nach oben

Die Orthopädie

Erschienen in:

17.09.2020 | Leitthema

Preoperative imaging of spinopelvic pathologies

State of the art

verfasst von: Dr. H. Almansour, M.Eng, M. Innmann, M. Akbar, F. Springer, C. Rehnitz

Erschienen in: Die Orthopädie | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The field of musculoskeletal diagnostics and personalized medicine has undergone a revolutionary transformation due to a deeper understanding of skeletal biomechanics and due to technological advancements. Analogous to this transformation, our understanding of spinopelvic conditions has experienced a paradigm shift in terms of both static and dynamic changes in spinopelvic pathologies and enabled a more accurate delineation of the drivers of disability. The purpose of this review is to describe the standard and state of the art of preoperative diagnostic and planning methods for common spinopelvic pathologies and to discuss both the added clinical value and limitations. The rationale is to accelerate the accurate and timely diagnosis and as well as the efficient and safe preoperative workflow.

Briggs AM et al (2018) Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 96(5):366PubMedPubMedCentral

Briggs AM et al (2016) Musculoskeletal health conditions represent a global threat to healthy aging: a report for the 2015 World Health Organization world report on ageing and health. Gerontologist 56(suppl_2):S243–S255PubMed

Tsang A et al (2008) Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain 9(10):883–891PubMed

Vos T et al (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390(10100):1211–1259

Murray CJ et al (2012) Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. lancet 380(9859):2197–2223PubMed

Redmond JM et al (2015) The hip-spine connection: understanding its importance in the treatment of hip pathology. Orthopedics 38(1):49–55PubMed

Nouh MR (2019) Imaging of the spine: where do we stand? WJR 11(4):55PubMedPubMedCentral

Diebo BG et al (2019) Radiographic categorization of the hip-spine syndrome in the setting of hip osteoarthritis and sagittal spinal malalignment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(17):659–666PubMed

Buckland AJ et al (2015) Acetabular anteversion changes due to spinal deformity correction: bridging the gap between hip and spine surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(23):1913–1920PubMed

10.

Petchprapa CN et al (2013) Demystifying radial imaging of the hip. Radiographics 33(3):E97–E112PubMed

11.

Chiamil SM, Abarca CA (2016) Imaging of the hip: a systematic approach to the young adult hip. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 6(3):265PubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Petersilge CA (2000) Chronic adult hip pain: MR arthrography of the hip. Radiographics 20(suppl_1):S43–S52PubMed

13.

Diebo BG et al (2015) Sagittal alignment of the spine: what do you need to know? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 139:295–301PubMed

14.

Clohisy JC et al (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):47PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Nötzli H et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(4):556–560PubMed

16.

Eijer H et al (2001) Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int 11(1):37–41

17.

Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K (1999) Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(2):281–288PubMed

18.

Wiberg G (1939) Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenial subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 83:1–130

19.

Leone A et al (2007) Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology 245(1):62–77PubMed

20.

Hoeffner E et al (2012) Neuroradiology back to the future: spine imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(6):999–1006PubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Dewtng SB (1963) Modern radiology in historical perspective. Acad Med 38(9):779

22.

Cleveland Clinic (2020) Spine X‑ray. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/10229-spine-x-ray. Accessed 25 May 2020

23.

Matz PG et al (2016) Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J 16(3):439–448PubMed

24.

Mainard D et al (2017) Accuracy and reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional planning for total hip arthroplasty using biplanar low-dose radiographs: a pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(4):531–536PubMed

25.

Knafo Y et al (2019) Value of 3D preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on biplanar weightbearing radiographs. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1932191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Huppertz A et al (2014) Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: what radiologists need to know. Skelet Radiol 43(8):1041–1051

27.

Innmann MM et al (2019) Are there clinically relevant anatomical differences of the proximal femur in patients with mild dysplastic and primary hip osteoarthritis? A CT-based matched-pairs cohort study. Clin Radiol 74(11):896.e17–896.e22

28.

Innmann MM et al (2018) Additive influence of hip offset and leg length reconstruction on postoperative improvement in clinical outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(1):156–161PubMed

29.

Merle C et al (2013) Prediction of three-dimensional femoral offset from AP pelvis radiographs in primary hip osteoarthritis. Eur J Radiol 82(8):1278–1285PubMed

30.

White S, Bainbridge J, Smith E (2008) Assessment of magnification of digital pelvic radiographs in total hip arthroplasty using templating software. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(7):592–596PubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Brainlab (2020) King Mark calibration device. https://www.brainlab.com/surgery-products/orthopedic-surgery-products/kingmark/. Accessed 7 Aug 2020

32.

Arnaout F, Dewan V, Paliobeis C (2018) The 3‑dot circle: a reliable method for safe and efficient digital templating of the acetabular component. J Orthop 15(3):787–791PubMedPubMedCentral

33.

King R et al (2009) A novel method of accurately calculating the radiological magnification of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(9):1217–1222PubMed

34.

Floyd E, Cohn P, Ferguson J, Kalantar SB (2020) A review of preoperative planning technologies for spinal deformity correction. In Seminars in Spine Surgery 2020 Mar 5 (p. 100787). WB Saunders

35.

Kyrölä KK et al (2018) Intra-and interrater reliability of sagittal spinopelvic parameters on full-spine radiographs in adults with symptomatic spinal disorders. Neurospine 15(2):175PubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Lafage R et al (2015) Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters. Spine J 15(12):2493–2502PubMed

37.

