Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Child's Nervous System 5/2018

19.01.2018 | Original Paper

Publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

Erschienen in: Child's Nervous System | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Publication of a study is the end point of the process to contribute to the literature and confirm the scientific value of the study. Publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meetings of neurosurgery have been studied, previously. However, publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meetings of pediatric neurosurgery have not been reported, yet. We evaluated abstracts presented at the 38th annual meeting of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ISPN) held in South Korea, 2010.

Methods

We conducted this cross-sectional study by reviewing the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the ISPN, 2010. Titles and authors of the abstracts were surveyed using Google Scholar and PubMed/MEDLINE. Time to publication, origin of the study, journal name in which the study has been accepted and published, and type of study has been analyzed for each abstract.

Results

The abstract booklet included 235 abstracts, consisted of 128 oral presentations (54%) and 107 electronic posters (46%). Fifty-nine (46%) of the oral presentations were published in a peer-reviewed journal. Laboratory studies were more likely to be published when compared to the clinical studies (72 vs. 39%). Thirty-two (30%) of the electronic posters were published in peer-reviewed journals. Most of the published abstracts were from Asia and Europe. Most of the abstracts were published in Child’s Nervous System and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics.

Conclusion

Publication rates of the abstracts presented at annual meeting of the ISPN were comparable to the other similar congresses. Oral presentations were more likely to be published. High publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the ISPN suggested that the meeting had a high scientific value.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtori S, Kubota G, Inage K, Yamauchi K, Orita S, Suzuki M, Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Sainoh T, Sato J, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Inoue G, Takaso M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2013) English publication rate of 3,205 abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the annual research meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 18:1031–1036CrossRefPubMed Ohtori S, Kubota G, Inage K, Yamauchi K, Orita S, Suzuki M, Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Sainoh T, Sato J, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Inoue G, Takaso M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2013) English publication rate of 3,205 abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the annual research meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 18:1031–1036CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Secil M, Ucar G, Senturk C, Karasu S, Dicle O (2005) Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:69–73PubMed Secil M, Ucar G, Senturk C, Karasu S, Dicle O (2005) Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:69–73PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Czorlich P, Regelsberger J, Meixensberger J, Westphal M, Eicker SO (2016) From abstract to publication in a peer-reviewed journal: evaluation of the 63rd annual meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 77:46–51PubMed Czorlich P, Regelsberger J, Meixensberger J, Westphal M, Eicker SO (2016) From abstract to publication in a peer-reviewed journal: evaluation of the 63rd annual meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 77:46–51PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(4):615–621CrossRefPubMed Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(4):615–621CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorman RL, Oderda GM (1990) Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality? Vet Hum Toxicol 32(5):470–472PubMed Gorman RL, Oderda GM (1990) Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality? Vet Hum Toxicol 32(5):470–472PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA (1997) Publication patterns of papers presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1138–1143CrossRefPubMed Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA (1997) Publication patterns of papers presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1138–1143CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson KR, Daluiski A, Kay RM (2000) Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop 20:2–6PubMed Jackson KR, Daluiski A, Kay RM (2000) Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop 20:2–6PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Meissner A, Delouya G, Marcovitch D, Donath D, Taussky D (2014) Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology meetings. Curr Oncol 21:e250–e254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meissner A, Delouya G, Marcovitch D, Donath D, Taussky D (2014) Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology meetings. Curr Oncol 21:e250–e254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P (1994) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 272:158–162CrossRefPubMed Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P (1994) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 272:158–162CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JC, Yoo S, Delamarter RB (1999) The publication rates of presentations at major Spine Specialty Society meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:425–427CrossRef Wang JC, Yoo S, Delamarter RB (1999) The publication rates of presentations at major Spine Specialty Society meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:425–427CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
Publikationsdatum
19.01.2018
Erschienen in
Child's Nervous System / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3726-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Child's Nervous System 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.