Background
Methods
Search strategy
Quality assessment
-
0 if none of the above criteria was fulfilled
-
1 if only standardization of the measure and/or researchers by training was done
-
2 if triangulation of methods/data sources was done
-
3 if the methods used for analysis were well established/published
-
4 if validity of the measure was tested with good results
Descriptive analysis
Ethics
Results
Literature search results
Sl No | Title | Authors | Publication | Country | Study type | Study population | Size of Population | Definition of Performance | Measures identified | Performance distinguished as centre(system)/personnel | Degree of description of measurement property | Quality of measurement property |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
| Investing in Improved Performance of National Tuberculosis Programs Reduces the Tuberculosis Burden: Analysis of 22 High-Burden Countries | Akachi, Y., A. Zumla, and R. Atun [28] | The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2012. 205: p. S284-S292 | High TB burden countries | Quantitative | Developing Countries | Not Applicable | 1. Secondary analysis of WHO, OECD data 2. Indicators of National Tubercular Program (NTP) and its effect on burden of disease | 1. Tuberculosis Burden: a. Incidence b. Prevalence c. Mortality 2. Tuberculosis control program: a. Case detection rate b. Treatment success rate c. NTP expenditure | System (Country) | 2 | 3 |
2
| Performance of female volunteer community health workers in Dhaka urban slums | Alam, K., S. Tasneem, and E. Oliveras [29] | Social Science & Medicine, 2012. 75(3): p. 511–515. | Dhaka, Bangladesh | Mixed Method [Quantitative and Qualitative (Focus group discussion)] | Community Health Workers (CHW) | 542 (50% of CHW) + 3 | Active participation | 1. Activities, tasks and services: a. Home visits b. Identifying pregnancies c. Bringing pregnant women to delivery centres d. Accompanying pregnant women to delivery and providing essential new born care | Personnel | 2 | 1 |
3
| Accessibility to tuberculosis treatment: assessment of health service performance. | Arakawa, T., et al. [30] | Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2011. 19(4): p. 994–1002 | Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo State, Brazil | Quantitative | Persons with TB and undergoing treatment at referral services | 100 | Accessibility of services | 1. Organization accessibility 2. Economic accessibility 3. Geographical accessibility | Centre | 2 | 3 |
4
| Problems measuring community health status at a local level: Papua New Guinea’s health information system. | Ashwell, H.E. and L. Barclay [31] | Rural Remote Health, 2010. 10(4): p. 1539. | Papua New Guinea’ | Mixed Method[Qualitative (interviews) Quantitative data from census] | Health persons rendering services at national, provincial and district health facilities | 175 + 77 | 1. Community Health and Wellbeing 2. Community use of services | 1. Community Health a. Physical health b. Social and Economic well being c. Healthy lifestyle d. Hygienic living environment e. Maternal and Child Health 2. Use of services a. Use of Antenatal, childbirth, immunization services b. Use of Environmentally induced diseases like malaria, pneumonia diarrhoea | Centre | 1 | 2 |
5
| Evaluation of maternal and child health services in El-Minia City, Egypt. | Awadalla, H.I., et al. [32] | Journal of Public Health, 2009. 17(5): p. 321–329. | El-Minia City, Egypt | Quantitative | Female clients using health services at maternal and child health centres | 400 | 1. Utilization 2. Client Satisfaction | 1.Utilization of various components of Maternal &Child Health (MCH) services a. Abortion b. Under 5 year mortality c. Curative MCH services d. Antenatal care e. Delivery services f. Family planning services g. Preventive and curative MCH services 2.Satisfaction a. Waiting time b. Environment c. Doctor client interaction d. Nurse client interaction e. Economic feasibility | Centre | 2 | 1 |
6
| District health managers’ perceptions of supervision in Malawi and Tanzania. | Bradley, S., et al. [33] | Hum Resour Health, 2013. 11: p. 43. | Malawi and Tanzania | Qualitative | District health management team | 57 | 1. Health indicators 2. Facility Provision 3. Individual Staff performance 4. Supervisory practices | 1.Health indicators a. Number of Deliveries b. Maternal mortality Figs. 2. Facility Provision a. Availability of supplies b. Registers filled c. Cleanliness of wards 3. Individual Staff performance a. Punctuality b. Response time for on call staff c. Absenteeism d. Staff reporting to work at recommended time 4. Supervisory practices | Personnel | 2 | 2* |
