Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2019

12.06.2019 | Original Research

Prioritizing Primary Care Patients for a Communication Intervention Using the “Surprise Question”: a Prospective Cohort Study

verfasst von: Joshua R. Lakin, MD, Margaret G. Robinson, BA, Ziad Obermeyer, MD, MPhil, Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA, Susan D. Block, MD, Rebecca Cunningham, MD, Joseph M. Tumblin, BA, Christine Vogeli, PhD, Rachelle E. Bernacki, MD, MS

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Communication about priorities and goals improves the value of care for patients with serious illnesses. Resource constraints necessitate targeting interventions to patients who need them most.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinician screening tool to identify patients for a communication intervention.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Primary care clinics in Boston, MA.

Participants

Primary care physicians (PCPs) and nurse care coordinators (RNCCs) identified patients at high risk of dying by answering the Surprise Question (SQ): “Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 2 years?”

Measurements

Performance of the SQ for predicting mortality, measured by the area under receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.

Results

Sensitivity of PCP response to the SQ at 2 years was 79.4% and specificity 68.6%; for RNCCs, sensitivity was 52.6% and specificity 80.6%. In univariate regression, the odds of 2-year mortality for patients identified as high risk by PCPs were 8.4 times higher than those predicted to be at low risk (95% CI 5.7–12.4, AUC 0.74) and 4.6 for RNCCs (3.4–6.2, AUC 0.67). In multivariate analysis, both PCP and RNCC prediction of high risk of death remained associated with the odds of 2-year mortality.

Limitations

This study was conducted in the context of a high-risk care management program, including an initial screening process and training, both of which affect the generalizability of the results.

Conclusion

When used in combination with a high-risk algorithm, the 2-year version of the SQ captured the majority of patients who died, demonstrating better than expected performance as a screening tool for a serious illness communication intervention in a heterogeneous primary care population.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright AA, Keating NL, Balboni TA, Matulonis UA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers’ mental health. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(29):4457–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.3863 CrossRef Wright AA, Keating NL, Balboni TA, Matulonis UA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers’ mental health. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(29):4457–64. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2009.​26.​3863 CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlin CM, Kelley JM, Jackson VA, Temel JS. Early palliative care for lung cancer: improving quality of life and increasing survival. International journal of palliative nursing. 2010;16(9):420–3CrossRef Dahlin CM, Kelley JM, Jackson VA, Temel JS. Early palliative care for lung cancer: improving quality of life and increasing survival. International journal of palliative nursing. 2010;16(9):420–3CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014. Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller SC, Mor V, Wu N, Gozalo P, Lapane K. Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2002;50(3):507–15CrossRef Miller SC, Mor V, Wu N, Gozalo P, Lapane K. Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2002;50(3):507–15CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller SC, Mor V, Teno J. Hospice enrollment and pain assessment and management in nursing homes. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2003;26(3):791–9CrossRef Miller SC, Mor V, Teno J. Hospice enrollment and pain assessment and management in nursing homes. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2003;26(3):791–9CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Obermeyer Z, Makar M, Abujaber S, Dominici F, Block S, Cutler D. Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(18):1888–96.CrossRef Obermeyer Z, Makar M, Abujaber S, Dominici F, Block S, Cutler D. Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(18):1888–96.CrossRef
16.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Block SD, Bernier GM, Crawley LM, Farber S, Kuhl D, Nelson W, et al. Incorporating palliative care into primary care education. National Consensus Conference on Medical Education for Care Near the End of Life. Journal of general internal medicine. 1998;13(11):768–73CrossRef Block SD, Bernier GM, Crawley LM, Farber S, Kuhl D, Nelson W, et al. Incorporating palliative care into primary care education. National Consensus Conference on Medical Education for Care Near the End of Life. Journal of general internal medicine. 1998;13(11):768–73CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pattison M, Romer AL. Improving Care Through the End of Life: launching a primary care clinic-based program. Journal of palliative medicine. 2001;4(2):249–54CrossRef Pattison M, Romer AL. Improving Care Through the End of Life: launching a primary care clinic-based program. Journal of palliative medicine. 2001;4(2):249–54CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pang WF, Kwan BC, Chow KM, Leung CB, Li PK, Szeto CC. Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the “surprise” question. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 2013;33(1):60–6. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2011.00204 CrossRef Pang WF, Kwan BC, Chow KM, Leung CB, Li PK, Szeto CC. Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the “surprise” question. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 2013;33(1):60–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3747/​pdi.​2011.​00204 CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Downar J, Goldman R, Pinto R, Englesakis M, Adhikari NK. The “surprise question” for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 2017;189(13):E484-e93. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160775 CrossRefPubMed Downar J, Goldman R, Pinto R, Englesakis M, Adhikari NK. The “surprise question” for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 2017;189(13):E484-e93. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1503/​cmaj.​160775 CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Haime V, Hong C, Mandel L, Mohta N, Iezzoni LI, Ferris TG, et al. Clinician considerations when selecting high-risk patients for care management. The American journal of managed care. 2015;21(10):e576–82PubMed Haime V, Hong C, Mandel L, Mohta N, Iezzoni LI, Ferris TG, et al. Clinician considerations when selecting high-risk patients for care management. The American journal of managed care. 2015;21(10):e576–82PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Batiste X, Martinez-Munoz M, Blay C, Amblas J, Vila L, Costa X, et al. Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO((c)) tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study. Palliative medicine. 2017;31(8):754–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316676647.CrossRefPubMed Gomez-Batiste X, Martinez-Munoz M, Blay C, Amblas J, Vila L, Costa X, et al. Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO((c)) tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study. Palliative medicine. 2017;31(8):754–63. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0269216316676647​.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48CrossRef Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prioritizing Primary Care Patients for a Communication Intervention Using the “Surprise Question”: a Prospective Cohort Study
verfasst von
Joshua R. Lakin, MD
Margaret G. Robinson, BA
Ziad Obermeyer, MD, MPhil
Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA
Susan D. Block, MD
Rebecca Cunningham, MD
Joseph M. Tumblin, BA
Christine Vogeli, PhD
Rachelle E. Bernacki, MD, MS
Publikationsdatum
12.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05094-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.