Influence of softening test and light-activation protocols on resin composite polymer structure

 

PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study analyzed the influences of the light-activation protocol and softening test on the degree of conversion (DC) and Knoop Hardness (KHN) of a microhybrid resin composite. Materials and Methods: Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) was light-activated with a third-generation light-emitting diode (Valo Ultradent) by three protocols – standard, high power, and plasma emulation – or with a quartz-tungsten halogen XL 3000 (3M ESPE) in conventional mode. All modes were set to deliver 19 J/cm². The DC (N = 20) was determined by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry on the top (T) and bottom (B) surfaces. For the KHN test, samples were subdivided in four groups (n = 5 each) according to the storage media: absolute ethanol, 75% ethanol, distilled water, and air (control group). The KHN values were evaluated on T and B before and 24 h after immersion in the storage media. Data were analyzed by split-plot analysis of variance (ANOVA; for DC) or repeated-measures split-plot ANOVA (for KHN), followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: For the DC, the light-activation protocol did not influence the results and there was no difference between T and B. For the KHN test, the light-activation protocol did not influence the results and T showed higher microhardness values than B for all experimental conditions. There were significant differences in KHN depending on the storage media. Samples immersed in absolute ethanol generally presented lower KHN values, with no differences compared to samples in 75% ethanol. Conclusion: The storage media affected the outcomes of the softening test.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Jiménez-Planas A, Martín J, Abalos C, Llamas R. Developments in polymerization lamps. Quintessence Int 2008; 39: e74-84
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Peutzfeldt A. Resin composite in dentistry: The monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 97-116
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Gonçalves F, Calheiros FC, Witzel MF, Kawano Y, Braga RR. Effect of photoactivation protocol and radiant exposure on monomer conversion and flexural strength of a resin composite after water and ethanol storage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 82: 89-92
  Google Scholar
• 4 Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of selected components on crosslink density in polymer structures. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 282-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Soh MS, Yap AU. Influence of curing modes on crosslink density in polymer structures. J Dent 2004; 32: 321-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Dewaele M, Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Munksgaard EC, Benetti AR, Finné G. et al. Influence of curing protocol on selected properties of light-curing polymers: Degree of conversion, volume contraction, elastic modulus, and glass transition temperature. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1576-84
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of pulse-delay curing on softening of polymer structures. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1570-3
  Google Scholar
• 8 Schneider LF, Moraes RR, Cavalcante LM, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L, Consani S. Cross-link density evaluation through softening tests: Effect of ethanol concentration. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 199-203
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Aguiar FH, Braceiro AT, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. Hardness and diametrical tensile strength of a hybrid composite resin polymerized with different modes and immersed in ethanol or distilled water media. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 1098-103
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 211-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Benetti AR, Asmussen E, Munksgaard EC, Dewale M, Peutzfeldt A, Leloup G. et al. Softening and elution of monomers in ethanol. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1007-13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Bagis B, Bagis Y, Ertas E, Ustaomer S. Comparison of the heat generation of light curing units. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9: 65-72
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Moon HJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effects of various light curing methods on the leachability of uncured substances and hardness of a composite resin. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 258-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Witzel MF, Calheiros FC, Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR. Influence of photoactivation method on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based materials. J Dent 2005; 33: 773-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Yap AU. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: Impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 113-20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Price RB, Dérand T, Loney RW, Andreou P. Effect of light source and specimen thickness on the surface hardness of resin composite. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 47-53
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Watts DC. Reaction kinetics and mechanics in photo-polymerised networks. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 27-35
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 dos Santos GB, Alto RV, Filho HR, da Silva EM, Fellows CE. Light transmission on dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 571-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Arikawa H, Fujii K, Kanie T, Inoue K. Light transmittance characteristics of light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 401-11
  Google Scholar
• 20 Feitosa VP, Fugolin AP, Correr AB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Consani S, Watson TF. et al. Effects of different photo-polymerization protocols on resin-dentine μTBS, mechanical properties and cross-link density of a nano-filled resin composite. J Dent 2012; 40: 802-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hubbezoğlu I, Bolayir G, Doğan OM, Doğan A, Ozer A, Bek B. Microhardness evaluation of resin composites polymerized by three different light sources. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 845-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar