Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2013

01.02.2013 | Original Article

Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients

verfasst von: S. Blank, A. Stange, L. Sisic, W. Roth, L. Grenacher, F. Sterzing, M. Burian, D. Jäger, M. Büchler, K. Ott

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Preoperative treatment is nowadays standard for locally advanced esophagogastric cancer in Europe. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to nonresponders so far. The aim of our retrospective exploratory study was the comparison of responder, nonresponder, and primary resected patients in respect of outcome considering the tumor entity.

Patients and methods

From 2001–2011, 607 patients with locally advanced esophagogastric carcinoma (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), n = 293; squamous cell cancer (SCC), n = 111; gastric cancer, n = 203) after preoperative treatment (n = 281) or primary resection (n = 326) were included. Histopathological response evaluation (Becker criteria) was available for 263.

Results

A total of 76/263 (28.9 %) were responders (<10 % residual tumor). There was an association of response with increased R0 resections (p < 0.001) but also with a higher complication rate (p = 0.008) compared to nonresponse and primary surgery. Mortality was not influenced. Increased R0 resections after response were confirmed in every tumor entity (AEG, p = 0.010; SCC, p = 0.023; gastric cancer, p = 0.006). Median survival was best for responders with 43.5 months [95 % confidence interval (CI), 27.9–59.1], followed by nonresponders with 24.3 months (95 % CI, 21.6–27.0) and primary resected patients with 20.8 months (95 % CI, 17.7–23.9; p = 0.002). AEG (p = 0.012) and gastric cancer (p = 0.017) revealed identical results, but in the subgroup of SCC, the survival of nonresponders (median, 11.6 months; 95 % CI, 6.9–16.3) was even worse than for primary resected patients (median, 23.8 months; 95 % CI, 1.7–46.0; p = 0.012).

Conclusion

The histopathological response rate was low. Generally, nonresponding patients with AEG or gastric cancer seem not to have a disadvantage compared to primary resected patients, but nonresponders with SCC have a worse prognosis, which strengthens the demand for a critical patient selection in surgery for this tumor entity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouche O, Lebreton G, Ducourtieux M, Bedenne L, Fabre JM, Saint-Aubert B, Geneve J, Lasser P, Rougier P (2011) Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29(13):1715–1721. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0597 PubMedCrossRef Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouche O, Lebreton G, Ducourtieux M, Bedenne L, Fabre JM, Saint-Aubert B, Geneve J, Lasser P, Rougier P (2011) Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29(13):1715–1721. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2010.​33.​0597 PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, Participants MT (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355(1):11–20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055531 PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, Participants MT (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355(1):11–20. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa055531 PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Zalcberg JR, Simes RJ, Barbour A, Gebski V (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12 (7):681–692. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5 Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Zalcberg JR, Simes RJ, Barbour A, Gebski V (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12 (7):681–692. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(11)70142-5
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F, Reichardt P, Hohenberger W, Eisenberger CF, Haag C, Mauer ME, Hasan B, Welch J, Ott K, Hoelscher A, Schneider PM, Bechstein W, Wilke H, Lutz MP, Nordlinger B, Van Cutsem E, Siewert JR, Schlag PM (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Trial 40954. J Clin Oncol 28(35):5210–5218 doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.6114 Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F, Reichardt P, Hohenberger W, Eisenberger CF, Haag C, Mauer ME, Hasan B, Welch J, Ott K, Hoelscher A, Schneider PM, Bechstein W, Wilke H, Lutz MP, Nordlinger B, Van Cutsem E, Siewert JR, Schlag PM (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Trial 40954. J Clin Oncol 28(35):5210–5218 doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​26.​6114
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowy AM, Mansfield PF, Leach SD, Pazdur R, Dumas P, Ajani JA (1999) Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer. Ann Surg 229(3):303–308PubMedCrossRef Lowy AM, Mansfield PF, Leach SD, Pazdur R, Dumas P, Ajani JA (1999) Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer. Ann Surg 229(3):303–308PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ott K, Sendler A, Becker K, Dittler HJ, Helmberger H, Busch R, Kollmannsberger C, Siewert JR, Fink U (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-FU, and leucovorin (PLF) in locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective phase II study. Gastric Cancer 6(3):159–167. doi:10.1007/s10120-003-0245-4 PubMedCrossRef Ott K, Sendler A, Becker K, Dittler HJ, Helmberger H, Busch R, Kollmannsberger C, Siewert JR, Fink U (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-FU, and leucovorin (PLF) in locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective phase II study. Gastric Cancer 6(3):159–167. doi:10.​1007/​s10120-003-0245-4 PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bader FG, Lordick F, Fink U, Becker K, Hofler H, Busch R, Siewert JR, Ott K (2008) Paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant treatment for adeno carcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG I). A comparison of two phase II trials with long-term follow-up. Onkologie 31(7):366–372. doi:10.1159/000135515 PubMedCrossRef Bader FG, Lordick F, Fink U, Becker K, Hofler H, Busch R, Siewert JR, Ott K (2008) Paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant treatment for adeno carcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG I). A comparison of two phase II trials with long-term follow-up. Onkologie 31(7):366–372. doi:10.​1159/​000135515 PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorenzen S, Brucher B, Zimmermann F, Geinitz H, Riera J, Schuster T, Roethling N, Hofler H, Ott K, Peschel C, Siewert JR, Molls M, Lordick F (2008) Neoadjuvant continuous infusion of weekly 5-fluorouracil and escalating doses of oxaliplatin plus concurrent radiation in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results of a phase I/II trial. Br J Cancer 99(7):1020–1026. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604659 PubMedCrossRef Lorenzen S, Brucher B, Zimmermann F, Geinitz H, Riera J, Schuster T, Roethling N, Hofler H, Ott K, Peschel C, Siewert JR, Molls M, Lordick F (2008) Neoadjuvant continuous infusion of weekly 5-fluorouracil and escalating doses of oxaliplatin plus concurrent radiation in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results of a phase I/II trial. Br J Cancer 99(7):1020–1026. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​bjc.​6604659 PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollschweiler E, Metzger R, Drebber U, Baldus S, Vallbohmer D, Kocher M, Holscher AH (2009) Histological type of esophageal cancer might affect response to neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy and subsequent prognosis. Ann Oncol 20(2):231–238. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn622 PubMedCrossRef Bollschweiler E, Metzger R, Drebber U, Baldus S, Vallbohmer D, Kocher M, Holscher AH (2009) Histological type of esophageal cancer might affect response to neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy and subsequent prognosis. Ann Oncol 20(2):231–238. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdn622 PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, Mortimer J, Estes NC, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA, Willett CG (2007) Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(24):3719–3725. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4760 PubMedCrossRef Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, Mortimer J, Estes NC, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA, Willett CG (2007) Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(24):3719–3725. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​10.​4760 PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Brucher BL, Becker K, Lordick F, Fink U, Sarbia M, Stein H, Busch R, Zimmermann F, Molls M, Hofler H, Siewert JR (2006) The clinical impact of histopathologic response assessment by residual tumor cell quantification in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 106(10):2119–2127. doi:10.1002/cncr.21850 PubMedCrossRef Brucher BL, Becker K, Lordick F, Fink U, Sarbia M, Stein H, Busch R, Zimmermann F, Molls M, Hofler H, Siewert JR (2006) The clinical impact of histopathologic response assessment by residual tumor cell quantification in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 106(10):2119–2127. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​21850 PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ott K, Bader FG, Lordick F, Feith M, Bartels H, Siewert JR (2009) Surgical factors influence the outcome after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a consecutive series of 240 patients at an experienced center. Ann Surg Oncol 16(4):1017–1025. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0336-5 PubMedCrossRef Ott K, Bader FG, Lordick F, Feith M, Bartels H, Siewert JR (2009) Surgical factors influence the outcome after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a consecutive series of 240 patients at an experienced center. Ann Surg Oncol 16(4):1017–1025. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-009-0336-5 PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Blank S, Blaker H, Schaible A, Lordick F, Grenacher L, Buechler M, Ott K (2012) Impact of pretherapeutic routine clinical staging for the individualization of treatment in gastric cancer patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(1):45–55. doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0805-8 Blank S, Blaker H, Schaible A, Lordick F, Grenacher L, Buechler M, Ott K (2012) Impact of pretherapeutic routine clinical staging for the individualization of treatment in gastric cancer patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(1):45–55. doi:10.​1007/​s00423-011-0805-8
14.
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer R, Ott K, Feith M, Lordick F, Siewert JR, Becker K (2009) Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 22(12):1555–1563. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2009.123 PubMedCrossRef Langer R, Ott K, Feith M, Lordick F, Siewert JR, Becker K (2009) Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 22(12):1555–1563. doi:10.​1038/​modpathol.​2009.​123 PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, Milan C, Mariette C, Conroy T, Pezet D, Roullet B, Seitz JF, Herr JP, Paillot B, Arveux P, Bonnetain F, Binquet C (2007) Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1160–1168. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7118 PubMedCrossRef Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, Milan C, Mariette C, Conroy T, Pezet D, Roullet B, Seitz JF, Herr JP, Paillot B, Arveux P, Bonnetain F, Binquet C (2007) Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1160–1168. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​04.​7118 PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Walz MK, Seeber S, Klump B, Budach W, Teichmann R, Schmitt M, Schmitt G, Franke C, Wilke H (2005) Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2310–2317. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034 PubMedCrossRef Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Walz MK, Seeber S, Klump B, Budach W, Teichmann R, Schmitt M, Schmitt G, Franke C, Wilke H (2005) Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2310–2317. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​00.​034 PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidecke CD, Weighardt H, Feith M, Fink U, Zimmermann F, Stein HJ, Siewert JR, Holzmann B (2002) Neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer: immunosuppression following combined radiochemotherapy. Surgery 132(3):495–501PubMedCrossRef Heidecke CD, Weighardt H, Feith M, Fink U, Zimmermann F, Stein HJ, Siewert JR, Holzmann B (2002) Neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer: immunosuppression following combined radiochemotherapy. Surgery 132(3):495–501PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi Y, Hihara J, Hironaka K, Ohshita A, Okita R, Okawaki M, Matsuura K, Nagamine I, Ikeda T, Ohara M, Hamai Y (2006) Postoperative immunosuppression cascade and immunotherapy using lymphokine-activated killer cells for patients with esophageal cancer: possible application for compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome. Oncol Rep 15(4):895–901PubMed Yamaguchi Y, Hihara J, Hironaka K, Ohshita A, Okita R, Okawaki M, Matsuura K, Nagamine I, Ikeda T, Ohara M, Hamai Y (2006) Postoperative immunosuppression cascade and immunotherapy using lymphokine-activated killer cells for patients with esophageal cancer: possible application for compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome. Oncol Rep 15(4):895–901PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Geh JI, Bond SJ, Bentzen SM, Glynne-Jones R (2006) Systematic overview of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy trials in oesophageal cancer: evidence of a radiation and chemotherapy dose response. Radiother Oncol 78(3):236–244. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2006.01.009 PubMedCrossRef Geh JI, Bond SJ, Bentzen SM, Glynne-Jones R (2006) Systematic overview of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy trials in oesophageal cancer: evidence of a radiation and chemotherapy dose response. Radiother Oncol 78(3):236–244. doi:10.​1016/​j.​radonc.​2006.​01.​009 PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Reim D, Gertler R, Novotny A, Becker K, Buschenfelde CM, Ebert M, Dobritz M, Langer R, Hoefler H, Friess H, Schumacher C (2012) Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction are more likely to respond to preoperative chemotherapy than distal gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2108–2118. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2147-8 Reim D, Gertler R, Novotny A, Becker K, Buschenfelde CM, Ebert M, Dobritz M, Langer R, Hoefler H, Friess H, Schumacher C (2012) Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction are more likely to respond to preoperative chemotherapy than distal gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2108–2118. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-2147-8
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider PM, Baldus SE, Metzger R, Kocher M, Bongartz R, Bollschweiler E, Schaefer H, Thiele J, Dienes HP, Mueller RP, Hoelscher AH (2005) Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification. Ann Surg 242(5):684–692PubMedCrossRef Schneider PM, Baldus SE, Metzger R, Kocher M, Bongartz R, Bollschweiler E, Schaefer H, Thiele J, Dienes HP, Mueller RP, Hoelscher AH (2005) Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification. Ann Surg 242(5):684–692PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorenzen S, Blank S, Lordick F, Siewert JR, Ott K (2012) Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2119–27. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2254-1 Lorenzen S, Blank S, Lordick F, Siewert JR, Ott K (2012) Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2119–27. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-012-2254-1
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Maschuw K, Kress R, Ramaswamy A, Braun I, Langer P, Gerdes B (2006) Short-term preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients leads to a reduction of the detectable number of lymph nodes in resection specimens. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391(4):364–368. doi:10.1007/s00423-006-0056-2 PubMedCrossRef Maschuw K, Kress R, Ramaswamy A, Braun I, Langer P, Gerdes B (2006) Short-term preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients leads to a reduction of the detectable number of lymph nodes in resection specimens. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391(4):364–368. doi:10.​1007/​s00423-006-0056-2 PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wichmann MW, Muller C, Meyer G, Strauss T, Hornung HM, Lau-Werner U, Angele MK, Schildberg FW (2002) Effect of preoperative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 137(2):206–210PubMedCrossRef Wichmann MW, Muller C, Meyer G, Strauss T, Hornung HM, Lau-Werner U, Angele MK, Schildberg FW (2002) Effect of preoperative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 137(2):206–210PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients
verfasst von
S. Blank
A. Stange
L. Sisic
W. Roth
L. Grenacher
F. Sterzing
M. Burian
D. Jäger
M. Büchler
K. Ott
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1034-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.