RoboticScope-Assisted Microanastomosis in a Chicken Leg Model

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Many recent studies show that exoscopes are safe and effective alternatives to operating microscopes (OM). Developments of robotics and automation are present in neurosurgery with the appearance of a newer device such as RoboticScope (RS) exoscope with a digital three-dimensional (3D) image and a head-mounted display. The body of the RS is connected to a six-axis robotic arm that contains two video cameras, and serves as stereovision. This robotic arm allows accurate 3D camera motions over the field of view, giving the user a great degree of freedom in viewpoint selection. The surgeons may specify the direction and speed of the robotic arm using simple head movements when the foot pedal is pressed. Since its development in 2020, the RS has occasionally been used in neurosurgery for a multitude of procedures.

Methods This study showcases vessel microanastomosis training on chicken legs using the RS. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of the RS without a comparative analysis of the standard OM. The study was conducted in 2023 during a month-long trial period of the device at the Department of Neurosurgery of the Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo. All procedures including RS-assisted anastomosis were performed by a neurosurgeon in anastomosis training (A.A.) supervised by a senior vascular neurosurgeon (E.B.). For the purpose of the study, we evaluated occlusion time in minutes, bypass patency with iodine, and overall satisfaction of the trainee in terms of light intensity, precision of automatic focus, mobility of the device, ergonomics, and convenience of the helmet.

Results Ten RS-assisted microanastomoses were performed by interrupted suturing technique with 10.0 nylon thread. Bypass training included seven “end-to-side,” two “end-to-end,” and one “side-to-side” microanastomoses. The smallest vessel diameter was 1 mm. Occlusion time improved by training from 50 to 24 minutes, with contrast patency of the anastomoses in all cases without notable leakage of the contrast, except one case. Complete satisfaction of the trainee was achieved in 7 out of 10 cases. During this period, we also performed different RS-assisted surgeries including a single indirect bypass, convexity brain tumor resection, and microdiscectomies.

Conclusion RS provides a new concept for microanastomosis training as an alternative or adjunct to the standard microscope. We found a full-time hands-on microsuturing without the need for manual readjustment of the device as an advantage as well as instant depth at automatic zooming and precise transposition of the focus via head movements. However, it takes time to adapt and get used to the digital image. With the evolution of the device helmet's shortcomings, the RS could represent a cutting-edge method in vessel microanastomosis in the future. Nevertheless, this article represents one of the first written reports on microanastomosis training on an animal model with the above-mentioned device.

Ethical Approval Statement

Given that it is a chicken leg model, the approval of the ethics committee of the institution was not required.

Authors' Contributions

A.A. was involved in investigation, methodology, project administration, and writing—review and editing. E.B. contributed to conceptualization. D.J. helped in investigation, writing—review and editing, and project administration. E.K. contributed to writing—original draft and preparation, visualization, conceptualization, and investigation. H.R. was involved in writing—original draft and preparation, visualization, conceptualization, and investigation. I.O. reviewed the manuscript. H.S. helped in validation. N.G. was involved in data curation.

Publication History

Article published online:
29 December 2023

© 2023. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

• References

• 1 Ricciardi L, Chaichana KL, Cardia A. et al. The exoscope in neurosurgery: an innovative “Point of View”. A systematic review of the technical, surgical, and educational aspects. World Neurosurg 2019; 124: 136-144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Herlan S, Marquardt JS, Hirt B, Tatagiba M, Ebner FH. 3D exoscope system in neurosurgery-comparison of a standard operating microscope with a new 3D exoscope in the Cadaver Lab. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019; 17 (05) 518-524
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Yeung W, Vakharia N, Johnatty C, Achar P, Kasbekar AV. Feasibility study of the Vitom 3D exoscope in ENT surgery using an animal model: relevance to coronavirus disease 2019. J Laryngol Otol 2021; 135 (08) 710-717
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Boehm F, Schuler PJ, Riepl R, Schild L, Hoffmann TK, Greve J. Performance of microvascular anastomosis with a new robotic visualization system: proof of concept. J Robot Surg 2022; 16 (03) 705-713
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Baron RB, Lakomkin N, Schupper AJ. et al. Postoperative outcomes following glioblastoma resection using a robot-assisted digital surgical exoscope: a case series. J Neurooncol 2020; 148 (03) 519-527
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Wali AR, Kang KM, Rennert R, Santiago-Dieppa D, Khalessi AA, Levy M. First-in-human clinical experience using high-definition exoscope with intraoperative indocyanine green for clip reconstruction of unruptured large pediatric aneurysm. World Neurosurg 2021; 151: 52
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Hafez A, Elsharkawy A, Schwartz C. et al. Comparison of conventional microscopic and exoscopic experimental bypass anastomosis: a technical analysis. World Neurosurg 2020; 135: e293-e299
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Piloni M, Bailo M, Gagliardi F, Mortini P. Resection of intracranial tumors with a robotic-assisted digital microscope: a preliminary experience with robotic scope. World Neurosurg 2021; 152: e205-e211
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Belykh E, George L, Zhao X. et al. Microvascular anastomosis under 3D exoscope or endoscope magnification: a proof-of-concept study. Surg Neurol Int 2018; 9 (01) 115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Abramovic A, Demetz M, Krigers A. et al. Surgeon's comfort: the ergonomics of a robotic exoscope using a head-mounted display. Brain Spine 2021; 2: 100855
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Khansa I, Khansa L, Westvik TS, Ahmad J, Lista F, Janis JE. Work-related musculoskeletal injuries in plastic surgeons in the United States, Canada, and Norway. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 165e-175e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ma L, Fei B. Comprehensive review of surgical microscopes: technology development and medical applications. J Biomed Opt 2021; 26 (01) 010901
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Yoo H, Kim BJ. History and recent advances in microsurgery. Archives Hand Microsurgery 2021; 26 (03) 174-183
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 14 Cui GY, Han XG, Wei Y. et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Orthop Surg 2021; 13 (07) 1960-1968
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar