Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 5/2020

12.07.2019 | Research Article

Prospective, multicenter study on the economic and clinical impact of gene-expression assays in early-stage breast cancer from a single region: the PREGECAM registry experience

verfasst von: S. Pérez Ramírez, M. del Monte-Millán, S. López-Tarruella, N. Martínez Jáñez, I. Márquez-Rodas, F. Lobo Samper, Y. Izarzugaza Perón, C. Rubio Terres, D. Rubio Rodríguez, J. Á. García-Sáenz, F. Moreno Antón, P. Zamora Auñón, M. Arroyo Yustos, M. Á. Lara Álvarez, E. M. Ciruelos Gil, L. Manso Sánchez, M. J. Echarri González, J. A. Guerra Martínez, C. Jara Sánchez, C. Bueno Muiño, S. García Adrián, J. R. Carrión Galindo, V. Valentín Maganto, M. Martín

Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and impact of gene-expression assays (GEAs) on treatment decisions in a real-world setting of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients.

Methods

This is a regional, prospective study promoted by the Council Health Authorities in Madrid. Enrolment was offered to women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-negative or micrometastatic, stage I or II breast cancer from 21 hospitals in Madrid. Treatment recommendations were recorded before and after knowledge of tests results. An economic model compared the cost-effectiveness of treatment, guided by GEAs or by common prognostic factors.

Results

907 tests (440 Oncotype DX® and 467 MammaPrint®) were performed between February 2012 and November 2014. Treatment recommendation changed in 42.6% of patients. The shift was predominantly from chemohormonal (CHT) to hormonal therapy (HT) alone, in 30.5% of patients. GEAs increased patients’ confidence in treatment decision making. Tumor grade, progesterone receptor positivity and Ki67 expression were associated with the likelihood of change from CHT to HT (P < 0.001) and from HT to CHT (P < 0.001). Compared with current clinical practice genomic testing increased quality-adjusted life years by 0.00787 per patient and was cost-saving from a national health care system (by 13.867€ per patient) and from a societal perspective (by 32.678€ per patient).

Conclusion

Using GEAs to guide adjuvant therapy in ESBC is cost-effective in Spain and has a significant impact on treatment decisions.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A, Winer E, Coates A, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2206–23.CrossRef Goldhirsch A, Winer E, Coates A, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2206–23.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2817–26.CrossRef Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2817–26.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van ’t Veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1999–2009. Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van ’t Veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1999–2009.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1671–6.CrossRef Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1671–6.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Albanell J, González A, Ruiz-borrego M, et al. Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:625–31.CrossRef Albanell J, González A, Ruiz-borrego M, et al. Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:625–31.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Eiermann W, Rezai M, Kümmel S, et al. The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:618–24.CrossRef Eiermann W, Rezai M, Kümmel S, et al. The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:618–24.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gligorov J, Pivot XB, Naman HL, et al. Prospective clinical utility study of the use of 21-gene assay in adjuvant decision making in women with estrogen receptor positive early invasive breast cancer: results from the SWITCH study. Oncologist. 2015;20:873–9.CrossRef Gligorov J, Pivot XB, Naman HL, et al. Prospective clinical utility study of the use of 21-gene assay in adjuvant decision making in women with estrogen receptor positive early invasive breast cancer: results from the SWITCH study. Oncologist. 2015;20:873–9.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Exner R, Bago-Horvath Z, Bartsch R, et al. The multigene signature MammaPrint® impacts on multidisciplinary team decisions in ER+, HER2- early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:837–42.CrossRef Exner R, Bago-Horvath Z, Bartsch R, et al. The multigene signature MammaPrint® impacts on multidisciplinary team decisions in ER+, HER2- early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:837–42.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cusumano PG, Generali D, Ciruelos E, et al. European inter-institutional impact study of MammaPrint®. Breast. 2014;23:423–8.CrossRef Cusumano PG, Generali D, Ciruelos E, et al. European inter-institutional impact study of MammaPrint®. Breast. 2014;23:423–8.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouzier R, Pronzato P, Chéreau E, et al. Multigene assays and molecular markers in breast cancer: systematic review of health economic analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:621–37.CrossRef Rouzier R, Pronzato P, Chéreau E, et al. Multigene assays and molecular markers in breast cancer: systematic review of health economic analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:621–37.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillner BE, Smith TJ. Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:160–8.CrossRef Hillner BE, Smith TJ. Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:160–8.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hornberger J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:313–24.PubMed Hornberger J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:313–24.PubMed
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsoi DT, Inoue M, Kelly CM, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:457–65.CrossRef Tsoi DT, Inoue M, Kelly CM, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:457–65.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang M, Rajan S, Issa AM, et al. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model. Cancer. 2012;118:5163–70.CrossRef Yang M, Rajan S, Issa AM, et al. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model. Cancer. 2012;118:5163–70.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lidgren M, Wilking N, Jönsson B, et al. Health related quality of life in different states of breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:1073–81.CrossRef Lidgren M, Wilking N, Jönsson B, et al. Health related quality of life in different states of breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:1073–81.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen E, Tong KB, Malin JL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of 70-gene MammaPrint® signature in node-negative breast cancer. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:333–42. Chen E, Tong KB, Malin JL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of 70-gene MammaPrint® signature in node-negative breast cancer. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:333–42.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Retèl VP, Joore MA, Knauer M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1382–91.CrossRef Retèl VP, Joore MA, Knauer M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1382–91.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ward S, Scope A, Rafia R, et al. Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–30.CrossRef Ward S, Scope A, Rafia R, et al. Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–30.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell HE, Epstein D, Bloomfield D, et al. The cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a comparison of no chemotherapy and first, second, and third generation regimens for patients with differing prognoses. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2517–30.CrossRef Campbell HE, Epstein D, Bloomfield D, et al. The cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a comparison of no chemotherapy and first, second, and third generation regimens for patients with differing prognoses. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2517–30.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrospide A, Soto-Gordoa M, Acaiturri T, et al. Cost of breast cancer treatment by clinical stage in the Basque Country. Spain. Rev Española Salud Pública. 2015;89:93–7.CrossRef Arrospide A, Soto-Gordoa M, Acaiturri T, et al. Cost of breast cancer treatment by clinical stage in the Basque Country. Spain. Rev Española Salud Pública. 2015;89:93–7.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassett MJ, O’Malley AJ, Pakes JR, et al. Frequency and cost of chemotherapy-related serious adverse effects in a population sample of women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1108–17.CrossRef Hassett MJ, O’Malley AJ, Pakes JR, et al. Frequency and cost of chemotherapy-related serious adverse effects in a population sample of women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1108–17.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat ORDEN 731/2013, de 6 de septiembre del Consejero de Sanidad, por la que se fijan los precios públicos por la prestación de los servicios y actividades de naturaleza sanitaria de la Red de Centros de la Comunidad de Madrid. BOCM No 215, 10 de septiembre de 2013. ORDEN 731/2013, de 6 de septiembre del Consejero de Sanidad, por la que se fijan los precios públicos por la prestación de los servicios y actividades de naturaleza sanitaria de la Red de Centros de la Comunidad de Madrid. BOCM No 215, 10 de septiembre de 2013.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparano JA. TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). Clin Breast Cancer. 2006;7:347–50.CrossRef Sparano JA. TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). Clin Breast Cancer. 2006;7:347–50.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, et al. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:9–19.CrossRef Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, et al. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:9–19.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bombard Y, Rozmovits L, Trudeau ME, et al. Patients’ perceptions of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment decisions. Curr Oncol. 2014;21:203–11.CrossRef Bombard Y, Rozmovits L, Trudeau ME, et al. Patients’ perceptions of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment decisions. Curr Oncol. 2014;21:203–11.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective, multicenter study on the economic and clinical impact of gene-expression assays in early-stage breast cancer from a single region: the PREGECAM registry experience
verfasst von
S. Pérez Ramírez
M. del Monte-Millán
S. López-Tarruella
N. Martínez Jáñez
I. Márquez-Rodas
F. Lobo Samper
Y. Izarzugaza Perón
C. Rubio Terres
D. Rubio Rodríguez
J. Á. García-Sáenz
F. Moreno Antón
P. Zamora Auñón
M. Arroyo Yustos
M. Á. Lara Álvarez
E. M. Ciruelos Gil
L. Manso Sánchez
M. J. Echarri González
J. A. Guerra Martínez
C. Jara Sánchez
C. Bueno Muiño
S. García Adrián
J. R. Carrión Galindo
V. Valentín Maganto
M. Martín
Publikationsdatum
12.07.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Elektronische ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02176-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Clinical and Translational Oncology 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.