Background
Pediatric obesity has become a global challenge in health care, plaguing both high and low-income nations and jeopardizing their ability to cope with the increasing cost of obesity management and treatment [
1]. The Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), and particularly countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), harbor one of the highest burdens of childhood obesity worldwide, with reported estimates exceeding 25% in some countries [
2‐
4]. Childhood obesity is associated with numerous adverse health consequences, with both immediate and longer-term complications [
5]. Among the immediate health risks are cardiometabolic abnormalities including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, increased glucose levels, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension [
5‐
7]. On the long term, childhood obesity tends to track into the adult years, increasing the risk for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and certain types of cancer, while also being associated with mental health problems, such as low self-esteem and depression [
8,
9].
Obesity is however being increasingly recognized as a “heterogeneous condition”, a fact that has been emphasized by the identification and characterization of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) amongst adults [
10‐
12]. Despite being obese, these individuals do not present any of the traditional cardiometabolic risk factors that are usually associated with obesity [
10,
11]. It has been argued that this subgroup of obese subjects may have a lower mortality risk and a healthier medical prognosis, compared to their non-metabolically healthy obese counterparts [
13‐
17]. Available studies have indicated that, amongst obese adults, the prevalence of MHO may range between 6 and 40% [
10,
11,
18,
19]. Similarly, it has been suggested that obese children may also vary in terms of their health profile [
12,
20‐
22], but MHO in the pediatric population has not been well-characterized [
12]. The investigation of MHO amongst children is important for several reasons. First, given the increasing need for weight management care, it may be necessary to prioritize specialized service delivery for those individuals with the greatest cardiometabolic risk [
12]. By characterizing obese individuals according to their relative health risks, those at lower cardiometabolic risk may be directed towards less intensive management services (e.g. outpatient dietitian counseling, behavioral modification etc.), while their peers at higher risk may require more intensive health services (e.g., multidisciplinary obesity treatment or drug-based management) [
12]. The recognition of childhood obesity as a heterogeneous condition implies that “a menu of therapeutic options” for children (and their caregivers) would be available to address their individual health needs, an approach that is in harmony with treating obesity as a chronic disease [
12,
23]. Second, given the possible protective effects of MHO on disease risk, when compared to metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO), it would be crucial to investigate and identify the characteristics that are associated with the MHO status in youth and to foster our understanding of the factors that could prevent obese subjects from developing metabolic abnormalities [
24‐
26].
In the Kingdom of Saudi-Arabia (KSA), like in several other countries of the EMR, the rate of obesity amongst children and adolescents is following an escalating secular trend [
27]. A recent national study (
Jeeluna) conducted in KSA showed that 15.9% of adolescents were obese [
28], a proportion that is considerably higher than what was reported in the early 1990s, where the prevalence of obesity was estimated at 6% in boys and 6.7% in girls aged 1–18 years [
29]. This alarming trend coupled with the probable protective effect of MHO on morbidity, highlights the need to investigate and better characterize MHO in the pediatric years. This study builds on the “Jeeluna” national study to examine the proportions of obese adolescents who are metabolically healthy in KSA and to investigate socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle predictors of MHO in this age group. Due to the lack of a universal definition for MHO, two commonly used definitions will be adopted in this study to assess the prevalence and factors associated with MHO in this population [
12,
30]. The selected definitions are based on traditional cardiometabolic risk factors that are easily measured and are routinely obtained in clinical practice.
Results
Of the study sample, 62.6% were boys and 37.4% were girls. The age of the study participants ranged between 10 and 19 years, with a mean of 15.9 years (±1.9) in boys and 15.6 years (±1.8) in girls. The large majority of the students participating in the study were of Saudi nationality (84.9%) (data not shown).
As shown in Tables
1, 219 subjects out of 1047 (20.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.4–23.4) were categorized as MHO based on the IDF definition and 249 out of 1047 (23.8%, 95% CI: 21.2–26.4) were categorized as MHO based on the CR definition. The results showed that 12.8% of the participants were classified as being MHO based on both definitions (IDF and CR), while 68.1% were categorized as MUO by both categorizations (data not shown).
