nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

21.03.2019 | School

Psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire in adolescents: a cross-sectional study

verfasst von: Yuhang Zhu, Juan Li, Shanju Hu, Xiaoxue Li, Di Wu, Shuai Teng

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study with two cohorts of school-based data in the urban areas of Weifang, China. 4385 and 841 representative adolescents aged 11–17 years have recruited into the baseline and test–retest group, respectively. Psychometric analyses included feasibility, item and dimension properties, reliability, construct validity, measurement invariance, convergent and discriminant validity, and known-group validity.

Results

The response rates of both baseline and test–retest surveys were more than 90%. Low missing values were found (0.02–1.92%) across ten dimensions. The measurement properties of items were satisfactory. Noteworthy ceiling effects were observed for ten dimensions (6.75–31.84%), while the observed floor effects were negligible (0.02–1.37%). Internal consistency was robust with Cronbach’s alpha (0.819–0.959), while the test–retest reliability was acceptable with the ICCs (0.724–0.849). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the ten-dimensional structure and supported the configural and metric invariance across gender and age groups. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the KIDSCREEN-52 and the PedsQL™ 4.0 were stronger in comparable dimensions than those in less comparable dimensions, demonstrating the convergent and discriminant validity. In most dimensions, statistically significant and medium or large effect size differences were found across socioeconomic and mental health status, supporting the known-group validity.

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate that the Mandarin Chinese version of KIDSCREEN-52 seems to work well in a Chinese context, and is a psychometrically valid and reliable HRQOL instrument.

The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K.CrossRef

Taylor, R. M., Gibson, F., & Franck, L. S. (2010). A concept analysis of health-related quality of life in young people with chronic illness. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 17(14), 1823–1833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02379.x.CrossRef

Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0.CrossRefPubMed

Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 84(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.3.205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gandek, B., & Jr, W. J. (1998). Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 953–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00086-9.CrossRefPubMed

Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ, 322(7297), 1297–1300. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zumbo, B. D. (2003). Healthy Days, health satisfaction and satisfaction with the overall quality of life. Essays on the quality of life. Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0389-5_11.CrossRef

Matza, L. S., Swensen, A. R., Flood, E. M., Secnik, K., & Leidy, N. K. (2004). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value in Health, 7(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.71273.x.CrossRefPubMed

Furusho, J., Kubagawa, T., Satoh, H., Shibata, R., Nemoto, Y., Matsuzaki, K., et al. (2006). Study of the kid-KINDL questionnaire scores for children with developmental disorders in normal classes and their parents. No to Hattatsu, 38(3), 183–186.PubMed

10.

The KIDSCREEN Group Europe. (2006). The KIDSCREEN questionnaires: Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Handbook. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

11.

Nakazawa, J. (2006). Children’s Peer Relations and Social Behavior: A Review of Recent Research in Japan. Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan 45, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.5926/arepj1962.45.0_185.CrossRef

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Measuring Healthy Days: Population Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life. https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/pdfs/mhd.pdf.Accessed April 13, 2018.

13.

Solans, M., Pane, S., Estrada, M. D., Serra-Sutton, V., Berra, S., & Herdman, M., et al. (2008). Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: A systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value in Health. 11(4), 742–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00293.x.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Stevanovic, D., Tadic, I., Novakovic, T., Kisic-Tepavcevic, D., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2012). Evaluating the Serbian version of the KIDSCREEN quality-of-life questionnaires: Reliability, validity, and agreement between children’s and parents’ ratings. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1729–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0286-4.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Duer, W., et al. (2005). KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 5(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.5.3.35.CrossRef

16.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Herdman, M., Devine, J., Otto, C., Bullinger, M., Rose, M., et al. (2014). The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Quality of Life Research. 23(3), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ng, J. Y., Burnett, A., Ha, A. S., & Sum, K. W. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) versions of the KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2415–2421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0973-z.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., & Kaciroti, N. (2009). Early vocabulary development in Mandarin (Putonghua) and Cantonese. Journal of Child Language. 36(5), 1115–1144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009185.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Wang, L., & Ladegaard, H. J. (2008). Language attitudes and gender in China: Perceptions and reported use of Putonghua and Cantonese in the Southern Province of Guangdong. Language Awareness, 17(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.2167/la425.0.CrossRef

20.

Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2011). Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.

21.

Snow, D. (2004). Cantonese as written language: The growth of a written Chinese vernacular. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

22.

Yang, R., & Wang, W. S. Y. (2018). Categorical perception of Chinese characters by simplified and traditional Chinese readers. Reading & Writing. 31(5), 1133–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9832-y.CrossRef

23.

The WHOQOL Group. (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research. 2(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435734.CrossRef

24.

Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 58(4), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Varni, J. W., Burwinkle T. M., Seid, M., & Skarr, D. (2003). The PedsQL™ 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 3(6), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003%3C0329:TPAAPP%3E2.0.CO;2.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Rode, C. A. (1999). The PedsQL™: Measurement model for the pediatric quality of life. Inventory Medical Care, 37(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-1999020 00–00003.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Hao, Y., Tian, Q., Lu, Y., Chai, Y., & Rao, S. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 generic core scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(8), 1229–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9672-y.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Yeung, N. C., Lau, J. T., Yu, X. N., Chu, Y., Shing, M. M., Leung, T. F., et al. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 generic core scales among pediatric cancer patients. Cancer Nursing. 36(6), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e31827028c8.CrossRef

29.

Currie, C., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO health behaviour in school-aged children survey. Health Education Research, 12(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/12.3.385.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Currie, C., Molcho, M., Boyce, W., Holstein, B., Torsheim, T., & Richter, M. (2008). Researching health inequalities in adolescents: The development of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Family Affluence Scale. Social Science & Medicine. 66(6), 1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.024.CrossRef

31.

Liu, Y., Wang, M., Villberg, J., Torsheim, T., Tynjälä, J., Lv, Y., et al. (2012). Reliability and validity of family affluence scale (FAS II) among adolescents in Beijing, China. Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9131-5.CrossRef

32.

Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.CrossRef

33.

Du, Y., Kou, J., & Coghill, D. (2008). The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self-report versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in china. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-2-8.CrossRef

34.

Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 15(1–2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000046128.CrossRef

35.

Koskelainen, M., Sourander, A., & Kaljonen, A. (2000). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Finnish school-aged children and adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(4), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007870070031.CrossRef

36.

Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Berg, F. V. D. (2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2.CrossRef

37.

Lai, K. Y. C., Leung, P. W. L., Luk, E. S. L., & Wong, A. S. L. (2014). Use of the extended strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to predict psychiatric caseness in Hong Kong. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 45(6), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0439-5.CrossRef

38.

Liu, S. K., Chien, Y. L., Shang, C. Y., Lin, C. H., Liu, Y. C., & Gau, S. S. (2013). Psychometric properties of the chinese version of strength and difficulties questionnaire. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(6), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.01.002.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Wong, G. K. C., Lam, S. W., Ngai, K., Wong, A., Poon, W. S., & Mok, V. (2013). Development of a short form of stroke-specific quality of life scale for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 335(1–2), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.09.033.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Rohenkohl, A. C., Bullinger, M., Pleil, A. M., Kriston, L., Quitmann, J. H., & the QoLISSY Study Group (2015). A Brief Version of the quality of life in short stature youth questionnaire–the QoLISSY-brief. Child Indicators Research, 9(4), 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9350-2.CrossRef

41.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.

43.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

45.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000.CrossRef

46.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4.CrossRef

47.

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal. 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRef

48.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2n edn.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-179060-8.50012-8.CrossRef

49.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Berra, S., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Tebé, C., Bisegger, C., Duer, W., et al. (2007). Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study. BMC Public Health, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-182.CrossRef

51.

Haraldstad, K., Christophersen, K. A., Eide, H., Nativg, G. K., Helseth, S., & the KIDSCREEN Group Europed (2011). Health related quality of life in children and adolescents: Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire, a cross sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(5), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.001.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Nezu, S., Iwasaka, H., Saeki, K., Ishizuka, R., Goma, H., Okamoto, N., et al. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire for children/adolescents and parents/proxies. Environmental Health & Preventive Medicine, 20(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-014-0427-1.CrossRef

53.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Auquier, P., Bruil, J., et al. (2010). Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 19(10), 1487–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., BurstrÓ§m, K., Cavrini, G., et al. (2010). Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9649-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Upton, P., Maddocks, A., Eiser, C., Barnes, P. M., & Williams, J. (2005). Development of a measure of the health-related quality of life of children in public care. Child Care Health & Development, 31(4), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00520.x.CrossRef

56.

Parizi, A. S., Garmaroudi, G., Fazel, M., Omidvari, S., Azin, S. A., Montazeri, A., et al. (2014). Psychometric properties of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire in Iranian adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 23(7), 2133–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0655-2.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Taliep, N. (2010). Evaluating the construct validity of the KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life questionnaire within a South African context utilising exploratory factor analysis: Initial validation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of the Western Cape.

58.

Tebé, C., Berra, S., Herdman, M., Aymerich, M., Alonso, J., & Rajmil, L. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the KIDSCREEN-52 for child and adolescent population. Medicina Clinica, 130(17), 650–654. https://doi.org/10.1157/13120999.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Tzavara, C., Tzonou, A., Zervas, I., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Dimitrakaki, C., & Tountas, Y. (2012). Reliability and validity of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire in a Greek adolescent population. Annals of General Psychiatry, 13(11), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-11-3.CrossRef

60.

Baydur, H., Ergin, D., Gerceklioglu, G., & Eser, E. (2016). Reliability and validity study of the KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire in a Turkish child and adolescent population. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 17(6), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.214559.CrossRef

61.

Sepúlveda, P. R., Molina, G. T., Molina, C. R., Martínez, N. V., Gonzalez, A. E., George, L. M., et al. (2013). Validation of an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in Chilean children and adolescents. Revista Médica De Chile. 141(10), 1283–1292. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013001000007.CrossRef

62.

Rigdon, E. E. (1995). A Necessary and Sufficient Identification Rule for Structural Models Estimated in Practice. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3003_4.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Bagheri, Z., Jafari, P., Tashakor, E., Kouhpayeh, A., & Riazi, H. (2014). Assessing Whether Measurement Invariance of the KIDSCREEN-27 across Child-Parent Dyad Depends on the Child Gender: A Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Global Journal of Health Science, 6(5), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n5p142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal. 11(2), 272–300. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8.CrossRef

65.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031002003.CrossRef

66.

Hong, S. D., Yang, J. W., Jang, W. S., Byun, H., Lee, M. S., Kim, H. S., et al. (2007). The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents (KIDSCREEN-52-HRQOL): Reliability and validity of the Korean version. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 22(3), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2007.22.3.446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Power, M., et al. (2007). The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Value in Health. 11(4), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9240-2.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Mechanic, D., & Hansell, S. (1987). Adolescent competence, psychological well-being, and self-assessed physical health. Journal of Health & Social Behavior. 28(4), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136790.CrossRef

69.

Andersen, J. R., Natvig, G. K., Haraldstad, K., Skrede, T., Aadland, E., & Resaland, G. K. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the kidscreen-27 questionnaire. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0460-4.CrossRef

Titel: Psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire in adolescents: a cross-sectional study
verfasst von: Yuhang Zhu
Juan Li
Shanju Hu
Xiaoxue Li
Di Wu
Shuai Teng
Publikationsdatum: 21.03.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Schlagwort: School
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02158-0

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire in adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Prevalence of mental health conditions and pain in adults with skeletal dysplasia

Psychosocial measures and weight change in a clinical paediatric population with obesity

Modality transition on renal replacement therapy and quality of life of patients: a 10-year follow-up cohort study

Diversity in changes of HRQoL over a 1-year period after radiotherapy in Norwegian breast cancer patients: results of cluster analyses

Association of nutritional status and health-related quality of life in children with chronic kidney disease

Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers