Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 10/2019

16.05.2019 | Original Article

Predictors of favorable survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer

verfasst von: Ayumi Shikama, Takeo Minaguchi, Wataru Takao, Yoshihiko Hosokawa, Keiko Nishida, Nobutaka Tasaka, Azusa Akiyama, Manabu Sakurai, Hiroyuki Ochi, Toyomi Satoh

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) for recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) remain to be defined. The present study aimed to identify predictors for favorable survival after SCS for the disease.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 112 patients who relapsed by 2016 among 1052 who were diagnosed with primary EC between 1985 and 2014. Characteristics associated with overall survival (OS) after SCS were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Twenty-nine of the 112 patients who relapsed underwent SCS. Complete resection was achieved in 18 (62%) patients, whose OS after SCS was significantly better than that of patients receiving incomplete resection (68 vs. 20 months; p = 0.001). Endometrioid histology and performance status (PS) 0 were significant and independent factors for a favorable OS (p = 0.005, and 0.049). The OS of patients with both factors was better than patients with one or no factors (median 75, 19 and 4 months; p = 0.001 and 0.00001). The number of predictors was associated with the rate of complete resection (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with endometrioid histology and PS 0 should be offered SCS for recurrent EC. Prospective trials are warranted to verify this proposal.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386CrossRef Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung-Kee-Fung M, Dodge J, Elit L et al (2006) Follow-up after primary therapy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 101(3):520–529CrossRefPubMed Fung-Kee-Fung M, Dodge J, Elit L et al (2006) Follow-up after primary therapy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 101(3):520–529CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris M, Alvarez RD, Kinney WK et al (1996) Treatment of recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium with pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 60(2):288–291CrossRefPubMed Morris M, Alvarez RD, Kinney WK et al (1996) Treatment of recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium with pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 60(2):288–291CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Barakat RR, Goldman NA, Patel DA et al (1999) Pelvic exenteration for recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 75(1):99–102CrossRefPubMed Barakat RR, Goldman NA, Patel DA et al (1999) Pelvic exenteration for recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 75(1):99–102CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Scarabelli C, Campagnutta E, Giorda G et al (1998) Maximal cytoreductive surgery as a reasonable therapeutic alternative for recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 70(1):90–93CrossRefPubMed Scarabelli C, Campagnutta E, Giorda G et al (1998) Maximal cytoreductive surgery as a reasonable therapeutic alternative for recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 70(1):90–93CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Campagnutta E, Giorda G, Piero GD et al (2004) Surgical treatment of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 100(1):89–96CrossRefPubMed Campagnutta E, Giorda G, Piero GD et al (2004) Surgical treatment of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 100(1):89–96CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bristow RE, Santillan A, Zahurak ML et al (2006) Salvage cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103(1):281–287CrossRefPubMed Bristow RE, Santillan A, Zahurak ML et al (2006) Salvage cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103(1):281–287CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Awtrey CS, Cadungog MG, Leitao MM et al (2006) Surgical resection of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 102(3):480–488CrossRefPubMed Awtrey CS, Cadungog MG, Leitao MM et al (2006) Surgical resection of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 102(3):480–488CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren Y, Shan B, Shi D et al (2014) Salvage cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 14(1):135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ren Y, Shan B, Shi D et al (2014) Salvage cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 14(1):135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadia A, Bellati F, Ditto A et al (2015) Surgical treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer: time for a paradigm shift. Ann Surg Oncol 22(13):4204–4210CrossRefPubMed Papadia A, Bellati F, Ditto A et al (2015) Surgical treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer: time for a paradigm shift. Ann Surg Oncol 22(13):4204–4210CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Turan T, Tasci T, Karalok A et al (2015) Salvage cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(9):1623–1632CrossRefPubMed Turan T, Tasci T, Karalok A et al (2015) Salvage cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(9):1623–1632CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bricou A, Bendifallah S, Daix-Moreux M et al (2018) A proposal for a classification for recurrent endometrial cancer: analysis of a French multicenter database from the FRANCOGYN Study Group. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(7):1278–1284CrossRefPubMed Bricou A, Bendifallah S, Daix-Moreux M et al (2018) A proposal for a classification for recurrent endometrial cancer: analysis of a French multicenter database from the FRANCOGYN Study Group. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(7):1278–1284CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwase H, Furukawa S, Hirasawa T et al (2018) The clinical features of recurrent endometrial cancer in Japan: chemotherapy instead of radiotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(8):1616–1623CrossRefPubMed Iwase H, Furukawa S, Hirasawa T et al (2018) The clinical features of recurrent endometrial cancer in Japan: chemotherapy instead of radiotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(8):1616–1623CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barlin JN, Puri I, Bristow RE (2010) Cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 118(1):14–18CrossRefPubMed Barlin JN, Puri I, Bristow RE (2010) Cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 118(1):14–18CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Odagiri T, Watari H, Hosaka M et al (2011) Multivariate survival analysis of the patients with recurrent endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 22(1):3–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Odagiri T, Watari H, Hosaka M et al (2011) Multivariate survival analysis of the patients with recurrent endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 22(1):3–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zang RY, Li ZT, Tang J et al (2004) Secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: who benefits? Cancer 100(6):1152–1161CrossRefPubMed Zang RY, Li ZT, Tang J et al (2004) Secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: who benefits? Cancer 100(6):1152–1161CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Harter P, Heitz F, du Bois A (2012) Surgery for relapsed ovarian cancer: when should it be offered? Curr Oncol Rep 14(6):539–543CrossRefPubMed Harter P, Heitz F, du Bois A (2012) Surgery for relapsed ovarian cancer: when should it be offered? Curr Oncol Rep 14(6):539–543CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Minaguchi T, Satoh T, Matsumoto K et al (2016) Proposal for selection criteria of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers. Int J Clin Oncol 21(3):573–579CrossRefPubMed Minaguchi T, Satoh T, Matsumoto K et al (2016) Proposal for selection criteria of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers. Int J Clin Oncol 21(3):573–579CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Harter P, Sehouli J, Reuss A et al (2011) Prospective validation study of a predictive score for operability of recurrent ovarian cancer: the Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(2):289–295CrossRefPubMed Harter P, Sehouli J, Reuss A et al (2011) Prospective validation study of a predictive score for operability of recurrent ovarian cancer: the Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(2):289–295CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of favorable survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer
verfasst von
Ayumi Shikama
Takeo Minaguchi
Wataru Takao
Yoshihiko Hosokawa
Keiko Nishida
Nobutaka Tasaka
Azusa Akiyama
Manabu Sakurai
Hiroyuki Ochi
Toyomi Satoh
Publikationsdatum
16.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01469-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.