Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2020

21.11.2019

Professional-Patient Boundaries: a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Attitudes and Practices

verfasst von: Harry Reyes Nieva, MAS, Elise Ruan, MD, MPH, Gordon D. Schiff, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The essence of humanism in medicine and health care is relationships—caring relationships between clinicians and patients. While raising concerns regarding professional-patient boundaries has positively contributed to our understanding and prevention of potentially harmful boundary violations, there is controversy about which types of relationships, caring acts, and practices are acceptable versus cross boundary lines.

Objective

To examine primary care physicians’ practices and attitudes regarding acts that have been questioned as potentially “inappropriate” or “unethical” crossing of professional-patient boundaries.

Design

Surveys conducted via in-person polling or electronic and mailed paper submissions from April 2016 to July 2017. We calculated descriptive statistics and examined associations with practices and attitudes using logistic regression.

Participants

Random sample of all US primary care physicians who treat adult patients; convenience sample of attendees at medicine grand rounds presentations.

Main Measures

Outcomes were self-reported practices and attitudes related to giving patients rides home, paying for patients’ medication, helping patients find jobs, employing patients, going to dinner with patients, and providing care to personal friends.

Key Results

Among 1563 total respondents, 34% had given a ride home, 34% had paid for medications, 15% helped patients find a job, 7% had employed a patient, 10% had dinner with patients, and 59% provided care to personal friends. A majority disapproved of dinner with a patient (75%) but approved of or were neutral on all other scenarios (61–90%).

Conclusions

The medical profession is quite divided on questions related to drawing lines about appropriate boundaries. Contrary to official and widespread proscriptions against such practices (with exception of dinner dates), many have actually engaged in such practices and the majority found them acceptable.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabbard GO, Nadelson C. Professional boundaries in the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1995;273(18):1445-1449.CrossRef Gabbard GO, Nadelson C. Professional boundaries in the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1995;273(18):1445-1449.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO. Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155(3):409-414.CrossRef Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO. Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155(3):409-414.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bird S. Managing professional boundaries. Aust Fam Physician 2013;42(9):666-668.PubMed Bird S. Managing professional boundaries. Aust Fam Physician 2013;42(9):666-668.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, J.A., Rosenberg, L.B., Schulman, B.J., Alpert, J.E., Waldinger, R.J., 2018. Reexamining the Call of Duty: Teaching Boundaries in Medical School. Acad Med, 93(11), 1624-1630.CrossRef Chen, J.A., Rosenberg, L.B., Schulman, B.J., Alpert, J.E., Waldinger, R.J., 2018. Reexamining the Call of Duty: Teaching Boundaries in Medical School. Acad Med, 93(11), 1624-1630.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiff GD. A piece of my mind. Crossing boundaries--violation or obligation? JAMA. 2013;310(12):1233-1234.CrossRef Schiff GD. A piece of my mind. Crossing boundaries--violation or obligation? JAMA. 2013;310(12):1233-1234.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez R. A model for boundary dilemmas: ethical decision-making in the patient-professional relationship. Ethical Hum Sci Serv 2000;2(1):43-61.PubMed Martinez R. A model for boundary dilemmas: ethical decision-making in the patient-professional relationship. Ethical Hum Sci Serv 2000;2(1):43-61.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gartrell N, Herman J, Olarte S, Feldstein M, Localio R. Psychiatrist-patient sexual contact: results of a national survey. I: Prevalence. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143(9):1126-1131.CrossRef Gartrell N, Herman J, Olarte S, Feldstein M, Localio R. Psychiatrist-patient sexual contact: results of a national survey. I: Prevalence. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143(9):1126-1131.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher N, Fahy T. Sexual relationships between doctors and patients. J R Soc Med 1990;83(11):681-683.CrossRef Fisher N, Fahy T. Sexual relationships between doctors and patients. J R Soc Med 1990;83(11):681-683.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabbard, Glen O., Kristin A. Kassaw, and Gonzalo Perez-Garcia. “Professional boundaries in the era of the Internet.” Acad Psychiatry 35, no. 3 (2011): 168-174.CrossRef Gabbard, Glen O., Kristin A. Kassaw, and Gonzalo Perez-Garcia. “Professional boundaries in the era of the Internet.” Acad Psychiatry 35, no. 3 (2011): 168-174.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown S, Gunderman RB. Viewpoint: enhancing the professional fulfillment of physicians. Acad Med 2006;81(6):577-582.CrossRef Brown S, Gunderman RB. Viewpoint: enhancing the professional fulfillment of physicians. Acad Med 2006;81(6):577-582.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kappers WM, Cutler SL. Poll Everywhere! Even in the Classroom: An Investigation into the Impact of Using PollEverwhere in a Large-Lecture Classroom. Comput Educ J 2015;6(20):140-145. Kappers WM, Cutler SL. Poll Everywhere! Even in the Classroom: An Investigation into the Impact of Using PollEverwhere in a Large-Lecture Classroom. Comput Educ J 2015;6(20):140-145.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health 2005;95(7):1149-1155.CrossRef Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health 2005;95(7):1149-1155.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 7 ed: Brooks/Cole: Cengage Learning; 2011. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 7 ed: Brooks/Cole: Cengage Learning; 2011.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott A, Jeon SH, Joyce CM, et al. A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:126.CrossRef Scott A, Jeon SH, Joyce CM, et al. A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:126.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. The American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. The American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2016.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz-Tena N, Potter F, Sinclair M, Williams S. Logistic Propensity Models to Adjust for Nonresponse in Physician Surveys. 2002; Alexandria, VA. Diaz-Tena N, Potter F, Sinclair M, Williams S. Logistic Propensity Models to Adjust for Nonresponse in Physician Surveys. 2002; Alexandria, VA.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JK, Fuller WA. Fractional Hot Deck Imputation. Biometrika. 2004(91):559-578.CrossRef Kim JK, Fuller WA. Fractional Hot Deck Imputation. Biometrika. 2004(91):559-578.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed: New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed: New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
Metadaten
Titel
Professional-Patient Boundaries: a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Attitudes and Practices
verfasst von
Harry Reyes Nieva, MAS
Elise Ruan, MD, MPH
Gordon D. Schiff, MD
Publikationsdatum
21.11.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05543-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.