Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020

11.09.2019

Predictors of rectal adenoma recurrence following transanal endoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

verfasst von: Tiffany Chan, Ahmer A. Karimuddin, Manoj J. Raval, P. Terry Phang, Vincent Tang, Carl J. Brown

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Transanal endoscopic surgery is the treatment of choice in patients with rectal adenomas that cannot be removed by endoscopy. However, the risk of adenoma recurrence and optimal surveillance is not well defined. The objective of this study was to characterize the timing and frequency of rectal adenoma recurrence after removal by transanal endoscopic surgery and identify recurrence risk factors.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of a large, single-center academic institution in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Consecutive patients between May 1, 2007 and September 30, 2016 with pathology-confirmed rectal adenoma treated by primary excision with transanal endoscopic surgery and at least 1 year of confirmed endoscopic follow-up were included. Main outcome measures were recurrence rates following TEM as well as risk factors for recurrence.

Results

297 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 66.5 ± 11.5 years and 57.9% were male. Median follow-up was 623 (range 56–3841) days. A total of 62 recurrences occurred in 41 patients (13.8% of study population). Recurrences were managed with repeat transanal endoscopic surgery or endoscopic resection 67.7% and 25.8% of the time, respectively. Radical resection was required for adenocarcinoma in 4 patients. Recurrence-free survival rates were 93.4% at 1 year, 86.2% at 2 years, and 73.1% at 5 years. After adjusting for individual surgeons, adenoma height, size > 3 cm, high-grade dysplasia, positive margins, and management of the rectal defect, patients who underwent surgery in the latter 5 years of the study had lower odds of recurrence (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19, 0.93, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Rectal adenomas managed by transanal endoscopic surgery are lesions at high risk for recurrence; surveillance should be performed within the first 2 years and continued for a total of at least 5 years. Most recurrences can be successfully treated with repeat TEM or endoscopic resection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ (1999) Natural history of colorectal cancer. Am J Med 106:3S–6SCrossRef Winawer SJ (1999) Natural history of colorectal cancer. Am J Med 106:3S–6SCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG et al (1990) Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98:371–379CrossRef O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG et al (1990) Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98:371–379CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC (1975) The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36(6):2251–2270CrossRef Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC (1975) The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36(6):2251–2270CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shinya H, Wolff WI (1979) Morphology, anatomic distribution, and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 190(6):679–683CrossRef Shinya H, Wolff WI (1979) Morphology, anatomic distribution, and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 190(6):679–683CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Burghardt J, Buess G (2005) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): a new technique and development during a time period of 20 years. Surg Technol Int 14:131–137PubMed Burghardt J, Buess G (2005) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): a new technique and development during a time period of 20 years. Surg Technol Int 14:131–137PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat De Graaf EJ, Burger JW, van Ijsseldijk AL et al (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 13:762–767CrossRef De Graaf EJ, Burger JW, van Ijsseldijk AL et al (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 13:762–767CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T et al (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional Transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1030CrossRef Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T et al (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional Transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1030CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR et al (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58(2):254–261CrossRef Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR et al (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58(2):254–261CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chernyshov SV, Shelygin YA, Mainovskaya OA et al (2015) Possibilities of transanal endoscopic microsurgery: the experience of 202 operations. Vopr Onkol 61(6):998–1005PubMed Chernyshov SV, Shelygin YA, Mainovskaya OA et al (2015) Possibilities of transanal endoscopic microsurgery: the experience of 202 operations. Vopr Onkol 61(6):998–1005PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C et al (2004) Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 47:323CrossRef Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C et al (2004) Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 47:323CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Serviddio G et al (2016) Factors associated with recurrence of advanced colorectal adenoma after endoscopic resection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(8):1148–1154CrossRef Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Serviddio G et al (2016) Factors associated with recurrence of advanced colorectal adenoma after endoscopic resection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(8):1148–1154CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barendse