Skip to main content
main-content

13.06.2019 | Original Research | Ausgabe 8/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2019

Proactive Population Health Strategy to Offer Tobacco Dependence Treatment to Smokers in a Primary Care Practice Network

Zeitschrift:
Journal of General Internal Medicine > Ausgabe 8/2019
Autoren:
MD, MAS Sara Kalkhoran, BA Elizabeth M. Inman, RN, MA Jennifer H. K. Kelley, PhD, MPH Jeffrey M. Ashburner, MD Nancy A. Rigotti
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11606-019-05079-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This study was presented at the 2018 Society for General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting in Denver, CO.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Background

Population-based strategies can expand the reach of tobacco cessation treatment beyond clinical encounters.

Objective

To determine the effect of two population-based tobacco cessation strategies, compared with usual care, on providing tobacco treatment outside of clinical encounters.

Design

3-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Participants

Current smokers ≥ 18 years old with a primary care provider at one of five community health centers in Massachusetts were identified via the electronic health record (n = 5225) and recruited using automated phone calls.

Interventions

One intervention group involved engagement with a health system–based tobacco coach (internal care coordination), and the other connected patients to a national quitline (external community referral).

Measurements

Proportion of smokers with documentation of any evidence-based cessation treatment in the 6 months after enrollment.

Key Results

Of 639 individuals who responded to the proactive treatment offer, 233 consented and were randomized 1:1:1 to study arm. At 6-month follow-up, the pooled intervention group, compared with usual care, had higher documentation of any smoking cessation treatment (63% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), cessation medication prescription (52% vs. 30%, p = 0.002), and counseling (47% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Internal care coordination was more effective than external community referral at connecting smokers to any cessation treatment (76% vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and at providing cessation medication (66% vs. 39%, p < 0.001), but comparable at linking smokers to cessation counseling resources.

Conclusions

Smokers responding to a population-based, proactive outreach strategy had better provision of tobacco cessation treatment when referred to either a health system–based or community-based program compared with usual care. The health system–based strategy outperformed the quitline-based one in several measures. Future work should aim to improve population reach and test the effect on smoking cessation rates.

Trial Registration

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Sichern Sie sich jetzt Ihr e.Med-Abo und sparen Sie 50 %!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Innere Medizin 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

  2. Sie können e.Med Allgemeinmedizin 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.