Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastroenterology 5/2017

08.09.2016 | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

Prospective randomized study of endoscopic biliary stone extraction using either a basket or a balloon catheter: the BasketBall study

verfasst von: Noritaka Ozawa, Ichiro Yasuda, Shinpei Doi, Takuji Iwashita, Masahito Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Masanori Nakashima, Tesshin Ban, Issei Kojima, Koichiro Matsuda, Mitsuru Matsuda, Yusuke Ishida, Yoshinobu Okabe, Nobuhiro Ando, Keisuke Iwata

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In Japan and Europe, a retrieval basket is generally used for endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones, while in the US, a retrieval balloon is mainly used. However, the efficacies of these two devices have not been previously compared. Therefore, the present multicenter, prospective, randomized study was performed to compare the efficacies of these two devices for endoscopic biliary stone extraction.

Methods

This study was designed as a non-inferiority study in comparing a basket removal with a balloon removal. Six Japanese institutions participated in this study, which included 184 patients with bile duct stones <11 mm in diameter with no limitation in the number of stones. The stones were identified and measured during ERCP, after which the patients were randomly assigned to undergo endoscopic stone extraction using either a basket catheter or a balloon catheter. The primary end point was the rate of complete removals of stones within 10 min, and the secondary end point was the rate of procedure-related complications.

Results

There were 91 patients in the basket group and 93 in the balloon group. The rate of successful stone extraction within 10 min was 81.3 % (74/91) in the basket group and 83.9 % (78/93) in the balloon group (p = 0.7000). The complication rate was 6.6 % in the basket group and 11.8 % in the balloon group (p = 0.3092). Complications included bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis.

Conclusions

Basket and balloon catheters showed similar efficacies for endoscopic biliary stone extraction when stone size is 11 mm or smaller.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasuda I, Itoi T. Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:376–85.CrossRefPubMed Yasuda I, Itoi T. Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:376–85.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Seitz U, Bapaye A, Bohnacker S, et al. Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. World J Surg. 1998;22:1133–44.CrossRefPubMed Seitz U, Bapaye A, Bohnacker S, et al. Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. World J Surg. 1998;22:1133–44.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:106–18.CrossRefPubMed Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:106–18.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoi T, Wang HP. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. Dig Endosc. 2010;22(Suppl 1):S69–75.CrossRefPubMed Itoi T, Wang HP. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. Dig Endosc. 2010;22(Suppl 1):S69–75.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maple JT, Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:731–44.CrossRefPubMed Maple JT, Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:731–44.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:24–34.CrossRefPubMed Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:24–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T, et al. Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:405–32.CrossRefPubMed Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T, et al. Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:405–32.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishiwatari H, Kawakami H, Hisai H, et al. Balloon catheter versus basket catheter for endoscopic bile duct stone extraction: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016;48:350–7.CrossRefPubMed Ishiwatari H, Kawakami H, Hisai H, et al. Balloon catheter versus basket catheter for endoscopic bile duct stone extraction: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016;48:350–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective randomized study of endoscopic biliary stone extraction using either a basket or a balloon catheter: the BasketBall study
verfasst von
Noritaka Ozawa
Ichiro Yasuda
Shinpei Doi
Takuji Iwashita
Masahito Shimizu
Tsuyoshi Mukai
Masanori Nakashima
Tesshin Ban
Issei Kojima
Koichiro Matsuda
Mitsuru Matsuda
Yusuke Ishida
Yoshinobu Okabe
Nobuhiro Ando
Keisuke Iwata
Publikationsdatum
08.09.2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1257-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Journal of Gastroenterology 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Krebspatienten impfen: Was? Wen? Und wann nicht?

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Nierenultraschall: Tipps vom Profi

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

„KI sieht, was wir nicht sehen“

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.