Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 1/2018

11.08.2017 | Original Article

Prognostic Value of Pre- and Post-Treatment FDG PET/CT Parameters in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

verfasst von: Hyoungwoo Kim, Ie Ryung Yoo, Sun Ha Boo, Hye Lim Park, Joo Hyun O, Sung Hoon Kim

Erschienen in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic value of PET parameters obtained from pre- and post-treatment FDG PET/CT examinations in patients with SCLC.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with initially diagnosed SCLC from 2009 to 2014 were included and had chemotherapy and/or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. FDG PET/CT examinations were performed before (PET1) and after (PET2) treatment to evaluate treatment response. A region of interest was placed over the primary lesion and metastatic lymph nodes within the thoracic cavity. PET parameters including change from PET1 to PET2 (Δ in %) were acquired: SUVmax, SUVpeak, MTV2.5, TLG, ΔSUVmax, ΔSUVpeak, ΔMTV and ΔTLG. Patient characteristics including staging, age, sex, LDH and response evaluation by RECIST were surveyed. Statistical analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis with respect to OS and PFS.

Results

The median follow-up was 9.6 months (2.5–80.5 months). 27 patients were LD and 32 were ED. Forty-six patients (78.0%) had died, and median OS was 8.6 months; 51 patients (86%) showed disease progression, and median PFS was 2.5 months. On univariate analysis, patients with ED, high interval change (ΔSUVmax and ΔSUVpeak) and low PET2 parameters showed longer OS and PFS. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that ΔSUVpeak (HR 2.6, P = 0.002) was an independent prognostic factors for OS, and MTV2.5 of PET2 (HR 2.8, P = 0.001), disease stage (HR 2.7, P = 0.003) and RECIST (HR 2.0, P = 0.023) were independent prognostic factors for PFS.

Conclusions

Metabolic and volumetric PET parameters obtained from pre- and post-treatment FDG PET/CT examinations in patients with SCLC have significant prognostic information.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat van Meerbeeck JP, Fennell DA, De Ruysscher DK. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011;378:1741–55.CrossRefPubMed van Meerbeeck JP, Fennell DA, De Ruysscher DK. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011;378:1741–55.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Morabito A, Carillio G, Daniele G, Piccirillo MC, Montanino A, Costanzo R, et al. Treatment of small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;91:257–70.CrossRefPubMed Morabito A, Carillio G, Daniele G, Piccirillo MC, Montanino A, Costanzo R, et al. Treatment of small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;91:257–70.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu D, Ma T, Niu Z, Zheng J, Han A, Zhao S, et al. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:332–7.CrossRefPubMed Zhu D, Ma T, Niu Z, Zheng J, Han A, Zhao S, et al. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:332–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudin CM, Ismaila N, Hann CL, Malhotra N, Movsas B, Norris K, et al. Treatment of small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the American College of Chest Physicians Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4106–11.CrossRefPubMed Rudin CM, Ismaila N, Hann CL, Malhotra N, Movsas B, Norris K, et al. Treatment of small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the American College of Chest Physicians Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4106–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gambhir SS, Hoh CK, Phelps ME, Madar I, Maddahi J. Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1428–36.PubMed Gambhir SS, Hoh CK, Phelps ME, Madar I, Maddahi J. Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1428–36.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao S, Penney BC, Wroblewski K, Zhang H, Simon CA, Kampalath R, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:27–38.CrossRefPubMed Liao S, Penney BC, Wroblewski K, Zhang H, Simon CA, Kampalath R, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:27–38.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki R, Komaki R, Macapinlac H, Erasmus J, Allen P, Forster K, et al. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1136–43.CrossRefPubMed Sasaki R, Komaki R, Macapinlac H, Erasmus J, Allen P, Forster K, et al. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1136–43.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Go SI, Song HN, Kang JH, Kang MH, Kim MJ, Jung J, et al. The clinical impact of the sum of the maximum standardized uptake value on the pretreatment with F-FDG-PET/CT in small-cell lung cancer. Oncology. 2014;86:1–9.CrossRefPubMed Go SI, Song HN, Kang JH, Kang MH, Kim MJ, Jung J, et al. The clinical impact of the sum of the maximum standardized uptake value on the pretreatment with F-FDG-PET/CT in small-cell lung cancer. Oncology. 2014;86:1–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Kim JO, Jung CK, Kim YS, Yoo Ie R, Choi WH, et al. Metabolic activity on [18f]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and glucose transporter-1 expression might predict clinical outcomes in patients with limited disease small-cell lung cancer who receive concurrent chemoradiation. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014;15:e13–21.CrossRefPubMed Lee J, Kim JO, Jung CK, Kim YS, Yoo Ie R, Choi WH, et al. Metabolic activity on [18f]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and glucose transporter-1 expression might predict clinical outcomes in patients with limited disease small-cell lung cancer who receive concurrent chemoradiation. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014;15:e13–21.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SB, Choi JY, Moon SH, Yoo J, Kim H, Ahn YC, et al. Prognostic value of volumetric metabolic parameters measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2014;14:2.PubMedPubMedCentral Park SB, Choi JY, Moon SH, Yoo J, Kim H, Ahn YC, et al. Prognostic value of volumetric metabolic parameters measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2014;14:2.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Onitilo AA, Engel JM, Demos JM, Mukesh B. Prognostic significance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography after treatment in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. Clin Med Res. 2008;6:72–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Onitilo AA, Engel JM, Demos JM, Mukesh B. Prognostic significance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography after treatment in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. Clin Med Res. 2008;6:72–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lodge MA, Chaudhry MA, Wahl RL. Noise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1041–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lodge MA, Chaudhry MA, Wahl RL. Noise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1041–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanderhoek M, Perlman SB, Jeraj R. Impact of the definition of peak standardized uptake value on quantification of treatment response. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:4–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vanderhoek M, Perlman SB, Jeraj R. Impact of the definition of peak standardized uptake value on quantification of treatment response. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:4–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat JH O, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: A simplified guide to PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0. Radiology. 2016;280:576–84.CrossRef JH O, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: A simplified guide to PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0. Radiology. 2016;280:576–84.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hentschel M, Appold S, Schreiber A, Abolmaali N, Abramyuk A, Dorr W, et al. Early FDG PET at 10 or 20 Gy under chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for locoregional control and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1203–11.CrossRefPubMed Hentschel M, Appold S, Schreiber A, Abolmaali N, Abramyuk A, Dorr W, et al. Early FDG PET at 10 or 20 Gy under chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for locoregional control and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1203–11.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu FY, Yen TC, Wang JY, Yang TS. Early prediction by 18F-FDG PET/CT for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving third-line cetuximab-based therapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:200–5.CrossRefPubMed Liu FY, Yen TC, Wang JY, Yang TS. Early prediction by 18F-FDG PET/CT for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving third-line cetuximab-based therapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:200–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Dusart M, Garcia C, Hossein-Foucher C, Lafitte JJ, et al. Primary tumor standardized uptake value measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: Update of a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European lung cancer working Party for the International Association for the study of lung cancer staging project. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:612–9.CrossRefPubMed Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Dusart M, Garcia C, Hossein-Foucher C, Lafitte JJ, et al. Primary tumor standardized uptake value measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: Update of a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European lung cancer working Party for the International Association for the study of lung cancer staging project. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:612–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wild AT, Herman JM, Dholakia AS, Moningi S, Lu Y, Rosati LM, et al. Lymphocyte-sparing effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with Unresectable pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:571–9.CrossRefPubMed Wild AT, Herman JM, Dholakia AS, Moningi S, Lu Y, Rosati LM, et al. Lymphocyte-sparing effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with Unresectable pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:571–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh JR, Seo JH, Chong A, Min JJ, Song HC, Kim YC, et al. Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:925–35.CrossRefPubMed Oh JR, Seo JH, Chong A, Min JJ, Song HC, Kim YC, et al. Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:925–35.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nobashi T, Koyasu S, Nakamoto Y, Kubo T, Ishimori T, Kim YH, et al. Prognostic value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters differs according to primary tumour location in small-cell lung cancer. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150618.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nobashi T, Koyasu S, Nakamoto Y, Kubo T, Ishimori T, Kim YH, et al. Prognostic value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters differs according to primary tumour location in small-cell lung cancer. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150618.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ong LT, Dunphy M, Foster A, Woo KM, Zhang Z, Perez CA, et al. Prognostic value of preradiotherapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetrics in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17:184–8.CrossRefPubMed Ong LT, Dunphy M, Foster A, Woo KM, Zhang Z, Perez CA, et al. Prognostic value of preradiotherapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetrics in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17:184–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yilmaz Demirci N, Yilmaz U, Biner Uslu I, Dikmen A, Yilmaz A, Erdogan Y. Prognostic significance of standardised uptake value (SUVmax ) measured on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016. doi:10.1111/ecc.12485. Yilmaz Demirci N, Yilmaz U, Biner Uslu I, Dikmen A, Yilmaz A, Erdogan Y. Prognostic significance of standardised uptake value (SUVmax ) measured on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016. doi:10.​1111/​ecc.​12485.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto Y, Kameyama R, Murota M, Bandoh S, Ishii T, Nishiyama Y. Early assessment of therapeutic response using FDG PET in small cell lung cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:467–72.CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto Y, Kameyama R, Murota M, Bandoh S, Ishii T, Nishiyama Y. Early assessment of therapeutic response using FDG PET in small cell lung cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:467–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prognostic Value of Pre- and Post-Treatment FDG PET/CT Parameters in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
verfasst von
Hyoungwoo Kim
Ie Ryung Yoo
Sun Ha Boo
Hye Lim Park
Joo Hyun O
Sung Hoon Kim
Publikationsdatum
11.08.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1869-3474
Elektronische ISSN: 1869-3482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-017-0490-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe