The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MFJM and JHO designed the study. MFJM interviewed and collected the data as a member of the research project, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the original paper. MFJM and JHO revised the paper and approved the final version.
This study examines the reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Empowerment Scale (ES) to be used in the community/psychosocial mental health field. Authors also reviewed the properties of the development and cross-cultural adaptation of the ES. Because mental health services are required to encourage empowerment and recovery-oriented interventions, adequate empowerment-oriented outcome measures are needed to evaluate services and study interventions across countries.
The current research was part of a larger research project with 213 participants. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to observe the ES’s construct-related validity, and a reliability analysis for internal consistency. The ES concurrent validity with the recovery and psychiatric symptoms measures was also assessed using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
The CFA supported the five-factor configuration for the refined model of measure as satisfactory. The Portuguese version of the ES presented an overall satisfactory reliability (α = .79) and was positively correlated with personal recovery (r = .71) and inversely with psychiatric symptoms (r = -.22).
The overall scale was considered reliable and valid to be used by Portuguese researchers and practitioners to evaluate empowering interventions in mental health services. Furthermore, in the effort to increase ES construct-related validity, this article suggests further improvements to enhance the empowerment measure.
Nelson G, Lord J, Ochocka J: Shifting the Paradigm in Community Mental Health: Towards Empowerment and Community. 2001, Toronto: University of Toronto Press
Nelson G, Kloos B, Ornelas J: Community Psychology and Community Mental Health: Towards Transformative Change. 2014, New York: Oxford University Press CrossRef
Ornelas J, Vargas-Moniz M, Duarte T: Community psychology and social change: a story from the field of mental health in Portugal. Global J Community Psychol Pract. 2010, 1 (1): 21-31.
Chamberlin J: A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1997, 20 (4): 43-46.
Wakefield PA, Randall GE, Richards DA: Identifying barriers to mental health system improvements: An examination of community participation in assertive community treatment programs. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2011, 5: 27- CrossRef
Ornelas J, Duarte T, Jorge-Monteiro MF: Transformative Organizational Change in Community Mental Health. Community Psychology and Community Mental Health: Towards Transformative Change. Edited by: Nelson G, Kloos B, Ornelas J. 2014, New York: Oxford University Press, 253-277. CrossRef
Maton KI, Brodsky AE: Empowering Community Settings: Theory, Research, and Action. Empowering Settings and Voices for Social Change. Edited by: Aber MS, Maton KI, Seidman E. 2011, New York, NY US: Oxford University Press, 38-64.
Nelson G, Lomotey J: Quantity and quality of participation and outcomes of participation in mental health consumer-run organizations. J Ment Health. 2006, 15 (1): 63-74. CrossRef
Speer PW, Peterson NA: Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: Testing cognitive, emotional and behavioral domains. Soc Work Res. 2000, 24 (2): 109-118. CrossRef
Zimmerman MA: Empowerment Theory: Psychological, Organizational, and Community Levels of Analysis. Handbook of Community Psychology. Edited by: Rappaport J, Seidman E. 2000, Dordrecht Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 43-63. CrossRef
Kieffer C: Citizen empowerment: a developmental perspective. Prev Hum Serv. 1984, 3: 9-36. CrossRef
Zimmerman MA, Warschausky S: Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: conceptual and methodological issues. Rehabil Psychol. 1998, 43 (1): 3-16. CrossRef
Hata A, Akiyama N, Kaneko M, Maeda K, Tsujii K, Asai H: Applying the Japanese version of ‘Empowerment Scale’ to schizophrenia patients. Seishin Igaku (Clinical Psychiatry). 2003, 45 (7): 733-740.
Fisher DB, Spiro L: Finding and Using our Voice: How Consumer/Survivor Advocacy is Transforming Mental Health Care. Mental Health Self-Help: Consumer and Family Initiatives. Edited by: Brown LD, Wituk S. 2010, New York, NY US: Springer Science + Business Media, 213-233. CrossRef
Jorge-Monteiro MF, Aguiar R, Sacchetto B, Vargas-Moniz M, Ornelas JH: What transformation? A qualitative study on empowering settings and community mental health organizations. Global J Community Psychol Pract. 2014, 5 (1): 1-13.
Ornelas J, Aguiar R, Sacchetto B, Jorge-Monteiro MF: Community-Based Participatory Research: A Collaborative Study to Measure Capabilities Towards Recovery in Mental Health Community Organizations. Psychology, Community & Health. vol. 1. 2012, Psych Open, 3-18.
Ornelas J: Promoção das capacidades e a integração de pessoas com doença mental: O papel de uma organização de base comunitária (Relatório Final, PTDC/PSI-PCL/113301/2009). 2014, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia: Lisboa
Arbuckle J: Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. 2003, Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation
Maroco J: Análise de Equações Estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações. 2010, Reportnumber: Pero Pinheiro
Hu L, Bentler PM: Evaluating Model Fit. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications. 1995, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 76-99.
Hoyle RH: The Structural Equation Modeling Approach: Basic Concepts and Fundamental Issues. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Edited by: Hoyle RH. 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc, 1-15.
Kline RB: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2005, New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 2
Haynes SN, Richard DCS, Kubany ES: Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess. 1995, 7 (3): 238-247. CrossRef
McDowell I: The Theoretical and Technical Foundations of Health Measurement. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (3rd ed). Edited by: McDowell I. 2006, New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, 10-54. CrossRef
Foster SL, Cone JD: Validity issues in clinical assessment. Psychol Assess. 1995, 7 (3): 248-260. CrossRef
Willis GB, DeMaio TJ, Harris-Kojetin B: Is the Bandwagon Headed to the Methodological Promised Land? Evaluating the Validity of Cognitive Interviewing Techniques. Cognition and Survey Research. Edited by: Sirken MG, Schechter S, Schwarz N, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R. 1999, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 133-153.
MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S: Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999, 4 (1): 84-99. CrossRef
- Properties of the Portuguese version of the empowerment scale with mental health organization users
Maria Fátima Jorge-Monteiro
José Henrique Ornelas
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet