Zentralbl Chir 2013; 138(3): 295-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1283960
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoskopische Therapieoptionen für Perforationen und Insuffizienzen des Gastrointestinaltrakts

The Role of Endoscopy in the Therapy for Perforations and Leakages of the Gastrointestinal Tract
J. Feisthammel
1   Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Rheumatologie, Leipzig, Deutschland
,
S. Jonas
2   Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Department für Operative Medizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland
,
J. Mössner
1   Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Rheumatologie, Leipzig, Deutschland
,
A. Hoffmeister
1   Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Rheumatologie, Leipzig, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 May 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Perforationen und Leckagen von Hohlorganen des Gastrointestinaltrakts können unter Anderem spontan entstehen. Sie können aber auch als Komplikation eines endoskopischen Eingriffes oder nach Anlage einer chirurgischen Anastomose auftreten. Es handelt sich typischerweise um eine schwerwiegende und für den Patienten oft lebensbedrohliche Situation. Klassisch erfolgt die Therapie operativ. Diese Eingriffe sind häufig technisch schwierig und die Morbidität und Letalität auch aufgrund der oft bestehenden lokalen Entzündung nicht zufriedenstellend. In den letzten Jahren wurden verschiedene endoskopische Techniken für die Therapie von Perforationen und Leckagen entwickelt. Dazu zählen vor allem endoskopisch applizierbare Klippsysteme und Stents sowie die relativ neu entwickelten Vakuumsaugdränagen. Insbesondere bei Perforationen der Gallenwege und des Rektum, zunehmend aber auch im Ösophagus, haben diese neuen Techniken trotz oft unzureichender Studiendaten rasch Bedeutung erlangt. Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt anhand der vorhandenen Literatur einen Überblick über die Indikationen und Grenzen der zur Verfügung stehenden endoskopisch-interventionellen Therapieoptionen.

Abstract

Perforations and leakages of hollow organs of the gastrointestinal tract can occur spontaneously among other causes. They can also develop as complications of an endoscopic intervention or after surgical construction of an anastomosis. For the patient, these situations usually are serious and life-threatening. Standard therapy has always been – and most of the time still is – major surgery. These procedures usually are technically difficult and their mortality and morbidity are not satisfactory due to, among others, the occurrence of local infections. Thus, various endoscopic techniques as therapy for perforations and leakages have been developed over the last years. These include above all the endoscopic placement of clip systems and stents and the relatively new vacuum drainage systems. In case of perforations and leakages of the bile duct and the rectum especially, these minimal invasive techniques are widely used, also increasingly in lesions of the esophagus. However, these new, endoscopic procedures suffer from a lack of evidence. This paper highlights the possibilities and limitations of endoscopic options in therapy for perforations and leakages of organs of the gastrointestinal tract.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Wettstein M, Frieling T, Luthen R et al. Endoskopische Therapie von Leckagen im Gastrointestinaltrakt, an den Gallenwegen und im Pankreas. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 740-748
  • 2 Brinster C, Singhal S, Lee L et al. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1475-1483
  • 3 Nesbitt JC, Sawyers JL. Surgical management of esophageal perforation. Am Surg 1987; 53: 183-191
  • 4 Sepesi B, Raymond D, Peters J. Esophageal perforation: surgical, endoscopic and medical management strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010; 26: 379-383
  • 5 Chirica M, Champault A, Dray X et al. Esophageal perforations. J Visc Surg 2010; 147: e117-e128
  • 6 Fischer A, Thomusch O, Benz S et al. Nonoperative treatment of 15 benign esophageal perforations with self-expandable covered metal stents. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 467-472
  • 7 Salminen P, Gullichsen R, Laine S. Use of self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1526-1530
  • 8 van den Bongard HJGD, Boot H, Baas P et al. The role of parallel stent insertion in patients with esophagorespiratory fistulas. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 110-115
  • 9 Di Franco F, Lamb PJ, Karat D et al. Iatrogenic perforation of localized oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 837-839
  • 10 van Boeckel PGA, Sijbring A, Vleggaar FP et al. Systematic review: temporary stent placement for benign rupture or anastomotic leak of the oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1292-1301
  • 11 Pennathur A, Chang AC, McGrath KM et al. Polyflex expandable stents in the treatment of esophageal disease: initial experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 1968-1972 discusion 1973
  • 12 Tuebergen D, Rijcken E, Mennigen R et al. Treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and esophageal perforations with endoluminal stents: efficacy and current limitations. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 1168-1176
  • 13 Leers J, Vivaldi C, Schafer H et al. Endoscopic therapy for esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2258-2262
  • 14 Wedemeyer J, Schneider A, Manns M et al. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 708-711
  • 15 Loske G, Schorsch T, Muller C. Endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy for esophageal defects. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2531-2535
  • 16 Ahrens M, Schulte T, Egberts J et al. Drainage of esophageal leakage using endoscopic vacuum therapy: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 693-698
  • 17 Abbas G, Schuchert M, Pettiford B et al. Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery 2009; 146: 749-755 discussion 755–756
  • 18 Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 941-951
  • 19 Kirschniak A, Kratt T, Stüker D et al. A new endoscopic over-the-scope clip system for treatment of lesions and bleeding in the GI tract: first clinical experiences. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 162-167
  • 20 Seebach L, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C. "Sparing the surgeon": clinical experience with over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal perforation. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1108-1111
  • 21 Loske G, Schorsch T, Müller C. Intraluminal and intracavitary vacuum therapy for esophageal leakage: a new endoscopic minimally invasive approach. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 540-544
  • 22 Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 293-298
  • 23 Kim JH, Yoo BM, Kim JH et al. Management of ERCP-related perforations: outcomes of single institution in Korea. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 728-734
  • 24 Knudson K, Raeburn CD, McIntyre RC et al. Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 975-981 discussion 981–982
  • 25 Waye JD, Kahn O, Auerbach ME. Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1996; 6: 343-377
  • 26 Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77 604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 9-14
  • 27 Khan MH, Howard TJ, Fogel EL et al. Frequency of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy detected by ERCP: experience at a large tertiary referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 247-252
  • 28 Elboim CM, Goldman L, Hann L et al. Significance of post-cholecystectomy subhepatic fluid collections. Ann Surg 1983; 198: 137-141
  • 29 Thuluvath PJ, Pfau PR, Kimmey MB et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: the role of endoscopy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 857-863
  • 30 Scanga AE, Kowdley KV. Management of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2007; 9: 31-38
  • 31 Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD et al. Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 786-792 discussion 793–795
  • 32 Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, de Luca N et al. Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 269-275
  • 33 Kahaleh M, Sundaram V, Condron SL et al. Temporary placement of covered self-expandable metallic stents in patients with biliary leak: midterm evaluation of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 52-59
  • 34 Chopra SS, Mrak K, Hünerbein M. The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surgery 2009; 145: 182-188
  • 35 Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 355-358
  • 36 Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T et al. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1818-1825
  • 37 Arezzo A, Miegge A, Garbarini A et al. Endoluminal vacuum therapy for anastomotic leaks after rectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14: 279-281