Table 1
Socio-demographic, anthropometric and cardiometabolic status amongst adolescents (n = 1047) in KSA by MUO or MHO status
| MUO (n = 828) | MHO (n = 219) | p-value | MUO (n = 798) | MHO (n = 249) | p-value |
Socio-demographic |
Age (years) | 15.88 ± 1.85 | 15.41 ± 1.86 | 0.0008 | 15.77 ± 1.85 | 15.81 ± 1.91 | 0.81 |
Gender |
Males | 534 (64.5) | 121 (55.3) | 0.01 | 520 (65.2) | 135 (54.2) | 0.002 |
Females | 294 (35.5) | 98 (44.8) | | 278 (34.8) | 114 (45.8) | |
Father’s level of education |
Elementary or less | 145 (19.7) | 35 (18) | 0.84 | 128 (18.1) | 52 (23.2) | 0.17 |
Intermediate-high school | 331 (45) | 91 (46.7) | | 330 (46.7) | 92 (41.1) | |
University or higher | 259 (35.2) | 69 (35.4) | | 248 (35.1) | 80 (35.7) | |
Mother’s level of education |
Elementary or less | 251 (33.7) | 57 (28.9) | 0.45 | 235 (32.8) | 73 (32.2) | 0.82 |
Intermediate- high school | 291 (39) | 81 (41.1) | | 285 (39.8) | 87 (38.3) | |
University or higher | 204 (27.4) | 59 (30) | | 196 (27.4) | 67 (29.5) | |
Anthropometric |
Height (cm) | 162.78 ± 10.43 | 158.08 ± 11.42 | < 0.0001 | 162.2 ± 10.97 | 160.5 ± 10.2 | 0.03 |
Weight (kg) | 88.45 ± 17.4 | 77.11 ± 14.27 | < 0.0001 | 86.94 ± 17.63 | 83.31 ± 16.4 | 0.004 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 33.28 ± 5.43 | 30.76 ± 4.25 | < 0.0001 | 32.93 ± 5.44 | 32.19 ± 4.79 | 0.04 |
BMI Z score | 2.82 ± 0.75 | 2.5 ± 0.57 | < 0.0001 | 2.78 ± 0.74 | 2.67 ± 0.66 | 0.02 |
WC (cm) | 93.32 ± 18.78 | 80.97 ± 16.84 | < 0.0001 | 91.08 ± 19.55 | 89.65 ± 17.37 | 0.27 |
Elevated WC | 447 (54.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.0001 | 357 (44.7) | 90 (36.1) | 0.02 |
Cardiometabolic |
SBP (mm Hg) | 127.66 ± 11.96 | 118.05 ± 7.8 | < 0.0001 | 128.6 ± 11.32 | 116.19 ± 8.08 | < 0.0001 |
DBP (mm Hg) | 72.84 ± 10.85 | 67.75 ± 8.7 | < 0.0001 | 73.37 ± 10.88 | 66.64 ± 7.9 | < 0.0001 |
TC (mmol/L) | 4.35 ± 0.78 | 4.24 ± 0.62 | 0.04 | 4.36 ± 0.77 | 4.2 ± 0.66 | 0.001 |
HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.13 ± 0.23 | 1.29 ± 0.2 | < 0.0001 | 1.13 ± 0.24 | 1.27 ± 0.19 | < 0.0001 |
LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.79 ± 0.7 | 2.63 ± 0.6 | 0.001 | 2.8 ± 0.69 | 2.63 ± 0.64 | 0.0007 |
TG (mmol/L) | 1.26 ± 0.76 | 0.87 ± 0.29 | < 0.0001 | 1.3 ± 0.76 | 0.79 ± 0.21 | < 0.0001 |
Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.62 ± 0.96 | 4.41 ± 0.67 | 0.0003 | 4.63 ± 0.97 | 4.4 ± 0.67 | < 0.0001 |
Gender disparities were noted in the proportions of MHO and MUO, according to both definitions (Table
1). Significant differences in age were observed with the IDF definition only, whereby subjects with MHO were younger. Across both the IDF and CR categories, the MHO group was significantly shorter, lighter, and less obese (lower BMI values and lower BMI z scores) than their MUO peers (Table
1). WC (cm) was significantly lower amongst MHO subjects based on the IDF definition. Similarly, the proportion of subjects with elevated WC was significantly lower amongst MHO subjects, based on the CR categorization. As expected, cardiometabolic risk factors were in the less healthy direction in the MUO group.
Table
2 shows the dietary and lifestyle characteristics of the study population. In approximately 60% of the study subjects, the daily frequency of fruits’ consumption was nil, while another equal proportion reported no consumption of milk. Similarly, 60% of the study subjects reported an intake of two or more soft drinks per day. Around half of the adolescents reported irregular breakfast consumption, no intake of vegetables, no exercise at school, and inadequate sleep on week days as well as week-ends. More than 80% of the study population reported screen time exceeding 2 h per day. There were no significant differences between the MHO and MUO groups in dietary and lifestyle characteristics, except for the weekly frequency of day napping, which was found to be significantly higher in the MHO group based on the CR definition. Psychosocial variables were also investigated amongst the study subjects (Additional file
1: Table S1). There were no significant differences in any of the psychosocial variables between MHO and MUO groups, according to both definitions.
Table 2
Dietary and lifestyle characteristics amongst adolescents (n = 1047) in KSA by MUO or MHO status
| MUO (n = 828) | MHO (n = 219) | p-value | MUO (n = 798) | MHO (n = 249) | p-value |
Dietary habits |
Regular breakfast consumption during the past month |
No | 360 (44) | 104 (48.2) | 0.27 | 353 (44.7) | 111 (45.1) | 0.92 |
Yes | 459 (56) | 112 (51.9) | | 436 (55.3) | 135 (54.9) | |
Frequency of snacks consumption/d |
0 | 444 (54.1) | 124 (57.4) | 0.39 | 437 (55.3) | 131 (53.3) | 0.5 |
1 | 220 (26.8) | 48 (22.2) | | 207 (26.2) | 61 (24.8) | |
≥ 2 | 157 (19.1) | 44 (20.4) | | 147 (18.6) | 54 (22) | |
Frequency of fruits consumption/d |
0 | 503 (61.1) | 134 (61.5) | 0.51 | 475 (59.9) | 162 (65.3) | 0.31 |
1 | 125 (15.2) | 27 (12.4) | | 119 (15) | 33 (13.3) | |
≥ 2 | 195 (23.7) | 57 (26.2) | | 199 (25.1) | 53 (21.4) | |
Frequency of vegetables consumption/d |
0 | 385 (46.8) | 100 (46.1) | 0.59 | 357 (45) | 128 (51.8) | 0.14 |
1 | 266 (32.3) | 65 (30) | | 263 (33.2) | 68 (27.5) | |
≥ 2 | 172 (20.9) | 52 (24) | | 173 (21.8) | 51 (20.7) | |
Frequency of soft drinks consumption/d |
≤ 1 | 320 (38.8) | 95 (44.2) | 0.15 | 317 (39.9) | 98 (40.0) | 0.98 |
≥ 2 | 504 (61.2) | 120 (55.8) | | 477 (60.1) | 147 (60.0) | |
Frequency of energy drinks consumption/d |
0 | 657 (79.8) | 170 (78.3) | 0.63 | 629 (79.2) | 198 (80.5) | 0.67 |
≥ 1 | 166 (20.2) | 47 (21.7) | | 165 (20.8) | 48 (19.5) | |
Frequency of milk consumption/d |
0 | 468 (57.3) | 129 (60.3) | 0.73 | 449 (57.1) | 148 (60.4) | 0.66 |
1 | 223 (27.3) | 54 (25.2) | | 215 (27.4) | 62 (25.3) | |
≥ 2 | 126 (15.4) | 31 (14.5) | | 122 (15.5) | 35 (14.3) | |
Frequency of fast food consumption/week | 2.03 ± 1.94 | 1.87 ± 1.78 | 0.29 | 2.03 ± 1.95 | 1.9 ± 1.76 | 0.36 |
Physical Activity and sedentarity |
Exercise in school |
No | 486 (59.7) | 130 (60.8) | 0.78 | 464 (59) | 152 (62.8) | 0.29 |
Yes | 328 (40.3) | 84 (39.3) | | 322 (41) | 90 (37.2) | |
Frequency of exercise for at least 30 mn during the past week | 1.76 ± 2.34 | 1.64 ± 2.3 | 0.51 | 1.8 ± 2.36 | 1.52 ± 2.2 | 0.11 |
Screen time |
≤ 2 h/d | 132 (18.7) | 37 (19.5) | 0.81 | 126 (18.5) | 43 (20) | 0.63 |
> 2 h/d | 573 (81.3) | 153 (80.5) | | 554 (81.5) | 172 (80) | |
Sleep |
Number of hours of sleep per night, during week days |
Adequate | 325 (40.3) | 100 (46.3) | 0.11 | 312 (40.1) | 113 (46.5) | 0.07 |
Inadequate | 481 (59.7) | 116 (53.7) | | 467 (60) | 130 (53.5) | |
Number of hours of sleep per night, during weekends |
Adequate | 334 (48.1) | 92 (50.8) | 0.52 | 323 (48.4) | 103 (49.5) | 0.78 |
Inadequate | 360 (51.9) | 89 (49.2) | | 344 (51.6) | 105 (50.5) | |
