Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2017

05.12.2016 | Original Article

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer Scale (RCAC) for young female cancer survivors

verfasst von: Ting-ting Qiao, Wei Zheng, Wei Xing, Li-xia Zhang, Wei Zhang, Yan-ping Shi, Xiao-juan Chen

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and test the psychometric properties of the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale (RCAC) in young Chinese female cancer survivors.

Methods

The Chinese version of the RCAC was developed using the standard Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) translation methodology, and then 800 young Chinese female cancer survivors were recruited to complete the scale. The validation of the RCAC is as follows: (1) content validity was evaluated by a group of experts; (2) factor structure was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis; (3) convergent validity was determined by correlations with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale; (4) internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient; and (5) test-retest reliability was assessed using intra-class correlations.

Results

Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71 to 0.81) and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.82 to 0.95) of the Chinese version of the RCAC were satisfactory. Results also indicated that the content validity index of the RCAC (Chinese version) was good. The Chinese version of the RCAC score was correlated with the PHQ-9 (r = 0.568, p < 0.01) and FACT-G (r = −0.524, p < 0.01) scores, which indicated acceptable convergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a six-factor structure of the Chinese version of the RCAC with a good model fit. Moreover, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis indicated factorial invariance (configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance) of the RCAC across cancer types.

Conclusions

The translation and cross-cultural adaption of the RCAC into Chinese was successful. The Chinese version of the RCAC has suitable factor structure and psychometric properties for reproductive concerns evaluation in young female cancer patients and is appropriate to use in clinical trials of Chinese patients.
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Armuand GM, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Wettergren L, Ahlgren J, Enblad G, Höglund M, Lampic C (2012) Sex differences in fertility-related information received by young adult cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 30:2147–2153. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.40.6470 CrossRefPubMed Armuand GM, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Wettergren L, Ahlgren J, Enblad G, Höglund M, Lampic C (2012) Sex differences in fertility-related information received by young adult cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 30:2147–2153. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2011.​40.​6470 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Xu X, Baker P, Tong C, Zhang L, Qi H, Zhao Y (2016) Patterns and associated factors of caesarean delivery intention among expectant mothers in China: implications from the implementation of China’s new national two-child policy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:E686. doi:10.3390/ijerph13070686 CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Xu X, Baker P, Tong C, Zhang L, Qi H, Zhao Y (2016) Patterns and associated factors of caesarean delivery intention among expectant mothers in China: implications from the implementation of China’s new national two-child policy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:E686. doi:10.​3390/​ijerph13070686 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Loi K, Lau M, Loh SF, Tan YY, Hong GS, Chan MY, Tan AM (2010) Attitudes toward fertility preservation in female cancer patients. J Reprod Med 55:411–416PubMed Loi K, Lau M, Loh SF, Tan YY, Hong GS, Chan MY, Tan AM (2010) Attitudes toward fertility preservation in female cancer patients. J Reprod Med 55:411–416PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard-Anderson J, Ganz PA, Bower JE, Stanton AL (2012) Quality of life, fertility concerns, and behavioral health outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:386–405. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr541 CrossRefPubMed Howard-Anderson J, Ganz PA, Bower JE, Stanton AL (2012) Quality of life, fertility concerns, and behavioral health outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:386–405. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djr541 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M, Rosenberg R, Przypyszny M, Rein A, Winer EP (2004) Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4174–4183. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.01.159 CrossRefPubMed Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M, Rosenberg R, Przypyszny M, Rein A, Winer EP (2004) Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4174–4183. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​01.​159 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, Katz A, Ai WZ, Chien AJ, Melisko ME, Cedars MI, Rosen MP (2012) Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer 118:1710–1717. doi:10.1002/cncr.26459 CrossRefPubMed Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, Katz A, Ai WZ, Chien AJ, Melisko ME, Cedars MI, Rosen MP (2012) Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer 118:1710–1717. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​26459 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohmann C, Borgmann-Staudt A, Rendtorff R, Reinmuth S, Holzhausen S, Willich SN, Henze G, Goldbeck L, Keil T (2011) Patient counselling on the risk of infertility and its impact on childhood cancer survivors: results from a national survey. J Psychosoc Oncol 29:274–285. doi:10.1080/07347332.2011.563344 CrossRefPubMed Hohmann C, Borgmann-Staudt A, Rendtorff R, Reinmuth S, Holzhausen S, Willich SN, Henze G, Goldbeck L, Keil T (2011) Patient counselling on the risk of infertility and its impact on childhood cancer survivors: results from a national survey. J Psychosoc Oncol 29:274–285. doi:10.