Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Surgery International 6/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery

verfasst von: Martin Salö, Tania Sjöberg Altemani, Magnus Anderberg

Erschienen in: Pediatric Surgery International | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A few studies have compared robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) with open pyeloplasty (OP) in children, but no previous study includes a long-term follow-up of renal function and hydronephrosis in combination with a thorough prospective follow-up of the RALP patients of at least 2 years.

Objective

To analyze perioperative results and long-term outcome of children with obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction, operated on with RALP compared to OP.

Patients and methods

Children ≤15 years operated on with RALP or OP from 2000 through 2013 were reviewed. Patient demographics, perioperative data, postoperative complications, and long-term outcome were evaluated. The outcome was based on pre- and postoperative examination of renal function, hydronephrosis and flank pain.

Results

129 pyeloplasties (84 OP, 39 RALP, 6 reoperations) on 123 patients were included. RALP had significantly longer operative time and shorter postoperative hospital stay, compared to OP. No difference was found in postoperative need of morphine or complication rates. Mean follow-up for RALP with ultrasound was 29 and 25 months with renal scan, compared to 34 and 28 months, respectively, for OP. The success rate for flank pain was 96 and 94 %, for hydronephrosis 93 and 95 %, and renal function 94 and 92 %, for RALP and OP, respectively.

Conclusions

RALP is a safe method, with advantages compared to OP, and with the same success rate. This study supports the use of RALP in children.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Capello SA et al (2005) Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1425–1428CrossRefPubMed Capello SA et al (2005) Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1425–1428CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Morin L et al (1996) Minimal hydronephrosis in the fetus: clinical significance and implications for management. J Urol 155(6):2047–2049CrossRefPubMed Morin L et al (1996) Minimal hydronephrosis in the fetus: clinical significance and implications for management. J Urol 155(6):2047–2049CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Löfgren P, B.S., Daxberg E-L, Eriksson M, Holmdahl G, Sandin A, Sjövall H, Sjögren P (2014) Pediatric robotically assisted surgery for pyeloplasty and fundoplication. Regional activity-based HTA 2014 Löfgren P, B.S., Daxberg E-L, Eriksson M, Holmdahl G, Sandin A, Sjövall H, Sjögren P (2014) Pediatric robotically assisted surgery for pyeloplasty and fundoplication. Regional activity-based HTA 2014
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JC, Hynes W (1949) Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 21(3):209–214CrossRefPubMed Anderson JC, Hynes W (1949) Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 21(3):209–214CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mei H et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 25(5):727–736CrossRefPubMed Mei H et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 25(5):727–736CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuessler WW et al (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1795–1799PubMed Schuessler WW et al (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1795–1799PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB (1995) Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 153(6):1962–1965CrossRefPubMed Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB (1995) Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 153(6):1962–1965CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Troxel S et al (2006) Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair. J Urol 176(3):1073–1076CrossRefPubMed Troxel S et al (2006) Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair. J Urol 176(3):1073–1076CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan HL, Roberts JP (1996) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children: preliminary results. Br J Urol 77(6):909–913CrossRefPubMed Tan HL, Roberts JP (1996) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children: preliminary results. Br J Urol 77(6):909–913CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Casale P (2009) Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Urol 19(1):97–101CrossRefPubMed Casale P (2009) Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Urol 19(1):97–101CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gettman MT et al (2002) A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 42(5):453–457 (discussion 457-8) CrossRefPubMed Gettman MT et al (2002) A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 42(5):453–457 (discussion 457-8) CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Atug F et al (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1440–1442CrossRefPubMed Atug F et al (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1440–1442CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Passerotti C, Peters CA (2006) Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopy: a description of the principle procedures. Sci World J 6:2581–2588CrossRef Passerotti C, Peters CA (2006) Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopy: a description of the principle procedures. Sci World J 6:2581–2588CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Batavia JP, Casale P (2014) Robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Curr Urol Rep 15(5):402CrossRefPubMed Van Batavia JP, Casale P (2014) Robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Curr Urol Rep 15(5):402CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee RS et al (2006) Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol 175(2):683–687 (discussion 687) CrossRefPubMed Lee RS et al (2006) Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol 175(2):683–687 (discussion 687) CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee DS et al (2006) Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology 67(3):599–602CrossRefPubMed Yee DS et al (2006) Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology 67(3):599–602CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Riachy E et al (2013) Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study. J Urol 189(1):283–287CrossRefPubMed Riachy E et al (2013) Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study. J Urol 189(1):283–287CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbosa JA et al (2013) Comparative evaluation of the resolution of hydronephrosis in children who underwent open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol 9(2):199–205CrossRefPubMed Barbosa JA et al (2013) Comparative evaluation of the resolution of hydronephrosis in children who underwent open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol 9(2):199–205CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kutikov A et al (2006) Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol 176(5):2237–2239 (discussion 2239-40) CrossRefPubMed Kutikov A et al (2006) Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol 176(5):2237–2239 (discussion 2239-40) CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal D et al (2014) Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort. J Pediatr Urol 10(2):380–385CrossRefPubMed Bansal D et al (2014) Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort. J Pediatr Urol 10(2):380–385CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorensen MD et al (2011) Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol 185(6 Suppl):2517–2522CrossRefPubMed Sorensen MD et al (2011) Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol 185(6 Suppl):2517–2522CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Freilich DA et al (2010) Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory Survey. J Urol 183(2):704–708CrossRefPubMed Freilich DA et al (2010) Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory Survey. J Urol 183(2):704–708CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Behan JW et al (2011) Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty. J Urol 186(4 Suppl):1663–1667CrossRefPubMed Behan JW et al (2011) Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty. J Urol 186(4 Suppl):1663–1667CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM (2007) Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol 178(5):2137–2141 (discussion 2141) CrossRefPubMed Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM (2007) Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol 178(5):2137–2141 (discussion 2141) CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Minnillo BJ et al (2011) Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults. J Urol 185(4):1455–1460CrossRefPubMed Minnillo BJ et al (2011) Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults. J Urol 185(4):1455–1460CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindgren BW et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option. J Urol 188(3):932–937CrossRefPubMed Lindgren BW et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option. J Urol 188(3):932–937CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Calisti A et al (2003) Functional outcome after pyeloplasty in children: impact of the cause of obstruction and of the mode of presentation. Eur Urol 43(6):706–710CrossRefPubMed Calisti A et al (2003) Functional outcome after pyeloplasty in children: impact of the cause of obstruction and of the mode of presentation. Eur Urol 43(6):706–710CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowe CK et al (2012) A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive? J Endourol 26(7):871–877CrossRefPubMed Rowe CK et al (2012) A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive? J Endourol 26(7):871–877CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery
verfasst von
Martin Salö
Tania Sjöberg Altemani
Magnus Anderberg
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Surgery International / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3869-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Pediatric Surgery International 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Pädiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.