Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2021

01.12.2021 | Original Article

Quality indicators in the treatment of geriatric hip fractures: literature review and expert consensus

verfasst von: An Sermon, Cedric Slock, Ellen Coeckelberghs, Deborah Seys, Massimiliano Panella, Luk Bruyneel, Stefaan Nijs, Alain Akiki, Pablo Castillon, Alex Chipperfield, René El Attal, Nicolai Bang Foss, Frede Frihagen, Torsten G Gerich, Denis Gümbel, Nikolaos Kanakaris, Morten Tange Kristensen, Inger Malchau, Henrik Palm, Hans-Christoph Pape, Kris Vanhaecht

Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Even though hip fracture care pathways have evolved, mortality rates have not improved during the last 20 years. This finding together with the increased frailty of hip fracture patients turned hip fractures into a major public health concern. The corresponding development of an indicator labyrinth for hip fractures and the ongoing practice variance in Europe call for a list of benchmarking indicators that allow for quality improvement initiatives for the rapid recovery of fragile hip fractures (RR-FHF). The purpose of this study was to identify quality indicators that assess the quality of in-hospital care for rapid recovery of fragile hip fracture (RR-FHF).

Methods

A literature search and guideline selection was conducted to identify recommendations for RR-FHF. Recommendations were categorized as potential structure, process, and outcome QIs and subdivided in-hospital care treatment topics. A list of structure and process recommendations that belongs to care treatment topics relevant for RR-FHF was used to facilitate extraction of recommendations during a 2-day consensus meeting with experts (n = 15) in hip fracture care across Europe. Participants were instructed to select 5 key recommendations relevant for RR-FHF for each part of the in-hospital care pathway: pre-, intra-, and postoperative care.

Results

In total, 37 potential QIs for RR-FHF were selected based on a methodology using the combination of high levels of evidence and expert opinion. The set consists of 14 process, 13 structure, and 10 outcome indicators that cover the whole perioperative process of fragile hip fracture care.

Conclusion

We suggest the QIs for RR-FHF to be practice tested and adapted to allow for intra-hospital longitudinal follow-up of the quality of care and for inter-hospital and cross-country benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives.
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ani AN, Samuelsson B, Tidermark J, Norling A, Ekström W, Cederholm T, Hedström M (2008) Early operation on patients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to independent living. A prospective study of 850 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(7):1436–1442. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.00890CrossRef Al-Ani AN, Samuelsson B, Tidermark J, Norling A, Ekström W, Cederholm T, Hedström M (2008) Early operation on patients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to independent living. A prospective study of 850 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(7):1436–1442. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2106/​jbjs.​G.​00890CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Talevski J, Sanders KM, Duque G, Connaughton C, Beauchamp A, Green D, Millar L, Brennan-Olsen SL (2019) Effect of clinical care pathways on quality of life and physical function after fragility fracture: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 20 (7):926 e921–926 e911. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.02.022 Talevski J, Sanders KM, Duque G, Connaughton C, Beauchamp A, Green D, Millar L, Brennan-Olsen SL (2019) Effect of clinical care pathways on quality of life and physical function after fragility fracture: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 20 (7):926 e921–926 e911. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jamda.​2019.​02.​022
14.
Zurück zum Zitat van Zelm R, Coeckelberghs E, Sermeus W, Wolthuis A, Bruyneel L, Panella M, Vanhaecht K (2020) Effects of implementing a care pathway for colorectal cancer surgery in ten European hospitals: an international multicenter pre–post-test study. Updates Surg 72(1):61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00706-9 van Zelm R, Coeckelberghs E, Sermeus W, Wolthuis A, Bruyneel L, Panella M, Vanhaecht K (2020) Effects of implementing a care pathway for colorectal cancer surgery in ten European hospitals: an international multicenter pre–post-test study. Updates Surg 72(1):61–71. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s13304-020-00706-9
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Middleton M (2018) Orthogeriatrics and hip fracture care in the UK: factors driving change to more integrated models of care. Geriatrics 3(3):55CrossRefPubMedCentral Middleton M (2018) Orthogeriatrics and hip fracture care in the UK: factors driving change to more integrated models of care. Geriatrics 3(3):55CrossRefPubMedCentral
20.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lloyd R (2019) Quality health care: a guide to developing and using indicators, 2nd edn. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA Lloyd R (2019) Quality health care: a guide to developing and using indicators, 2nd edn. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA
34.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2011) The management of hip fracture in adults (clinical guide- line CG124).(N. I. for H. and C. Excellence, Ed.) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2011) The management of hip fracture in adults (clinical guide- line CG124).(N. I. for H. and C. Excellence, Ed.)
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) (2014) Australian and New Zealand guideline for hip fracture care: improving outcomes in hip fracture management. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) (2014) Australian and New Zealand guideline for hip fracture care: improving outcomes in hip fracture management.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) (2014) Management of hip fractures in the elderly. Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guideline American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) (2014) Management of hip fractures in the elderly. Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guideline
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Nijs S (2018) Rapid Recovery Fragility Fracture: HIP. Evidence-based recommendations summary update Nijs S (2018) Rapid Recovery Fragility Fracture: HIP. Evidence-based recommendations summary update
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM, Svenningsen P, Zago M (2017) Enhanced recovery after emergency surgery: a systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 5(2):70–78PubMedPubMedCentral Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM, Svenningsen P, Zago M (2017) Enhanced recovery after emergency surgery: a systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 5(2):70–78PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Quality indicators in the treatment of geriatric hip fractures: literature review and expert consensus
verfasst von
An Sermon
Cedric Slock
Ellen Coeckelberghs
Deborah Seys
Massimiliano Panella
Luk Bruyneel
Stefaan Nijs
Alain Akiki
Pablo Castillon
Alex Chipperfield
René El Attal
Nicolai Bang Foss
Frede Frihagen
Torsten G Gerich
Denis Gümbel
Nikolaos Kanakaris
Morten Tange Kristensen
Inger Malchau
Henrik Palm
Hans-Christoph Pape
Kris Vanhaecht
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Elektronische ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00995-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.