RM, Musters GD, de Graaf EJR et al (2018) TREND Study group. Randomised controlled trial of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND Study). Gut 67:837–846CrossRef Barendse RM, Musters GD, de Graaf EJR et al (2018) TREND Study group. Randomised controlled trial of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND Study). Gut 67:837–846CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmanuel A, Gulati S, Burt M et al (2018) Safe and effective endoscopic resection of massive colorectal adenomas ≥ 8 cm in a Tertiary Referral Center. Dis Colon Rectum 61(8):955–963PubMed Emmanuel A, Gulati S, Burt M et al (2018) Safe and effective endoscopic resection of massive colorectal adenomas ≥ 8 cm in a Tertiary Referral Center. Dis Colon Rectum 61(8):955–963PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF et al (2015) Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 64:57–65CrossRef Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF et al (2015) Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 64:57–65CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G et al (2015) Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Colorectal Dis 17(5):397–402CrossRef Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G et al (2015) Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Colorectal Dis 17(5):397–402CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown C, Raval MJ, Phang PT et al (2017) The surgical defect after Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: open versus closed management. Surg Endosc 31(3):1078–1082CrossRef Brown C, Raval MJ, Phang PT et al (2017) The surgical defect after Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: open versus closed management. Surg Endosc 31(3):1078–1082CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulskas A, Kilius A, Petrulis K et al (2017) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant benign rectal tumours: is large size a contraindication? Int J Colorectal Dis 32(12):1759–1761CrossRef Dulskas A, Kilius A, Petrulis K et al (2017) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant benign rectal tumours: is large size a contraindication? Int J Colorectal Dis 32(12):1759–1761CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Cassoni P et al (2012) Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc 26(9):2594–2600CrossRef Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Cassoni P et al (2012) Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc 26(9):2594–2600CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitehouse PA, Tilney HS, Armitage JN et al (2006) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: risk factors for local recurrence of benign rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 8:795–799CrossRef Whitehouse PA, Tilney HS, Armitage JN et al (2006) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: risk factors for local recurrence of benign rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 8:795–799CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McCloud JM, Waymont N, Pahwa N et al (2006) Factors predicting early recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision for rectal adenoma. Colorectal Dis 8(7):581–585CrossRef McCloud JM, Waymont N, Pahwa N et al (2006) Factors predicting early recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision for rectal adenoma. Colorectal Dis 8(7):581–585CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganai S, Kanumuri P, Rao RS et al (2006) Local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal polyps and early cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 13:547–556CrossRef Ganai S, Kanumuri P, Rao RS et al (2006) Local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal polyps and early cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 13:547–556CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant polyps of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 18:521–527CrossRef Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant polyps of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 18:521–527CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Piccoli M, Agresta F, Trapani V et al (2014) Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(7):863–875CrossRef Piccoli M, Agresta F, Trapani V et al (2014) Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(7):863–875CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Helewa RM, Rajaee AN, Raiche I et al (2016) The implementation of a transanal endoscopic microsurgery programme: initial experience with surgical performance. Colorectal Dis 18(11):1057–1062CrossRef Helewa RM, Rajaee AN, Raiche I et al (2016) The implementation of a transanal endoscopic microsurgery programme: initial experience with surgical performance. Colorectal Dis 18(11):1057–1062CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Koebrugge B, Bosscha K, Ernst MF (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of rectal lesions: is there a learning curve? Dig Surg 26:372–377CrossRef Koebrugge B, Bosscha K, Ernst MF (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of rectal lesions: is there a learning curve? Dig Surg 26:372–377CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Letarte F, Raval M, Karimuddin A et al (2018) Salvage TME following TEM: a possible indication for TaTME. Tech Coloproctol 96(5):280–287 Letarte F, Raval M, Karimuddin A et al (2018) Salvage TME following TEM: a possible indication for TaTME. Tech Coloproctol 96(5):280–287
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of rectal adenoma recurrence following transanal endoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study
verfasst von
Tiffany Chan
Ahmer A. Karimuddin
Manoj J. Raval
P. Terry Phang
Vincent Tang
Carl J. Brown
Publikationsdatum
11.09.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07114-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.