Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Uro-News 1/2017

09.01.2017 | Magnetresonanztomografie | Medizin aktuell

Pro & Kontra

Ist die transrektale Prostatabiopsie besser als die perineale?

verfasst von: PD Dr. med. Michael Seitz, Prof. Dr. med. Rolf Harzmann

Erschienen in: Uro-News | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Über den besten Zugang bei der Gewebeentnahme in der Prostata scheinen die Meinungen noch immer zu divergieren. Zwei Urologen haben für URO-NEWS zu dieser Kontroverse kurz und prägnant Stellung bezogen.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawakami S, Yamamoto S, Numao N, et al. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer. Int J Urol. 2007;14(8):719–24.CrossRefPubMed Kawakami S, Yamamoto S, Numao N, et al. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer. Int J Urol. 2007;14(8):719–24.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerruto MA, Vianello F, D’Elia C, et al. Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86(4):4–287.CrossRef Cerruto MA, Vianello F, D’Elia C, et al. Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86(4):4–287.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy. Urology. 2008;71(2):191–5.CrossRefPubMed Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy. Urology. 2008;71(2):191–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, et al. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(2):310–5.CrossRefPubMed Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, et al. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(2):310–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(2):134–8.CrossRefPubMed Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(2):134–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz BF, Swanzy S, Thrasher JB. A randomized prospective comparison of antibiotic tissue levels in the corpora cavernosa of patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation using gentamicin plus cefazolin versus an oral fluoroquinolone for prophylaxis. J Urol. 1996;156(3):991–4.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz BF, Swanzy S, Thrasher JB. A randomized prospective comparison of antibiotic tissue levels in the corpora cavernosa of patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation using gentamicin plus cefazolin versus an oral fluoroquinolone for prophylaxis. J Urol. 1996;156(3):991–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Carratala J, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Tubau F, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora of cancer patients receiving norfloxacin prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40(2):503–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Carratala J, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Tubau F, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora of cancer patients receiving norfloxacin prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40(2):503–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyazaki Y, Akamatsu S, Kanamaru S, et al. A prospective randomized trial Comparing a combined regimen of amikacin and levofloxacin to levofloxacin alone as prophylaxis in transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Urol J. 2016;13(1):2533–40.PubMed Miyazaki Y, Akamatsu S, Kanamaru S, et al. A prospective randomized trial Comparing a combined regimen of amikacin and levofloxacin to levofloxacin alone as prophylaxis in transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Urol J. 2016;13(1):2533–40.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruyere F, Malavaud S, Bertrand P, et al. Prosbiotate: a multicenter, prospective analysis of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2015;193(1):145–50.CrossRefPubMed Bruyere F, Malavaud S, Bertrand P, et al. Prosbiotate: a multicenter, prospective analysis of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2015;193(1):145–50.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Carignan A, Roussy JF, Lapointe V, et al. Increasing risk of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: time to reassess antimicrobial prophylaxis? Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):453–9.CrossRefPubMed Carignan A, Roussy JF, Lapointe V, et al. Increasing risk of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: time to reassess antimicrobial prophylaxis? Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):453–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, et al. Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;189(1 Suppl):S12–17; discussion S17-8.CrossRefPubMed Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, et al. Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;189(1 Suppl):S12–17; discussion S17-8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kandemir O, Bozlu M, Efesoy O, et al. The incidence and risk factors of resistant E. coli infections after prostate biopsy under fluoroquinolone prophylaxis: a single-centre experience with 2215 patients. J Chemother. 2016;28(4):284–8.CrossRefPubMed Kandemir O, Bozlu M, Efesoy O, et al. The incidence and risk factors of resistant E. coli infections after prostate biopsy under fluoroquinolone prophylaxis: a single-centre experience with 2215 patients. J Chemother. 2016;28(4):284–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen JE, Landis P, Trock BJ, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in the rectal carriage of men in an active surveillance cohort: longitudinal analysis. J Urol. 2015;193(2):552–6.CrossRefPubMed Cohen JE, Landis P, Trock BJ, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in the rectal carriage of men in an active surveillance cohort: longitudinal analysis. J Urol. 2015;193(2):552–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dai J, Leone A, Mermel L, et al. Rectal swab culture-directed antimicrobial prophylaxis for prostate biopsy and risk of postprocedure infection: a cohort study. Urology. 2015;85(1):8–14.CrossRefPubMed Dai J, Leone A, Mermel L, et al. Rectal swab culture-directed antimicrobial prophylaxis for prostate biopsy and risk of postprocedure infection: a cohort study. Urology. 2015;85(1):8–14.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Issa MM, Al-Qassab UA, Hall J, et al. Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle minimizes the risk of sepsis following prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;190(5):1769–75.CrossRefPubMed Issa MM, Al-Qassab UA, Hall J, et al. Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle minimizes the risk of sepsis following prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;190(5):1769–75.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zani EL, Clark OA, Rodrigues Netto N, Jr. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(5):CD006576. Zani EL, Clark OA, Rodrigues Netto N, Jr. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(5):CD006576.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DS, Hwang JH, Choi DK, et al. Control of infective complications of transrectal prostate biopsy. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15(4):431–6.CrossRef Park DS, Hwang JH, Choi DK, et al. Control of infective complications of transrectal prostate biopsy. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15(4):431–6.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Abughosh Z, Margolick J, Goldenberg SL, et al. A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine prophylactic cleansing of the rectum before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1326–31.CrossRefPubMed Abughosh Z, Margolick J, Goldenberg SL, et al. A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine prophylactic cleansing of the rectum before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1326–31.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor AK, Zembower TR, Nadler RB, et al. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1275–9.CrossRefPubMed Taylor AK, Zembower TR, Nadler RB, et al. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1275–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Womble PR, Linsell SM, Gao Y, et al. A Statewide Intervention to Reduce Hospitalizations after Prostate Biopsy. J Urol. 2015;194(2):403–9.CrossRefPubMed Womble PR, Linsell SM, Gao Y, et al. A Statewide Intervention to Reduce Hospitalizations after Prostate Biopsy. J Urol. 2015;194(2):403–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang L, Tang Z, Gao L, et al. The augmented prophylactic antibiotic could be more efficacious in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(8):1197–207.CrossRefPubMed Yang L, Tang Z, Gao L, et al. The augmented prophylactic antibiotic could be more efficacious in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(8):1197–207.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pro & Kontra
Ist die transrektale Prostatabiopsie besser als die perineale?
verfasst von
PD Dr. med. Michael Seitz
Prof. Dr. med. Rolf Harzmann
Publikationsdatum
09.01.2017
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Uro-News / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1432-9026
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-5676
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-017-1347-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Uro-News 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.