Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2019

26.07.2018 | Oncology

Prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging, whole-tumour apparent diffusion coefficient values and HPV genotyping for stage IB-IV cervical cancer patients following chemoradiotherapy

verfasst von: Gigin Lin, Lan-Yan Yang, Yu-Chun Lin, Yu-Ting Huang, Feng-Yuan Liu, Chun-Chieh Wang, Hsin-Ying Lu, Hsin-Ju Chiang, Yu-Ruei Chen, Ren-Chin Wu, Koon-Kwan Ng, Ji-Hong Hong, Tzu-Chen Yen, Chyong-Huey Lai

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To develop and validate a prognostic model of integrating whole-tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from pretreatment diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping in predicting the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for women with stage IB–IV cervical cancer following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods

We retrospectively analysed three prospectively collected cohorts comprising 300 patients with stage IB–IV cervical cancer treated with CCRT in 2007–2014 and filtered 134 female patients who underwent MR imaging at 3.0 T for final analysis (age, 24–92 years; median, 54 years). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the whole-tumour ADC histogram parameters, HPV genotyping and relevant clinical variables in predicting OS and DFS. The dataset was randomly split into training (n = 88) and testing (n = 46) datasets for construction and independent bootstrap validation of the models.

Results

The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 69 months (range, 9–126 months). Non-squamous cell type, ADC10 <0.77 × 10-3 mm2/s, T3-4, M1 stage and high-risk HPV status were selected to generate a model, in which the OS and DFS for the low, intermediate and high-risk groups were significantly stratified (p < 0.0001). The prognostic model improved the prediction significantly compared with the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage for both the training and independent testing datasets (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The prognostic model based on integrated clinical and imaging data could be a useful clinical biomarker to predict OS and DFS in patients with stage IB–IV cervical cancer treated with CCRT.

