Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021

30.04.2020 | 2019 EAES Oral

Prospective randomized controlled study for comparison of 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma

verfasst von: Kanghaeng Lee, Sang Il Youn, Yongjoon Won, Sa-Hong Min, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Due to the technological advance in resolution and stereoscopic depth, the 3-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic system has been widely used in real surgery. However, there have been few studies to confirm the clinical usefulness of the 3D laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes between the 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D LDG for gastric cancer patients.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized controlled, single-center, and superiority trial. This study was carried in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma which could be radically resected by LDG were randomly assigned (1:1) to the 2D or 3D group. From October 2016 to August 2018, 84 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned into the 2D group (44 patients) or the 3D group (40 patients). A total of 5 patients were excluded; 3 in the 2D group and 2 were in the 3D group. Consequently, the data from 79 patients were analyzed (2D: 41 cases; 3D: 38 cases). For the LDG procedure, 3D and 2D camera and display system were applied according to the assigned group. The primary end point was the duration of total laparoscopic operation time. Secondary end points included the amount of intraoperative blood loss (IBL), the number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complications and open conversion rate.

Results

There were no differences between 2 and 3D groups with respect to clinicopathologic characteristics. The total operation time in 3D groups was significantly shorter than 2D group (122 [106.5–161] versus 101 [77.75–125.5] minutes; P = 0.001). The postoperative complication rates in the 3D groups was significantly lower than 2D group (24.4% versus 7.9%, respectively; P = 0.045).

Conclusion

3D LDG shorten the operation time compared with 2D LDG in gastric cancer patients. And 3D laparoscopy provided the benefit of less postoperative complications.

Trial Registration

cris.nih.go.kr number KCT0003717
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148 Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346CrossRef Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000001346​CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY, Kim W, Kim HI, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Hur H, Kong SH, Cho GS, Kim JJ, Park DJ, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Kim JW, Lee JH, Kim MC, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2019) Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY, Kim W, Kim HI, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Hur H, Kong SH, Cho GS, Kim JJ, Park DJ, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Kim JW, Lee JH, Kim MC, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2019) Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003217​CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, Lau JY, Ng EK, Li AK (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440CrossRef Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, Lau JY, Ng EK, Li AK (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440CrossRef
8.
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng CH, Lu J, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang CM (2018) Comparison of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy with a 2D procedure for gastric cancer: A phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Surgery 163:300–304.CrossRef Zheng CH, Lu J, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang CM (2018) Comparison of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy with a 2D procedure for gastric cancer: A phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Surgery 163:300–304.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung MR, Park YK, Seon JW, Kim KY, Cheong O, Ryu SY (2002) Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system. World J Surg 36(10):2400–3241CrossRef Jung MR, Park YK, Seon JW, Kim KY, Cheong O, Ryu SY (2002) Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system. World J Surg 36(10):2400–3241CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Kildebro N, Rosenberg J (2017) Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg 213:159–170CrossRef Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Kildebro N, Rosenberg J (2017) Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg 213:159–170CrossRef
18.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Buia A, Farkas S (2013) 3-D-Laparoskopie vs 2‑D‑Laparoskopie. Der Chirurg 84(3):202–207CrossRef Buia A, Farkas S (2013) 3-D-Laparoskopie vs 2‑D‑Laparoskopie. Der Chirurg 84(3):202–207CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS (2006) Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chir Belg 106:662–664CrossRef Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS (2006) Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chir Belg 106:662–664CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA (2012) Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc 26(10):2961–2968CrossRef Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA (2012) Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc 26(10):2961–2968CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Munshi A (2019) Do not use robotic surgery in oncology patients when conventional surgical approaches are equally effective. Lancet Oncol 20:e240CrossRef Munshi A (2019) Do not use robotic surgery in oncology patients when conventional surgical approaches are equally effective. Lancet Oncol 20:e240CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinha R, Sundaram M, Raje S, Rao G, Sinha M, Sinha R (2013) 3D laparoscopy: technique and initial experience in 451 cases. Gynecol Surg 10(2):123–128CrossRef Sinha R, Sundaram M, Raje S, Rao G, Sinha M, Sinha R (2013) 3D laparoscopy: technique and initial experience in 451 cases. Gynecol Surg 10(2):123–128CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YY, Lee Y, Lee CM, Park S (2019) Lymphadenectomy using two instrument arms during robotic surgery for gastric cancer: astrategy to facilitate reduced-port robotic gastrectomy. Asian J Surg. 43:459–466CrossRef Kim YY, Lee Y, Lee CM, Park S (2019) Lymphadenectomy using two instrument arms during robotic surgery for gastric cancer: astrategy to facilitate reduced-port robotic gastrectomy. Asian J Surg. 43:459–466CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective randomized controlled study for comparison of 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma
verfasst von
Kanghaeng Lee
Sang Il Youn
Yongjoon Won
Sa-Hong Min
Young Suk Park
Sang-Hoon Ahn
Do Joong Park
Hyung-Ho Kim
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07587-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.