use of dizziness as an umbrella term, neglecting the four dizziness subtypes vertigo, presyncope, disequilibrium, and other dizziness. However, we believe that differentiating dizziness subtypes is less important in older people, as the majority of older dizzy persons in the community have more than one dizziness subtype [5].
Although our study was not designed to investigate causality, the identified predictors may provide important leads for the management of dizziness in older persons. Examples are the use of nitrates (medication adjustment), presence of anxiety or depression (psychotherapy), visual impairment (correction of vision), and impaired function of lower extremities (physiotherapy). Treating these characteristics in dizzy older patients may reduce not only symptoms of dizziness but also dizziness-related impairment [29]. To investigate the effectiveness of such a multifactorial targeted intervention, we are performing a randomized controlled clinical trial among older dizzy patients in general practice (trial number NTR4346).
From a wider perspective, we believe our study adds important evidence to the concept of dizziness as a geriatric syndrome. Geriatric syndromes are multifactorial health conditions that occur when the accumulated effect of impairments in multiple systems renders a person vulnerable to situational challenges [5]. Sloane and Dallara already pointed at the limitations of the current diagnosis-oriented approach of dizziness and expressed the need for strategies that more effectively reduce symptoms and dizziness-related disability [30]. Tinetti et al. suggested that considering dizziness a geriatric syndrome might lay the groundwork for such an impairment reduction strategy [5]. Although other research groups support the concept of dizziness as a geriatric syndrome [3, 4, 16, 17], the scientific evidence is limited due to cross-sectional study designs. With the present study we strengthen the case for the concept of dizziness as a geriatric syndrome, by demonstrating the long-term relationship between dizziness and multiple predisposing characteristics. Hopefully, our results contribute to a necessary shift of paradigm: when evaluating dizziness in older patients, clinicians should not just focus on diagnosing underlying diseases but also on identifying contributing factors that are potentially modifiable.

Conclusions

Multiple factors predict regular dizziness in community-dwelling older adults. A multifactorial approach – targeting potentially modifiable predictors – may add to the current diagnosis-oriented approach of dizziness in older patients.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Jan Poppelaars, Ingrid Coolen, and Paulien Maat for their help in collecting and processing the data.
Declaration of sources of funding
The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam is largely funded by grants of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport of The Netherlands. The sponsors did not participate in the study design, data-collection, analysis, interpretation, or the preparation or submission of this report. The first author (OM) was supported by an individual grant of the Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisartsen (SBOH) in The Netherlands.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

