Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016

24.07.2015

Previous weight loss as a predictor of weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

verfasst von: Monica Sethi, Melissa Beitner, Melissa Magrath, Bradley Schwack, Marina Kurian, George Fielding, Christine Ren-Fielding

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) can be influenced by a variety of factors. The objective of this study is to investigate whether the maximum amount of previous weight loss with diet and exercise, prior to evaluation for bariatric surgery, is predictive of postoperative weight loss success among primary LAGB patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was designed from a prospectively collected database at a single institution. Inclusion criteria consisted of age ≥18 years, initial body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2, intake information on the maximum weight loss at any time prior to referral to our bariatric practice, and at least 2 years of postoperative follow-up. Patients with prior bariatric surgery were excluded. Outcomes included mean % excess weight loss (EWL), percent that achieved weight loss success (%EWL ≥ 40), and percent with suboptimal weight loss (%EWL < 20) at 2 years post-LAGB.

Results

In the study, 462 primary LAGB patients were included. Mean previous weight loss was 29.7 lb (SD 27.6, range 0–175). These patients were divided into four previous weight loss groups (0, 1–20, 21–50, >50 lb) for analysis. In adjusted multivariate analyses, patients with >50 lb of maximum previous weight loss had a significantly higher mean %EWL, (p < 0.0001) and %BMIL (p < 0.0001), were more likely to reach weight loss success (≥40 % EWL, p = 0.047), and were less likely to experience suboptimal weight loss (<20 % EWL, p = 0.027) at 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusion

Previous weight loss appears to be a significant predictor of weight loss after LAGB. With multiple options for weight loss surgery, this study helps elucidate which patients may be more likely to achieve greater weight loss with the LAGB, allowing clinicians to appropriately counsel patients preoperatively.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarese LE, Pories WJ (2014) Adult weight loss diets: metabolic effects and outcomes. Nutr Clin Pract 29:759–767CrossRefPubMed Matarese LE, Pories WJ (2014) Adult weight loss diets: metabolic effects and outcomes. Nutr Clin Pract 29:759–767CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai AG, Wadden TA (2005) Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med 142:56–66CrossRefPubMed Tsai AG, Wadden TA (2005) Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med 142:56–66CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wadden TA, Bartlett S, Letizia KA, Foster GD, Stunkard AJ, Conill A (1992) Relationship of dieting history to resting metabolic rate, body composition, eating behavior, and subsequent weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 56:203S–208SPubMed Wadden TA, Bartlett S, Letizia KA, Foster GD, Stunkard AJ, Conill A (1992) Relationship of dieting history to resting metabolic rate, body composition, eating behavior, and subsequent weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 56:203S–208SPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Basciani S, Costantini D, Contini S, Persichetti A, Watanabe M, Mariani S, Lubrano C, Spera G, Lenzi A, Gnessi L (2015) Safety and efficacy of a multiphase dietetic protocol with meal replacements including a step with very low calorie diet. Endocrine 48:863–870CrossRefPubMed Basciani S, Costantini D, Contini S, Persichetti A, Watanabe M, Mariani S, Lubrano C, Spera G, Lenzi A, Gnessi L (2015) Safety and efficacy of a multiphase dietetic protocol with meal replacements including a step with very low calorie diet. Endocrine 48:863–870CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bischoff SC, Damms-Machado A, Betz C, Herpertz S, Legenbauer T, Low T, Wechsler JG, Bischoff G, Austel A, Ellrott T (2012) Multicenter evaluation of an interdisciplinary 52-week weight loss program for obesity with regard to body weight, comorbidities and quality of life: a prospective study. Int J Obes (Lond) 36:614–624CrossRef Bischoff SC, Damms-Machado A, Betz C, Herpertz S, Legenbauer T, Low T, Wechsler JG, Bischoff G, Austel A, Ellrott T (2012) Multicenter evaluation of an interdisciplinary 52-week weight loss program for obesity with regard to body weight, comorbidities and quality of life: a prospective study. Int J Obes (Lond) 36:614–624CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2008) SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:2281–2300CrossRef Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2008) SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:2281–2300CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity (1991) Consensus statement, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference 9:1–20 Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity (1991) Consensus statement, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference 9:1–20
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Weichman K, Ren C, Kurian M, Heekoung AY, Casciano R, Stern L, Fielding G (2011) The effectiveness of adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective 6-year U.S. follow-up study. Surg Endosc 25:397–403CrossRefPubMed Weichman K, Ren C, Kurian M, Heekoung AY, Casciano R, Stern L, Fielding G (2011) The effectiveness of adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective 6-year U.S. follow-up study. Surg Endosc 25:397–403CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasza J, Brody F, Vaziri K, Scheffey C, McMullan S, Wallace B, Khambaty F (2011) Analysis of poor outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc 25:41–47CrossRefPubMed Kasza J, Brody F, Vaziri K, Scheffey C, McMullan S, Wallace B, Khambaty F (2011) Analysis of poor outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc 25:41–47CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, Parikh JA, Dutson E, Mehran A, Ko CY, Gibbons MM (2012) Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg 22:70–89CrossRefPubMed Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, Parikh JA, Dutson E, Mehran A, Ko CY, Gibbons MM (2012) Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg 22:70–89CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ray EC, Nickels MW, Sayeed S, Sax HC (2003) Predicting success after gastric bypass: the role of psychosocial and behavioral factors. Surgery 134:555–563 discussion 563–554 CrossRefPubMed Ray EC, Nickels MW, Sayeed S, Sax HC (2003) Predicting success after gastric bypass: the role of psychosocial and behavioral factors. Surgery 134:555–563 discussion 563–554 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jantz EJ, Larson CJ, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN (2009) Number of weight loss attempts and maximum weight loss before Roux-en-Y laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery are not predictive of postoperative weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:208–211CrossRefPubMed Jantz EJ, Larson CJ, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN (2009) Number of weight loss attempts and maximum weight loss before Roux-en-Y laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery are not predictive of postoperative weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:208–211CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbons LM, Sarwer DB, Crerand CE, Fabricatore AN, Kuehnel RH, Lipschutz PE, Raper SE, Williams NN, Wadden TA (2006) Previous weight loss experiences of bariatric surgery candidates: how much have patients dieted prior to surgery? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:159–164CrossRefPubMed Gibbons LM, Sarwer DB, Crerand CE, Fabricatore AN, Kuehnel RH, Lipschutz PE, Raper SE, Williams NN, Wadden TA (2006) Previous weight loss experiences of bariatric surgery candidates: how much have patients dieted prior to surgery? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:159–164CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen R, Dugay G, Rajaram K, Cabrera I, Siegel N, Ren CJ (2004) Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 14:514–519CrossRefPubMed Shen R, Dugay G, Rajaram K, Cabrera I, Siegel N, Ren CJ (2004) Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 14:514–519CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ochner CN, Puma LM, Raevuori A, Teixeira J, Geliebter A (2010) Effectiveness of a prebariatric surgery insurance-required weight loss regimen and relation to postsurgical weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18:287–292CrossRef Ochner CN, Puma LM, Raevuori A, Teixeira J, Geliebter A (2010) Effectiveness of a prebariatric surgery insurance-required weight loss regimen and relation to postsurgical weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18:287–292CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Talarico JA, Torquati A, McCarthy EM, Bonomo S, Lutfi RE (2010) Pre-Lap-Band group education in Medicaid population: does it really make a difference? Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:356–360CrossRefPubMed Talarico JA, Torquati A, McCarthy EM, Bonomo S, Lutfi RE (2010) Pre-Lap-Band group education in Medicaid population: does it really make a difference? Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:356–360CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wedin S, Madan A, Correll J, Crowley N, Malcolm R, Karl Byrne T, Borckardt JJ (2014) Emotional eating, marital status and history of physical abuse predict 2-year weight loss in weight loss surgery patients. Eat Behav 15:619–624CrossRefPubMed Wedin S, Madan A, Correll J, Crowley N, Malcolm R, Karl Byrne T, Borckardt JJ (2014) Emotional eating, marital status and history of physical abuse predict 2-year weight loss in weight loss surgery patients. Eat Behav 15:619–624CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Previous weight loss as a predictor of weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
verfasst von
Monica Sethi
Melissa Beitner
Melissa Magrath
Bradley Schwack
Marina Kurian
George Fielding
Christine Ren-Fielding
Publikationsdatum
24.07.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4441-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.