The authors declare they have no competing interests.
This paper is inspired from an MSc thesis completed by the first author VR, under the supervision of authors GB and CE. Authors CL, LC and MM contributed editorial comments in earlier versions, while author NJ contributed clinical expertise relevant to therapeutic trajectories in pediatric palliative care and oncology. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This paper defends the ethical and empirical significance of direct engagement with terminally ill children and adolescents in PPC research on health-related quality of life. Clinical trials and other forms of health research have resulted in tremendous progress for improving clinical outcomes among children and adolescents diagnosed with a life-threatening illness. Less attention has been paid, however, to engaging this patient population directly in studies aimed at optimizing health-related quality of life in PPC. Though not restricted to care at the end of life, PPC—and by extension PPC research—is in part dependent on recognizing the social complexities of death and dying and where health-related quality of life is a fundamental element. To explore these complexities in depth requires partnership with terminally ill children and adolescents, and acknowledgement of their active social and moral agency in research.
Principles of pediatric research ethics, theoretical tenets of the “new sociology of the child(hood),” and human rights codified in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) underpin the position that a more engagement-centered approach is needed in PPC research. The ethics, sociologies and human rights of engagement will each be discussed as they relate to research with terminally ill children and adolescents in PPC. Qualitative method(ologies) presented in this paper, such as deliberative stakeholder consultations and phenomenology of practice can serve as meaningful vehicles for achieving i) participation among terminally ill children and adolescents; ii) evidence-bases for PPC best practices; and iii) fulfillment of research ethics principles.
PPC research based on direct engagement with PPC patients better reflects their unique expertise and social epistemologies of terminal illness. Such an approach to research would strengthen both the ethical and methodological soundness of HRQoL inquiry in PPC.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics and Committee on Hospital Care. Palliative care for children. Pediatrics. 2000;106:351–7. CrossRef
Liben S. Palliative care for children: Is it really needed? Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2000;17:294–5. CrossRef
Pascuet E, Cowin L, Vaillancourt R, Splinter W, Vadeboncoeur C, Grandmaison Dumond L, et al. A comparative cost-minimization analysis of providing paediatric palliative respite care before and after the opening of services at a paediatric hospice. Healthc Manag Forum. 2010;23:63–6. CrossRef
Ward-smith P, Korphage RM. Where health care dollars are spent when pediatric palliative care is provided. Nurs Econ. 2008;26:175–9. PubMed
Gans D, Kominski GF, Roby DH, Diamant AL, Chen X, Lin W, et al. Better outcomes, lower costs: palliative care program reduces stress, costs of care for children with life-threatening conditions. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res 2012;(PB2012-3):1-8.
Field M, Behrman R. Committee on Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families: When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington: National Academies Press; 2003.
Wolfe J. Suffering in children at the end of life: recognizing an ethical duty to palliate. J Clin Ethics. 2000;11:157–63. PubMed
Theunissen N, Vogels T, Koopman H, Verrips G, Zwinderman K, Verloove-Vanhorick S, et al. The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res. 2014;7:387–97. CrossRef
Cremeens J, Eiser C, Blades M. Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;4:58. CrossRef
Schaefer K, Chittenden E. Raising the Bar for the Care of Seriously Ill Patients: Results of a National Survey to Define Essential Palliative Care Competencies for Medical Students and. Acad Med 2014;89:1024–1031.
James A, Prout A. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. 2nd ed. London: Falmer Press; 1997.
Understanding the CRC | Convention on the Rights of the Child | UNICEF. 2014.
Smolin DM. Overcoming Religious Objections To the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Emory Int Law Rev. 2006;20:81–110.
Freeman MDA. The Moral Status of Children: Essays on the Rights of the Children. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1997.
Lavalette M, Cunningham S. The New Sociology of Childhood. In: Goldson B, Lavalette M, McKechnie J, editors. Children, Welfare and the State. London: SAGE; 2002.
Stillion JM, Papadatou D. Suffer the Children: An Examination of Psychosocial Issues in Children and Adolescents with Terminal Illness. Am Behav Sci. 2002;46:299–315. CrossRef
Hart RA. Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Florence: UNICEF ICDC; 1992.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. 2014.
Thomas N, O’Kane C. The ethics of participatory research with children. Child Soc. 1998;12:336–48. CrossRef
Drotar D. Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1998.
Bartlett G, Longo C, Rahimzadeh V, Crimi L. iChange. Ethics and Methods for Engagement in Genomic Research with Vulnerable Populations. Preliminary GE3LS Report Submitted to the Research Oversight Committee for the Genome Canada Project: Study of Biomarkers for Pediatric Glioblastoma through Genomi. Volume 28; 2014(November 2013).
Doherty KO, Burgess MM. Defining Deliberative Outputs in a Public Engagement about Biobanks. Health Law Rev. 2008;16:4–6.
Schelbe L, Chanmugam A, Moses T, Saltzburg S, Williams LR, Letendre J. Youth participation in qualitative research: Challenges and possibilities. Qual Soc Work 2014:1-18. doi: 10.1177/1473325014556792.
Greig AD, Taylor J, MacKay T. Doing Research with Children: A Practical Guide. 16th ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2012.
Christensen P, Prout A. Working with Ethical Symmetry in Social Research with Children. Childhood. 2002;9:477–97. CrossRef
Van Manen M. Phenomenology of Practice. Phenomenol Pract. 2007;1:11–30.
O’Doherty KC, Burgess MM, Edwards K, Gallagher RP, Hawkins AK, Kaye J, et al. From consent to institutions: Designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:367–74.
Roche J. Children: Rights, Participation and Citizenship. Childhood. 1999;6:475–93.
Balen R. Involving Children in Health and Social Research: “Human becomings” or “active beings”? Childhood. 2006;13:29–48. CrossRef
- Promoting an ethic of engagement in pediatric palliative care research
Mary Ellen Macdonald
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II