Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2017

24.08.2017 | Review

Prophylactic pelvic drainage after rectal resection with extraperitoneal anastomosis: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

verfasst von: Benjamin Menahem, Antoine Vallois, Arnaud Alves, Jean Lubrano

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 11/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The role of prophylactic pelvic drainage in reducing the postoperative complication rate after rectal surgery remains unclear and controversial.

Objective

This review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials was performed to determine whether drainage of the extraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal surgery impacts the postoperative complication rate.

Study eligibility criteria

Study eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic pelvic drainage after rectal surgery.

Methods

The Medline and Cochrane Trials Register databases were searched for prospective randomized controlled trials comparing drainage versus no drainage after rectal surgery. Studies published until December 2016 were included. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK).

Results

Three randomized controlled trials involving 660 patients with extraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal surgery (330 with and 330 without prophylactic pelvic drains) were included. The overall mortality rate was 0.7% (2/267) in the drain group and 1.9% (5/261) in the no-drain group (P = 0.900). The anastomotic leakage rate was 14.8% (49/330) in the drain group and 16.7% (55/330) in the no-drain group (P = 0.370). The postoperative small bowel obstruction rate was significantly higher in the drain than no-drain group (50/267, 18.7% vs. 33/261, 12.6%; odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–2.60; P = 0.050).

