Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2017

01.12.2017 | Short Communication

Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture

verfasst von: Antonio Naranjo, Sonia Fernández-Conde, Soledad Ojeda, Laura Torres-Hernández, Carolina Hernández-Carballo, Idoia Bernardos, Sinforiano Rodríguez, Pedro Laynez

Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

An observational study was carried out in two hospitals in patients > 65 years admitted for hip fracture. At 6 months, 15% of patients in the hospital with orthogeriatric standard care and 75% in the hospital with fracture liaison service were receiving bisphosphonates.

Purpose

Many patients with fractures are discharged without preventive therapy against further fractures. We sought to compare the effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service (FLS), outpatient FLS, and the standard care after hip fractures in prevention of future fractures.

Methods

An observational study was carried out in two hospitals in patients > 65 years of age, admitted between March and July 2016 for fractures. The Candelaria hospital (HUNSC) has no specific protocol for secondary prevention, while at the Negrin Hospital (HUGCDN), an FLS nurse visits the inpatients, gathers metabolic history, instructs regarding the diet, exercises, and fall prevention, and completes a discharge report regarding osteoporosis treatment. The prescription rate of osteoporosis treatment was analyzed at admission, discharge, and 6 months after discharge. We also analyzed the data of patients with hip fractures who attended the outpatient FLS before March 2016.

Results

We included a total of 185 inpatients with a mean age of 82 years and 73% were women. At admission, 8% of the patients in HUNSC and 10% in HUGCDN were receiving bisphosphonates. At discharge, the percentages were 8 and 96%, while at 6 months they were 15 and 75%, respectively (p < 0.001). The outpatient FLS recorded 206 hip fractures (27% of discharges for fractures), with 77% adherence to treatment at 6 months.

Conclusions

Compared with the conventional management, the FLS model for inpatients with hip fractures achieved a fivefold increase in the adherence to treatment at 6 months, similar to the rates of outpatient FLS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat León Vázquez F, Bonis J, Bryant Cerezo V, Herrero Hernández S, Jamart Sánchez L, Díaz HA (2015) Prevención de fractura osteoporótica en España: uso de fármacos antes y después de una fractura de cadera. Rev Osteoporos Metab Miner 2:54–62CrossRef León Vázquez F, Bonis J, Bryant Cerezo V, Herrero Hernández S, Jamart Sánchez L, Díaz HA (2015) Prevención de fractura osteoporótica en España: uso de fármacos antes y después de una fractura de cadera. Rev Osteoporos Metab Miner 2:54–62CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Naranjo A, Ojeda-Bruno S, Bilbao Cantarero A, Rodríguez-Moreno S (2016) Secondary fracture prevention after femur fractures in the Gran Canaria North Health Area: a 2004–2014 comparison. Reumatol Clin 12:58CrossRefPubMed Naranjo A, Ojeda-Bruno S, Bilbao Cantarero A, Rodríguez-Moreno S (2016) Secondary fracture prevention after femur fractures in the Gran Canaria North Health Area: a 2004–2014 comparison. Reumatol Clin 12:58CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Formiga F, Rivera A, Nolla JM, Coscujuela A, Sole A, Pujol R (2005) Failure to treat osteoporosis and the risk of subsequent fractures in elderly patients with previous hip fracture: a five-year retrospective study. Aging Clin Exp Res 17:96–99CrossRefPubMed Formiga F, Rivera A, Nolla JM, Coscujuela A, Sole A, Pujol R (2005) Failure to treat osteoporosis and the risk of subsequent fractures in elderly patients with previous hip fracture: a five-year retrospective study. Aging Clin Exp Res 17:96–99CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Caeiro JR, Bartra A, Mesa-Ramos M, Etxebarría Í, Montejo J, Carpintero P et al (2017) Burden of first osteoporotic hip fracture in Spain: a prospective, 12-month, observational study. Calcif Tissue Int 100:29–39CrossRefPubMed Caeiro JR, Bartra A, Mesa-Ramos M, Etxebarría Í, Montejo J, Carpintero P et al (2017) Burden of first osteoporotic hip fracture in Spain: a prospective, 12-month, observational study. Calcif Tissue Int 100:29–39CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Si L, Winzenberg TM, Palmer AJA (2013) Systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 25:51–60CrossRefPubMed Si L, Winzenberg TM, Palmer AJA (2013) Systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 25:51–60CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:393–406CrossRefPubMed Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:393–406CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Naranjo A, Ojeda-Bruno S, Bilbao-Cantarero A, Quevedo-Abeledo JC, Diaz-González BV, Rodríguez-Lozano C (2015) Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain. Osteoporos Int 26:2579–2585CrossRefPubMed Naranjo A, Ojeda-Bruno S, Bilbao-Cantarero A, Quevedo-Abeledo JC, Diaz-González BV, Rodríguez-Lozano C (2015) Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain. Osteoporos Int 26:2579–2585CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grigoryan KV, Javedan H, Rudolph JL (2014) Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 28:49–55CrossRef Grigoryan KV, Javedan H, Rudolph JL (2014) Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 28:49–55CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell P, Åkesson K, Chandran M, Cooper C, Ganda K, Schneider M (2016) Implementation of Models of Care for secondary osteoporotic fracture prevention and orthogeriatric Models of Care for osteoporotic hip fracture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 30:536–558CrossRefPubMed Mitchell P, Åkesson K, Chandran M, Cooper C, Ganda K, Schneider M (2016) Implementation of Models of Care for secondary osteoporotic fracture prevention and orthogeriatric Models of Care for osteoporotic hip fracture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 30:536–558CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawley S, Leal J, Delmestri A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Arden NK, Cooper C et al (2016) Anti-osteoporosis medication prescriptions and incidence of subsequent fracture among primary hip fracture patients in England and Wales: an interrupted time-series analysis. J Bone Miner Res 31:2008–2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hawley S, Leal J, Delmestri A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Arden NK, Cooper C et al (2016) Anti-osteoporosis medication prescriptions and incidence of subsequent fracture among primary hip fracture patients in England and Wales: an interrupted time-series analysis. J Bone Miner Res 31:2008–2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leal J, Gray AM, Hawley S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Delmestri A, Arden NK et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res 32:203–211CrossRefPubMed Leal J, Gray AM, Hawley S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Delmestri A, Arden NK et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res 32:203–211CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Hawley S, Delmestri A, Lippett J, Cooper C et al (2017) Geographic variation in secondary fracture prevention after a hip fracture during 1999–2013: a UK study. Osteoporos Int 28:169–178CrossRefPubMed Shah A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Hawley S, Delmestri A, Lippett J, Cooper C et al (2017) Geographic variation in secondary fracture prevention after a hip fracture during 1999–2013: a UK study. Osteoporos Int 28:169–178CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Eekman DA, van Helden SH, Huisman AM, Verhaar HJ, Bultink IE, Geusens PP et al (2014) Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study. Osteoporos Int 25:701–709CrossRefPubMed Eekman DA, van Helden SH, Huisman AM, Verhaar HJ, Bultink IE, Geusens PP et al (2014) Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study. Osteoporos Int 25:701–709CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture
verfasst von
Antonio Naranjo
Sonia Fernández-Conde
Soledad Ojeda
Laura Torres-Hernández
Carolina Hernández-Carballo
Idoia Bernardos
Sinforiano Rodríguez
Pedro Laynez
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Elektronische ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0373-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.