The majority of primary care physicians support integration of children’s oral health promotion and disease prevention into their practices but can experience challenges integrating oral health services into their workflow. Most electronic health records (EHRs) in primary care settings do not include oral health information for pediatric patients. Therefore, it is important to understand providers’ preferences for oral health information within the EHR. The objectives of this study are to assess (1) the relative importance of various elements of pediatric oral health information for primary care providers to have in the EHR and (2) the extent to which practice and provider characteristics are associated with these information preferences.
We surveyed a sample of primary care physicians who conducted Medicaid well-child visits in North Carolina from August – December 2013. Using descriptive statistics, we analyzed primary care physicians’ oral health information preferences relative to their information preferences for traditional preventive aspects of well-child visits. Furthermore, we analyzed associations between oral health information preferences and provider- and practice-level characteristics using an ordinary least squares regression model.
Fewer primary care providers reported that pediatric oral health information is “very important,” as compared to more traditional elements of primary care information, such as tracking immunizations. However, the majority of respondents reported some elements of oral health information as being very important. Also, we found positive associations between the percentage of well child visits in which oral health screenings and oral health referrals are performed and the reported importance of having pediatric oral health information in the EHR.
Incorporating oral health information into the EHR may be desirable for providers, particularly those who perform oral health screenings and dental referrals.
DHHS US. Oral health in America: a report of the surgeon general. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2000;28:685–95.
AAP, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Pediatrics. 2016;137:1–3. CrossRef
Lee JY, Bouwens TJ, Savage MF, Vann WF. Examining the cost-effectiveness of early dental visits. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28:102–8. PubMed
Mitchell-Royston L, Nowak A, Silverman J. American Academy of pediatric dentistry: Interprofessional study of oral health in pediatric care. Washington: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2014.
Dooley D, Moultrie NM, Heckman B, Gansky SA, Potter MB, Walsh MM. Oral health prevention and toddler well-child care: routine integration in a safety net system. Pediatrics. 2016;137:1–8. CrossRef
Wald JS, Rizk S, Webb JR, Haque S, Brown S, Ebron S. Children's EHR format enhancement: final recommendation report. Rockville: Prepared by RTI International under Contract No. HHSA 290–2009-00021I; 2015.
AAP. Bright futures recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. 2016. [ https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/periodicity_schedule.pdf]Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186–204. CrossRef
Yusof MM, Stergioulas L, Zugic J. Health information systems adoption: findings from a systematic review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129:262. PubMed
Delone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003;19:9–30. CrossRef
Rozier RG. Oral health in North Carolina: innovations, opportunities, and challenges. N C Med J. 2012;73:100–7. PubMed
DHHS US. National Plan and provider enumeration system. 2016. [ https://nppes.cms.hhs.gov/NPPES/Welcome.do] Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
UNC Sheps Center for Health Services Research. North Carolina health professions data system. 2016. [ http://www.shepscenter.unc.edu/programs-projects/workforce/projects/hpds/] Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
NC DHHS. Into the mouths of babes. 2016. [ https://www2.ncdhhs.gov/dph/oralhealth/partners/IMB.htm] Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
AHRQ. The national evaluation of the CHIPRA quality demonstration grant program. 2016. [ http://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/statesummaries/nc-statesum.pdf] Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
Richard M, Cromartie J, Hart G. Metropolitan, urban, and rural commuting areas: toward a better depiction of the United States settlement system. Urban Geogr. 1999;20:727–48. CrossRef
Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:1108–14. CrossRef
AAP, Clinical Affairs Committee--Infant Oral Health Subcommittee. Guideline on infant oral health care. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34:148–52.
Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull. 1974;81:358–61. CrossRef
Dinno A. Implementing Horn's parallel analysis for principal component analysis and factor analysis. Stata J. 2009;9:291.
AHRQ. Children's electronic health record format. 2015. [ https://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/childrens-electronic-health-record-ehr-format] Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
CMS. EHR incentive program. 2016. [ http://cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html] Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
- Providers’ preferences for pediatric oral health information in the electronic health record: a cross-sectional survey
Christopher M. Shea
B. Alex White
R. Gary Rozier
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Pädiatrie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II