The Difference Between Ultrasound-Guided and Stereotactic-Guided Neurosurgical Procedures

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

We evaluate two different methods, ultrasound (US) guidance and stereotactic guidance, routinely used in our Department for navigation in various neurosurgical procedures. We have performed 53 US-guided and 101 stereotactic-guided procedures. These procedures were intracranial lesion biopsies, intracranial cysts and abscesses puncture and evacuations, ventricular punctures for hydrocephalus shunt operations, stereotactic-guided microneurosurgical resections, and stereotactic-guided endoscopic operations. Advantages of the US-guided operations are the shortness of the procedure, simplicity (no need for moving patient for additional CT scanning), no irradiation and the possibility of real-time imaging. The disadvantages of the US-guided procedures are worse resolution of the images in deep-seated and small lesions as well as the need for a bigger trepanation because of the transducer's dimensions. Stereotactic procedures are time-consuming but more precise and usually done in local anaesthesia because only a small trepanation is required. Main disadvantage of the stereotactic-guided procedures when compared with the US-guided procedures is a lack of real-time intraoperative control. According to our experience, both methods are complementary and safe and they do not cause any additional complications when used as a navigation tool in microneurosurgical operations. Both methods are highly reliable when used in properly selected patients.

References

• 1 Soo T M, Bernstein M, Provias J, Tasker R, Lozano A, Gulha A. Failed stereotactic biopsy in a series of 518 cases.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1996;  64 183-196
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Ebel H, Rieger A, Spies E H, Böker D K. Stereotactic cysto-ventricular shunting in diencephalic (arachnoid) cysts and failure in cystic craniopharyngeoma.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1995;  38 41-47
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Skrap M, Melatini A, Vassallo A, Sidoti C. Stereotactic aspiration and drainage of brain abscesses. Experience with 9 cases.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1996;  39 108-112
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Ebeling U, Hasdemir M G. Stereotactic guided microsurgery of cerebral lesions.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1995;  38 10-15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Dohrmann G J, Rubin M J. Use of ultrasound in neurosurgical operations - preliminary report.  Surg Neurol. 1981;  16 162-366
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Auer L M, Van Velthofen V. Intraoperative ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery. Berlin: Springer Verlag 1990
  Google Scholar
• 7 Melada A, Jeličič I. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of intracerebral lesions.  Neurol Croat. 1993;  42 349-357
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Tsutsumi Y, Andoh Y, Inoue N. Ultrasound-guided biopsy for deep-seated brain tumors.  J Neurosurg. 1982;  57 164-167
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Tsutsumi Y, Andoh Y, Sakaguchi J. A new ultrasound-guided brain biopsy technique through a burr hole.  Acta Neuroch. 1989;  86 72-75
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Berger S M. Ultrasound-guided stereotactic biopsy using a new apparatus.  J Neurosurg. 1986;  65 550-554
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Sjolander U, Lindgren P G, Hugosson R. Ultrasound sector scanning for the localisation and biopsy of intracerebral lesions.  J Neurosurg. 1983;  58 7-10
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Corresponding Author

Z Heinrich

Department of Neurosurgery University Clinical Centre Zagreb

Kišpatićeva 12 10000 Zagreb Croatia

Phone: Phone:+38512421873

Fax: Fax:+38512421873

Email: E-mail:Zdravko.heinrich@zg.tel.hr