Number of days went to sleep during the day in the past week | 3.79 ± 2.86 | 3.86 ± 2.95 | 0.73 | 3.69 ± 2.89 | 4.14 ± 2.83 | 0.03 |
Smoking |
Smoking cigarettes during the past month |
No | 746 (91.2) | 196 (91.2) | 0.99 | 715 (91) | 227 (91.9) | 0.65 |
Yes | 72 (8.8) | 19 (8.8) | | 71 (9) | 20 (8.1) | |
Smoking Shisha during the past month |
No | 755 (92.4) | 200 (93.5) | 0.6 | 726 (92.6) | 229 (92.7) | 0.95 |
Yes | 62 (7.6) | 14 (6.5) | | 58 (7.4) | 18 (7.3) | |
The predictors of MHO status, after adjustment for age and sex, are shown in Table
3. Across both definitions, female gender was associated with higher odds of MHO (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.06–1.94 based on IDF; OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.19–2.12 based on CR). Age was significantly inversely associated with MHO, based on the IDF categorization (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.81–0.95). Compared to the lowest level of fathers’ education (elementary or less), an intermediate or high-school educational level was associated with lower odds of MHO based on the CR definition, and the association was close to significance (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46–1.02). Across both definitions, there was a significant inverse association between MHO, weight, BMI and BMI-z score, with the latter being the strongest anthropometric predictor of MHO. There was also a negative association between WC (cm) and MHO based on the IDF definition, while elevated WC was associated with lower odds of MHO based on the CR categorization. The daily frequencies of vegetable and soft drink consumption were associated with lower odds of MHO, based on the CR and IDF definitions, respectively. Meeting the sleep recommendations during weekdays as well as the weekly frequency of day napping, were positively associated with MHO. Across both definitions, there was no association between MHO and any of the psychosocial variables under investigation (data not shown).
Table 3
Association of socio-demographic, anthropometric, dietary and lifestyle characteristics with MHO after age and sex adjustment
| OR (95% CI)* | p-value | OR (95% CI)* | p-value |
Socio-demographic |
Age (years) | 0.88 (0.81–0.95) | 0.001 | 1.02 (0.94–1.10) | 0.65 |
Gender |
Males | reference | | reference | |
Females | 1.43 (1.06–1.94) | 0.02 | 1.59 (1.19–2.12) | 0.002 |
Father’s level of education |
Elementary or less | reference | | reference | |
Intermediate or high school | 1.13 (0.73–1.76) | 0.58 | 0.68 (0.46–1.02) | 0.06 |
University or higher | 1.07 (0.68–1.70) | 0.76 | 0.83 (0.55–1.25) | 0.37 |
Mother’s level of education |
Elementary or less | reference | | reference | |
Intermediate or high school | 1.18 (0.80–1.73) | 0.4 | 0.99 (0.69–1.42) | 0.95 |
University or higher | 1.23 (0.82–1.87) | 0.32 | 1.14 (0.77–1.68) | 0.5 |
Anthropometric |
Weight (Kg) | 0.95 (0.94–0.96) | < 0.0001 | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) | 0.01 |
BMI (Kg/m2) | 0.87 (0.83–0.91) | < 0.0001 | 0.96 (0.93–1.00) | 0.03 |
BMI Z score | 0.36 (0.26–0.51) | < 0.0001 | 0.78 (0.62–0.98) | 0.03 |
WC (cm) | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | < 0.0001 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.74 |
Elevated WC | NA | | 0.74 (0.55–1.00) | 0.05 |
Dietary Habits |
Regular breakfast consumption in the past month |
No | reference | | reference | |
Yes | 0.90 (0.66–1.23) | 0.51 | 1.09 (0.81–1.47) | 0.55 |
Frequency of snacks consumption/d |
≥ 3 | reference | | reference | |
2 | 0.77 (0.49–1.22) | 0.27 | 0.79 (0.52–1.21) | 0.28 |
≤ 1 | 1.01 (0.68–1.50) | 0.96 | 0.81 (0.56–1.17) | 0.27 |
Frequency of fruits consumption/d |
0 | reference | | reference | |
1 | 0.78 (0.49–1.25) | 0.3 | 0.83 (0.54–1.27) | 0.38 |
≥ 2 | 1.04 (0.73–1.49) | 0.81 | 0.81 (0.57–1.15) | 0.24 |
Frequency of vegetables consumption/d |
0 | reference | | reference | |
1 | 0.89 (0.63–1.27) | 0.54 | 0.70 (0.50–0.98) | 0.04 |
≥ 2 | 1.12 (0.76–1.65) | 0.56 | 0.83 (0.57–1.20) | 0.32 |
Frequency of soft drinks consumption/d |
≥ 2 | reference | | reference | |
≤ 1 | 0.73 (0.54–1.00) | 0.05 | 0.94 (0.70–1.26) | 0.66 |
Frequency of power drinks consumption/d |
≥ 1 | reference | | reference | |
0 | 0.86 (0.60–1.25) | 0.43 | 1.04 (0.72–1.49) | 0.84 |
Frequency of milk drinks consumption/d |
0 | reference | | reference | |
1 | 0.85 (0.59–1.21) | 0.36 | 0.88 (0.63–1.24) | 0.48 |
≥ 2 | 0.87 (0.56–1.35) | 0.53 | 0.91 (0.60–1.39) | 0.67 |
Frequency of fast food consumption/week | 0.97 (0.90–1.06) | 0.50 | 0.98 (0.91–1.06) | 0.58 |
Physical Activity and Sedentarity |
Exercise in school |
No | reference | | reference | |
Yes | 1.19 (0.81–1.74) | 0.37 | 1.13 (0.79–1.61) | 0.51 |
Screen Time |
> 2 h/day | reference | | reference | |
≤ 2 h/day | 1.01 (0.67–1.52) | 0.96 | 1.08 (0.73–1.59) | 0.71 |
Frequency of exercise for at least 30 mn in the past week | 0.98 (0.91–1.04) | 0.45 | 0.96 (0.90–1.02) | 0.21 |
Sleep |
Number of sleep hrs per night, during week days | | | | |
Inadequate | reference | | reference | |
Adequate | 1.31 (0.97–1.78) | 0.08 | 1.34 (1.00–1.80) | 0.05 |
Number of sleep hrs per night, during weekends |
Inadequate | reference | | reference | |
Adequate | 1.10 (0.79–1.53) | 0.57 | 1.03 (0.75–1.41) | 0.86 |
Number of days went to sleep during the day in the past week | 1.02 (0.97–1.08) | 0.44 | 1.05 (1.00–1.11) | 0.05 |
Smoking |
Smoking cigarette during the past month |
Yes | reference | | reference | |
No | 0.75 (0.43–1.30) | 0.3 | 1.00 (0.59–1.71) | 0.99 |
Smoking shisha during the past month |
Yes | reference | | reference | |
No | 0.88 (0.47–1.63) | 0.68 | 0.88 (0.50–1.55) | 0.66 |
Stepwise logistic regression was carried out to determine the independent predictors of MHO (Table
4). The model included the variables that were significantly associated with MHO (for either definition) after age and sex adjustment. As such, the final model included age, gender, BMI (kg/m
2), WC (cm), father’s level of education, frequency of vegetable consumption per day, frequency of soft drinks’ consumption per day, sleep hours per night, and daytime napping. It is important to note that, since the final model included both age and sex, we selected BMI (kg/m
2) instead of BMI-z score, given that the latter already adjusts for inter-individual differences in age and sex. In addition, since significant interactions were found between gender, the number of sleep hours during week-days, and the frequency of napping, analyses were performed for boys and girls separately as well as for the total study population. Based on the IDF definition, BMI and WC were the only significant independent predictors of MHO in the overall sample. Based on the CR categorization, the significant independent predictors of MHO included female gender, BMI and the weekly frequency of day napping. Gender-disparities in MHO predictors were noted. MHO defined as per the IDF criteria was associated with BMI and WC in both genders, but in boys, the predictors also included the weekly frequency of consuming 2 vegetables per day (in comparison with a reference intake of 0/day). The weekly frequency of day napping as well as meeting the sleep recommendations during week-days also reached borderline significance in boys, but not in girls. Based on the CR categorization, the significant independent predictors of MHO included BMI and the frequency of soft drink consumption in girls, and father’s level of education in boys.
Table 4
Independent associations of socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle characteristics with MHO status
Among All |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.89 (0.84–0.93) | < 0.0001 |
WC (cm) | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | < 0.0001 |
Model-CR definition* |
Female Gender | 1.76 (1.29–2.41) | 0.0004 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.97 (0.94–1.00) | 0.06 |
Number of days went to sleep during the day in the past week | 1.06 (1.00–1.12) | 0.04 |
Among Boys |
Model-IDF definition* | | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.91 (0.85–0.96) | 0.001 |
WC (cm) | 0.97 (0.96–0.99) | < 0.0001 |
Frequency of vegetable consumption/d, ≥2/day | 1.77 (1.07–2.91) | 0.02 |
Number of sleep hours during week days, adequate | 1.51 (0.99–2.35) | 0.07 |
Number of days went to sleep during the day in the past week | 1.07 (0.99–1.16) | 0.08 |
Model-CR definition* |
Father’s level of education, intermediate-high school | 0.60 (0.39–0.92) | 0.02 |
Among Girls | | |
Model-IDF definition* |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.84 (0.77–0.92) | 0.0001 |
WC (cm) | 0.97 (0.96–0.99) | 0.0005 |
Model-CR definition* |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.95 (0.89–1.00) | 0.06 |
Frequency of soft drinks consumption/d, ≤1/day | 0.49 (0.30–0.81) | 0.006 |
Discussion
This study is the first to investigate MHO amongst adolescents in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. The study showed that approximately one in five obese adolescents in KSA was identified as metabolically healthy, despite being obese. In agreement with previous reports [
12,
21,
45‐
53], subjects with MHO were significantly younger, less obese, had smaller waist circumference and were more likely to be females. In addition, sleep habits and vegetable intake were found to be significantly associated with MHO in the study population, particularly in boys. Interestingly, the factors that predicted MHO varied depending on the definition that was used to identify subjects as MHO or MUO.
The study findings showed that the prevalence of MHO amongst obese adolescents in KSA (20.9–23.8%) falls within the range reported in the literature (3.9–49.3%) [
12,
22,
45‐
56]. Caution must however be exerted when comparing prevalence estimates of MHO given that various studies may have adopted different definitions and that some studies included both overweight and obese subjects when assessing MHO. In certain studies, the definition of MHO was based on the presence of insulin resistance as estimated by Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) [
12,
21,
22,
48,
50], or as the presence of less than 2 cardiometabolic risk factors [
21,
45‐
47,
54], while in others, including the present study, MHO was identified based on the absence of any cardiometabolic risk factor [
12,
22,
48,
49,
51‐
53,
55,
56]. In addition, the criteria adopted to define individual cardiometabolic abnormalities were often discrepant between studies, and included those proposed by the IDF, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), the modified Adult treatment Panel III (ATPIII), as well as other ethnic specific criteria. Based on the CR definition proposed by Prince et al. (2014) [
12], the prevalence of MHO obtained in this study (23.8%) was lower than the one reported amongst 8–17 year old overweight and obese Canadian children (MHO: 31.5%) and amongst obese German children (mean age: 11.6 ± 2.8 years) (MHO: 49.3%) [
51]. The younger age of the children participating in these studies and the fact that both overweight and obese children were included in the study by Prince et al. (2014) [
12] may explain the higher proportion of MHO in these studies, compared to our results. Based on the IDF definition, the prevalence of MHO obtained in this study (20.9%) was similar to the one reported amongst obese children and adolescents (10–18 years old) in Belgium (18.6%) [
22], and lower than the estimate reported amongst obese youth aged 8–18 years in Austria (30.7%) [
55]. Importantly, the results of this study highlighted poor agreement between definitions in classifying subjects as MHO, whereby only 12.8% of the participants were classified as MHO based on both the IDF and CR definitions. Poor agreement between various MHO definitions has also been described by other studies [
12,
48], underscoring the need for a harmonized definition for the identification of MHO in clinical as well as research settings.
It remains important to note that, at the time of this study, the MHO subjects were healthier than their MUO peers based on measures of traditional cardiometabolic health risk, but it is unknown whether this discrepancy would remain stable over time or whether it may be extrapolated to other health domains (such as musculoskeletal, respiratory) or whether the inclusion of other indicators of cardiovascular health (e.g., apo B, inflammatory markers, insulin resistance) would impact the MHO prevalence estimates obtained in this study [
12]. It has been debated that MHO may not be a stable phenotype and there are unanswered questions on whether it represents a transient phenotype, changing with age, from childhood into adulthood [
57]. However, based on the Bogalusa Heart Study, where 1098 individuals had participated both as children (5–17 years) and as adults (24–43 years), Li et al. (2012) showed that MHO children had favorable cardiometabolic profiles and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) in adulthood compared with MUO children, thus providing evidence that the MHO phenotype starts in childhood and continues into adulthood [
58] .