Key points

• ADC 10 is the best prognostic factor among ADC parameters in cervical cancer treated with CCRT
• A novel prognostic model was built based on histology, ADC 10 , T and M stage and HPV status
• The prognostic model outperforms FIGO stage in the survival prediction
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740CrossRef Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang CC, Lai CH, Huang HJ et al (2010) Clinical effect of human papillomavirus genotypes in patients with cervical cancer undergoing primary radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:1111-1120 Wang CC, Lai CH, Huang HJ et al (2010) Clinical effect of human papillomavirus genotypes in patients with cervical cancer undergoing primary radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:1111-1120
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuang F, Yan Z, Wang J, Rao Z (2014) The value of diffusion-weighted MRI to evaluate the response to radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 32:342–349CrossRef Kuang F, Yan Z, Wang J, Rao Z (2014) The value of diffusion-weighted MRI to evaluate the response to radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 32:342–349CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura K, Joja I, Kodama J, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y (2012) Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumour is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:283–290CrossRef Nakamura K, Joja I, Kodama J, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y (2012) Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumour is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:283–290CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heo SH, Shin SS, Kim JW et al (2013) Pre-treatment diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor recurrence in uterine cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation: value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Korean J Radiol 14:616-625 Heo SH, Shin SS, Kim JW et al (2013) Pre-treatment diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor recurrence in uterine cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation: value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Korean J Radiol 14:616-625
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA (2008) Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 18:1058–1064CrossRef McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA (2008) Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 18:1058–1064CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Micco M, Vargas HA, Burger IA et al (2014) Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Radiol 83:1169–1176CrossRef Micco M, Vargas HA, Burger IA et al (2014) Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Radiol 83:1169–1176CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Himoto Y, Fujimoto K, Kido A et al (2015) Pretreatment mean apparent diffusion coefficient is significantly correlated with event-free survival in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ib to IIIb cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:1079–1085CrossRef Himoto Y, Fujimoto K, Kido A et al (2015) Pretreatment mean apparent diffusion coefficient is significantly correlated with event-free survival in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ib to IIIb cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:1079–1085CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Zhao X, Li Y (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting and monitoring the response of uterine cervical cancer to combined chemoradiation. Clin Radiol 64:1067–1074CrossRef Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Zhao X, Li Y (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting and monitoring the response of uterine cervical cancer to combined chemoradiation. Clin Radiol 64:1067–1074CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HS, Kim CK, Park BK, Huh SJ, Kim B (2013) Evaluation of therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:187–193CrossRef Kim HS, Kim CK, Park BK, Huh SJ, Kim B (2013) Evaluation of therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:187–193CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gladwish A, Milosevic M, Fyles A et al (2016) Association of apparent diffusion coefficient with disease recurrence in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radical chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology 279:158–166CrossRef Gladwish A, Milosevic M, Fyles A et al (2016) Association of apparent diffusion coefficient with disease recurrence in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radical chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology 279:158–166CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures. they are data. Radiology 278:563–577 Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures. they are data. Radiology 278:563–577
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai CH, Chao A, Wang CC, Huang HJ (2014) Human papillomavirus and management of cervical cancer: does genotype matter. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 3:136–142CrossRef Lai CH, Chao A, Wang CC, Huang HJ (2014) Human papillomavirus and management of cervical cancer: does genotype matter. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 3:136–142CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim BG (2013) Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in cervical cancer and beyond. J Gynecol Oncol 24:291–292CrossRef Kim BG (2013) Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in cervical cancer and beyond. J Gynecol Oncol 24:291–292CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin G, Ng KK, Chang CJ et al (2009) Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 250:784–792CrossRef Lin G, Ng KK, Chang CJ et al (2009) Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 250:784–792CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri K, Brewster DH, Graham C et al (2014) Influence of HPV type on prognosis in patients diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 135:2721–2726CrossRef Cuschieri K, Brewster DH, Graham C et al (2014) Influence of HPV type on prognosis in patients diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 135:2721–2726CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin G, Lai CH, Tsai SY et al (2017) (1)H MR spectroscopy in cervical carcinoma using external phase array body coil at 3.0 tesla: prediction of poor prognostic human papillomavirus genotypes. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:899–907CrossRef Lin G, Lai CH, Tsai SY et al (2017) (1)H MR spectroscopy in cervical carcinoma using external phase array body coil at 3.0 tesla: prediction of poor prognostic human papillomavirus genotypes. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:899–907CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM (2005) Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics 21:3301–3307CrossRef Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM (2005) Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics 21:3301–3307CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura K, Joja I, Nagasaka T et al (2012) The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 127:478–483CrossRef Nakamura K, Joja I, Nagasaka T et al (2012) The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 127:478–483CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jalaguier-Coudray A, Villard-Mahjoub R, Delouche A et al (2017) Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of pathologic complete response in cervical cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective observational study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161299:161299 Jalaguier-Coudray A, Villard-Mahjoub R, Delouche A et al (2017) Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of pathologic complete response in cervical cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective observational study. Radiology. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​2017161299:​161299
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Marur S, Li S, Cmelak AJ et al (2017) E1308: Phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose radiation and weekly cetuximab in patients with HPV-associated resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx—ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. J Clin Oncol 35:490–497CrossRef Marur S, Li S, Cmelak AJ et al (2017) E1308: Phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose radiation and weekly cetuximab in patients with HPV-associated resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx—ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. J Clin Oncol 35:490–497CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Ye Z, Sun H, Bai R (2015) Clinical application of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in uterine cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:1073–1078CrossRef Liu Y, Ye Z, Sun H, Bai R (2015) Clinical application of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in uterine cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:1073–1078CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuang F, Ren J, Zhong Q, Liyuan F, Huan Y, Chen Z (2013) The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 23:1050–1058CrossRef Kuang F, Ren J, Zhong Q, Liyuan F, Huan Y, Chen Z (2013) The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 23:1050–1058CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin Y, Li H, Chen Z et al (2015) Correlation of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient with uterine cervical pathologic finding. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:1125–1131CrossRef Lin Y, Li H, Chen Z et al (2015) Correlation of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient with uterine cervical pathologic finding. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:1125–1131CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA et al (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:246–252CrossRef Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA et al (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:246–252CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Guan Y, Shi H, Chen Y et al (2016) Whole-lesion histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of cervical cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40:212–217CrossRef Guan Y, Shi H, Chen Y et al (2016) Whole-lesion histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of cervical cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40:212–217CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue H, Ren C, Yang J et al (2014) Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of local aggressiveness of cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:341–348CrossRef Xue H, Ren C, Yang J et al (2014) Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of local aggressiveness of cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:341–348CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA et al (2013) Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:314–320CrossRef Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA et al (2013) Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:314–320CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JJ, Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK, Kim B (2014) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting parametrial invasion in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 24:1081–1088CrossRef Park JJ, Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK, Kim B (2014) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting parametrial invasion in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 24:1081–1088CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen JR, Esthappan J, DeWees T et al (2013) Tumor volume and subvolume concordance between FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:431–434CrossRef Olsen JR, Esthappan J, DeWees T et al (2013) Tumor volume and subvolume concordance between FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:431–434CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho KC, Lin G, Wang JJ, Lai CH, Chang CJ, Yen TC (2009) Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured by 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and SUV from FDG PET/CT in primary cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:200–208CrossRef Ho KC, Lin G, Wang JJ, Lai CH, Chang CJ, Yen TC (2009) Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured by 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and SUV from FDG PET/CT in primary cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:200–208CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JJ, Kim CK, Park BK (2016) Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in uterine cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 120:507–511CrossRef Park JJ, Kim CK, Park BK (2016) Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in uterine cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 120:507–511CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno Y, Lisbona R, Tamada T, Alaref A, Sugimura K, Reinhold C (2017) Comparison of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume versus ADC histogram: prognostic value of tumour treatment response and survival in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer. Br J Radiol 90:20170035CrossRef Ueno Y, Lisbona R, Tamada T, Alaref A, Sugimura K, Reinhold C (2017) Comparison of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume versus ADC histogram: prognostic value of tumour treatment response and survival in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer. Br J Radiol 90:20170035CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Grech-Sollars M, Hales PW, Miyazaki K et al (2015) Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain. NMR Biomed 28:468–485CrossRef Grech-Sollars M, Hales PW, Miyazaki K et al (2015) Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain. NMR Biomed 28:468–485CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging, whole-tumour apparent diffusion coefficient values and HPV genotyping for stage IB-IV cervical cancer patients following chemoradiotherapy
verfasst von
Gigin Lin
Lan-Yan Yang
Yu-Chun Lin
Yu-Ting Huang
Feng-Yuan Liu
Chun-Chieh Wang
Hsin-Ying Lu
Hsin-Ju Chiang
Yu-Ruei Chen
Ren-Chin Wu
Koon-Kwan Ng
Ji-Hong Hong
Tzu-Chen Yen
Chyong-Huey Lai
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5651-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

European Radiology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.