Limb lengthening in three dogs using distraction rates without a latency period

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: To report three clinical cases suffering from limb shortening secondary to monostotic physeal closure, in which distraction osteogenesis had been performed without a latency period and with high distraction rates. Methods: Three dogs had limb lengthening performed, using an Ilizarov ring fixator in two dogs and a linear dynamic fixator in the other dog.Bone lengthening achieved for a radius /ulna was 27 mm at 2 mm per day , a tibia was 78 mm at 3 mm per day, and a femur of 45 mm was 3 mm per day . Results: Complications related to pin loosening occurred in each case, thus requiring surgical corrective procedures, but these did not affect the final outcome. Lateral bowing of the bar and bone and some musculo-cutendinous contracture occurred in the femur. Fixation frames were on for 12 weeks in Case 1, eight weeks in Case 2 and nine weeks in Case 3. All three of the cases had a good functional outcome. Discussion: The faster rates of lengthening were not associated with any long-term deleterious soft tissue complications, but they were associated with pin loosening and bending of the bar. In each case there was excellent osteogenesis. Conclusions: From the results achieved in these three cases it can be concluded that a latency period prior to distraction osteogenesis may not be necessary. Also, distraction rates up to 3 mm per day can be used to shorten the time needed to achieve lengthening; however further studies are needed to investigate the high level of complications.

• References

• 1 Latte Y. Application of the Ilizarov method in veterinary orthopaedics surgery (part 1); 75 applications of the Ilizarov method (part 2).. Eur J Comp Anim Prac 1998; 2: 26-50 1: 64-81.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Franczuszki D, Chalman JA, Butler HC. et al. Postoperative effects of experimental femoral shortening in the mature dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23: 429-437.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Carrig CB, Merkley D, Mostosky UV. Asynchronous growth of the canine radius and ulna: Effects of different amounts of ulnar growth retardation. J Am Vet Rad Soc 1978; 19: 16-22.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 O’Brien TR. Developmental deformities due to arrested epiphyseal growth. Vet Clin N Am 1971; 1: 19-35.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Fox SM, Bray JC, Guerin SR. et al. Antebrachial deformities in the dog: Treatment with external fixation. J Small Anim Pract 1995; 36: 315-320.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ferretti A. The application of the Ilizarov technique to veterinary medicine.. In: Operative Principles of Ilizarov; fracture treatment -nonunion osteomyeltis-lengthening deformity correction. Bianchi A Aronson J (ed). Baltimore: William Wilkins; 1991: 551-570.
  Google Scholar
• 7 Ilizarov GA. Transosseous osteosynthesis theoretical and clinical aspects of regeneration and growth of tissue osteogenesis and hematopoiese.. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1992: 279-283.
  Google Scholar
• 8 Rahal SC, Volpi RS, Vulcano LC. Treatment of segmental tibial defects using acute bone shortening followed by gradual lengthening with circular external fixator. J Vet Med 2005; 4: 180-185.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 White SH, Kenwright J. Timing of distraction of an osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72-B: 356-361.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Marcellin-Little DJ, Ferretti A, Roe SC. et al. Hinged Ilizarov external fixation for correction of antebrachial deformities. Vet Surg 1998; 3: 231-245.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Brunner UH, Cordey J, Kessler S. Advances in osteogenesis: Bone segmental transport in combination with intramedullary nail. Injury 1993; 24: 29-44.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Villa A. Lengthening.. In: Advances in Ilizarov Apparatus Assembly English ed. Bianchi A Maiocchi (ed). Milan: Medicalplastic srl.,; 1994: 84-97.
  Google Scholar
• 13 Lewis DD, Radasch RM, Beale BS. et al. Initial clinical experience with the IMEX circular external skeletal fixation system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 118-127
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Aida T, Yoshioka I, Tominaga K. et al. Effects of latency period in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Intl J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2003; 32: 54-62.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Gil-Albarova J, de Pablos J, Franzeb M. et al. Delayed distraction in bone lengthening. Improved healing in lambs. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 604-606.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 White SH, Kenwright J. The importance of delay in distraction of osteotomies. Ortho Clin N Am 1991; 22: 569-579.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Aronson J, Shen X. Experimental healing of distraction osteogenesis comparing metaphyseal to diaphyseal sites. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 301: 25-30.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Elkins AD, Morandi M, Zembo M. Distraction osteogenesis in the dog using the Ilizarov external ring fixator. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29: 419-426.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar