Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 11/2017

04.03.2017 | Original Article

Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study

verfasst von: A. Aichmair, M. Moser, M. R. Bauer, E. Bachmann, J. G. Snedeker, M. Betz, M. Farshad

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 11/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the pull-out strength of thoracolumbar pedicle screws implanted via either a patient-specific template-guided or conventional free-hand fluoroscopically controlled technique in a randomized cadaveric study, and to evaluate the influence of local vertebral bone density, quantified by Hounsfield units (HU), on pedicle screw pull-out strength.

Methods

Thoracolumbar pedicles of three spine cadavers were instrumented using either a free-hand fluoroscopically controlled or a patient-specific template-guided technique. Preoperative bone density was quantified by HU measured on CT. Pedicle perforation was evaluated on postoperative CT scans by an independent and blinded radiologist. After dissected vertebrae were embedded in aluminum fixation devices, pull-out testing was initiated with a preload of 50 N and a constant displacement rate of 0.5 mm/s. Subgroup analyses were performed excluding pedicle screws with a pedicle breach (n = 47).

Results

Pull-out strength was significantly different with 549 ± 278 and 441 ± 289 N in the template-guided (n = 50) versus fluoroscopically controlled (n = 48) subgroups (p = 0.031), respectively. Subgroup analysis limited to screws with an intrapedicular trajectory revealed a tendency toward a higher pull-out strength in the template-guided (n = 30) versus fluoroscopically controlled screws (n = 21) with 587 ± 309 and 454 ± 269 N (p = 0.118), respectively. There was a trend toward a higher pull-out strength (709 ± 418 versus 420 ± 149 N) in vertebrae with a bone density of (>171 HU) versus (<133 HU), respectively (p = 0.061).

Conclusions

There was a significantly higher pull-out strength of thoracolumbar pedicle screws when inserted via a patient-specific template-guided versus conventional free-hand fluoroscopically controlled technique, potentially associated with screw trajectory.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T et al (2001) Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Spine J 1:402–407CrossRefPubMed Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T et al (2001) Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Spine J 1:402–407CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhuang X-M, Yu B-S, Zheng Z-M et al (2010) Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E925–E931. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c5fb21 CrossRef Zhuang X-M, Yu B-S, Zheng Z-M et al (2010) Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E925–E931. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181c5fb21​ CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Newcomb AGUS, Baek S, Kelly BP, Crawford NR (2016) Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. doi:10.1080/10255842.2016.1209187 PubMed Newcomb AGUS, Baek S, Kelly BP, Crawford NR (2016) Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. doi:10.​1080/​10255842.​2016.​1209187 PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Farshad M, Farshad-Amacker NA, Bachmann E et al (2014) Biomechanical comparison of sagittal-parallel versus non-parallel pedicle screw placement. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:2147–2151. doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2244-0 CrossRef Farshad M, Farshad-Amacker NA, Bachmann E et al (2014) Biomechanical comparison of sagittal-parallel versus non-parallel pedicle screw placement. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:2147–2151. doi:10.​1007/​s00701-014-2244-0 CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber JW, Boden SD, Ganey T, Hutton WC (1998) Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: does convergence affect axial pullout strength? J Spinal Disord 11:215–220CrossRefPubMed Barber JW, Boden SD, Ganey T, Hutton WC (1998) Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: does convergence affect axial pullout strength? J Spinal Disord 11:215–220CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuan Q, Han X, Han X et al (2014) Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:B27–B35. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000431 CrossRef Yuan Q, Han X, Han X et al (2014) Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:B27–B35. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0000000000000431​ CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Z, Cui G, Lei W et al (2010) Application of an expandable pedicle screw in the severe osteoporotic spine: a preliminary study. Clin Investig Med Méd Clin Exp 33:E368–E374CrossRef Wu Z, Cui G, Lei W et al (2010) Application of an expandable pedicle screw in the severe osteoporotic spine: a preliminary study. Clin Investig Med Méd Clin Exp 33:E368–E374CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu D, Shi L, Lei W et al (2016) Biomechanical comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic synthetic bone in primary implantation: an experimental study. Clin spine Surg 29:E351–E357. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828bfc85 PubMed Liu D, Shi L, Lei W et al (2016) Biomechanical comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic synthetic bone in primary implantation: an experimental study. Clin spine Surg 29:E351–E357. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e31828bfc85​ PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Renner SM, Lim T-H, Kim W-J et al (2004) Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:E212–E216CrossRef Renner SM, Lim T-H, Kim W-J et al (2004) Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:E212–E216CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Choma TJ, Frevert WF, Carson WL et al (2011) Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:454–462. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d449ec CrossRef Choma TJ, Frevert WF, Carson WL et al (2011) Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:454–462. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181d449ec​ CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat El Saman A, Meier S, Sander A et al (2013) Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39:455–460. doi:10.1007/s00068-013-0310-6 CrossRefPubMed El Saman A, Meier S, Sander A et al (2013) Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39:455–460. doi:10.​1007/​s00068-013-0310-6 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kueny RA, Kolb JP, Lehmann W et al (2014) Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing. Eur Spine J 23:2196–2202. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3476-7 CrossRefPubMed Kueny RA, Kolb JP, Lehmann W et al (2014) Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing. Eur Spine J 23:2196–2202. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-014-3476-7 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan HT, Zhang RJ, Shen CL et al (2016) The biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation combined with trajectory bone cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae. Clin spine Surg 29:78–85. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a14870 PubMed Fan HT, Zhang RJ, Shen CL et al (2016) The biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation combined with trajectory bone cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae. Clin spine Surg 29:78–85. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e3182a14870​ PubMed
27.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai K-J, Murakami H, Horton WC et al (2009) Pedicle screw fixation strength: a biomechanical comparison between 4.5-mm and 5.5-mm diameter screws in osteoporotic upper thoracic vertebrae. J Surg Orthop Adv 18:23–27PubMed Tsai K-J, Murakami H, Horton WC et al (2009) Pedicle screw fixation strength: a biomechanical comparison between 4.5-mm and 5.5-mm diameter screws in osteoporotic upper thoracic vertebrae. J Surg Orthop Adv 18:23–27PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Farshad M, Betz M, Farshad-Amacker NA, Moser M (2016) Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study. Eur Spine. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4728-5 Farshad M, Betz M, Farshad-Amacker NA, Moser M (2016) Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study. Eur Spine. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-016-4728-5
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ et al (2009) A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric and clinical study. Int J Med Robot 5:184–191. doi:10.1002/rcs.249 CrossRefPubMed Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ et al (2009) A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric and clinical study. Int J Med Robot 5:184–191. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​249 CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Birnbaum K, Schkommodau E, Decker N et al (2001) Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery with individual templates and comparison to conventional operation method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:365–370CrossRef Birnbaum K, Schkommodau E, Decker N et al (2001) Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery with individual templates and comparison to conventional operation method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:365–370CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugawara T, Higashiyama N, Kaneyama S et al (2013) Multistep pedicle screw insertion procedure with patient-specific lamina fit-and-lock templates for the thoracic spine: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:185–190. doi:10.3171/2013.4.SPINE121059 CrossRefPubMed Sugawara T, Higashiyama N, Kaneyama S et al (2013) Multistep pedicle screw insertion procedure with patient-specific lamina fit-and-lock templates for the thoracic spine: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:185–190. doi:10.​3171/​2013.​4.​SPINE121059 CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamartina C, Cecchinato R, Fekete Z et al (2015) Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study. Eur Spine J 24(suppl 7):937–941. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4261-y CrossRefPubMed Lamartina C, Cecchinato R, Fekete Z et al (2015) Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study. Eur Spine J 24(suppl 7):937–941. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-015-4261-y CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y, Yuan Z-S, Spiker WR et al (2016) A comparative study on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement assisted by personalized rapid prototyping template between pre- and post-operation in patients with relatively normal mid-upper thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 25:1706–1715. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4540-2 CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Yuan Z-S, Spiker WR et al (2016) A comparative study on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement assisted by personalized rapid prototyping template between pre- and post-operation in patients with relatively normal mid-upper thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 25:1706–1715. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-016-4540-2 CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry E, Cuppone M, Porada S et al (2005) Personalised image-based templates for intra-operative guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 219:111–118CrossRefPubMed Berry E, Cuppone M, Porada S et al (2005) Personalised image-based templates for intra-operative guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 219:111–118CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Merc M, Drstvensek I, Vogrin M et al (2013) A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:893–899. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1755-0 CrossRefPubMed Merc M, Drstvensek I, Vogrin M et al (2013) A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:893–899. doi:10.​1007/​s00402-013-1755-0 CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Ota E et al (2016) Additive-manufactured patient-specific titanium templates for thoracic pedicle screw placement: novel design with reduced contact area. Eur Spine J 25:1698–1705. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3908-z CrossRefPubMed Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Ota E et al (2016) Additive-manufactured patient-specific titanium templates for thoracic pedicle screw placement: novel design with reduced contact area. Eur Spine J 25:1698–1705. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-015-3908-z CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin M-H, Hur J-W, Ryu K-S, Park C-K (2015) Prospective comparison study between the fluoroscopy-guided and navigation coupled with O-arm–guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E347–E351. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829047a7 CrossRefPubMed Shin M-H, Hur J-W, Ryu K-S, Park C-K (2015) Prospective comparison study between the fluoroscopy-guided and navigation coupled with O-arm–guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E347–E351. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e31829047a7​ CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study
verfasst von
A. Aichmair
M. Moser
M. R. Bauer
E. Bachmann
J. G. Snedeker
M. Betz
M. Farshad
Publikationsdatum
04.03.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5025-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2017

European Spine Journal 11/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Announcements

Announcements

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.