Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Medical Oncology 2/2020

01.02.2020 | Original Paper

Prospective assessment of the clinical benefit of a tailored cancer gene set built on a next-generation sequencing platform in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

verfasst von: Thomas C. Westbrook, Ian S. Hagemann, Jessica Ley, Kevin Chen, Kevin Palka, Jingxia Liu, Ling Chen, Peter Oppelt, Douglas Adkins

Erschienen in: Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We performed a prospective trial to assess the clinical benefit of a tailored gene set built on a next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Archived tumor tissue obtained from patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC was analyzed for variants by a tailored Comprehensive Cancer Gene set of 40 genes (CCG-40) performed on a NGS platform. These data were provided to clinicians to inform treatment decisions. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (disease control) that resulted from selection and administration of a targeted therapy based on results of the CCG-40. Barriers to performance and implementation of the assay were recorded. Forty patients enrolled. Primary tumor sites included oropharynx (14), larynx/hypopharynx (14), oral cavity (9), and nasopharynx (3). The CCG-40 assay was performed in 23 patients (57.5%), but not in 17 patients due inadequate financial coverage (12) or insufficient tumor tissue (5). Potentially actionable tumor variants were identified in 3 patients (7.5%); all were PIK3CA variants. Due to inability to obtain access to candidate drugs (2) or rapid decline in performance status (1), none of these patients received targeted therapy informed by the CCG-40 results. The CCG-40 assay did not provide clinical benefit to the patients on this trial. Identification of limitations of the assay and barriers to the test’s performance and application may be used to optimize this strategy in future trials.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ford J. Precision oncology: a new forum for an emerging field. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1(1):1–2. Ford J. Precision oncology: a new forum for an emerging field. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1(1):1–2.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsimberidou AM, Iskander NG, Hong DS, et al. Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson Cancer Center initiative. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(22):6373–83.CrossRef Tsimberidou AM, Iskander NG, Hong DS, et al. Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson Cancer Center initiative. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(22):6373–83.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Slamon DJ, Leyland-jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):783–92.CrossRef Slamon DJ, Leyland-jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):783–92.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Van’t veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(25):1999–2009.CrossRef Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Van’t veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(25):1999–2009.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mcarthur GA, Chapman PB, Robert C, et al. Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):323–32.CrossRef Mcarthur GA, Chapman PB, Robert C, et al. Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):323–32.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal N, Frederick MJ, Pickering CR, et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333(6046):1154–7.CrossRef Agrawal N, Frederick MJ, Pickering CR, et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333(6046):1154–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickering CR, Zhang J, Yoo SY, et al. Integrative genomic characterization of oral squamous cell carcinoma identifies frequent somatic drivers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):770–81.CrossRef Pickering CR, Zhang J, Yoo SY, et al. Integrative genomic characterization of oral squamous cell carcinoma identifies frequent somatic drivers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):770–81.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lui VW, Hedberg ML, Li H, et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):761–9.CrossRef Lui VW, Hedberg ML, Li H, et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):761–9.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stransky N, Egloff AM, Tward AD, et al. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2011;333(6046):1157–60.CrossRef Stransky N, Egloff AM, Tward AD, et al. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2011;333(6046):1157–60.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–82.CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–82.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Seiwert TY, Zuo Z, Keck MK, et al. Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(3):632–41.CrossRef Seiwert TY, Zuo Z, Keck MK, et al. Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(3):632–41.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedberg ML, Goh G, Chiosea SI, et al. Genetic landscape of metastatic and recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(1):169–80.CrossRef Hedberg ML, Goh G, Chiosea SI, et al. Genetic landscape of metastatic and recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(1):169–80.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris LG, Chandramohan R, West L, et al. The molecular landscape of recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers: insights from a precision oncology sequencing platform. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):244–55.CrossRef Morris LG, Chandramohan R, West L, et al. The molecular landscape of recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers: insights from a precision oncology sequencing platform. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):244–55.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CH, Guthrie VB, Masica DL, et al. Genomic alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma determined by cancer gene-targeted sequencing. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(6):1216–23.CrossRef Chung CH, Guthrie VB, Masica DL, et al. Genomic alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma determined by cancer gene-targeted sequencing. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(6):1216–23.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chau NG, Li YY, Jo VY, et al. Incorporation of next-generation sequencing into routine clinical care to direct treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(12):2939–49.CrossRef Chau NG, Li YY, Jo VY, et al. Incorporation of next-generation sequencing into routine clinical care to direct treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(12):2939–49.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinhofer I, Budach V, Saki M, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing of locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck reveals druggable targets for improving adjuvant chemoradiation. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:78–86.CrossRef Tinhofer I, Budach V, Saki M, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing of locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck reveals druggable targets for improving adjuvant chemoradiation. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:78–86.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagemann IS, Devarakonda S, Lockwood CM, et al. Clinical next-generation sequencing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(4):631–9.CrossRef Hagemann IS, Devarakonda S, Lockwood CM, et al. Clinical next-generation sequencing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(4):631–9.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):156–67.CrossRef Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):156–67.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. KEYNOTE-048: phase 3 study of first-line pembrolizumab (P) for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Abstract presented at ESMO 2018 Congress; 2018 October 22; Munich. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. KEYNOTE-048: phase 3 study of first-line pembrolizumab (P) for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Abstract presented at ESMO 2018 Congress; 2018 October 22; Munich.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Meric-bernstam F, Brusco L, Shaw K, et al. Feasibility of large-scale genomic testing to facilitate enrollment onto genomically matched clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(25):2753–62.CrossRef Meric-bernstam F, Brusco L, Shaw K, et al. Feasibility of large-scale genomic testing to facilitate enrollment onto genomically matched clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(25):2753–62.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Massard C, Michiels S, Ferté C, et al. High-Throughput genomics and clinical outcome in hard-to-treat advanced cancers: results of the MOSCATO 01 trial. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(6):586–95.CrossRef Massard C, Michiels S, Ferté C, et al. High-Throughput genomics and clinical outcome in hard-to-treat advanced cancers: results of the MOSCATO 01 trial. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(6):586–95.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodon J, Soria JC, Berger R, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):751–8.CrossRef Rodon J, Soria JC, Berger R, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):751–8.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sicklick JK, Kato S, Okamura R, et al. Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):744–50.CrossRef Sicklick JK, Kato S, Okamura R, et al. Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):744–50.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwaederle M, Zhao M, Lee JJ, et al. Impact of precision medicine in diverse cancers: a meta-analysis of phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(32):3817–25.CrossRef Schwaederle M, Zhao M, Lee JJ, et al. Impact of precision medicine in diverse cancers: a meta-analysis of phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(32):3817–25.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim SM, Cho SH, Hwang IG, et al. Investigating the feasibility of targeted next-generation sequencing to guide the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):300–12.CrossRef Lim SM, Cho SH, Hwang IG, et al. Investigating the feasibility of targeted next-generation sequencing to guide the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):300–12.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Tourneau C, Delord JP, Gonçalves A, et al. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1324–34.CrossRef Le Tourneau C, Delord JP, Gonçalves A, et al. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1324–34.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective assessment of the clinical benefit of a tailored cancer gene set built on a next-generation sequencing platform in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer
verfasst von
Thomas C. Westbrook
Ian S. Hagemann
Jessica Ley
Kevin Chen
Kevin Palka
Jingxia Liu
Ling Chen
Peter Oppelt
Douglas Adkins
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Medical Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-019-1336-3

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.