Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018

10.05.2018 | Epidemiology

Predictors of surveillance mammography outcomes in women with a personal history of breast cancer

verfasst von: Kathryn P. Lowry, Lior Z. Braunstein, Konstantinos P. Economopoulos, Laura Salama, Constance D. Lehman, G. Scott Gazelle, Elkan F. Halpern, Catherine S. Giess, Alphonse G. Taghian, Janie M. Lee

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To identify predictors of poor mammography surveillance outcomes based on clinico-pathologic features.

Methods

This study was HIPAA compliant and IRB approved. We performed an electronic medical record review for a cohort of women with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I or II invasive breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy who developed subsequent in-breast treatment recurrence (IBTR) or contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Poor surveillance outcome was defined as second breast cancer not detected by surveillance mammography, including interval cancers (diagnosed within 365 days of surveillance mammogram with negative results) and clinically detected cancers (diagnosed without a surveillance mammogram in the preceding 365 days). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of poor mammography surveillance outcome, including patient and primary tumor characteristics, breast density, mode of primary tumor detection, and time to second cancer diagnosis.

Results

164 women met inclusion criteria (65 with IBTR, 99 with CBC); 124 had screen-detected second cancers. On univariate analysis, poor surveillance outcome (n = 40) was associated with age at primary cancer diagnosis < 50 years (p < 0.0001), AJCC stage II primary cancers (p = 0.007), and heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts (p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, age < 50 years at primary breast cancer diagnosis remained a significant predictor of poor surveillance outcome (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Women younger than age 50 at primary breast cancer diagnosis are at risk of poor surveillance mammography outcomes, and may be appropriate candidates for more intensive clinical and imaging surveillance.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2014, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/, based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2017 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2014, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. https://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​csr/​1975_​2014/​, based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2017
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatcheressian JL et al (2013) Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(7):961–965CrossRefPubMed Khatcheressian JL et al (2013) Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(7):961–965CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnipper LE et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol 30(14):1715–1724CrossRefPubMed Schnipper LE et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol 30(14):1715–1724CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Runowicz CD et al (2016) American Cancer Society/American Society of clinical oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. J Clin Oncol 34(6):611–635CrossRefPubMed Runowicz CD et al (2016) American Cancer Society/American Society of clinical oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. J Clin Oncol 34(6):611–635CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moy L et al (2016) ACR appropriateness criteria stage I breast cancer: initial workup and surveillance for local recurrence and distant metastases in asymptomatic women. J Am Coll Radiol 13(11S):e43–e52 Moy L et al (2016) ACR appropriateness criteria stage I breast cancer: initial workup and surveillance for local recurrence and distant metastases in asymptomatic women. J Am Coll Radiol 13(11S):e43–e52
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu WL et al (2009) Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114(3):403–412CrossRefPubMed Lu WL et al (2009) Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114(3):403–412CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N et al (2009) Early detection of second breast cancers improves prognosis in breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol 20(9):1505–1510CrossRefPubMed Houssami N et al (2009) Early detection of second breast cancers improves prognosis in breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol 20(9):1505–1510CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N et al (2011) Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 305(8):790–799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Houssami N et al (2011) Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 305(8):790–799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N et al (2013) Risk factors for second screen-detected or interval breast cancers in women with a personal history of breast cancer participating in mammography screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 22(5):946–961CrossRef Houssami N et al (2013) Risk factors for second screen-detected or interval breast cancers in women with a personal history of breast cancer participating in mammography screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 22(5):946–961CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD et al (2017) National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the breast cancer surveillance consortium. Radiology 283(1):49–58CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD et al (2017) National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the breast cancer surveillance consortium. Radiology 283(1):49–58CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorlie T et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874CrossRefPubMed Sorlie T et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldhirsch A et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Coates AS et al (2015) Tailoring therapies–improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 26(8):1533–1546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coates AS et al (2015) Tailoring therapies–improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 26(8):1533–1546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L (2011) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet 378(9805):1812–1823CrossRefPubMed Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L (2011) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet 378(9805):1812–1823CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360(8):790–800CrossRefPubMed Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 360(8):790–800CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, France Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, France
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvold ND et al (2011) Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 29(29):3885–3891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arvold ND et al (2011) Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 29(29):3885–3891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Braunstein LZ et al (2015) Outcome following local-regional recurrence in women with early-stage breast cancer: impact of biologic subtype. Breast J 21(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed Braunstein LZ et al (2015) Outcome following local-regional recurrence in women with early-stage breast cancer: impact of biologic subtype. Breast J 21(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
21.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM et al (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS—breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM et al (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS—breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho N, Han W, Han B, Bae MS, Ko ES, Nam SJ, Chae EY, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Song BJ, Kim E, Moon HJ, Kim SI, Kim SM, Kang E, Choi Y, Kim HH, Moon WK (2017) Breast cancer screening with mammography plus ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in women 50 years or younger at diagnosis and treated with breast conservation therapy. JAMA Oncol 3(11), 1495–1502CrossRef Cho N, Han W, Han B, Bae MS, Ko ES, Nam SJ, Chae EY, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Song BJ, Kim E, Moon HJ, Kim SI, Kim SM, Kang E, Choi Y, Kim HH, Moon WK (2017) Breast cancer screening with mammography plus ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in women 50 years or younger at diagnosis and treated with breast conservation therapy. JAMA Oncol 3(11), 1495–1502CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirtz HS et al (2014) Factors associated with long-term adherence to annual surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(3):541–550CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wirtz HS et al (2014) Factors associated with long-term adherence to annual surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(3):541–550CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Domingo L et al (2014) Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain. Breast Cancer Res 16(1):R3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Domingo L et al (2014) Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain. Breast Cancer Res 16(1):R3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Caldarella A et al (2013) Biological characteristics of interval cancers: a role for biomarkers in the breast cancer screening. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139(2):181–185CrossRefPubMed Caldarella A et al (2013) Biological characteristics of interval cancers: a role for biomarkers in the breast cancer screening. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139(2):181–185CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wedam SB, Swain SM (2005) Contralateral breast cancer: where does it all begin? J Clin Oncol 23(21):4585–4587CrossRefPubMed Wedam SB, Swain SM (2005) Contralateral breast cancer: where does it all begin? J Clin Oncol 23(21):4585–4587CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Swain SM et al (2004) Estrogen receptor status of primary breast cancer is predictive of estrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(7):516–523CrossRefPubMed Swain SM et al (2004) Estrogen receptor status of primary breast cancer is predictive of estrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(7):516–523CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Huo D et al (2011) Concordance in histological and biological parameters between first and second primary breast cancers. Cancer 117(5):907–915CrossRefPubMed Huo D et al (2011) Concordance in histological and biological parameters between first and second primary breast cancers. Cancer 117(5):907–915CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown M, Bauer K, Pare M (2010) Tumor marker phenotype concordance in second primary breast cancer, California, 1999–2004. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(1):217–227CrossRefPubMed Brown M, Bauer K, Pare M (2010) Tumor marker phenotype concordance in second primary breast cancer, California, 1999–2004. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(1):217–227CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Arpino G et al (2005) Hormone receptor status of a contralateral breast cancer is independent of the receptor status of the first primary in patients not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 23(21):4687–4694CrossRefPubMed Arpino G et al (2005) Hormone receptor status of a contralateral breast cancer is independent of the receptor status of the first primary in patients not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 23(21):4687–4694CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JM et al (2015) Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(7) Lee JM et al (2015) Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(7)
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of surveillance mammography outcomes in women with a personal history of breast cancer
verfasst von
Kathryn P. Lowry
Lior Z. Braunstein
Konstantinos P. Economopoulos
Laura Salama
Constance D. Lehman
G. Scott Gazelle
Elkan F. Halpern
Catherine S. Giess
Alphonse G. Taghian
Janie M. Lee
Publikationsdatum
10.05.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4808-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.