Skip to main content
main-content

31.01.2019 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2019 Open Access

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019

Prenatal detection of right aortic arch

Zeitschrift:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics > Ausgabe 4/2019
Autoren:
Gülen Yerlikaya, Tünay Efetürk, Stephanie Springer, Theresa Reischer
Wichtige Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

In right aortic arch the transverse arch is to the right of the trachea, in contrast to the normal left aortic arch. The incidence of right aortic arch (RAA) has been reported as 1 in 1000 in low risk-population, although the exact incidence is unknown [1, 2]. There can be various forms of aortic arch abnormalities, such as right-sided aortic arch with right ductus arteriosus and with mirror image branching, RAA with aberrant left subclavian or innominate artery; right aortic arch with left ductus arteriosus (DA) and double aortic arch (DAA).
The diagnosis of right-sided aortic arch is important due to possible associated cardiac and non-cardiac defects and chromosomal abnormalities, especially 22q11 microdeletion and trisomy 21 [3]. RAA is best detected in the three-vessel-trachea view.
The aim of this study was to review fetuses with the diagnosis of RAA in our center to evaluate associated conditions and outcome and, therefore, to suggest perinatal and postnatal management. Second, evaluate the importance and possible implication of fetal MRI in those cases.

Methods

In this retrospective study, all cases between 2006 and 2017 were enrolled (Table 1). We searched our database for all cases of a RAA. Ultrasound examinations were performed on a Voluson E6 and E10 (GE Medical Systems, Zipf, Austria). A right-sided aortic arch was diagnosed when the transverse arch was to the right of the trachea in the three-vessel-trachea view. Subsequently, the aortic arch and DA form a U-shaped configuration with the trachea between the two vessels (so-called U-sign) (Fig. 1a, b). In almost all the cases, the DA is left sided. In cases of a right-sided DA, the aortic arch and the duct are placed to the right of the trachea and form a V-shaped configuration. All the cases of RAA were examined by a subspecialist in fetal or fetal–maternal medicine to confirm the diagnosis and whether there were any other malformations present. The fetal thymus was not examined in cross-sectional planes. Fetal MRI was performed for additional information concerning possible intra- and extracardiac abnormalities. Perinatal and postnatal echocardiographic examination was performed through a specialist in fetal echocardiography. Karyotyping for diagnosis of 22q11 deletion was offered to each patient. The outcomes observed were associated intracardiac and/or extracardiac malformations and neonatal outcome related to associated malformations, chromosomal abnormalities, such as 22q11 microdeletion and trisomy 21. Postnatal symptoms related to compression of trachea/esophagus and surgery due to vascular ring symptoms. Additional data, such as gestational age at diagnosis and fetal and neonatal outcome were also collected.
Table 1
Summary of 36 cases with right aortic arch
Case
GA at diagnosis (week)
Aortic arch
DA
Intracardiac anomalies
Extracardiac anomalies
Karyotype
Outcome
Surgery
Postnatal findings
1
20
RAA
L
TOF
No
46, XY
Livebirth
For TOF
No
2
28
RAA
L
No
Mild ventriculomegaly, shortening of the long bones
n.k
Livebirth
No
Epilepsy, Lennox–Gastaud syndrome, Pallister–Kilian syndrome
3
23
RAA
L
No
SUA
n.k
Livebirth
No
No
4
18
RAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
No
No
5
23
RAA
L
No
No
n.k
Livebirth
No
Hyperreflexia, premature closer of the fontanelle, neurological development normal until now
6
24
RAA
L
No
Hypoplastic NB
Trisomy 21
TOP
  
7
24
RAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
Yes for VSD
Perimembraneous VSD with mitral regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension due to right–left shunt
8
21
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
No
Trisomy 21
9
20
DAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
No
VSD
10
23
DAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
No
No
11
22
RAA
L
No
Talipes bilateral
22q11.2
TOP
  
