Assessment of Gait Symmetry Improvements in National Athletes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction during Rehabilitation

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify changes in gait parameters and their symmetries among athletes with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions during a rehabilitation program. Twenty-two national players with ACL reconstructions and 15 healthy athletes were recruited. The gait data were collected between postoperative weeks 4–5, 8–9 and 12–13 using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The spatio-temporal gait parameters and symmetry indexes (SIs) were evaluated for the patients and the control group. One-way and repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance were used to analyse the data. The results demonstrated significant differences among spatio-temporal (P<0.001) and SIs (P=0.007) of patients for Test 1 and the control group. Repeated measure analysis revealed significant changes in the linear combinations of spatio-temporal gait variables (P=0.002) and SIs (P=0.043) over time. The injured limb’s step length, cadence and weight acceptance time presented significant improvement across time (P<0.001). Moreover, the SI of the stance time was reduced significantly by 46.48% (P=0.004) among SI parameters. After three months, no significant differences were found between patients and healthy controls for the measured gait components (P>0.05). The rehabilitation program allowed national athletes to restore symmetry in spatio-temporal gait parameters toward the control group’s range 12–13 weeks post-reconstruction.

• References

• 1 Andersson AC. Knee laxity and function after conservative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14: 150-153
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bacchini M, Cademartiri C, Soncini G. Gait analysis in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction according to Kenneth Jones’ technique. Acta Biomed 2009; 80: 140-149
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Barrack RL, Bruckner JD, Kneisl J, Inman WS, Alexander AH. The outcome of nonoperatively treated complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in active young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 259: 192-199
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC. The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 402: 9-20
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Bush-Joseph CA, Hurwitz DE, Patel RR, Bahrani Y, Garretson R, Bach BR, Andriacchi TP. Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 36-41
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES. Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62: 259-270
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Decker MJ, Torry MR, Noonan TJ, Sterett WI, Steadman JR. Gait retraining after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 848-856
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Devita P, Hortobagyi T, Barrier J. Gait biomechanics are not normal after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and accelerated rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 1481-1488
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Devita P, Hortobagyi T, Barrier J, Torry M, Glover KL, Speroni DL, Money J, Mahar MT. Gait adaptations before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 853-859
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ernst GP, Saliba E, Diduch DR, Hurwitz SR, Ball DW. Lower extremity compensations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 251-260
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gao B, Zheng NN. Alterations in three-dimensional joint kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and -reconstructed knees during walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25: 222-229
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Goh S, Boyle J. Self evaluation and functional testing two to four years post ACL reconstruction. Aust J Physiother 1997; 43: 255-262
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Gokeler A, Schmalz T, Knopf E, Freiwald J, Blumentritt S. The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength and laxity on gait analysis parameters in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11: 372-378
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
  Google Scholar
• 15 Heier KA, Mack DR, Moseley JB, Paine R, Bocell JR. An analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in middle-aged patients. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 527-532
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 383-392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Knoll Z, Kocsis L, Kiss RM. Gait patterns before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004; 12: 7-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraido JL, Fu FH. The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 130-137
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 MacDonald PB, Hedden D, Pacin O, Sutherland K. Proprioception in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 774-778
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: A 10-year study. Knee 2006; 13: 184-188
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Marasovic T, Cecic M, Zanchi V. Analysis and interpretation of ground reaction forces in normal gait. WSEAS Transactions on Systems 2009; 8: 1105-1114
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Marx RG, Jones EC, Angel M, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 762-770
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Minning SJ, Myer GD, Mangine RE, Eifert-Mangine M, Colosimo AJ. Serial assessments to determine normalization of gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2009; 19: 569-575
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Hirshman P. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am J Knee Surg 1991; 4: 3-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. A comparison of results in acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament ruptures of arthroscopically assisted autogenous patellar tendon reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 460-471
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Risberg MA, Mork M, Jenssen HK, Holm I. Design and implementation of a neuromuscular training program following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001; 31: 620-631
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Robinson RO, Herzog W, Nigg BM. Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1987; 10: 172-176
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Snyder-Mackler L, Ladin Z, Schepsis AA, Young JC. Electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Effects of electrically elicited contraction of the quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles on gait and on strength of the thigh muscles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 1025-1036
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Timoney JM, Inman WS, Quesada PM, Sharkey PF, Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Alexander AH. Return of normal gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 887-889
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Winiarski S, Czamara A. Evaluation of gait kinematics and symmetry during the first two stages of physiotherapy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2012; 14: 91-100
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material