Background
The World Health Organization (WHO) defined “Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) as glucose intolerance first detected during pregnancy” [
1]. Various adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were complicated by GDM [
2], while its complex care requires risk reduction strategies beyond the control of blood glucose level [
3].
Globally, GDM affects an estimated 15% of the pregnant women, 87.6% of the hyperglycemia were in low and middle-income countries. It is one of the challenging health problems of sub-Saharan African countries [
4].
A review indicated that the occurrence of GDM in sub-Saharan Africa was 14% [
5] and Middle East and North Africa ranged from 8.4 to 24.5% [
6] though the study used different screening and diagnostic criteria. Research findings also showed that the prevalence of GDM varied to a certain extent among regions in Africa. For example, East [
7] and West [
8] Africa reported 6 and 14%, respectively. Variations were also noted within sub-regions, like Rwanda [
9] and Tanzania [
10], where the prevalence was 8.3 and 19.5%, respectively. Two decades ago, the prevalence of GDM in the rural area of North Ethiopia was reported as 3.7% [
11]. Additionally, a survey done in the same region (North Ethiopia) found a prevalence of 13% among urban women which was higher than that of women in rural areas (5%) [
12]. However, the study used only fasting blood glucose test as diagnostic criteria for GDM.
According several studies, the increasing occurrence of GDM was related to advanced age, family history of diabetes, inactive physical activity, obesity, and risky behaviors [
13‐
15]. Studies had also recognized that there was association between dietary habits during pregnancy and GDM. However, there had been no concrete consensus on the effects specific dietary aspects and the risk for GDM [
16‐
18].
Gestational diabetes mellitus commonly identified during the second or third trimester of pregnancy as a result of the placental hormone plays an important role in the adverse effect on glucose metabolism [
2]. As pregnancy progresses, various hormones such as estrogen, progesterone, leptin, cortisol, placental lactogen, and placental growth hormone promote a state of insulin resistance [
19]. Primarily, human placental lactogen produced by placenta raises maternal blood glucose level and makes a woman’s body less sensitive to insulin leading to a higher-than-normal blood glucose level and perhaps GDM [
20].
After the pre-existing diabetes (overt diabetes) is ruled out at the first antenatal visit, the recommended oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has to be performed at 24–28 weeks of pregnancy [
21,
22]. However, since there has been no well-established national guideline for GDM screening in the country, most clinicians focus on risk factors to indicate GDM screening. This approach was leaving many pregnant women unnoticed until they develop symptoms of overt diabetes and complications.
Recognizing GDM offers an opportunity to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and improve the lifestyle to prevent the occurrence of diabetes in the future [
23,
24]. Moreover, as per the knowledge of the principal investigator, no study has been conducted on prevalence of GDM in Ethiopia using the updated international diagnostic criteria. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of GDM and associated factors among women attending antenatal care at selected Gondar town public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia.
Data collection
Demographic, obstetric, lifestyle, and anthropometric information
A structured and pretested questionnaire was developed and interviewer-administered to all study participants The questionnaire was prepared in English and then translated to Amharic (the local and national language) and then translated back to English by language experts to check its consistency (English version questionnaire attached as Additional file
1).
A face to face interview was employed to gather information on residence, age, last normal menstrual period (LNMP), marital status, religion, ethnicity, level of education, occupational status, average monthly income, family history of diabetes, previous history of GDM and birth weight of the previous child, behavioral and lifestyle characteristics, such as current exposure to alcohol, coffee, antenatal depressive symptoms, physical activity, and dietary diversity. Gestational age estimations were based on a reliable LNMP combined with first-trimester ultrasonography (if available). Additionally, socio-demographic information (parity, gravidity, gestational age (early fetal ultrasound result), obstetric history, medical history, hemoglobin) were retrieved from ANC cards.
The short form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to assessed the physical activities that women do as part of their everyday lives [
30]. The IPAQ was suitable for adults between 15 and 69 years of age and implemented in different countries. It was designed to assess specific types of activity such as walking, moderate and vigorous intensity activities done at work, as part of house and yard work, to get place to place, and in spare time for recreation, exercise or sport. Women were asked to recall their activities of the last 7 days preceding the interview. Data was reported as metabolic equivalents (MET-minutes per week) using the IPAQ scoring protocol to considered women into high, moderate and low level of physical activity categories [
30].
Dietary diversity was assessed using a 24-h food recall method by the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) 2016 version woman’s minimum dietary diversity measurement tool [
31]. It contained a list of ten food groups (starchy staples, nuts and seeds, pulses, dairy, meat, eggs, poultry and fish, dark green leafy vegetables, other vitamin-A rich fruits and vegetables, other vegetables, and other fruits). The minimum dietary diversity score (MDDS) was dichotomized on the basis of whether or not women have consumed the list of defined food groups the previous day or night. The MDDS of five and more was categorized as adequate dietary diversity [
31].
A mother was asked, “How often have you drunk coffee since your pregnancy?” If the answer was “daily” or “sometimes in a week” the mother was categorized as exposed to coffee. She was also asked, “How often have you drunk alcohol since your pregnancy?” If the answer was “daily” or “sometimes in a week” the mother was labelled as exposed to alcohol.
The mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was measured on the left arm using a non-stretchable measuring tape. As the result of most of the pregnant women could not recall their weight before conception, it was difficult to determine BMI. MUAC was as reliable measure due to quite stable during the course of pregnancy and highly correlated to the BMI before conception [
32,
33]. Pregnant women with MUAC of ≥28 cm were considered as having overweight and/or obesity [
34].
For measuring blood pressure (BP), the pregnant women were asked to take rest for at least 5 min in sitting positions if they were exerted. Then, the pressure was measured on the right arm using normal cuffs fitted for adults with a standard sphygmomanometer placing the stethoscope bell lightly over the brachial artery. The average systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded in mmHg after two readings were taken with an intermission of 5–10 min. Hypertension was considered to be present if the systolic and diastolic blood pressures were greater than or equal to 140 mmHg and 90 mmHg, respectively.
Antenatal depression symptoms were measured by using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) screening tool developed [
35] and validated in urban Ethiopia [
36]. The tool was used to measure the feelings a mother had experienced in the past week. The tool contains ten specific questions with four Likert scale response options (most of the time, sometimes, not often, never), scored from 0 to 3 (a higher score indicated more depressive symptoms), which is simple to use, can be scored by simple addition. An EPDS score of 13 and more used like similar studies conducted in Ethiopia and abroad [
37‐
39] to categorize the presence of antenatal depression.
Laboratory assessment
Pregnant women scheduled for 2 h-75 g OGTT were called and reminded to complete an overnight fast for 8–12 h. Blood glucose level was analyzed using 5 μl capillary whole blood with HemoCue Glucose B-201
+ (A¨ngelholm AB, Sweden). (The specifications of the HemoCue Glucose B-201
+ glucometer attached as Additional file
2). Pregnant women were asked to sit and take rest before the first sample was taken using a finger prick at the side of the fingertip with a sterile lancet after cleaning in disinfectant and allowed to dry. A drop of blood was allowed to fill the cuvette after wiping away the first 2 or 3 drops of blood. Wipe off excess blood on the outside of the cuvette tip and place the filled cuvette in the cuvette holder. After 40–240 s the glucose value of the sample was displayed. The necessary precautions were taken during sample collection. Then, they were given a 75 g of glucose dissolved in 250 mL of water which they drank within 5 min under supervision. Capillary blood samples were taken again at 1 h and 2 h. The whole blood capillary values were converted to plasma venous values by multiplying a constant factor of 1.11 [
40]. GDM diagnosis was made by using the 2017 American Diabetes Association (ADA) [
28] or 2013 WHO [
41] or modified International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) [
42] diagnostic criteria. Similar values have been accepted by the WHO though slightly modified as a range [
29]. The diagnosis of GDM is made when one or more of the values was met (fasting: ≥ 92 mg/dL, 1 h: ≥180 mg/dL; 2 h: ≥ 153 mg/dL). Hemoglobin analysis was also carried out by laboratory technologists in their respective health facilities. Pregnant women with hemoglobin concentration below 11 g/dl were considered as having anaemia [
43].
Statistical analysis
All data were entered into Epi Info™ 7 software, then exported to statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (IBM, NY, USA) for analysis. Descriptive statistics, like frequency, percentage, and mean, SD, and the range were used for the presentation of variables. Tables and figure were also used for data presentation. Categorical variables were expressed as proportions and chi-square analysis was performed to compare proportions. Student t-test was used to compare means for normally distributed variables. Binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with GDM. Variables with P-value of ≤0.20 in the bivariate analysis were exported to the multivariate analysis to control the possible effect of confounders. Model goodness of fit test was checked by the Hosmer-and Lemeshow test (P-value = 0.953). Multicollinearity was checked by using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence level was estimated to show the strength of association, and a P-Value < 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.
Discussion
This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of GDM and associated factors among women attending antenatal care at Gondar town public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia, using the updated international diagnostic criteria.
In this study, the overall prevalence of GDM among women was 12.8% (95% CI: 10.8–14.8). The result was consistent with the Management Sciences for Health (MSF) reported the prevalence of GDM among urban women in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia (13%), but the study used only a fasting blood glucose test which means it did not consider internationally recommended diagnostic criteria [
12]. The finding was higher than those of studies conducted in Rwanda (8.3%) [
9], Tanzania (5.9%) [
7], Egypt (8%) [
44], and Nigeria (8.6%) [
45]. The main reason for the high prevalence of GDM in this study setting might be the fact that the lower cut-off points for FPG and OGTT were used in the updated diagnostic criteria. On the other hand, the finding is lower than those of studies conducted in Tanzania (19.5%) [
10] and South Africa (25.8%) [
46] which used similar diagnostic criteria. This evidence indicates that the prevalence of GDM might also be affected not only by different diagnostic criteria but also by the characteristics of the population [
2,
45,
46]. Increased testing for GDM, change in lifestyle, and the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity might have contributed [
47].
Women with the mid-upper arm circumference of ≥28 cm were two times more likely to develop GDM than women with MUAC < 28 cm. This finding agreed with findings from Tanzania by Mwanri et al. [
7] and Njete et al [
10]. .Although, pre-gestational weight was not available in this study, different studies in Egypt, Ghana and South Africa which considered obesity using BMI noted its significant association with GDM [
14,
15,
48]. Similarly, a review and meta-analysis by Nelson SM et al [
49]. revealed that pre-pregnancy BMI was more strongly associated with the risk of GDM. This was happened by the fact that the decreased insulin sensitivity in obese pregnancies, resulted increases the blood glucose level [
49,
50]. Overweight or obesity exposed to sedentary life led to obesity due to inactive lifestyle. This cycle also adversely affects the glucose metabolism. Likewise, we expect a further rise in GDM in the coming years as obesity is emerging as a public health problem.
Pregnant women with a previous history of GDM had six fold more increased odds of developing of the problem during the pregnancy at the moment. This finding was in line with those of studies in Egypt [
48], Nigeria [
51], Colorado [
52], and a systematic review by Catherine Kim et al. [
53]. The frequent occurrence of GDM showed the presence of communal risk factors in succeeding pregnancies [
54]. Similarly, GDM was four fold higher in women with family history of diabetes. The finding was consistent with an evidence in the US [
55] and studies in Iran [
56,
57]. This might be the fact that the hyperglycemia was linked with a genetically dysfunction of beta cell and familial predisposition to insulin secretory defects [
58]. Moreover, living standards and lifestyles of families are more likely similar resulting in sharing the related risk factors [
59].
Low physical activity increases the likelihood of developing GDM at least three times compared to a high level of physical activity during pregnancy. This finding was in line with a study conducted in Vietnam [
60], a meta-analysis by Tobias et al. [
61], and review by Biase et al. [
59]. Increased level of physical activity during pregnancy reduces glucose levels by preventing weight gain and enhancement of insulin sensitivity [
13,
60,
62].
Pregnant women with inadequate dietary diversity had two times higher GDM than their counterparts. Healthy eating habits and the consumption of food from a variety of dietary groups during pregnancy contributes to the prevention of pregnancy-related complications [
63]. Despite a piece of contradict evidence regarding the impact of dietary variability during pregnancy and developing GDM, studies revealed the association between dietary diversity and GDM [
17,
64‐
66]. The possible reason for the association between inadequate dietary diversity and GDM might be the fact that the majority of women with GDM were classified as inadequate dietary diversity group. Similarly, a large proportion women relied on the monotonous food group in which cereals were the most common consumed food group. Their diets were likely to have been excessive in refined carbohydrates and sugars. On the other hand, dietary diversity varied across a range of factors related to the demographic and socio-economic status of individuals and households. Further research is required to know whether improving dietary pattern adherence during pregnancy is associated with a lower risk of GDM. Our result suggests that clinical and public health efforts to encourage dietary diversity for women of reproductive age might yield benefits in the reduction of GDM in future pregnancies.
Women with antenatal depression had four times higher GDM compared to women with non-depressive symptoms. The finding is supported studies by Morrison et al. [
67] showed antenatal depression as a risk factor for GDM. The finding was in line with that of a study in Chicago which showed that a history of prenatal depression increased the risk for the development of GDM [
68]. The association between depression and GDM was bidirectional [
69] and could be explained by shared psychosocial and physiological factors for these comorbid situations. Pregnant women who had depression were more likely to practice unhealthy behaviors like sedentary lifestyle which lead to the risk of developing GDM [
70]. Moreover, change in cortisol levels by depression have hyperglycemic effects [
71,
72].
This study has strengths and limitation. The strength of the study was that it employed recent and universal screening tool to detect GDM and it has been done for all pregnant women at 24–28 weeks gestation. They underwent a two-hour 75 g OGTT, and updated standard reference cutoff values were considered. Besides, for pregnant women who had risk factors for GDM and whose OGTT results were negative at the regular test were tested again at late gestational age. WHO recommends that in settings where laboratories or proper storages and transport of blood samples is not guaranteed, which is the case in resource limited countries like Ethiopia, the use of point of care tests may influence the result [
23]. However, we used plasma-calibrated hand-held glucometers because of convenience and acceptable reliability. Moreover, due to the nature of study design which restricted causal inference and could not reveal the temporal sequence between the factors and the outcome variable which could be limitation of the study.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the overall prevalence of GDM was found to be high and a major public health concern among pregnant women in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia. Previous history of GDM, antenatal depression, family history of diabetes, low physical activity, overweight and/or obese women and inadequate dietary diversity were significantly associated with GDM. Given the imminent burden of obesity, unhealthy eating, and physical inactivity, a substantial threat of GDM is anticipated in Ethiopia. This may be an appropriate time to think about considering the need for routine screening of GDM to reduce the impact of the diseases in the country. In this regard, our study may serve as a baseline for larger studies and background evidence for policy debates for universal GDM screening in the existing health care system. Integrating healthy lifestyle choices into ANC services, such as reduced obesity, healthy eating, improvement in physical activities and effective strategies for coping with depression are strongly recommended.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.