Skip to main content
main-content

01.06.2014 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2014

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2014

Prospective evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patient-based health-related survey: comparison of acute and chronic cases

Zeitschrift:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery > Ausgabe 6/2014
Autoren:
Satoshi Ochiai, Tetsuo Hagino, Shinya Senga, Masanori Saito, Hirotaka Haro

Abstract

Introduction

To verify the usefulness of and optimal timing for conducting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, we evaluated and compared baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes in patients with ACL injury divided into acute and chronic groups.

Patients and methods

101 patients after ACL reconstruction were studied. Patients who underwent surgery within 8 weeks after injury were classified as acute group (n = 40), and those having surgery after 8 weeks as chronic group (n = 61). SF-36, VAS, Lysholm score, anterior tibial translation, and pivot shift were assessed before surgery and 6, 18 and 30 months after surgery. The results of two groups were compared.

Results

In the preoperative SF-36 survey, physical and mental health scores were lower than the national standard scores in both groups. Physical health score was significantly lower in acute group, although mental health score was not significantly different between two groups. Preoperative VAS and Lysholm score were significantly poorer in acute group compared to chronic group. However, preoperative anterior tibial translation and pivot shift were not significantly different between the two groups. In postoperative evaluations, all parameters were improved significantly compared to preoperative values in both groups, and no significant differences were observed between the two groups.

Discussion

All evaluation methods showed significant improvements after surgery in both acute and chronic groups, confirming that ACL reconstruction is useful for both acute and chronic injuries. However, preoperative evaluations by SF-36, VAS, and Lysholm scale yielded different results in two groups, indicating the need to evaluate acute and chronic cases separately. Development of a specific evaluation method that is valid for any duration from injury to surgery is desirable.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise