The Strategic Approach of Managing Healthcare Data Exchange in Austria

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: The exchange of electronic medical data between healthcare providers constitutes an integral part of modern medicine, and its importance is growing. Efficient application on a national level requires a uniform approach to the management of healthcare data exchange, avoiding isolated solutions that are expensive and also incompatible.

Methods: In this communication we explain the basic concepts of establishing a nationwide framework to guide healthcare data exchange in Austria. To achieve this goal, a three-step approach was adopted: (i) creating general guidelines to direct electronic medical data exchange; (ii) defining detailed standards for electronic messages; (iii) organizing pilot projects to implement these standards, and further improving the general guidelines based on the results of the pilot projects.

Results: We present the MAGDA-LENA framework which guides healthcare data exchange in Austria, and compare it with the US framework HIPAA. We describe several communication scenarios for which concrete message standards were developed in recent years, based on the MAGDA-LENA framework. We further discuss the implementation of these standards in four pilot projects.

Conclusions: The strategic approach of managing healthcare data exchange presented in this paper is expected to have a substantial impact on medical informatics in Austria over the next few years.

• References

• 1 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 European Commission, Directorate General Information Society. The eEurope initiative. http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/index_en.htm
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 European Commission, Directorate General Information Society. The E-Health initiative. http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_information/e_health/e_health_en.htm
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 European Commission. Health and Telemedicine Projects co-funded by the European Commission. http://.ehto.org/ht_projects/index.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 CEN/TC 251. European Standards in Health Informatics. http://.centc251.org/FinWork/greensheetpwd.htm
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 CEN /TC 251. Revised proposal for a new work item entitled: Health informatics – Guidance on good practice for patient identification in the process of care; 2003. Report No.: CEN/TC 251/N03009rev. http://.centc251.org/TCMeet/doclist/TCdoc03/N03009rev-PatientIdentification-NWP.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 MedCom. http://.medcom.dk/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 HYGEIAnet. http://.hygeianet.gr/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Tsiknakis M, Katehakis DG, Orphanoudakis SC. An open, component-based information infrastructure for integrated health information networks. Int J Med Inf 2002; 68 1 (03) 3-26.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 International Standards Organization Technical Commitee 215 (ISO/TC 215). http://.iso.ch/iso/en/stdsdevelopment/tc/-tclist/TechnicalCommitteeDetailPage.TechnicalCommitteeDetail?COMMID=4720
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 European Committee for Standardization Technical Committee 251 (CEN/TC 251). http://.centc251.org/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Austrian Standards Institute. http://.onnorm.at/index_e.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Beeler GW. HL7 version 3 – an object-oriented methodology for collaborative standards development. Int J Med Inf 1998; 48 1-3 151-161.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Beeler GW, Huff S, Rishel W, Shakir AM, Walker M, Mead C. et al. HL7 V3 Message Development Framework. 1999. http://.hl7.org/library/mdf99/mdf99.pdf
  Google Scholar
• 15 The openEHR foundation. http://.openehr.org/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Ingram D. The Good European Health Record Project. In Ladeira MJ, Laires MF, Christensen JP. editors Health in the New Communications Age. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995: 66-74.
  Google Scholar
• 17 Burggasser H, Dorda W, Gambal J, Gell G, Ingruber H, Kotschy W. et al. Rahmenbedingungen für ein logisches österreichisches Gesundheitsdatennetz (MAGDA-LENA V2.0). 2000. http://.akh-wien.ac.at/STRING/
  Google Scholar
• 18 CEN/TC 251. Health informatics – Electronic healthcare record communication. European Prestandard: European Committee For Standardization; 2000. Report No.: ENV 13606. www.centc251.org/FinWork/greensheetpwd.htm
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 CEN/TC 251. Medical Informatics – Methodology for the development of healthcare messages; 1996. Report No.: CR 12587. www.-centc251.org/FinWork/greensheetpwd.htm
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 UN/CEFACT. Unified Modelling Methodology (UMM); 1999. Report No.: CEFACT/-TMWG/N090. www.unece.org/cefact/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Austrian National Counsil. The Austrian Signature Act; 1999. Report No.: BGBl. I Nr. 190/1999. www.signatur.rtr.at/en/legal/index.-html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Austrian National Counsil. The Austrian Signature Ordinance; 2000. Report No.: BGBl. II Nr. 30/2000. www.signatur.rtr.at/en/legal/index.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Electronic Business using eXtensible Markup Language (ebXML). www.ebxml.org/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 European Commission. Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. 1995. http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/privacy/index_en.htm
  Google Scholar
• 25 US Department of Commerce. Safe Harbor Privacy Principles. 2000. http://export.gov/safeharbor/
  Google Scholar
• 26 Simonic K, Gell G. MAGDA-LENA Datenschutz-Policy für die Kommunikation in Forschung und Lehre. 2001. www.unigraz.at/imi/datenschutz/index.html
  Google Scholar