7
| A Rapid assessment methodology for the evaluation of primary care organization and performance in Brazil | Macinko, J., C. Almeida, and P.K. de Sá [34] | Health Policy and Planning, 2007. 22(3): p. 167–177. | Brazil | Quantitative | Client and provider | 936 | Assessment of primary care experiences | 1.Accessibility of Facility and Services 2.Gate keeping/ First contact care 3.Longitudinality 4.Comprehensiveness 5.Coordination 6.Family focus 7.Community orientation 8.Provider characteristics | Centre | 2 | 3 |
8
| The establishment of bonds between professional and patient in TB treatment: the performance of primary health care services in a city in the interior of Sao Paulo | Ponce, M.A., et al. [35] | Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2011. 19(5): p. 1222–9 | Sao Paul, Brazil | Quantitative | Patient Health professional Managers | 108 + 37 + 15 | Establishment of bonds (Patient experience Health professional experience Managers experience) | Bonding Identified by 11 items | Centre | 2 | 3 |
9
| Assessing the performance of primary health centres under decentralized government in Kerala, India | Varathrajan D, Thankappan R, Jayapalan S [36] | Health Policy and Planning, 2004.19(1)41–51 | Kerala, India | Mixed Method [Qualitative (key informant/ client interviews) Quantitative data from PHCs] | Primary Health Centre | 10 | Cost effectiveness | 1. Infrastructure: Building structure, Toilet, Clean running water, Electricity, Communication, Wash basin, equipment and instruments, furniture, drugs and other supplies 2. Access: Size of building to patient load, home visits by PHC staff, facility hours, patient records waiting area, patient privacy, distribution/display of health education materials, display of community statistics 3. Costs: salary, investment, maintenance, patient care, building, furniture, equipment 4. Number of patient contacts served 5. Client experience: focus on illness, service received, access frequency, staff behaviour, diagnosis 6. Key informant experience: budget, cost, financial sources, PHC and local government characteristics and linkages | Centre | 2 | 3 |
10
| Gap analysis and the performance of primary health centres in the implementation of the school health programme of NRHM | Shreedevi D [37] | International journal of Research in Business Management, 2014.2(2)1–8 | Andhra Pradesh, India | Quantitative | Primary Health Centre | 159 | Program delivery | Program Specific 1. Services a. Screening, Health care and Referral b. Immunization c. Micronutrient management d. De-worming 2. Promotion 3. Capacity building 4. Monitoring & Evaluation 5. Midday Meal | System(District) | 2 | 3 |
11
| Factors affecting the performance of maternal health care providers in Armenia | Fort AL, Voltero L [38] | Human Resources for Health 2004, p 2–8 | Armenia | Mixed Method [Qualitative (personnel interviews) Quantitative data (skill items)] | Nurses and Midwifes | 285 | Completion of clinical and non-clinical tasks | Skill Items of 1. Prenatal care (42 items) 2. Post-natal care (3 items) | Personnel | 2 | 3 |
12
| Improving health worker performance: The patient-perspective from a PBF program in Rwanda | Lannes. L [39] | Social science and Medicine (2015). 138:1–11 | Rwanda | Quantitative | Health workers of Primary level facilities | 157 | Patient satisfaction | 1. Clinical services a. Privacy during examination b. Staff attitude c. Explanation d. Cost of drugs e. Cost of services f. Availability of drugs g. Overall satisfaction 2. Non-clinical services a. Waiting time b. Time with provider c. Cleanliness | Personnel | 2 | 3 |
13
| Assessment of the role of primary health care in tuberculosis control in Serbia | Stosic M, Lazarevic N, Kuruc V, Ristic L [40] | MedicinskiPregled (Novi Sad) 2015. 68(9–10):331–335 | Serbia | Quantitative | Primary Health Centre | 19 | Organization of care | 1. Availability and coverage of general practice and TB services 2. Health activities performed 3. Collaboration with health services Compliance to health needs | Centre | 2 | 3 |
14
| Skilled Birth Attendants in Tanzania: A descriptive study of cadres and emergency obstetric care signal functions performed | Uneo E, Adegoke A. A, Masenga G, Fimbo J, Msuya S E [41] | Maternal and child health journal, 2015.19:155–169 | Tanzania | Mixed Method[Quantitative(facility survey and task items) Qualitative(challenges in care delivery)] | Healthcare workers in Primary Health Centre | 158 | Knowledge and Skill of Emergency Obstetric Care signal functions | 1. BEmOC signal functions a. Administers parenteral antibiotics b. Administers uterotonics drug c. Administers parenteral anti-convulsants d. Manually remove the placenta e. Remove retained products f. Perform assisted vaginal delivery g. Perform basic neonatal resuscitation 2. CEmOC signal functions a. Perform surgery Perform blood transfusion | Personnel | 2 | 3 |
15
| Organization and delivery of primary healthcare services in Petropolis, Brazil | Macinko J, Almeida C, Oliveria ES, Sa P K [42] | International Journal of Health Planning and Management | Brazil | Mixed Method [Quantitative (facility survey) Qualitative(validated participant selection)] | Primary care facility and Family care centres | 33 care facilities | Attributes of Primary care systems | 1. Accessibility 2. First contact 3. Longitudinality 4. Comprehensiveness 5. Coordination 6. Family-focused 7. Community orientation 8. Provider characteristics | Centre | 2 | 3 |
Quality of measures
Description of the PHC performance measures
Method of performance assessment
Performance of the professionals
Performance of the health system/Centre
Perspective and structural levels of performance
Comparison with the WHO aspects of health systems performance assessment
WHO aspects Measures | Overall Level of Health | Distribution of Health in Population | Overall Level of Responsiveness | Distribution of Responsiveness | Distribution of Resources | Distribution of Financial Contribution |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global standard: Measures from WHO aspects of performance assessment [15] | 1. Mortality rate: age and specific 2. Morbidity rate: age and disease specific 3. Maternal Mortality Ratio 4. Infant Mortality rate and Neonatal Mortality rate 5. DALE/DALY/HALE 6. Life expectancy 7. Disease and disability prevalence | 1. Immunization coverage 2. Antenatal care 3. Natal care: percentage of deliveries attended by trained personnel 4. Growth monitoring 5. Contraceptive prevalence rate 6. Emergence of communicable disease | 1. Quality of care 2. Client satisfaction | 1. Availability and use of facilities 2. Human resources for health | 1. Human resources 2. Healthcare facilities | 1. Government health budget 2. Contribution of NGOs/donors on health services 3. Contribution for insurance 4. Individual out-of-pocket expenditure 5. Measurement of health system efficiency: Per capita expenditure 6. Education/ average years of schooling |
Measures from review of articles | • Case detection and Treatment Success Rate [42] • Incidence, prevalence and mortality by disease [42] • Community health [31] • Number of deliveries and maternal mortality figs. [33] | • Community health [31] | • Client experience and satisfaction with quality of care: privacy, doctor client interaction, nurse client interaction, staff attitude, explanation, economic feasibility, availability of drugs, cost of service/drugs [32, 34, 36, 42] • Facility hours, privacy, patient records, health education [34] • Provider and key informant satisfaction with budget, costs, financial resources, facility and local management characteristics and linkages [34] • Program implementation [39] • Services / skill item performance: quality, quantity, efficiency, problem solving capacity, adaptability [30] | • Use of antenatal, childbirth, immunization services, environmentally induced disease like malaria, pneumonia, diarrhoea [31, 32, 39] • Utilization of maternal and child health services like abortion, under 5 year mortality, preventive & curative services, antenatal care, delivery services, family planning services [32] • Attributes of primary care- first contact, community orientation, provider characteristics [41] | Human resources: Attitude and characteristics of provider- punctuality, response time, absenteeism, supervisory practices, collaboration, co-ordination, community orientation, compliance to health needs, health activities performed [33, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41]and collaboration • Organization accessibility (building size to patient load) • Economic accessibility • Geographic accessibility Basic Infrastructure: building structure, toilet, clean running water, electricity, communication, equipment and instrument, furniture, drugs and supplies [34] | • Cost effectiveness [34] |