OM extracted the data and wrote the first draft. OM, MR, and JW were involved in the design of the study. OM and PV performed the statistical analyses. All authors revised the draft for intellectual content and approved the final version of the paper.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Colledge NR, Wilson JA, Macintyre CC, MacLennan WJ: The prevalence and characteristics of dizziness in an elderly community. Age Ageing. 1994, 23: 117-120. 10.1093/ageing/23.2.117.CrossRefPubMed Colledge NR, Wilson JA, Macintyre CC, MacLennan WJ: The prevalence and characteristics of dizziness in an elderly community. Age Ageing. 1994, 23: 117-120. 10.1093/ageing/23.2.117.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gassmann KG, Rupprecht R: Dizziness in an older community dwelling population: a multifactorial syndrome. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009, 13: 278-282. 10.1007/s12603-009-0073-2.CrossRefPubMed Gassmann KG, Rupprecht R: Dizziness in an older community dwelling population: a multifactorial syndrome. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009, 13: 278-282. 10.1007/s12603-009-0073-2.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez F, Curcio CL, Duque G: Dizziness as a geriatric condition among rural community-dwelling older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011, 15: 490-497. 10.1007/s12603-011-0050-4.CrossRefPubMed Gomez F, Curcio CL, Duque G: Dizziness as a geriatric condition among rural community-dwelling older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011, 15: 490-497. 10.1007/s12603-011-0050-4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kao AC, Nanda A, Williams CS, Tinetti ME: Validation of dizziness as a possible geriatric syndrome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001, 49: 72-75. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49012.x.CrossRefPubMed Kao AC, Nanda A, Williams CS, Tinetti ME: Validation of dizziness as a possible geriatric syndrome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001, 49: 72-75. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49012.x.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinetti ME, Williams CS, Gill TM: Dizziness among older adults: a possible geriatric syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2000, 132: 337-344.CrossRefPubMed Tinetti ME, Williams CS, Gill TM: Dizziness among older adults: a possible geriatric syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2000, 132: 337-344.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinetti ME, Williams CS, Gill TM: Health, functional, and psychological outcomes among older persons with chronic dizziness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000, 48: 417-421.CrossRefPubMed Tinetti ME, Williams CS, Gill TM: Health, functional, and psychological outcomes among older persons with chronic dizziness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000, 48: 417-421.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekwall A, Lindberg A, Magnusson M: Dizzy - why not take a walk? Low level physical activity improves quality of life among elderly with dizziness. Gerontology. 2009, 55: 652-659. 10.1159/000235812.CrossRefPubMed Ekwall A, Lindberg A, Magnusson M: Dizzy - why not take a walk? Low level physical activity improves quality of life among elderly with dizziness. Gerontology. 2009, 55: 652-659. 10.1159/000235812.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal Y, Carey JP, la Santina CC, Schubert MC, Minor LB: Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2001–2004. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169: 938-944. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66.CrossRefPubMed Agrawal Y, Carey JP, la Santina CC, Schubert MC, Minor LB: Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2001–2004. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169: 938-944. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Scuffham P, Chaplin S, Legood R: Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2003, 57: 740-744. 10.1136/jech.57.9.740.CrossRef Scuffham P, Chaplin S, Legood R: Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2003, 57: 740-744. 10.1136/jech.57.9.740.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens JA, Corso PS, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR: The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Inj Prev. 2006, 12: 290-295. 10.1136/ip.2005.011015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stevens JA, Corso PS, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR: The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Inj Prev. 2006, 12: 290-295. 10.1136/ip.2005.011015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Maarsingh OR, Dros J, Schellevis FG, van Weert HC, Bindels PJ, van der Horst HE: Dizziness reported by elderly patients in family practice: prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics. BMC Fam Pract. 2010, 11: 2-10.1186/1471-2296-11-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maarsingh OR, Dros J, Schellevis FG, van Weert HC, Bindels PJ, van der Horst HE: Dizziness reported by elderly patients in family practice: prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics. BMC Fam Pract. 2010, 11: 2-10.1186/1471-2296-11-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maarsingh OR, Dros J, Schellevis FG, van Weert HC, van der Windt DA, ter Riet G, van der Horst HE: Causes of persistent dizziness in elderly patients in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2010, 8: 196-205. 10.1370/afm.1116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maarsingh OR, Dros J, Schellevis FG, van Weert HC, van der Windt DA, ter Riet G, van der Horst HE: Causes of persistent dizziness in elderly patients in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2010, 8: 196-205. 10.1370/afm.1116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeg D, Knipscheer C, van Tilburg W: Autonomy and Well-Being in the Aging Population: Concepts and Design of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. 1993, Bunnik, The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute of Gerontology Deeg D, Knipscheer C, van Tilburg W: Autonomy and Well-Being in the Aging Population: Concepts and Design of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. 1993, Bunnik, The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute of Gerontology
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeg DJ, Van TT, Smit JH, De Leeuw ED: Attrition in the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. The effect of differential inclusion in side studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002, 55: 319-328. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00475-9.CrossRefPubMed Deeg DJ, Van TT, Smit JH, De Leeuw ED: Attrition in the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. The effect of differential inclusion in side studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002, 55: 319-328. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00475-9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Huisman M, Poppelaars J, van der Horst M, Beekman AT, Brug J, van Tilburg TG, Deeg DJ: Cohort profile: the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Int J Epidemiol. 2011, 40: 868-876. 10.1093/ije/dyq219.CrossRefPubMed Huisman M, Poppelaars J, van der Horst M, Beekman AT, Brug J, van Tilburg TG, Deeg DJ: Cohort profile: the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Int J Epidemiol. 2011, 40: 868-876. 10.1093/ije/dyq219.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat de Moraes SA, Soares WJ, Ferriolli E, Perracini MR: Prevalence and correlates of dizziness in community-dwelling older people: a cross sectional population based study. BMC Geriatr. 2013, 13: 4-10.1186/1471-2318-13-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Moraes SA, Soares WJ, Ferriolli E, Perracini MR: Prevalence and correlates of dizziness in community-dwelling older people: a cross sectional population based study. BMC Geriatr. 2013, 13: 4-10.1186/1471-2318-13-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens KN, Lang IA, Guralnik JM, Melzer D: Epidemiology of balance and dizziness in a national population: findings from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Age Ageing. 2008, 37: 300-305. 10.1093/ageing/afn019.CrossRefPubMed Stevens KN, Lang IA, Guralnik JM, Melzer D: Epidemiology of balance and dizziness in a national population: findings from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Age Ageing. 2008, 37: 300-305. 10.1093/ageing/afn019.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriegsman DM, Penninx BW, van Eijk JT, Boeke AJ, Deeg DJ: Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients' self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 1407-1417. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00274-0.CrossRefPubMed Kriegsman DM, Penninx BW, van Eijk JT, Boeke AJ, Deeg DJ: Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients' self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 1407-1417. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00274-0.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefPubMed Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Radloff LS: The CES-D Scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977, 1: 385-401. 10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRef Radloff LS: The CES-D Scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977, 1: 385-401. 10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Berkman LF, Berkman CS, Kasl S, Freeman DH, Leo L, Ostfeld AM, Cornoni-Huntley J, Brody JA: Depressive symptoms in relation to physical health and functioning in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1986, 124: 372-388.PubMed Berkman LF, Berkman CS, Kasl S, Freeman DH, Leo L, Ostfeld AM, Cornoni-Huntley J, Brody JA: Depressive symptoms in relation to physical health and functioning in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1986, 124: 372-388.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McWhinnie JR: Disability indicators for measuring well-being (OECD Social Indicators Development Program, Special Studies No. 5). 1979, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development McWhinnie JR: Disability indicators for measuring well-being (OECD Social Indicators Development Program, Special Studies No. 5). 1979, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994, 49: M85-M94. 10.1093/geronj/49.2.M85.CrossRefPubMed Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994, 49: M85-M94. 10.1093/geronj/49.2.M85.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y: Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model. BMJ. 2009, 338: b604-10.1136/bmj.b604.CrossRefPubMed Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y: Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model. BMJ. 2009, 338: b604-10.1136/bmj.b604.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsson Möller U, Midlov P, Kristensson J, Ekdahl C, Berglund J, Jakobsson U: Prevalence and predictors of falls and dizziness in people younger and older than 80 years of age - a longitudinal cohort study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013, 56: 160-168. 10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.013.CrossRefPubMed Olsson Möller U, Midlov P, Kristensson J, Ekdahl C, Berglund J, Jakobsson U: Prevalence and predictors of falls and dizziness in people younger and older than 80 years of age - a longitudinal cohort study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013, 56: 160-168. 10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.013.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Moons KG, Kengne AP, Woodward M, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Altman DG, Grobbee DE: Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker. Heart. 2012, 98: 683-690. 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301246.CrossRefPubMed Moons KG, Kengne AP, Woodward M, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Altman DG, Grobbee DE: Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker. Heart. 2012, 98: 683-690. 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301246.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR: A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 1373-1379. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3.CrossRefPubMed Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR: A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 1373-1379. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Dros J, Maarsingh OR, Beem L, van der Horst HE, ter Riet G, Schellevis FG, van Weert HC: Functional prognosis of dizziness in older primary care patients: a prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012, 60: 2263-2269. 10.1111/jgs.12031.CrossRefPubMed Dros J, Maarsingh OR, Beem L, van der Horst HE, ter Riet G, Schellevis FG, van Weert HC: Functional prognosis of dizziness in older primary care patients: a prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012, 60: 2263-2269. 10.1111/jgs.12031.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloane PD, Dallara J: Clinical research and geriatric dizziness: the blind men and the elephant. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999, 47: 113-114.CrossRefPubMed Sloane PD, Dallara J: Clinical research and geriatric dizziness: the blind men and the elephant. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999, 47: 113-114.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of dizziness in older persons: a 10-year prospective cohort study in the community
verfasst von
Otto R Maarsingh
Hanneke Stam
Peter M van de Ven
Natasja M van Schoor
Matthew J Ridd
Johannes C van der Wouden
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Geriatrics / Ausgabe 1/2014
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-133

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

BMC Geriatrics 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.