Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis 5/2018

01.11.2017 | Review

Preoperative double-J stent placement can improve the stone-free rate for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Yubo Yang, Yin Tang, Yunjin Bai, Xiaoming Wang, Dechao Feng, Ping Han

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To evaluate the efficiency and safety of preoperative double-J stent placement for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). All analyses were performed by the Review Manager 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Stone-free rate (SFR) was regarded as primary outcome. Second outcomes, including operation time, complication rates as well as major complication rates were also assessed. A total of 11,239 patients (2605 with and 8634 without preoperative stent) from nine retrospective studies were included. Our pooled analysis showed that SFR was significantly higher in patients with a preoperative stent than those without a stent (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.19–2.15, p = 0.002). Operation time was not significantly different between stented and non-stented groups (OR − 0.89, 95% CI − 5.79–4.01, p = 0.72). No significant differences of complication rates were observed between stented and non-stented groups (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.67–1.33, p = 0.73). Furthermore, major complication rates were not significantly different between two groups, either (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.43–2.70, p = 0.88). Generally, preoperative double-J stent placement significantly improved SFR of patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Operation time, complication rates, as well as major complication rates, were similar between stented and non-stented groups. However, the effect of preoperative double-J stent placement for different locations and burden of stones is unclear, more high-quality studies should be anticipated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vashishtha S, Sureka SK, Agarwal S et al (2014) Urethral stricture and stone: their coexistence and management. Urol J 11:1204–1210PubMed Vashishtha S, Sureka SK, Agarwal S et al (2014) Urethral stricture and stone: their coexistence and management. Urol J 11:1204–1210PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones BJ, Ryan PC, Lyons O et al (1990) Use of the double pigtail stent in stone retrieval following unsuccessful ureteroscopy. Br J Urol 66:254–256CrossRefPubMed Jones BJ, Ryan PC, Lyons O et al (1990) Use of the double pigtail stent in stone retrieval following unsuccessful ureteroscopy. Br J Urol 66:254–256CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S et al (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21:1277–1280CrossRefPubMed Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S et al (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21:1277–1280CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A et al (2013) Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol 31:855–859CrossRefPubMed Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A et al (2013) Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol 31:855–859CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T et al (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1219CrossRefPubMed Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T et al (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1219CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D et al (2016) Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteral and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int 117:648–654CrossRefPubMed Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D et al (2016) Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteral and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int 117:648–654CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung MC, Yip SK, Lee FC et al (2000) Outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy: selective internal stenting and factors enhancing success. J Endourol 14:559–564CrossRefPubMed Cheung MC, Yip SK, Lee FC et al (2000) Outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy: selective internal stenting and factors enhancing success. J Endourol 14:559–564CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD (2011) Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol 25:751–754CrossRefPubMed Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD (2011) Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol 25:751–754CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRefPubMed Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768–2774CrossRefPubMed Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768–2774CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Xu C, He D et al (2016) Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis. Peer J 4:e2728 (eCollection 2016) CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Xu C, He D et al (2016) Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis. Peer J 4:e2728 (eCollection 2016) CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartling L, Milne A, Hamm MP et al (2013) Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol 66:982–993CrossRefPubMed Hartling L, Milne A, Hamm MP et al (2013) Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol 66:982–993CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX et al (2012) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteral calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD006029 Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX et al (2012) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteral calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD006029
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F et al (2012) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 109:1384–1389CrossRefPubMed Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F et al (2012) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 109:1384–1389CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu L, Farris CA, Corcoran AT et al (2011) Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy. Urology 78:309–313CrossRefPubMed Chu L, Farris CA, Corcoran AT et al (2011) Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy. Urology 78:309–313CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Preoperative double-J stent placement can improve the stone-free rate for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Yubo Yang
Yin Tang
Yunjin Bai
Xiaoming Wang
Dechao Feng
Ping Han
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1012-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Urolithiasis 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.