Pellisé F et al (2015) Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J 24(1):3–11PubMed

38.

Riley MS et al (2018) Health-related quality of life outcomes in complex adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 28(2):194–200PubMed

39.

Akbar M et al (2013) Use of Surgimap Spine in sagittal plane analysis, osteotomy planning, and correction calculation. Neurosurg Clin 24(2):163–172

40.

Feng Z‑H et al (2018) Design of a 3D navigation template to guide the screw trajectory in spine: a step-by-step approach using Mimics and 3‑Matic software. J Spine Surg 4(3):645PubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Escott BG et al (2013) EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(23):e183

42.

Ofori K et al (2014) Estimation of adult patient doses for selected X‑ray diagnostic examinations. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7(4):459–462

43.

Huppertz A et al (2011) Computed tomography for preoperative planning in minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasty: radiation exposure and cost analysis. Eur J Radiol 78(3):406–413PubMed

44.

Merle C et al (2019) High variability of acetabular offset in primary hip osteoarthritis influences acetabular reaming—a computed tomography–based anatomic study. J Arthroplasty 34(8):1808–1814PubMed

45.

Merle C et al (2012) Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip. J Bone Joint Surgery Br 94(4):477–482

46.

Merle C et al (2013) Proximal femoral canal shape is more accurately assessed on AP hip radiographs than AP pelvis radiographs in primary hip osteoarthritis. Hip Int 23(5):484–491PubMed

47.

Khanduja V, Villar R (2006) Arthroscopic surgery of the hip: current concepts and recent advances. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(12):1557–1566PubMed

48.

Klein GR, Purtill JJ (2005) Hip arthroscopy: Indications and technique. Seminars in arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2004.12.007CrossRef

49.

Edwards D, Lomas D, Villar R (1995) Diagnosis of the painful hip by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surgery Br 77(3):374–376

50.

Kassarjian A (2006by) Hip MR arthrography and femoroacetabular impingement. In: Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology. Thieme, Stuttgart

51.

Dimmick S et al (2013) Femoroacetabular impingement. Radiol Clin 51(3):337–352

52.

Lotz JC et al (2012) New treatments and imaging strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral disks. Radiology 264(1):6–19PubMed

53.

Berbari EF et al (2015) 2015 infectious diseases society of america (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of native vertebral osteomyelitis in adultsa. Clin Infect Dis 61(6):e26–e46PubMed

54.

Taylor DG et al (2018) Presentation and outcomes after medical and surgical treatment versus medical treatment alone of spontaneous infectious spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J 8(4_suppl):49S–58SPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Charpak G (1981) La détection des particules. Recherche 12:1384–1396

56.

Deschênes S et al (2010) Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X‑ray imager. Spine 35(9):989–994PubMed

57.

Melhem E et al (2016) EOS® biplanar X‑ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop 10(1):1–14PubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Innmann MM et al (2020) How can patients with mobile hips and stiff lumbar spines be identified prior to total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, diagnostic cohort study. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.029CrossRefPubMed

59.

Heckmann N et al (2018) Late dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: spinopelvic imbalance as a causative factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(21):1845–1853PubMed

60.

Esposito CI et al (2018) Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1449–1454PubMed

61.

Illés T, Somoskeöy S (2012) The EOS™ imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36(7):1325–1331

62.

Courvoisier A, Vialle R, Skalli W (2014) EOS 3D Imaging: assessing the impact of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2014.848166CrossRef

63.

Almansour H et al (2019) Three-dimensional analysis of initial brace correction in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. JCM 8(11):1804PubMedCentral

64.

Ilharreborde B et al (2011) Angle measurement reproducibility using EOSthree-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation. Spine 36(20):E1306–E1313PubMed

65.

Hui SC et al (2016) Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x‑ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT-IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” Winner in Imaging Research. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11(1):46PubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Ferrero E et al (2018) Preliminary experience with SpineEOS, a new software for 3D planning in AIS surgery. Eur Spine J 27(9):2165–2174PubMed

67.

Faria R et al (2013) The EOS 2D/3D X‑ray imaging system: a cost-effectiveness analysis quantifying the health benefits from reduced radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol 82(8):e342–e349PubMed

Titel: Preoperative imaging of spinopelvic pathologies
State of the art
verfasst von: Dr. H. Almansour, M.Eng
M. Innmann
M. Akbar
F. Springer
C. Rehnitz
Publikationsdatum: 17.09.2020
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Die Orthopädie / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 2731-7145
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7153
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-020-03982-w

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Preoperative imaging of spinopelvic pathologies

State of the art

Abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

Fibröse Dysplasie

Kritischer Kommentar zur Definition des Krankheitsbildes im Sinne der Berufskrankheit Nummer 2102 Meniskopathie

Biomechanische Kompensationsmechanismen der Hüftgelenke und der Wirbelsäule

Intraoperative Bestimmung der Beckenkippung und Pfannenposition in der Hüftendoprothetik – Relevanz der Navigation und Robotik

Herausforderungen in der Balancierung adulter Wirbelsäulendeformitäten – die vergessene koronare Ebene

Zur Diskussion über das Krankheitsbild im Sinne der Berufskrankheit 2102 Meniskopathie

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie