Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
In percutaneous ablation procedures, periprocedural pain, unrest and respiratory concerns can be detrimental to achieve a safe and efficacious ablation and impair treatment outcome. This study aimed to compare the association between anesthetic technique and local disease control in patients undergoing percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
This IRB-exempted single-center comparative, retrospective analysis of three cohorts analyzed 90 patients treated for hepatic malignancies from January 2013 until September 2018. The local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), safety and periprocedural pain perception were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses to correct for potential confounders.
In 114 procedures (22 general anesthesia; 32 midazolam; 60 propofol), 171 liver tumors (136 CRLM; 35 HCC) were treated with percutaneous MWA. Propofol and general anesthesia were superior to midazolam/fentanyl sedation regarding LTPFS (4/94 [4.3%] vs. 19/42 [45.2%] vs. 2/35 [5.7%]; P < 0.001, respectively). Local tumor progression rate was 14.6% (25/171). Eighteen tumors (72.0%) were retreated by ablation. Of them, 14 (78%) were previously treated with midazolam. Propofol versus midazolam (P < 0.001), general anesthesia versus midazolam (P = 0.016), direct postprocedural visual analog pain score above 5 (P = 0.050) and more than one tumor per procedure (P = 0.045) were predictors for LTPFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that propofol versus midazolam (HR 7.94 [95% CI 0.04–0.39; P < 0.001]) and general anesthesia versus midazolam (HR 6.33 [95% CI 0.04–0.69; P = 0.014]) were associated with LTPFS. Pain during and directly after treatment was significantly worse in patients who received midazolam sedation (P < 0.001).
Compared to propofol and general anesthesia, midazolam/fentanyl sedation was associated with an increased periprocedural perception of pain and lower local tumor progression-free survival. To reduce the number of repeat procedures required to eradicate hepatic malignancies, general anesthesia and propofol sedation should be favored over midazolam.
Crocetti L, de Baere T, Lencioni R. Quality improvement guidelines for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2010;33:11–7. CrossRef
Wang X, Sofocleous CT, Erinjeri JP, et al. Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36:166–75. CrossRef
Vari A, Gangi A. Anesthesia practices for interventional radiology in Europe. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2017;40:803–13. CrossRef
Andreano A, Galimberti S, Franza E, et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation of hepatic tumors: prospective evaluation of postablation syndrome and postprocedural pain. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:97–105.e1-2. CrossRef
Zhang HZ, Pan J, Sun J, et al. Pain control for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation. Cancer Imaging. 2018;18:40. CrossRef
Puijk RS, Ruarus AH, Scheffer HJ, et al. Percutaneous liver tumour ablation: image guidance, endpoint assessment, and quality control. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69:51–62. CrossRef
Solbiati L, Ahmed M, Cova L, et al. Small liver colorectal metastases treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: local response rate and long-term survival with up to 10-year follow-up. Radiology. 2012;265:958–68. CrossRef
Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases: factors affecting outcomes—a 10-year experience at a single center. Radiology. 2016;278:601–11. CrossRef
Liang P, Yu J, Lu MD, et al. Practice guidelines for ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatic malignancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5430–8. CrossRef
Ulmer BJ, Hansen JJ, Overley CA, et al. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:425–32. CrossRef
Poulos JE, Kalogerinis PT, Caudle JN. Propofol compared with combination propofol or midazolam/fentanyl for endoscopy in a community setting. AANA J. 2013;81:31–6.
Arepally A, Oechsle D, Kirkwood S, et al. Safety of conscious sedation in interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2001;24:185–90. CrossRef
Lai R, Peng Z, Chen D, et al. The effects of anesthetic technique on cancer recurrence in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:290–6. CrossRef
Wagner HJ, Nowacki J, Klose KJ. Propofol versus midazolam for sedation during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7:673–80. CrossRef
Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Schreiber F, et al. Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline-Updated June 2015. Endoscopy. 2015;47:1175–89. CrossRef
Lovett P, Gomez V, Hodge DO, et al. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl sedation for colonoscopy in the elderly patient population. J Perianesth Nurs. 2017;32:210–4. CrossRef
Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1957–63. CrossRef
Ahmed SA, Selim A, Hawash N, et al. Randomized controlled study comparing use of propofol plus fentanyl versus midazolam plus fentanyl as sedation in diagnostic endoscopy in patients with advanced liver disease. Int J Hepatol. 2017;2017:8462756. CrossRef
Sebe A, Yilmaz HL, Koseoglu Z, et al. Comparison of midazolam and propofol for sedation in pediatric diagnostic imaging studies. Postgrad Med. 2014;126:225–30. CrossRef
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7. CrossRef
van Tilborg AA, Scheffer HJ, Nielsen K, et al. Transcatheter CT arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography for liver tumor visualization during percutaneous ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:1101–11.e4. CrossRef
Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands (I.K.N.L.). National evidence-based guideline. Colorectaalcarcinoom. 2014. https://oncoline.nl/
Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update. Radiology. 2014;273:241–60. CrossRef
Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72:95–7. CrossRef
IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM ® SPSS ® Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.
Correa-Gallego C, Fong Y, Gonen M, et al: A retrospective comparison of microwave ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4278–83. CrossRef
Kim HJ, Park BK, Chung IS. Comparison of general anesthesia and conscious sedation during computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of T1a renal cell carcinoma. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69:24–9. CrossRef
Wang D, Wang S, Chen J, et al. Propofol combined with traditional sedative agents versus propofol- alone sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:101–10. CrossRef
Manninen PH, Chan AS, Papworth D. Conscious sedation for interventional neuroradiology: a comparison of midazolam and propofol infusion. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:26–30. CrossRef
Padmanabhan A, Frangopoulos C, Shaffer LET. Patient satisfaction with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:1102–8. CrossRef
Schroeder C, Kaoutzanis C, Tocco-Bradley R, et al. Patients prefer propofol to midazolam plus fentanyl for sedation for colonoscopy: results of a single-center randomized equivalence trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:62–9. CrossRef
Yang W, Cai J, Zabkiewicz C, et al. The effects of anesthetics on recurrence and metastasis of cancer, and clinical implications. World J Oncol. 2017;8:63–70. CrossRef
Snyder GL, Greenberg S. Effect of anaesthetic technique and other perioperative factors on cancer recurrence. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:106–15. CrossRef
- Propofol Compared to Midazolam Sedation and to General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Microwave Ablation in Patients with Hepatic Malignancies: A Single-Center Comparative Analysis of Three Historical Cohorts
Robbert S. Puijk
Valentijn Ziedses des Plantes
Alette H. Ruarus
Laurien G. P. H. Vroomen
Marcus C. de Jong
Caroline J. Hoedemaker-Boon
Deirdre H. Thöne-Passchier
Ceylan C. Gerçek
Jan J. J. de Vries
Petrousjka M. P. van den Tol
Hester J. Scheffer
Martijn R. Meijerink
- Springer US
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Radiologie
Mail Icon II