Anomalies and Variants of the Endoscopic Anatomy for Third Ventriculostomy

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Objective: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is an alternative to shunt placement in occlusive hydrocephalus. The negative impact of anatomic anomalies and variants on ETV have been sporadically reported but not yet investigated systematically. Therefore, the objectives of the present study are 1) to evaluate the frequency of endoscopic anatomic anomalies of the ventricular system, 2) to define their potential to complicate the procedure and to compromise the surgical results, and 3) to investigate the value of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for their detection. Method: The video recordings, the operative reports, and the preoperative MR images of 25 hydrocephalic patients who underwent ETV were reviewed. The surgical results were classified into completed and successful, completed, but failed, and unsuccessfully attempted ETV and were correlated with the absence or presence of anatomic variants. Results: In 9 of the 25 patients, 10 anatomic anomalies or variants, respectively, were identified, accounting for an incidence rate of 36 %. The single most common anatomic anomaly was a thickened third ventricular floor in 4 patients. Anatomic variants extended the operation time (n = 6), increased the stretching of floor and walls of the third ventricle during perforation (n = 4), were related to minor arterial bleeding (n = 3), and obscured the visual control of the basilar artery (n = 2). In 5 of the 9 patients, ETV was completed and successful, but in 2 patients, ETV was finally abandoned, and in an additional 2 patients, ETV was completed, but failed to cure the symptoms of hydrocephalus. In contrast, ETV was completed and successful in all 16 patients with normal anatomy. All anatomic anomalies had been detectable on preoperative MR imaging, with the exception of the thickened floor of the third ventricle. Conclusion: Anatomic anomalies are a frequent finding during ETV. Successful perforation and control of the hydrocephalus correlates with the absence of anatomic anomalies. Most anatomic variants have the potential to increase the operative risk. With the exception of the thickened third ventricular floor, MR imaging allows us to identify all anatomic anomalies preoperatively, and enables the neurosurgeon to weigh the operative risk in a patient with an anatomic anomaly against the chance to perform ETV successfully.

References

• 1 Mixter W J. Ventriculoscopy and puncture of the floor of the third ventricle.  Boston Med Surg J. 1923;  188 277-278
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Scarff J E. Endoscopic treatment of hydrocephalus. Description of a ventriculoscope and preliminary report of cases.  Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1936;  35 853-860
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Putnam T J. Treatment of hydrocephalus by endoscopic coagulation of the choroid plexus.  N Engl J Med. 1934;  210 1374-1376
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Grunert P, Perneczky A, Resch K. Endoscopic procedures through the foramen interventriculare of Monro under stereotactical conditions.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1994;  37 2-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Hopf N J, Grunert P, Fries G, Resch K, Perneczky A. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: Outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 795-806
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Jones R FC, Stening W A, Brydon M. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy.  Neurosurgery. 1990;  26 86-92
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Buxton N, Macarthur D, Mallucci C, Punt J, Vloeberghs M. Neuroendoscopy in the premature population.  Child's Nerv Syst. 1998;  14 649-652
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Decq P, Yepes C, Anno Y, Djindjian M, Nguyen J P, Kéravel Y. Neurosurgical endoscopy. A review of applications.  Neurochirurgie. 1994;  14 313-321
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Manwaring K H. Endoscopic ventricular fenestration. In: Manwaring KH, Crone K (Eds). Neuroendoscopy New York: Mary Ann Liebert 1992: 79-89
  Google Scholar
• 10 Rohde V, Reinges M HT, Krombach G A, Gilsbach J M. The combined use of image-guided frameless stereotaxy and neuroendoscopy for the surgical management of occlusive hydrocephalus and intracranial cysts.  Br J Neurosurg. 1998;  12 531-538
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Reinges M HT, Spetzger U, Rohde V, Adams L, Gilsbach J M. Experience with a new multifunctional instrument holder in minimally invasive navigated neurosurgery.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1998;  41 149-151
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Jones R FC, Kwok B CT, Stening W A, Vonau M. The current status of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of non-communicating hydrocephalus.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1994;  37 28-36
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Perneczky A, Tschabitscher M, Resch K. (Eds) .Endoscopic anatomy for neurosurgery. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme 1993
  Google Scholar
• 14 Grotenhuis J A. (ed) .Manual of endoscopic procedures in neurosurgery. Nijmegen: Uitgeverij Machaon 1995
  Google Scholar
• 15 Oka K, Go Y, Kin Y, Tomonaga M. An observation of the third ventricle under flexible fiberoptic ventriculoscope: Normal structure.  Surg Neurol. 1993;  40 273-277
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Vinas F C, Dujovny N, Dujovny M. Microanatomical basis for third ventriculostomy.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1996;  39 116-121
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Teo C. Endoscopy for the treatment of hydrocephalus. In: King W, Fraze J, De Salles A (eds). Endoscopy of the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems New York, Stuttgart: Thieme 1998: 58-67
  Google Scholar
• 18 Grant J A, McLone D G. Third ventriculostomy: A review.  Surg Neurol. 1997;  47 210-212
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Rhoten R LP, Luciano M G, Barnett G H. Computer-assisted endoscopy for neurosurgical procedures: Technical note.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40 632-638
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Cohen A R. Ventriculoscopic surgery.  Pediatr Neurosurg. 1993;  19 127-134
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Cohen A R. Comment to: McLaughlin MR, Wahlig JB, Kaufmann AM, Albright AL. Traumatic basilar aneurysm after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 1403-1404
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Sainte-Rose C. Third ventriculostomy. In: Manwaring KH, Crone KR (Eds). Neuroendoscopy New York: Mary Ann Liebert 1992: 47-62
  Google Scholar
• 23 McLaughlin M R, Wahlig J B, Kaufmann A M, Albright A L. Traumatic basilar aneurysm after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 1400-1404
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Kunz U, Goldman A, Bader C, Waldbauer H, Oldenkott P. Endoscopic fenestration of the 3^rd ventricular floor in aqueductal stenosis.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1994;  37 42-47
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Rieger A, Rainov N G, Sanchin L, Schopp G, Burkert W. Ultrasound-guided endoscopic fenestration of the third ventricular floor for non-communication hydrocephalus.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1996;  39 17-20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Vandertorp W P, Verdaasdonk R M, van Swol C FP. Laser-assisted neuroendoscopy using a neodymium-yttrium aluminium garnet or diode contact laser with pretreated fiber tips.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  88 82-92
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Heilman C B, Cohen A R. Endoscopic ventricular fenestration using a “saline torch”.  J Neurosurg. 1991;  74 224-229
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Kelly P J. Stereotactic third ventriculostomy in patients with nontumoral adolescent/adult onset aqueductal stenosis and symptomatic hydrocephalus.  J Neurosurg. 1991;  75 865-873
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Guiot G. Ventriculocisternostomy for stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius. Puncture of the floor of the third ventricle with a leucotome under television control.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1973;  28 264-289
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Hoffman H J, Harwood-Nash D, Gilday D L. Percutaneous third ventriculostomy in the management of noncommunicating hydrocephalus.  Neurosurgery. 1980;  7 313-321
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Sayers M P, Kosnik E J. Percutaneous third ventriculostomy: Experience and technique.  Childs Brain. 1976;  2 24-30
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Grunert P, Hopf N, Perneczky A. Frame-based and frameless endoscopic procedures in the third ventricle.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;  68 80-89
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Vries J K. Endoscopy as an adjunct to shunting for hydrocephalus.  Surg Neurol. 1980;  13 69-72
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Nishihara T, Hara T, Suzuki I, Kirino T, Yamakawa K. Third ventriculostomy for symptomatic syringomyelia using flexible endoscope: Case report.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1996;  39 130-132
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Oka K, Yamamoto M, Ikeda K, Tomonaga M. Flexible endoneurosurgical therapy for aqueductal stenosis.  Neurosurgery. 1993;  33 236-243
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Yamamoto M, Oka K, Takasugi S, Hachisuka S, Miyake E, Tomonaga M. Flexible neuroendoscopy for percutaneous treatment of intraventricular lesions in the absence of hydrocephalus.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1997;  40 139-143
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Lang J. Surgical anatomy of the hypothalamus.  Acta Neurochirurgica. 1985;  75 5-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Auer L A, Auer D P. Virtual endoscopy for planning and simulation of minimally invasive neurosurgery.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  43 529-548
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Pierre-Khan A, Renier D, Bombois B, Askienay S, Moreau R, Hirsch J F. Place de la ventriculo-cisternostomie dans le traitement des hydrocéphalies non-communicantes.  Neurochirurgie. 1975;  21 557-569
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Corresponding Author

V Rohde,M. D 

Department of Neurosurgery Technical University (RWTH) Aachen

Pauwelsstrasse 30 52057 Aachen Germany

Phone: Phone:+492418088478

Fax: Fax:+492418888420

Email: E-mail:veit@rohde.ac.uunet.de