Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Recent US guidelines state that, at screening colonoscopy in individuals above 50 years of age, adenoma detection rates must be higher than 25 % in men and 15 % in women [1]. Should European gastroenterologists embrace the adenoma detection rates of the US gastroenterologists as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?

References

• 1 Rex D K, Petrin J L, Baron T H. et al . Quality indicators for colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 873-885
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Benson V S, Patnick J, Davies A K. et al . Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries.  Int J Cancer. 2008;  122 1357-1367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Lieberman D A, Holub J, Eisen G. et al . Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 875-883
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Harris J K, Vader J P, Wietlisbach V. et al . Variations in colonoscopy practice in Europe: a multicentre descriptive study (EPAGE).  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;  42 126-134
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Bressler B, Paszat L F, Chen Z. et al . Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 96-102
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Bressler B, Paszat L F, Vinden C. et al . Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 452-456
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Farrar W D, Sawhney M S, Nelson D B. et al . Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 1259-1264
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Alberts D S, Martínez M, Roe D J. et al . Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians’ Network.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1156-1162
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Pabby A, Schoen R E, Weissfeld J L. et al . Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 385-391
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Robertson D J, Greenberg E R, Beach M. et al . Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  129 34-41
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Winawer S, Zauber A G, Ho M N. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1977-1981
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Singh H, Turner D, Xue L. et al . Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies.  JAMA. 2006;  295 2366-2373
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lieberman D A, Weiss D G, Harford W V. et al . Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 1077-1085
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Sawhney M S, Farrar W D, Gudiseva S. et al . Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  131 1700-1705
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Van Rijn J C, Reitsma J B, Stoker J. et al . Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 343-350
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Weissfeld J L, Schoen R E, Pinsky P F. et al . Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;  97 989-997
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Pickhardt P J, Nugent P A, Mysliwiec P A. et al . Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy.  Ann Intern Med. 2004;  141 352-359
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Van Gelder R E, Nio C Y, Florie J. et al . Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 41-48
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C. et al . Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 1247-1256
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Bretthauer M, Skovlund E, Grotmol T. et al . Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;  38 1268-1274
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Chen S C, Rex D K. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  107 856-861
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Lieberman D A, Holub J, Eisen G. et al . Prevalence of polyps greater than 9 mm in a consortium of diverse clinical practice settings in the United States.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 798-805
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Irby K, Anderson W F, Henson D E. et al . Emerging and widening colorectal carcinoma disparities between Blaks and Whites in the United States (1975 - 2002).  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;  15 792-797
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Thornton J G, Morris A M, Thornton J D. et al . Racial variation in colorectal polyp and tumor location.  J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;  99 723-728
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Reid M E, Marshall J R, Roe D. et al . Smoking exposure as a risk factor for prevalent and recurrent colorectal adenomas.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;  12 1006-1011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Jacobs E T, Martinez M E, Alberts D S. et al . Association between body size and colorectal adenoma recurrence.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 982-990
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Sedjo R L, Byers T, Levin T R. et al . Change in body size and the risk of colorectal adenomas.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;  16 526-531
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Kim J H, Lim Y J, Kim Y H. et al . Is metabolic syndrome a risk factor for colorectal adenoma?.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;  16 1543-1546
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Aitken J F, Bain C J, Ward M. et al . Risk of colorectal adenomas in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer: some implications for screening programmes.  Gut. 1996;  39 105-108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Pariente A, Milan C, Lafon J. et al . Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with ’sporadic’ colorectal cancer: a case-control study.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  115 7-15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Cottet V, Pariente A, Nalet B. et al . Colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas: increased risk of colorectal tumors.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 1086-1092
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Saini S D, Kim H M, Schoenfeld P. Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 614-626
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Denis B, Ruetsch M, Strentz P. et al . Short term outcomes of the first round of a pilot colorectal cancer screening programme with guaiac based faecal occult blood test.  Gut. 2007;  56 1579-1584
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Manfredi S, Piette C, Durand G. et al . Colonoscopy results of a French regional FOBT-based colorectal cancer screening program with high compliance.  Endoscopy. 2008;  DOI 10.1055/s-2007 - 995 430
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J J. et al . Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 378-384
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Harewood G C, Sharma V K, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 76-79
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A. et al . Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 721-731
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Harewood G C. Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopist features.  Dig Dis Sci. 2005;  50 47-51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Sanchez W, Harewood G C, Petersen B T. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1941-1945
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Barclay R L, Vicari J J, Doughty A S. et al . Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2533-2541
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Simmons D T, Harewood G C, Baron T H. et al . Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  24 965-971
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Rex D. Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 732-734
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S. et al . Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 456-460
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Rex D. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 33-36
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Rex D. Who is the best colonoscopist?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 145-150
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Rex D. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2866-2877
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Brown S R, Baraza W, Hurlstone P. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;  4 CD006439
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Ratiu N, Gelbmann C, Rath H R. et al . Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: does it improve the detection of adenomas in the distal colon and rectum?.  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;  16 153-156
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou I S. et al . A prospective randomized study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does NBI induce a learning effect?.  Gut. 2008;  57 59-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 East J E, Saunders B P, Burling D. et al . Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 2529-2535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Deenadayalu V P, Chadalawada V, Rex D K. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 2138-2142
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Harrison M, Singh N, Rex D K. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 519-522
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Triadafilopoulos G, Watts D, Higgins J. et al . A novel retrograde-viewing auxilliary imaging device (third eye retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 139-144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Lieberman D. A call to action - measuring the quality of colonoscopy.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2588-2589
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Johnson D A. and the Quality Measures Task Force of the American College of Gastroenterology . Pay for performance: ACG guide for physicians.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 2119-2122
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Harewood G C, Petersen B T, Ott B J. Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  24 313-318
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Imperiali G, Minoli G, Meucci G M. et al . Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 314-318
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C. et al . Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840 149 screening colonoscopies.  Gut. 2007;  56 1585-1589
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Lieberman D A, Weiss D G, Bond J H. et al . Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 162-168
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E. et al . Colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening for detection advanced neoplasia.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 1863-1872
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A. et al . Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia.  N Engl J Med. 2005;  352 2061-2068
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M. et al . The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40 - 80 years.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 255-262
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Terry M B, Neugut A I, Bostick R M. et al . Reliability in the classification of advanced adenomas.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;  11 660-663
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Schoen R E, Gerber L D, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 492-496
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Betes M, Munoz-Navas M A, Duque J M. et al . Use of colonoscopy as a primary screening test for colorectal cancer in average risk people.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 2648-2654
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Waye J. Follow-up colonoscopy: screen more, survey less, and save.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 955-957
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

J.-F. Bretagne, MD 

Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif

Hôpital Pontchaillou

35033 Rennes

France

Email: jean-francois.bretagne@chu-rennes.fr