Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports 1/2020

17.01.2020 | Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Preoperative Assessment for Inpatients

verfasst von: Joseph McComb, Chad Talarek, Ksenia Guvakova, Gordon Morewood

Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

This chapter will highlight several important concepts that are relevant to the assessment and optimization of hospitalized patients prior to the administration of an anesthetic.

Recent Findings

Patients admitted to hospital comprise a unique population. The risk-benefit ratio of pre-procedural investigations and the economic implications of specific management strategies may be significantly different than for patients managed on an ambulatory basis. The anesthesiologist must have a thorough understanding of these factors. Preoperative workflows provide effective coordination of the necessary resources and ensure that each patient’s procedure is completed as safely and efficiently as possible.

Summary

A working knowledge of reimbursement principles, expertise in local procedural workflows, and the ability to quickly and effectively screen patients for high-risk conditions place anesthesiologists at the center of the perioperative process and the financial viability of their inpatient facility.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein DN, Liu TC, Winegar AL, Jackson LW, Darnutzer JL, Wulf KM, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative optimization protocol for primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast. 2018;33:3642–8.CrossRef Bernstein DN, Liu TC, Winegar AL, Jackson LW, Darnutzer JL, Wulf KM, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative optimization protocol for primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast. 2018;33:3642–8.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Duceppe E, Parlow J, MacDonald P, Lyons K, McMullen M, Srinathan S, et al. Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and Management for Patients who Undergo Noncardiac Sur- gery. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:17–32.CrossRef Duceppe E, Parlow J, MacDonald P, Lyons K, McMullen M, Srinathan S, et al. Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and Management for Patients who Undergo Noncardiac Sur- gery. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:17–32.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Fleisher LA. The value of preoperative assessment before noncardiac surgery in the era of value-based care. Circ. 2017;136:1769–71 This paper discusses the shifting focus of pre-operative assessment away from comprehensive testing in all patients and towards the focused assignment of resources and support of patient-centered decision making.CrossRef •• Fleisher LA. The value of preoperative assessment before noncardiac surgery in the era of value-based care. Circ. 2017;136:1769–71 This paper discusses the shifting focus of pre-operative assessment away from comprehensive testing in all patients and towards the focused assignment of resources and support of patient-centered decision making.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat • Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, Carlson MA, Lavedan P, Bailey TL, et al. Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):233–40 This paper discusses the increasing importance of non-cardiopulmonary risk factors in identifying appropriate candidates for surgery and reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality. CrossRef • Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, Carlson MA, Lavedan P, Bailey TL, et al. Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):233–40 This paper discusses the increasing importance of non-cardiopulmonary risk factors in identifying appropriate candidates for surgery and reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality. CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Murthy S, Hepner DL, Cooper Z, Bader AM, Neuman MD. Controversies in anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery in older adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:ii15–25.CrossRef Murthy S, Hepner DL, Cooper Z, Bader AM, Neuman MD. Controversies in anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery in older adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:ii15–25.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:e278–333.PubMed Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:e278–333.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Elnahal SM, Clancy CC, Shulkin DJ. A framework for disseminating clinical best practices in the VA health system. JAMA. 2017;317(3):255–6.CrossRef Elnahal SM, Clancy CC, Shulkin DJ. A framework for disseminating clinical best practices in the VA health system. JAMA. 2017;317(3):255–6.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–7.CrossRef Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Abbott TE, et al. Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:2631–40.CrossRef Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Abbott TE, et al. Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:2631–40.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:517–73.CrossRef The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:517–73.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1082–115.CrossRef Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1082–115.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–51.CrossRef January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–51.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–95.CrossRef Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–95.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke activity status index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651–4.CrossRef Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke activity status index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651–4.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee T, Marcantonio E, Mangione C, Thomas E, Polanczyk C, Cook E, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–9.CrossRef Lee T, Marcantonio E, Mangione C, Thomas E, Polanczyk C, Cook E, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest. 2011;140:1207–15.CrossRef Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest. 2011;140:1207–15.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.CrossRef Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholls J, Gaskin PS, Ward J, Areti YK. Guidelines for preoperative investigations for elective surgery at Queen Elizabeth Hospital: effects on practices, outcomes, and costs. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:176–89.CrossRef Nicholls J, Gaskin PS, Ward J, Areti YK. Guidelines for preoperative investigations for elective surgery at Queen Elizabeth Hospital: effects on practices, outcomes, and costs. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:176–89.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477e81.CrossRef Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477e81.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen-Van-Tam SE, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Myint S, et al. Risk factors for hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in a large English teaching hospital: a case-control study. Infection. 1999;27:12–7.CrossRef Nguyen-Van-Tam SE, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Myint S, et al. Risk factors for hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in a large English teaching hospital: a case-control study. Infection. 1999;27:12–7.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McConnell K. John et al. ambulance diversion and lost hospital revenues. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:702–10.CrossRef McConnell K. John et al. ambulance diversion and lost hospital revenues. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:702–10.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat • Artenstein AW, Rathlev NK, Neal D, et al. Decreasing Emergency Department Walkout Rate and Boarding Hours by Improving Inpatient Length of Stay. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(6):982–92 This paper highlights the financial implications which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef • Artenstein AW, Rathlev NK, Neal D, et al. Decreasing Emergency Department Walkout Rate and Boarding Hours by Improving Inpatient Length of Stay. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(6):982–92 This paper highlights the financial implications which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat • Gaieski DF, Agarwal AK, Mikkelsen ME, et al. The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(7):953–60 This paper highlights the implications for medical care which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef • Gaieski DF, Agarwal AK, Mikkelsen ME, et al. The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(7):953–60 This paper highlights the implications for medical care which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Phruetthiphat OA, Gao Y, Anthony CA, Pugely AJ, Warth LC, Callaghan JJ. Incidence of and preoperative risk factors for surgical delay in primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(11):2432–6.CrossRef Phruetthiphat OA, Gao Y, Anthony CA, Pugely AJ, Warth LC, Callaghan JJ. Incidence of and preoperative risk factors for surgical delay in primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(11):2432–6.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett SR. Preoperative assessment of older adults. Anesthesiol Clin. 2019;37:423–36.CrossRef Barnett SR. Preoperative assessment of older adults. Anesthesiol Clin. 2019;37:423–36.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Coffman J, Tran T, Quast T, Berlowitz MS, Chae SH. Cost conscious care: preoperative evaluation by a cardiologist prior to low-risk procedures. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(2):e000481.CrossRef Coffman J, Tran T, Quast T, Berlowitz MS, Chae SH. Cost conscious care: preoperative evaluation by a cardiologist prior to low-risk procedures. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(2):e000481.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock M, Fritsch G, Hepner DL. Preoperative laboratory testing. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016;34:43–58.CrossRef Bock M, Fritsch G, Hepner DL. Preoperative laboratory testing. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016;34:43–58.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Manji F, McCarty K, Kurzweil V, Mark E, Rathmell JP, Agarwala AV. Measuring and improving the quality of preprocedural assessments. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(6):1846–54.CrossRef Manji F, McCarty K, Kurzweil V, Mark E, Rathmell JP, Agarwala AV. Measuring and improving the quality of preprocedural assessments. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(6):1846–54.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Weile J, Brix J, Moellekaer AB. Is point-of-care ultrasound disruptive innovation? Formulating why POCUS is different from conventional comprehensive ultrasound. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018;10:25.CrossRef Weile J, Brix J, Moellekaer AB. Is point-of-care ultrasound disruptive innovation? Formulating why POCUS is different from conventional comprehensive ultrasound. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018;10:25.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein AA, Snell A, Nashef SA, Hall RM, Kneeshaw JD, Arrowsmith JE. The impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography on cardiac surgical practice. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:947–52.CrossRef Klein AA, Snell A, Nashef SA, Hall RM, Kneeshaw JD, Arrowsmith JE. The impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography on cardiac surgical practice. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:947–52.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Canty DJ, Royse CF, Kilpatrick D, Bowman L, Royse AG. The impact of focused transthoracic echocardiography in the pre-operative clinic. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:618–25.CrossRef Canty DJ, Royse CF, Kilpatrick D, Bowman L, Royse AG. The impact of focused transthoracic echocardiography in the pre-operative clinic. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:618–25.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Haji DL, Royse A, Royse CF. Non-cardiologist-performed transthoracic echocardiography. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25:4–12.CrossRef Haji DL, Royse A, Royse CF. Non-cardiologist-performed transthoracic echocardiography. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25:4–12.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowie B, Kluger R. Evaluation of systolic murmurs using transthoracic echocardiography by anaesthetic trainees. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:785–90.CrossRef Cowie B, Kluger R. Evaluation of systolic murmurs using transthoracic echocardiography by anaesthetic trainees. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:785–90.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanzola RC, Walsh S, Hopman WM, Sydor D, Arellano R, Allard RV. Brief report: focused transthoracic echocardiography training in a cohort of Canadian anesthesiology residents: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:32–7.CrossRef Tanzola RC, Walsh S, Hopman WM, Sydor D, Arellano R, Allard RV. Brief report: focused transthoracic echocardiography training in a cohort of Canadian anesthesiology residents: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:32–7.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Royse CF, Haji DL, Faris JG, et al. Evaluation of the interpretative skills of participants of a limited transthoracic echocardiography training course (H.a.R.T. scan course). Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:498–504.CrossRef Royse CF, Haji DL, Faris JG, et al. Evaluation of the interpretative skills of participants of a limited transthoracic echocardiography training course (H.a.R.T. scan course). Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:498–504.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler AC, Greeley WJ, Conlin F, Feldman JM. Perioperative anesthesiology UltraSonographic evaluation (PAUSE): a guided approach to perioperative bedside ultrasound. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(2):521–9.CrossRef Adler AC, Greeley WJ, Conlin F, Feldman JM. Perioperative anesthesiology UltraSonographic evaluation (PAUSE): a guided approach to perioperative bedside ultrasound. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(2):521–9.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Pronovost PJ, Marsteller JA. A physician management infrastructure. J Am Med Assoc. 2011;305(5):500–1.CrossRef Pronovost PJ, Marsteller JA. A physician management infrastructure. J Am Med Assoc. 2011;305(5):500–1.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Preoperative Assessment for Inpatients
verfasst von
Joseph McComb
Chad Talarek
Ksenia Guvakova
Gordon Morewood
Publikationsdatum
17.01.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Anesthesiology Reports / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 2167-6275
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-020-00371-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Current Anesthesiology Reports 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Preprocedural Assessment for Patients Anticipating Sedation

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.