​1080/​07347332.​2011.​563344 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenzel L, Dogan-Ates A, Habbal R, Berkowitz R, Goldstein DP, BernsteinM KBC, Osann K, Newlands E, Seckl MJ, Hancock B, Cella D (2005) Defining and measuring reproductive concerns of female cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 34:94–98. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi017 CrossRef Wenzel L, Dogan-Ates A, Habbal R, Berkowitz R, Goldstein DP, BernsteinM KBC, Osann K, Newlands E, Seckl MJ, Hancock B, Cella D (2005) Defining and measuring reproductive concerns of female cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 34:94–98. doi:10.​1093/​jncimonographs/​lgi017 CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorman JR, Su HI, Pierce JP, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, Malcarne VL (2014) A multidimensional scale to measure the reproductive concerns of young adult female cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 8:218–228. doi:10.1007/s11764-013-0333-3 CrossRefPubMed Gorman JR, Su HI, Pierce JP, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, Malcarne VL (2014) A multidimensional scale to measure the reproductive concerns of young adult female cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 8:218–228. doi:10.​1007/​s11764-013-0333-3 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorman JR, Su HI, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, Malcarne VL (2015) Experiencing reproductive concerns as a female cancer survivor is associated with depression. Cancer 121:935–942. doi:10.1002/cncr.29133 CrossRefPubMed Gorman JR, Su HI, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, Malcarne VL (2015) Experiencing reproductive concerns as a female cancer survivor is associated with depression. Cancer 121:935–942. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​29133 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16:606–613CrossRef Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16:606–613CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Chiu H, Xu B, Ma Y, Jin T, Wu M, Conwell Y (2010) Reliability and validity of the PHQ-9 for screening late-life depression in Chinese primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 25:1127–1133. doi:10.1002/gps.2442 CrossRefPubMed Chen S, Chiu H, Xu B, Ma Y, Jin T, Wu M, Conwell Y (2010) Reliability and validity of the PHQ-9 for screening late-life depression in Chinese primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 25:1127–1133. doi:10.​1002/​gps.​2442 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lent L, Hahn E, Eremenco S, Webster K, Cella D (1999) Using cross-cultural input to adapt the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scales. Acta Oncol 38:695–702CrossRef Lent L, Hahn E, Eremenco S, Webster K, Cella D (1999) Using cross-cultural input to adapt the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scales. Acta Oncol 38:695–702CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung YB, Goh C, Wee J, Khoo KS, Thumboo J (2009) Measurement properties of the Chinese language version of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general in a Singaporean population. Ann Acad Med Singap 38:225–229PubMed Cheung YB, Goh C, Wee J, Khoo KS, Thumboo J (2009) Measurement properties of the Chinese language version of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general in a Singaporean population. Ann Acad Med Singap 38:225–229PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynn MR (1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 35:382–385CrossRef Lynn MR (1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 35:382–385CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107:238–246CrossRef Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107:238–246CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ximénez C, Revuelta J (2010) Factorial invariance in a repeated measures design: an application to the study of person-organization fit. Span J Psychol 13:485–493CrossRef Ximénez C, Revuelta J (2010) Factorial invariance in a repeated measures design: an application to the study of person-organization fit. Span J Psychol 13:485–493CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmitt N, Golubovich J, Leong FT (2011) Impact of measurement invariance on construct correlations, mean differences, and relations with external correlates: an illustrative example using Big Five and RIASEC measures. Assessment 18:412–427. doi:10.1177/1073191110373223 CrossRefPubMed Schmitt N, Golubovich J, Leong FT (2011) Impact of measurement invariance on construct correlations, mean differences, and relations with external correlates: an illustrative example using Big Five and RIASEC measures. Assessment 18:412–427. doi:10.​1177/​1073191110373223​ CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Yekaninejad MS, Pakpour AH, Tadakamadla J, Kumar S, Mosavi SH, Fridlund B, Bottomley A, Aaronson NK (2015) Oral-health-related quality of life in patients with cancer: cultural adaptation and the psychometric testing of the Persian version of EORTC QLQ-OH17. Support Care Cancer 23:1215–1224. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2468-9 CrossRefPubMed Yekaninejad MS, Pakpour AH, Tadakamadla J, Kumar S, Mosavi SH, Fridlund B, Bottomley A, Aaronson NK (2015) Oral-health-related quality of life in patients with cancer: cultural adaptation and the psychometric testing of the Persian version of EORTC QLQ-OH17. Support Care Cancer 23:1215–1224. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-014-2468-9 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer Scale (RCAC) for young female cancer survivors
verfasst von
Ting-ting Qiao
Wei Zheng
Wei Xing
Li-xia Zhang
Wei Zhang
Yan-ping Shi
Xiao-juan Chen
Publikationsdatum
05.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3519-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.