In this study, and in concordance with other reports, there were differences in how MHO related to adiposity, socio-demographic and lifestyle predictors, depending on the classification used to define MHO. First, WC was significantly associated with MHO, based on both the IDF and CR definitions, independently of age and sex, thus highlighting the importance of measuring WC in clinical settings. However, in the fully adjusted model, WC remained an independent predictor of MHO based on the IDF definition only, and not the CR definition. Similar results were obtained by other studies that have adopted the CR definition. For instance, Prince et al. (2014) has shown that WC was no longer significantly related with MHO in Canadian children, after adjustment for lifestyle factors [
12]. In addition, the results of this study showed that, based on both definitions, BMI- z score was the strongest predictor of MHO amongst adolescents in KSA, and that, after adjustment for dietary and lifestyle factors, BMI was more strongly associated with MHO, compared to WC. These results are in agreement with those reported by a longitudinal study amongst adolescents, where BMI and its changes over time were more strongly related to cardiovascular factors compared with WC [
51]. It is important to acknowledge that WC may not always be reflective of visceral fat as it is not able to differentiate between subcutaneous fat in the abdominal area and visceral fat accumulation [
59]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the screening of an obese adolescent may include WC as a proxy of abdominal obesity [
60,
61], in conjunction with BMI which may be able to better predict metabolic health in this age group. It has in fact been argued that BMI is one of the most consistent determinants of MHO in adolescents [
12,
52,
56] and that MHO status may not be really found at higher levels of obesity [
21].
In this study, we found an association between the frequency of consumption of vegetables and MHO amongst boys, but not girls. Gender-based differences in the association of diet composition with MHO have been previously reported amongst adults [
44] but no studies have examined these differences in children and adolescents. Such gender-based disparities may reflect differences in physiology or in the reporting of dietary intakes between sexes. The combination of phytochemicals, antioxidants, and dietary fiber brought by a diet rich in vegetables may decrease oxidative stress, mitigate the inflammatory response, improve insulin sensitivity and decrease cardio-metabolic risk, which may explain our study findings [
62]. It is worth noting that some studies have reported a positive association of MHO with the intake of milk and fruits, and an inverse association with the consumption of soft drinks [
47,
50,
54], while other studies found no association between MHO and food groups’ intakes [
12,
48]. Surprisingly, our results showed that, in girls, a lower intake of soft drinks was associated with lower odds of MHO. This may be due to the fact that adolescent girls, and particularly those with high adiposity, tend to under-report their intakes of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods [
63‐
65]. It is important to note that the questionnaire adopted in this study was qualitative in nature, and did not obtain quantitative information on portions or serving sizes usually consumed. In addition, the questionnaire did not allow for the estimation of energy and macronutrient intakes, and hence differences between MHO and MUO groups in this respect, could not be investigated.
Based on the CR definition, the results showed that meeting the recommended number of sleep hours per night was associated with higher odds of MHO in the total sample, after adjustment for age and sex. This sleep indicator was also associated with MHO in boys, based on the IDF definition. These findings are in line with those reported by Li et al. (2015) amongst Chinese children and adolescents, where MHO subjects had significantly longer sleep hours, and with those reported by Spruyt et al. (2010), where shorter sleep durations among children in the United States (US) were strongly associated with adverse metabolic outcomes such as higher plasma levels of insulin, low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein [
50,
66]. Interestingly, the results of our study have also shown that the weekly frequency of day napping was an independent positive predictor of MHO status, particularly in boys. Studies on the association between day napping and metabolic health are scarce. In adults, longer napping durations (> 60–90 mn) were associated with higher risk of Metabolic syndrome and incidence of coronary heart disease, while this association was not observed for shorter nap durations (< 30–60 mn) [
67‐
69]. In high school students, afternoon or evening naps, as assessed by actigraphy, were associated with higher levels of interleukin 6, while this association was not found for morning naps [
70]. The same study has reported that diary-reported napping was not associated with any inflammatory marker. In addition, although some studies have suggested that daytime naps may be associated with reduced nocturnal sleep and with increased food craving amongst adolescents [
71], others have found no association between daytime sleep and increased risk of adiposity in children and adolescents [
72,
73]. It has been proposed that nighttime sleep and naps serve different physiological functions. Naps may in fact reduce daytime psychosocial stress and cortisol levels, which may, at least partly explain the observed associations in our study [
72,
74,
75].
It is of interest that, in our study, sleep indicators were associated with MHO in boys only, and not in girls. Gender-based differences in the association between sleep and metabolic health have been previously described amongst adults [
25], but few studies have tackled this association in adolescents. In a nationally representative survey of 7–15 year old children and adolescents, short sleep duration was associated with elevated waist circumference, and this association was observed amongst boys only [
76]. In a study conducted on children and adolescents aged 6–20 years, short sleep duration was associated with lower resting energy expenditure in boys and with higher leptin levels in girls [
77,
78]. These results suggest a possible gender difference in the impact of sleep duration on hormonal and physiologic parameters during childhood and adolescence [
78]. Alternatively, the gender-based disparities in the association between sleep and MHO may reflect differences in lifestyle-related factors. In fact, the widespread use of videogames and technology among teenage boys, may delay the onset of sleep, possibly introducing daytime napping as well [
79]. Consequently, this group is at higher risk of disruption of the normal circadian rhythmicity related to sleep and the hormonal systems involved in metabolic regulation [
79]. Taken together, our findings highlight the need for the integration of sleep in the development of effective prevention, treatment, and intervention programs targeting adolescent obesity and related metabolic abnormalities [
76,
80]. The inclusion of sleep questions in health assessments can provide a clear picture of whether the adolescent has good or poor sleeping habits and help in planning for lifestyle and behavior modification interventions when needed [
80].
In the present study, there was no association between physical activity, sedentary behavior, and MHO amongst adolescents. The link between physical activity and MHO status in youth is not well understood, since only few studies have examined this association. Prince et al. (2014) [
12] showed that higher physical activity was independently associated with MHO amongst Canadian children, while Camhi et al. (2013), Heinzle et al. (2015) and Senechayl et al. (2013) reported no associations between physical activity, screen time and MHO amongst US and Canadian adolescents [
21,
46,
52]. The lack of association between MHO and physical activity in the present study may be due to the low prevalence of physical activity amongst obese adolescents in KSA whereby the frequency of engaging in physical activity for at least 30 min was less than 2 times per week in this population group. Alternatively, other factors such as cardiorespiratory or musculoskeletal fitness, which may offer additional insight as to why some obese adolescents experience metabolic abnormalities while others do not [
45,
52], were not assessed in this study.
The strengths of this study included the large sample and the national representativeness of the study population. Anthropometric measurements were obtained using standardized protocols rather than being self-reported. The findings of this study should however be interpreted in light of the following limitations. First, the study instrument was self-administered which may be associated with recall bias, and a high cognitive burden [
81]. However, the questionnaire underwent several rounds of expert review and was pilot-tested for clarity, appropriate wording and comprehension amongst the target respondent group, i.e. adolescents in KSA. Second, pubertal stage and the levels of sex hormones, which may affect the cardiometabolic profile, were not assessed in this study [
22,
48,
50,
51]. In addition, direct measures of adiposity, such as fat mass, percent body fat and visceral fat, which may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of metabolic abnormalities, were not obtained. It is also important to note that physical activity and dietary assessment were not investigated using objective measurements, but were self-reported based on questions that were formulated in congruence with those included in the Youth Risk Behavior Survey [
33] and the Global School-based Student Health Survey [
28,
34], with cultural adaptation. It is worth noting that, although the questionnaire inquired about the frequency of daytime sleeping, it did not allow for the assessment of nap duration or its timing during the day. In addition, the questionnaire used in the Jeeluna study did not inquire about the age of onset of obesity, and thus did not allow us to examine the association between obesity duration and MHO/MUO status in the study sample. Furthermore, those who consented to blood withdrawal and provided blood samples represented 58.3% of the originally surveyed population. A comparison between those who provided blood samples and those who did not, showed that socio-economic characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the group that provided blood was older (15.9 ± 1.83 vs. 15.69 ± 1.84 years), heavier (BMI: 22.77 ± 5.92 vs. 22.36 ± 6.06 kg/m
2), and included more girls compared to boys (50.9% girls vs. 49.1% boys) (
p < 0.05). Such differences could have resulted in an underestimation of MHO in the study sample, given that BMI has been repetitively shown to be inversely associated with MHO in youth. Despite the above, these differences in age, BMI and gender are less likely to have affected the association between dietary, anthropometric and sleep indicators, as identified in this study. Lastly, the cross-sectional nature of this study does not allow for causality inference. There is a need for longitudinal studies to further confirm the role of adiposity, dietary, psychosocial, socio-demographic and lifestyle- related factors in modulating metabolic profiles in obese youth.