Gesprächsanalyse – ein Instrument für Aphasieforschung und -therapie

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der mangelnde Transfer klinischer aphasiologischer Therapieerfolge in den Alltag der Betroffenen wird allgemein beklagt. Der vorliegende Beitrag geht von der Überlegung aus, dass diese Transferproblematik aus einer mangelnden Kenntnis der alltäglichen Anforderung an das „Aphasiemanagement” in Familie und Paarbeziehung resultiert. Wir argumentieren, dass gesprächsanalytische Untersuchungen zur Interaktion mit Aphasikern im häuslichen und klinischen Kontext in der Lage sind, eine „alltagstauglichere” Form der Aphasietherapie zu entwickeln. Dazu werden die Methoden und Ergebnisse der aphasiebezogenen Gesprächsanalyse zusammengefasst und bewertet. Wir gehen zunächst auf einige Ergebnisse der Analyse von aphasischen Gesprächen (also solche, an denen Aphasiker beteiligt sind) ein, diskutieren dann den Stellenwert gesprächsanalytischer Methoden für die aphasiologische Befunderhebung in der klinischen Praxis und befassen uns abschließend mit der Rolle der Gesprächsanalyse in der aphasiologischen Therapie(forschung).

Abstract

It is well known that the clinical therapy for aphasia leads to improvements. However, these are often not transferred by the aphasic to his or her everyday interactional routines at home. This deplorable lack of transferability, so we argue in this article, is due to the therapist's lack of knowledge of what is central for the everyday management of aphasia in the family and in couples after aphasia. We also argue that the methodological and theoretical framework of conversation analysis is a useful instrument for developing forms of aphasia therapy which are more transferable to mundane situations outside the clinic. In order to show this, we summarise and evaluate our own and other researchers' results on conversation analysis as applied to aphasic speech events. We first discuss some important features of aphasic conversations (i.e., those in which at least one aphasic is involved), we then show the relevance of conversation analysis for the assessment of aphasia in the clinical context and we finally argue for conversation analysis as a tool in aphasia therapy.

• 1 Mitchum CC, Sloan Berndt R. The Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach to Treatment of Language Disorders.  Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 1995;  5 1-17
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Pulvermüller F, Berthier ML. Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis.  Aphasiology. 2008;  22, 6 563-599
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bauer A, Auer P. Aphasie im familiären Alltag.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 4 Chapey R, Duchan JF, Elman RJ. et al .Life participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values for the future.. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4. Aufl.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001: 235-245
  Google Scholar
• 5 Holland A. Living Successfully with Aphasia: Three Variations on the Theme.  Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2006;  13 44-51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Grötzbach H, Iven C. ICF in der Sprachtherapie.. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 7 Lyon J. Finding, Defining, and Refining Functionality in Real Life for People Confronting Aphasia.. In: Worrall Frattaly, Hrsg. Neurogenic Communication Disorders: A Functional Approach. New York, Stuttgart: Thieme; 2000: 137-161
  Google Scholar
• 8 Huber W, Poeck K, Springer L. Klinik und Rehabilitation der Aphasie.. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2007
  Google Scholar
• 9 Grötzbach H. Evidenzbasierte Aphasietherapie.  Forum Logopädie. 2005;  4 6-11
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Heeschen C, Schegloff EA. Aphasic Agrammatism as Interactional Artefact and Achievement.. In: Goodwin C, Hrsg. Conversation and Brain Damage Oxford: #Verlag##; 2003: 231-282
  Google Scholar
• 11 Rönfeldt B. Paragrammatism reconsidered.  INLIST 10 http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/inlist 1999; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Auer P, Rönfeldt B. Prolixity as adaptation: Prosody and turn-taking in German conversation with a fluent aphasic.. In: Couper-Kuhlen E, Ford CE, Hrsg. Sound Patterns in Interaction. Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2004: 171-200
  Google Scholar
• 13 Bauer A. Miteinander im Gespräch bleiben – Partizipation in aphasischen Alltagsgesprächen.  http://www.verlag-gespraechsforschung.de 2009; 
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS. Access and social inclusion in aphasia: Interactional principles and applications.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 81-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Lucius-Hoene G, Hallama R, Haag A. et al .Partnerschaftliches Coping. Ehepaare bewältigen die Aphasie.. In: Bauer A, Auer P. Aphasie im familiären Alltag. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2008: 132-149
  Google Scholar
• 16 Parr S. Psychosocial aspects of aphasia: Whose perspectives.  Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedia. 2001;  53 266-288
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: tracking social exclusion.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 98-123
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S,. Hrsg Aphasie.. Leben mit dem Sprachverlust. München: Urban & Fischer; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 19 Rönfeldt BM. How to live with a spoiled Identity: stigma management in aphasic families.  Stem-, spraak-, en taalpathologie. 2001;  10 269-281
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Deppermann A. Gespräche analysieren. Eine Einführung in konversationsanalytische Methoden.. Opladen: Leske & Budrich; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 21 Auer P. Sprachliche Interaktion.. Tübingen: Niemeyer; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 22 Davis GA, Wilcox MJ. Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics.. San Diego: College-Hill; 1985
  Google Scholar
• 23 Holland A. Communicative Abilities in Daily Living.. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1980
  Google Scholar
• 24 Bergmann JR. Das Konzept der Konversationsanalyse.. In: Antos G, Brinker K, Heinemann W, Sager SF Hrsg. Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter; 2001: 919-927
  Google Scholar
• 25 Wilkinson R. Introduction, Aphasiology Special Issue: Conversation Analysis.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 251-258
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Selting M, Couper-Kuhlen E. Argumente für die Entwicklung einer „interaktionalen Linguistik”’.  Gesprächsforschung. 2000;  1 76-95 http://www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Heeschen C, Schegloff EA. Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: on the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 365-405
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Kolk H, Heeschen K. Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1990;  4 221-231
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Kolk H, Heeschen K. Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of aphasia.  Language and Cognitive Processes. 1992;  7 89-129
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Springer L. Medienspezifische Sprachperformanz.. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 31 Milroy L, Perkins L. Repair strategies in aphasic discourse. Towards a collaborative model.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 1992;  6 27-40
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Clark HH, Schaefer E. Collaboration on contributions to conversation.  Language and cognitive processes. 1987;  2 19-41
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Clark HH, Schaefer E. Contributing to discourse.  Cognitive Science. 1989;  13 259-294
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Clark HH, Wilkes-Gibbs D. Refering as a collaborative process.  Cognition. 1986;  22 1-39
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Wilkes-Gibbs D. Studying language use as collaboration.. In: Kasper J, Kellermann E Hrsg. Communication Strategies. Psycholinguistic Perspectives. London: Addison-Wesley; 1997: 238-274
  Google Scholar
• 36 Perkins L, Milroy L. Sharing the communicative burden: A conversation-analytic account of aphasic/non-aphasic interaction.  Multilingua. 1997;  16 199-215
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Perkins L. Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation.. In: Goodwin C Hrsg. Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003: 147-162
  Google Scholar
• 38 Laakso M, Klippi A. A closer look at the hint & guess sequences in aphasic conversation.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 345-363
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Laakso M. Collaborative Construction of Repair in Aphasic Conversation. An Interactive View on the Extended Speaking Turns of Persons with Wernicke's Aphasia.. In: Goodwin C Hrsg. Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003: 162-188
  Google Scholar
• 40 Oelschlaeger M. Participation of a conversation partner in the word searches of a person with aphasia.  Am J Speech-Language Pathology. 1999;  8 62-71
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Oelschlaeger M, Damico JS. Word Searches in Aphasia.. In: Goodwin C Hrsg. Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003: 211-227
  Google Scholar
• 42 Bongartz R. Kommunikationstherapie mit Aphasikern und Angehörigen.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 43 Ferguson A, Peterson P. Intonation in partner accommodation for aphasia: A descriptive single case study.  J of Comm Disorders. 2002;  35 11-30
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Goodwin C. Die Ko-Konstruktion von Bedeutung in Gesprächen mit einem Aphasiker.  Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft. 2000;  2 224-246
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Goodwin C. Gesture, aphasia and interaction.. In: McNeill D, Hrsg. Language and Gesture Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000: 85-95
  Google Scholar
• 46 Goodwin C. A Competent Speaker Who CanŽt Speak: The Social Life of Aphasia.  Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 2004;  14 151-170
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Goodwin C, Goodwin MH, Olsher D. Producing Sense with Nonsense Syllables.. In: Ford CE et al., Hrsg.The Language of Turn and Sequence Oxford: Univ. Press; 2002: 56-80
  Google Scholar
• 48 Ekman P, Friesen WV. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding.  Semiotica. 1969;  1 49-98
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Goodwin C, Goodwin M. Context, activity and participation.. In: Auer P, di Luzio A, Hrsg. The Contextualization of Language Amsterdam: Benjamins; 1992: 77-99
  Google Scholar
• 50 Auer P. 1992 Introduction: John Gumperz' Approach to Contextualization.. In: Auer P, di Luzio A, Hrsg. The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 1992: 1-38
  Google Scholar
• 51 Damico JS, Wilson BT, Simmons-Mackie NN. et al . Overcoming unintelligibility in aphasia: The impact of non-verbal interactive strategies.  Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2008;  22 775-782
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Auer P, Bauer A. in Vorb. Multimodality in aphasic conversation: Why gestures sometimes don’t help.  Erscheint in: Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991
  Google Scholar
• 54 Croteau C, Vychytil A, Larfeuil C. et al . “Speaking for” behaviours in spouses of people with aphasia: A descriptive study of six couples in an interview situation.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 291-312
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Le Dorze G, Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends based on the WHO Model of chronic diseases.  Aphasiology. 1995;  9 239-255
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Hengst JA. Collaborative referencing between individuals with aphasia and routine communication partners.  J of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 2003;  46 831-848
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Oelschlaeger M, Damico JS. Spousal interaction after aphasia: collaborative compensations for personal communication.. Vortrag, University of Freiburg; 2005
  Google Scholar
• 58 Sorin-Peters R. 2003 Viewing couples living with aphasia as adult learners – implications for promoting quality of life.  Aphasiology. 2003;  17 405-416
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Clark HH. Using language.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 60 Ferguson A. Describing competence in aphasic/normal conversation.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 1996;  10 55-63
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Ferguson A. The influence of Aphasia, Familiarity and Activity on conversational repair.  Aphasiology. 1994;  8 143-157
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Lindsay J, Wilkinson R. Repair sequences in aphasic talk: a comparison of aphasic-speech therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 305-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Bauer A, Kulke F. Language exercises for dinner: Aspects of aphasia management in family settings.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 1135-1160
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A. Communication strategies used by “good” versus “poor” speaking partners of individuals with aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 807-820
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Holland A. Why can't clinicians talk to aphasic adults.  Aphasiology. 1998;  12 844-846
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Holland A, Halper A. Talking to individuals with aphasia: a challenge for the rehabilitation team.  Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 1996;  2 27-37
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Hansen H. Therapiearbeit. Eine qualitative Untersuchung der Arbeitstypen und -Muster ambulanter logopädischer Therapieprozesse.. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 68 Drew P, Heritage J. Talk at Work.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992
  Google Scholar
• 69 Horton SA. A framework for description and analysis of therapy for language impairment in aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2006;  20 528-564
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS. Social Role Negotiation in Aphasia Therapy: Competence, Incompetence and Conflict.. In: Kovarsky D, Duchan J, Maxwell M, Hrsg. Constructing (In) Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998: 313-341
  Google Scholar
• 71 Ferguson A, Armstrong E. Reflections on speech language therapists’ talk.  Int J of Comm Dis. 2004;  39 469-507
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Laakso M. The interaction in conversations between aphasic person and speech therapists.. In: Gunnarsson BL, Linell P, Nordberg B Hrsg. Text and Talk in Professional Contexts. Uppsala: The Swedish Association of Applied Linguistics (ASLA); 1994: 237-256
  Google Scholar
• 73 Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS, Damico H. A qualitative study of feedback in aphasia therapy.  Americ J of Speech-Language Pathology. 1999;  8 218-230
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Ferguson A. Learning in aphasia therapy: ItŽs not so much what you do, but how you do it.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 125-150
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Ferguson A, Elliot. Analyzing aphasia treatment sessions.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 2001;  15 229-243
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Wilkinson R, Bryan K, Lock S. et al . Therapy using Conversation Analysis: Helping Couples to adapt to Aphasia in Conversation.  J Language & Communication Disorders. 1998;  13 144-149
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Beushausen U. Therapeutische Entscheidungsfindung in der Sprachtherapie.. München: Urban & Fischer; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 78 Perkins L. Applying conversation analysis to aphasia: clinical implications and analytic issues.  European J of Disorders of Communication. 1995;  30 372-383
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Whitworth A, Perkins L, Lesser R. Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Aphasia (CAPPA).. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 80 Becker A. Pragmatik und Aphasie. Konversationsanalytische Verfahren in der Aphasiediagnostik.. Frankfurt: Peter Lang; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 81 Booth S, Perkins L. The use of conversation analysis to guide individualized advice to carers and evaluate change in aphasia: a case study.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 283-304
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Perkins L, Crisp J, Walshaw D. Exploring CA as an assessment tool for aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 259-281
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Damico JS, Oelschlaeger M, Simmons-Mackie N. Qualitative methods in aphasia research: conversation analysis.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 667-679
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Campagna A. Redezuginterne Bearbeitungsstrategien für Lexikalisierungsprobleme bei Aphasie.  MA Arbeit, Deutsches Seminar, Universität Freiburg: http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/2567; 2005; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Armstrong L, Brady M, Mackenzie C. et al . Transcription-less analysis of aphasic discourse: A clinician's dream or a possibility?.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 355-374
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Lock S, Wilkinson R, Bryan K. et al . Supporting Partners of People with aphasia in relationships and conversation (SPPARC).  Int J of Language and Communication Disorders. 2001;  36 25-30
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Lesser R, Milroy L. Linguistics and aphasia: psycholinguistic and pragmatic aspects of intervention.. London: Longman; 1993
  Google Scholar
• 88 Tesak J. Aphasie.  Idsein: Schulz-Kirchner;. 2002; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Booth S, Swabey D. Group training in communication skills for carers of adults with aphasia.  Int J of Language and Communication Disorders. 1999;  34 291-309
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Holland A. Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia.  J of Neurolinguistics. 1991;  6 197-211
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Hopper T, Holland A, Rewega M. Conversational coaching: Treatment Outcomes and future directions.  Aphasiology. 2002;  16 745-761
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Kagan A. Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals.  Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 1995;  2 15-28
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Kagan A. Supported Communication for Adults with Aphasia (SCA): methods and resources for training conversation partners.  Aphasiology. 1998;  12 816-831 und 851–864 (Clinical Forum)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Marshall RC. Having the courage to be competent: persons and families living with aphasia.  J Communication Disorders. 2002;  35 139-152
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Prof. Dr. P. Auer

Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS)

School of Language and Literature

Albertstraße 19

79104 Freiburg

Email: peter.auer@germanistik.uni-freiburg.de

• Supplementary Material