Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017

22.06.2017 | Urologic Oncology

Preoperative Measurement of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Patient Survival in Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to Nephrectomy

verfasst von: Takuya Tsujino, MD, Kazumasa Komura, MD, Tomohisa Matsunaga, MD, Yuki Yoshikawa, MD, Tomoaki Takai, MD, Taizo Uchimoto, MD, Kenkichi Saito, MD, Naoki Tanda, MD, Rintaro Oide, BS, Koichiro Minami, MD, Hirofumi Uehara, MD, Seong Ho Jeong, BS, Kohei Taniguchi, MD, PhD, Hajime Hirano, MD, PhD, Hayahito Nomi, MD, PhD, Naokazu Ibuki, MD, PhD, Kiyoshi Takahara, MD, PhD, Teruo Inamoto, MD, PhD, Haruhito Azuma, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) by measurement of serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels has been shown to provide prognostic value in various cancer types. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative assessment of the mGPS predicts patient survival outcome in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Materials and Methods

Clinicopathological and follow-up data in 219 RCC patients, all of whom underwent curative or non-curative nephrectomy, were collected. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after nephrectomy were evaluated, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the predictive value of the variables, including the mGPS.

Results

During the median follow-up of 57 months, 53 patients (24.2%) were deceased within 22 months of the median OS. The 5-year OS rate from nephrectomy was 85.9 and 18.8% in non-metastatic (n = 195) and metastatic (n = 24) patients, respectively. Increasing mGPS was associated with shorter OS in non-metastatic patients (2-year OS rate of 98.2% in mGPS0, 73.3% in mGPS1, and 44.4% in mGPS2; hazard ratio [HR] 9.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.88–20.13, p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference in OS according to the mGPS was seen in metastatic patients (HR 2.01, 95% CI 0.79–5.16, p = 0.137). On multivariate analysis, the mGPS remained as an independent predictor for OS (HR 5.24, 95% CI 1.39–19.77, p = 0.015) and CSS (HR 4.69, 95% CI 1.13–20.96, p = 0.034) in non-metastatic RCC patients.

Conclusions

The mGPS appeared to be a reliable, preoperatively defined predictive marker with widely standardized protocol in non-metastatic RCC, and should therefore be considered in treatment decision making for RCC patients.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Komura K, Inamoto T, Black PC, et al. Prognostic significance of body mass index in Asian patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Nutr Cancer. 2011;63:908–15.CrossRefPubMed Komura K, Inamoto T, Black PC, et al. Prognostic significance of body mass index in Asian patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Nutr Cancer. 2011;63:908–15.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearon KC. Cancer cachexia: developing multimodal therapy for a multidimensional problem. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1124–32.CrossRefPubMed Fearon KC. Cancer cachexia: developing multimodal therapy for a multidimensional problem. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1124–32.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS. Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:215–9.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS. Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:215–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1028–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1028–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:881–6.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:881–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat McMillan DC. An inflammation-based prognostic score and its role in the nutrition-based management of patients with cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:257–62.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC. An inflammation-based prognostic score and its role in the nutrition-based management of patients with cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:257–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McMillan DC. The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:534–40.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC. The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:534–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:205–12.CrossRefPubMed Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:205–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Karam JA, Devine CE, Urbauer DL, et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant axitinib in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014;66:874–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karam JA, Devine CE, Urbauer DL, et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant axitinib in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014;66:874–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Powles T, Sarwar N, Stockdale A, et al. Safety and efficacy of pazopanib therapy prior to planned nephrectomy in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1303–9.CrossRefPubMed Powles T, Sarwar N, Stockdale A, et al. Safety and efficacy of pazopanib therapy prior to planned nephrectomy in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1303–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rini BI, Plimack ER, Takagi T, et al. A phase ii study of pazopanib in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma to optimize preservation of renal parenchyma. J Urol. 2015;194:297–303.CrossRefPubMed Rini BI, Plimack ER, Takagi T, et al. A phase ii study of pazopanib in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma to optimize preservation of renal parenchyma. J Urol. 2015;194:297–303.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane BR, Derweesh IH, Kim HL, et al. Presurgical sunitinib reduces tumor size and may facilitate partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:112.e15–21.e15.CrossRefPubMed Lane BR, Derweesh IH, Kim HL, et al. Presurgical sunitinib reduces tumor size and may facilitate partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:112.e15–21.e15.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655–63.CrossRefPubMed Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655–63.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F, et al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1649–57.CrossRefPubMed Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F, et al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1649–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol. 2002;168:2395–400.CrossRefPubMed Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol. 2002;168:2395–400.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stafford HS, Saltzstein SL, Shimasaki S, et al. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival. J Urol. 2008;179:1704–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stafford HS, Saltzstein SL, Shimasaki S, et al. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival. J Urol. 2008;179:1704–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Naito S, Yamamoto N, Takayama T, et al. Prognosis of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the cytokine era: a cooperative group report of 1463 patients. Eur Urol. 2010;57:317–25.CrossRefPubMed Naito S, Yamamoto N, Takayama T, et al. Prognosis of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the cytokine era: a cooperative group report of 1463 patients. Eur Urol. 2010;57:317–25.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamb GW, Aitchison M, Ramsey S, et al. Clinical utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients undergoing curative nephrectomy for renal clear cell cancer: basis of new prognostic scoring systems. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:279–83.CrossRefPubMed Lamb GW, Aitchison M, Ramsey S, et al. Clinical utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients undergoing curative nephrectomy for renal clear cell cancer: basis of new prognostic scoring systems. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:279–83.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Preoperative Measurement of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Patient Survival in Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to Nephrectomy
verfasst von
Takuya Tsujino, MD
Kazumasa Komura, MD
Tomohisa Matsunaga, MD
Yuki Yoshikawa, MD
Tomoaki Takai, MD
Taizo Uchimoto, MD
Kenkichi Saito, MD
Naoki Tanda, MD
Rintaro Oide, BS
Koichiro Minami, MD
Hirofumi Uehara, MD
Seong Ho Jeong, BS
Kohei Taniguchi, MD, PhD
Hajime Hirano, MD, PhD
Hayahito Nomi, MD, PhD
Naokazu Ibuki, MD, PhD
Kiyoshi Takahara, MD, PhD
Teruo Inamoto, MD, PhD
Haruhito Azuma, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
22.06.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5948-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.