Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2007

01.11.2007

Predictors of Outcome After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture: Edinburgh Ruptured Aneurysm Score

verfasst von: Andrew Tambyraja, John Murie, Roderick Chalmers

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 11/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Many surgeons adopt a selective policy of intervention for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study aimed to develop an objective method of identifying patients suitable for attempted repair.

Methods

Consecutive patients selected for attempted repair of ruptured AAA over a 31-month period (January 2000 to July 2002) were entered into an observational study. Altogether, 53 preoperative physiological and biochemical variables were recorded and related to operative outcome.

Results

A total of 105 patients underwent attempted repair of a ruptured AAA. There were 39 (37%) deaths in hospital or within 30 days of operation. On univariate analysis, hemoglobin <9 g/dl (p = 0.038), blood pressure <90 mmHg (p = 0.036), and Glasgow Coma Scale <15 (p = 0.016) were found to be risk factors that predicted death. Of 70 patients with no or one risk factor, 20 (29%) died. Of 30 patients with two factors, 15 (50%) died, and of the five patients with all three factors, four (80%) died. There was a significant association between mortality and cumulative risk factors (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

These three risk factors are easily assessed in the emergency setting and might form the basis of a scoring system to inform the outcome of ruptured AAA.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Best VA, Price JF, Fowkes FG (2003) Persistent increase in the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Scotland, 1981–2000. Br J Surg 90:1510–1515PubMedCrossRef Best VA, Price JF, Fowkes FG (2003) Persistent increase in the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Scotland, 1981–2000. Br J Surg 90:1510–1515PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Acosta S, Ogren M, Bengtsson H, et al. (2006) Increasing incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population based study. J Vasc Surg 44:237–143PubMedCrossRef Acosta S, Ogren M, Bengtsson H, et al. (2006) Increasing incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population based study. J Vasc Surg 44:237–143PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bown MJ, Sutton AJ, Bell PR, et al. (2002) A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 89:714–730PubMedCrossRef Bown MJ, Sutton AJ, Bell PR, et al. (2002) A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 89:714–730PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewin DF, Campbell WB (1998) Ruptured aortic aneurysm: the decision not to operate. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:221–225PubMed Hewin DF, Campbell WB (1998) Ruptured aortic aneurysm: the decision not to operate. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:221–225PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyle JR, Gibbs PJ, King D, et al. (2003) Predicting outcome in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26:607–611PubMedCrossRef Boyle JR, Gibbs PJ, King D, et al. (2003) Predicting outcome in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26:607–611PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gloviczki P, Pairolero PC, Mucha P Jr, et al. (1992) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: repair should not be denied. J Vasc Surg 15:851–857PubMedCrossRef Gloviczki P, Pairolero PC, Mucha P Jr, et al. (1992) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: repair should not be denied. J Vasc Surg 15:851–857PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Samy AK, Murray G, MacBain G (1994) Glasgow Aneurysm Score. Cardiovasc Surg 2:41–44PubMed Samy AK, Murray G, MacBain G (1994) Glasgow Aneurysm Score. Cardiovasc Surg 2:41–44PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardman DT, Fisher CM, Patel MI, et al. (1996) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: who should be offered surgery? J Vasc Surg 23:123–129PubMedCrossRef Hardman DT, Fisher CM, Patel MI, et al. (1996) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: who should be offered surgery? J Vasc Surg 23:123–129PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tambyraja AL, Fraser SC, Murie JA, et al. (2005) Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 92:570–573PubMedCrossRef Tambyraja AL, Fraser SC, Murie JA, et al. (2005) Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 92:570–573PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatt M, Martinez M, Perry EP, et al. (2005) Do scoring systems help in predicting survival following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery? Surgeon 3(Suppl):68 Gatt M, Martinez M, Perry EP, et al. (2005) Do scoring systems help in predicting survival following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery? Surgeon 3(Suppl):68
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leo E, Biancari F, Nesi F, et al. (2006) Risk scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after emergency open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg 192:19–23PubMedCrossRef Leo E, Biancari F, Nesi F, et al. (2006) Risk scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after emergency open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg 192:19–23PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradbury AW, Makhdoomi KR, Adam DJ, et al. (1997) Twelve-year experience of the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 84:1705–1707PubMedCrossRef Bradbury AW, Makhdoomi KR, Adam DJ, et al. (1997) Twelve-year experience of the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 84:1705–1707PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. (1997) Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischaemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 26:517–538PubMedCrossRef Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. (1997) Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischaemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 26:517–538PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatt M, Perry EP, El-Barghouti N (2005) Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and the Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 92:1178–1179PubMedCrossRef Gatt M, Perry EP, El-Barghouti N (2005) Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and the Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 92:1178–1179PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dehne MG, Junger A, Hartman B, et al. (2005) Serum creatinine and perioperative outcome: a matched-pairs approach using computerised anaesthesia records. Eur J Anaesthesiol 22:89–95PubMedCrossRef Dehne MG, Junger A, Hartman B, et al. (2005) Serum creatinine and perioperative outcome: a matched-pairs approach using computerised anaesthesia records. Eur J Anaesthesiol 22:89–95PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Halpern VJ, Kline RG, D’Angelo AJ, et al. (1997) Factors that affect the survival rate of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 26:939–945PubMedCrossRef Halpern VJ, Kline RG, D’Angelo AJ, et al. (1997) Factors that affect the survival rate of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 26:939–945PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Noel AA, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr, et al. (2001) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the excessive mortality rate of conventional repair. J Vasc Surg 34:41–46PubMedCrossRef Noel AA, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr, et al. (2001) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the excessive mortality rate of conventional repair. J Vasc Surg 34:41–46PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of Outcome After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture: Edinburgh Ruptured Aneurysm Score
verfasst von
Andrew Tambyraja
John Murie
Roderick Chalmers
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9181-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2007

World Journal of Surgery 11/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.