Conclusions

Prophylactic use of pelvic drainage after extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis has no impact on the incidence of anastomotic leakage or postoperative death. However, it significantly increases the rate of postoperative small bowel obstruction.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM (1999) Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2:174–180CrossRef Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM (1999) Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2:174–180CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wiggers T (2006) Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 8:259–265CrossRef Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wiggers T (2006) Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 8:259–265CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang HY, Zhao CL, Xie J, Ye YW, Sun JF, Ding ZH et al (2016) To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 31:951–960CrossRef Zhang HY, Zhao CL, Xie J, Ye YW, Sun JF, Ding ZH et al (2016) To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 31:951–960CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Vedovati MC, Balzarotti R, Avenia N, Mariani E et al (2013) To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:35–42CrossRef Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Vedovati MC, Balzarotti R, Avenia N, Mariani E et al (2013) To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:35–42CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrowski H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084CrossRef Petrowski H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Monnson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD et al (2013) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon rectum 56:535–550CrossRef Monnson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD et al (2013) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon rectum 56:535–550CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M, Cahill R, Coleman M, Haboubi N et al (2017) A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Color Dis 19:O1–O12CrossRef Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M, Cahill R, Coleman M, Haboubi N et al (2017) A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Color Dis 19:O1–O12CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TI et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:113–121CrossRef Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TI et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:113–121CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216CrossRefPubMed Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Trancart D, Regimbeau J-M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis in 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502CrossRefPubMed Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Trancart D, Regimbeau J-M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis in 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicentre trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicentre trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Regimbeau JM, Valleur P (1999) Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg 189:554–559CrossRefPubMed Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Regimbeau JM, Valleur P (1999) Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg 189:554–559CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Celerier B, Denost Q, Van Geluwe B, Pontallier A, Rullier E (2016) The risk of definitive stoma formation at ten years after low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Color Dis 18:59–66CrossRef Celerier B, Denost Q, Van Geluwe B, Pontallier A, Rullier E (2016) The risk of definitive stoma formation at ten years after low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Color Dis 18:59–66CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J (2014) Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:662–671CrossRef Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J (2014) Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:662–671CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Denost Q, Rouanet P, Faucheron JL, Panis Y, Meunier B, Cotte E et al (2017) French research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR). To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: the GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Ann Surg 265:474–480CrossRefPubMed Denost Q, Rouanet P, Faucheron JL, Panis Y, Meunier B, Cotte E et al (2017) French research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR). To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: the GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Ann Surg 265:474–480CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351CrossRefPubMed Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D, Gavaghan D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Cont Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRef Jadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D, Gavaghan D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Cont Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagmuller E, Lorenz D, Werthmann K, Trede M (1990) Uses and risks of drainage following elective colon resection. A prospective randomized and controlled clinical study. Chirurg 61:266–271PubMed Hagmuller E, Lorenz D, Werthmann K, Trede M (1990) Uses and risks of drainage following elective colon resection. A prospective randomized and controlled clinical study. Chirurg 61:266–271PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Menningen R, Kusche J, Troidl H (1989) Prophylaktische drainage von koloanastomosen. Coloproctology 11:76–80 Menningen R, Kusche J, Troidl H (1989) Prophylaktische drainage von koloanastomosen. Coloproctology 11:76–80
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao HZ, Wang WJ, Li SW, Jiang LX (2012) Study on the safety and feasibility of not placing prophylactic drainage after colorectal anastomosis. China Med Pharm 2:23–24 Cao HZ, Wang WJ, Li SW, Jiang LX (2012) Study on the safety and feasibility of not placing prophylactic drainage after colorectal anastomosis. China Med Pharm 2:23–24
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang W, Luo B, Pang MH, Li P (2011) Prophylactic abdominal drainage in patients with colorectal anastomosis: a prospective study. Chin J Dig Surg 10:427–429 Zhang W, Luo B, Pang MH, Li P (2011) Prophylactic abdominal drainage in patients with colorectal anastomosis: a prospective study. Chin J Dig Surg 10:427–429
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffmann J, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Damm P, Jensen R (1987) A prospective controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon rectum 30:449–452CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann J, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Damm P, Jensen R (1987) A prospective controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon rectum 30:449–452CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CD, Lamont PM, Orr N, Lennox M (1989) Is a drain necessary after colonic anastomosis? J R Soc Med 82:661–664PubMedPubMedCentral Johnson CD, Lamont PM, Orr N, Lennox M (1989) Is a drain necessary after colonic anastomosis? J R Soc Med 82:661–664PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Merad F, Yahchouchi E, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Laborde Y, Langlois-Zantain O (1998) Prophylatic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis: a multicenter study controlled by randomization. French Association for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 133:309–314CrossRefPubMed Merad F, Yahchouchi E, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Laborde Y, Langlois-Zantain O (1998) Prophylatic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis: a multicenter study controlled by randomization. French Association for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 133:309–314CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagar PM, Couse N, Kerin M, May J, MacFie J (1993) Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 80:769–771CrossRefPubMed Sagar PM, Couse N, Kerin M, May J, MacFie J (1993) Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 80:769–771CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagar PM, Hartley MN, MacFie J, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman P, May J (1995) Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon rectum 38:254–258CrossRefPubMed Sagar PM, Hartley MN, MacFie J, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman P, May J (1995) Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon rectum 38:254–258CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown SR, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, Heah SM, Tang CL (2001) A prospective randomised study of drains in infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses. Tech Coloproctol 5:89–92CrossRefPubMed Brown SR, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, Heah SM, Tang CL (2001) A prospective randomised study of drains in infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses. Tech Coloproctol 5:89–92CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Yahchouchi E, Laborde Y, Pelissier E et al (1999) Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Assoc Surgical Res Surgery 125:529–535 Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Yahchouchi E, Laborde Y, Pelissier E et al (1999) Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Assoc Surgical Res Surgery 125:529–535
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilsabeck JR (1982) The presacral space as a collector of fluid accumulations following rectal anastomosis: tolerance of rectal anastomosis to closed suction pelvic drainage. Dis Colon rectum 25:680–684CrossRefPubMed Hilsabeck JR (1982) The presacral space as a collector of fluid accumulations following rectal anastomosis: tolerance of rectal anastomosis to closed suction pelvic drainage. Dis Colon rectum 25:680–684CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sehapayak S, McNatt M, Carter HG, Bailey W, Baldwin A Jr (1973) Continuous sump-suction drainage of the pelvis after low rectal resection: a reappraisal. Dis Colon rectum 16:485–489CrossRefPubMed Sehapayak S, McNatt M, Carter HG, Bailey W, Baldwin A Jr (1973) Continuous sump-suction drainage of the pelvis after low rectal resection: a reappraisal. Dis Colon rectum 16:485–489CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsujinaka S, Kawamura YJ, Konishi F, Maeda T, Mizokami K (2008) Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks. ANZ J Surg 78:461–465CrossRefPubMed Tsujinaka S, Kawamura YJ, Konishi F, Maeda T, Mizokami K (2008) Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks. ANZ J Surg 78:461–465CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Berliner SD, Burson LC, Lear PE (1967) Intraperitoneal drains in surgery of the colon. Clinical evaluation of 454 cases. Am J Surg 113:646–647CrossRefPubMed Berliner SD, Burson LC, Lear PE (1967) Intraperitoneal drains in surgery of the colon. Clinical evaluation of 454 cases. Am J Surg 113:646–647CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Monson JR, MacFie J, Irving H, Keane FB, Brennana TG, Tanner WA (1986) Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collection following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Br J Surg 73:993–994CrossRefPubMed Monson JR, MacFie J, Irving H, Keane FB, Brennana TG, Tanner WA (1986) Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collection following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Br J Surg 73:993–994CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prophylactic pelvic drainage after rectal resection with extraperitoneal anastomosis: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
verfasst von
Benjamin Menahem
Antoine Vallois
Arnaud Alves
Jean Lubrano
Publikationsdatum
24.08.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2891-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.