12
22
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
No
22q11.2
13
22
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
No
No
14
20
RAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
No
No
15
22
RAA
L
Persistent left superior vena cava
SUA, caudal regression syndrome with tethered cord, hydronephrosis
n.k
Livebirth
Yes due to multiple malformtaion
VACTERL association
16
21
DAA
L
TGA
No
n.k
Livebirth
Yes
RAA, ASD II, anomalous pulmonary connection, aplasia of the thumb, ear and clavicula, chylothorax, karyotyping normal
17
25
RAA
L
No
No
n.k
Livebirth
No
No
18
24
RAA
L
No
No
n.k
Livebirth
No
No
19
24
RAA
L
VSD
Partial agenesis of corpus callosum
Diffus cortical development disorder of the brain
n.k
TOP
  
20
22
RAA
L
No
No
Tr21
  
Still pregnant
21
21
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
No
No
22
23
RAA
L
No
No
Mosaic 21
Livebirth
No
46, XX
23
21
RAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
No
No
24
15
RAA
L
No
SUA
20p12.2 duplication
Livebirth
No
No
25
21
RAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
No
No
26
26
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
Yes
No
27
21
RAA
L
No
No
46, XY
Livebirth
No
No
28
23
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
No
No
29
21
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
No
No
30
29
DAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
?
No
31
21
RAA
L
No
No
n.k.
Livebirth
No
No
32
20
DAA
L
No
No
46, XY
Livebirth
No
No
33
20
RAA
L
No
No
n.k
Livebirth
Yes
DAA
34
23
RAA
L
TOF
SUA, mild retrognathia
n.k
Livebirth
Yes for TOF
No
35
23
RAA
L
No
Hypoplasia of pontocerebellum
n.k
Livebirth
No
No
36
27
RAA
L
No
No
46, XX
Livebirth
No
No
GA gestational age, DA ductus arteriosus, RRA right aortic arch, DAA double aortic arch, L left, TOF tetralogy of fallot, SUA single umbilical artery, n.k. not known, VSD ventricular septal defect, TGA transposition of great arteries, TOP termination of pregnancy
The study obtained ethics approval from the Medical University’s Ethics Committee of Vienna (EK Nr: 2062/2017). Due to the observational and retrospective nature of the study consent for participation by parents was not required.

Results

During this period, in total 36 fetuses had aortic arch abnormalities. 32 fetuses were diagnosed with RAA and 4 with DAA. The mean gestational age was 22 (range 15–29). The mean maternal age at the time point of diagnosis was 27 (range 20–38; for detailed characteristic description of the study cohort see Table 2). 33 cases were in singleton pregnancies and 3 in dichorionic–diamniotic twin pregnancies. All fetuses had a left-sided duct. No right-sided duct was described in our study population. Three out of four DAA were confirmed postnatally. In one of the 32 suspected right-sided aortic arch, the diagnosis turned out to be a DAA. Seven (19. 5%) cases had intracardiac abnormalities. Five were detected prenatally (two tetralogy of fallot one with pulmonary atresia, TGA, persisted left superior vena cava and one VSD) and two after birth (Table 1). Prenatally one DAA presented transposition of the great arteries, which could not be confirmed after birth. Instead it was described as a RAA with atrioventricular septal defect and total anomalous pulmonary connection and in one case a perimembraneous VSD with mitral regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension due to right–left shunt was diagnosed, which needed operation. Another simple VSD was seen postnatally but no intervention was necessary yet. Fetal MRI gave additional information about extracardiac malformation, such as hypoplasia of the cerebellum in one fetus and caudal regression syndrome with tethered cord and VACTERL association in another fetus. Both were confirmed after birth. Other extracardiac malformations were observed in 11/36(30. 6%) of patients. Nine prenatally, whereas two were diagnosed postnatally. The most common abnormality prenatally was single umbilical artery (SUA) in four fetuses. Ventriculomegaly and shortening of the long bones in one, severe hydronephrosis, retrognathia in one fetus, partial agenesis of corpus callosum and cortical development disorder in one, talipes in one fetus and one absent nasal bone (Table 1).
Table 2
General characteristics of the study cohort
Characteristics
Value
Maternal age, years
27 (range 20–38)
Gestational age at diagnosis, weeks
22 (range 15–29)
Extracardiac anomalies
11/36 (30.6%)
Intracardiac anomalies
7/36 (22.2%)
Chromosomal anomalies
5/36 (13.9%)
 22q11.2deletion
2/36 (5.6%)
 Trisomy 21
3/36 (8.3%)
 Other (+Syndromes)
2/36 (5.6%)
Termination of pregnancy
3/36 (8.3%)
Surgery due to vascular ring symptoms
2/36 (5.6%)
Karyotype was available in 16(44.4%) out of 36 cases. Karyotyping was declined in the other cases. In the group where an invasive procedure was performed 22.q11 deletion was present in 1 case. Furthermore, trisomy 21, 20p12.2 duplication and one mosaic for trisomy 20. Postnatally the genetic testing for one fetus with mosaic for trisomy 20 showed normal karyotype. In the other group, without karyotyping, one case was diagnosed with 22q11 deletion and one with trisomy 21 in neonatal period due to phenotypic appearance. A third case was identified with epilepsy, Lennox–Gastaud syndrome and Pallister–Killian syndrome postnatally. And another case with isolated RAA showed hyperreflexia and premature closer of the fontanelle. The reason is unknown till yet but neurological development is normal so far. Postnatal examination of all other newborns did not show any phenotypic abnormalities and, therefore, they were considered to be normal, without any chromosomal abnormalities or genetic syndromes. One woman is still pregnant, therefore, the final outcome is not known at this time point.
Two needed surgery after they were borne due to airway obstruction. In both cases it was described as RAA with left-sided DA and an aberrant left subclavian artery, arising from a remnant of the primordial aortic arch, also known as Kommerell‘s diverticulum. Three feticides were performed for pregnancy termination in one case with 22q11 deletion, trisomy 21, and partial agenesis of corpus callosum.

Discussion

RAA can be detected prenatally in the three-vessel-trachea view, but the exact incidence of this condition still remains unknown. We did not have any cases of a right-sided aortic arch with a right-sided duct. It is assumed that some cases of RAA with right-sided DA may have been missed and as a consequence the incidence of complete right-sided variants and RAA in general may be underreported in our population. However, we still could show clearly that RAA is associated with additional intra and extracardiac abnormalities. In comparison to other reports we performed fetal MRI in each case for additional information. To the best of our knowledge there are almost no report about RAA and fetal MRI in the literature. Fetal MRI did not just confirm the diagnosis which has been made by ultrasound it detected also malformations which were missed beforehand such as pontocerebellar hypoplasia in one fetus and multiple abnormalities in another case with caudal regression syndrome, severe hydronephrosis, micropenis, SUA, and persistent superior left vena cava, hypotelorismus, and suspicion of VACTERL syndrome. We believe that fetal MRI is a useful adjunct for assessing the fetal anatomy, especially in cases of isolated aortic arch abnormalities. Li et al. could show that fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, particularly with transverse views at the level of the aortic arch, in the diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies had an accuracy of 95.6% [4]. Fetal CMR is a promising diagnostic tool for assessment of congenital cardiovascular abnormalities, especially in situations that limit echocardiography [5]. On the contrary, it is believed that the suspicion of a right aortic arch in an asymptomatic baby does not justify magnetic resonance imaging, although it is the best modality for demonstrating the arch vessels [6].
Right aortic arch is associated significantly often with 22q11.2 deletion and trisomy 21 as reported previously [3, 7]. We had two cases with 22.q11.2 deletion, and two with trisomy 21, whereas two of these conditions were diagnosed after birth. Furthermore, we had one newborn diagnosed with epilepsy, Lennox–Gastaud syndrome and Pallister–Killian syndrome and another case with hyperreflexia and premature closer of the fontanelle. All this cases happened in the group of women who declined invasive procedure. It is unclear in professional circles whether karyotyping should be performed with array or FISH or not for isolated findings of RAA. It has been reported that in cases with isolated RAA or DAA up to 24% have 22q11.2 microdeletion postnatally [8]. The overall percentage of chromosomal abnormalities in our study was 13.9% with 22q11 microdeletion being responsible for roughly half the cases (5.6%). However, the severity of trisomy 21 and especially 22q11.2 deletion is unpredictable and, therefore, even in the absence of other malformation the prognosis is uncertain. Especially the severity of immunodeficiency, development impairment, and mental and psychiatric illness are unpredictable. As a consequence many parents will probably request further testing. These facts have to be made clear for the couple and second, according to our findings, we could show that isolated RAA can be associated with other chromosomal abnormalities. It seems reasonable to mention the importance of further interventions in isolated right-sided aortic arch. However, some authors have suggested that RAA as an isolated finding in a fetus may not justify karyotyping [9] and other authors believe that the identification of the thymus hypoplasia or aplasia may help to identify the fetuses at higher risk for 22q11.2 microdeletion [10]. We did not evaluate the thymus in our retrospective study. This and that karyotyping was not performed for each case may be one limitation in our study which may have underestimated the incidence of 22q11.2 microdeletion cases. However, it is worth mentioning that 22q11.2 was not the only chromosomal anomaly we found in our population, as it was the case in other studies [11]. It was associated with trisomy 21 as well and 20p12.2 duplication. Examination after birth by a skilled neonatologist was uneventful and, therefore, we concluded that 20p12.2 duplication in this case has unknown clinical significance.
Another limitation of our study was the fact that it was retrospective, although postnatal confirmation and follow-up and fetal MRI for each case were available. However, we still could show that aortic arch abnormalities such as RAA can be associated with different chromosomal and non-chromosomal abnormalities and syndromes apart from 22q11.2 deletion and trisomy 21, which are well known. Nevertheless, a larger number of cases is necessary to provide more accurate information on the incidence of RAA and associated malformations.

Conclusion

RAA is associated with other cardiac and non-cardiac malformation, microdeletion 22q11, and trisomy 21. Fetal MRI is a good tool for diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies and intra and extracardiac malformations. Furthermore, detailed fetal cardiac and extracardiac examination and fetal echocardiography prenatally and postnatally should be undertaken in all cases of RAA. Based on our results we would recommend that karyotyping should be offered in any case of RAA, irrespective of co-existing malformations. This information we received through the retrospective study may be considered to prepare a possibly standardized approach to RAA. However, a much larger numbers of cases are needed to do so.

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article exists.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

e.Med Gynäkologie & Urologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Gynäkologie & Urologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der beiden Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten gynäkologischen oder urologischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet

2014 | Buch

Perikonzeptionelle Frauenheilkunde

Fertilitätserhalt, Prävention und Management von Schwangerschaftsrisiken

Ein Praxisbuch für alle, die in der Beratung und Betreuung von Schwangeren und Paaren mit Kinderwunsch tätig sind. Die Herausgeber und Autoren haben alle wichtigen Informationen zusammengetragen, um Frauen sicher zu beraten, zu betreuen und kompetent Verantwortung zu übernehmen.

Herausgeber:
Christian Gnoth, Peter Mallmann

2019 | Buch

Praxisbuch Gynäkologische Onkologie

Dieses kompakte und praxisrelevante Standardwerk richtet sich alle Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis, die Patientinnen mit bösartigen Tumoren des Genitales und der Mamma behandeln. Die 5. Auflage wurde komplett aktualisiert und auf der Basis …

Herausgeber:
Prof. Dr. Edgar Petru, Dr. Daniel Fink, Prof. Dr. Ossi R. Köchli, Prof. Dr. Sibylle Loibl

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Gynäkologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise